Skeptical is good in this matter. My point of view is that Malone is a better subject for investigatory questions and skepticism than Dr. Paul. Steve, my comment was more about informing others reading than it was about you.
Btw, are you from UK, by any chance? It seems 'sceptical' is preferred there over 'skeptical" favored (favoured?) here in the US. Who knew?
Skeptical is good in this matter. My point of view is that Malone is a better subject for investigatory questions and skepticism than Dr. Paul. Steve, my comment was more about informing others reading than it was about you.
Btw, are you from UK, by any chance? It seems 'sceptical' is preferred there over 'skeptical" favored (favoured?) here in the US. Who knew?
No,😉 I'm not from the UK... I'm a somewhat dyslexic American grunt
using the swipe and auto correct functions on my phone that couldn't spell without the impediments.
Here's another question I have. Malone claims a "vaccine" injury. If this is true then it wouldn't make any sense that he'd have taken his own poison, would it?
For that matter, there's a whole boat-load of stuff that makes no sense as far as how Malone represents himself. Unless he just happens to be in a huge struggle to maintain control of the corona debate as a gatekeeper in the medical freedom movement and "controlled opposition" working for the pharmaco-military industrial community --as he has for his entire career.
They're all at the fake James Bond Spectre table of make-believe BS. I believe none of them, except Paul.
His soul is intact and he ain't a money and fame whore.
When the truth finally comes out - like it did much later in the US Civil rights movement - you found out it was actually whites who were the proper marionettes of blacks behind the scenes still enfeebling the blacks but in a highly sophisticated malevolent charade manner.
Life is interesting.
Don't take any of this bollocks too seriously. I wouldn't hang Steve's hat on any of it. It's 3am here in Cape Town, South Africa and I have to be up in 4 hours to run an insolvency enquiry involving even bigger liars; so I bid you good gentlemen "goodnight".
Skeptical is good in this matter. My point of view is that Malone is a better subject for investigatory questions and skepticism than Dr. Paul. Steve, my comment was more about informing others reading than it was about you.
Btw, are you from UK, by any chance? It seems 'sceptical' is preferred there over 'skeptical" favored (favoured?) here in the US. Who knew?
No,😉 I'm not from the UK... I'm a somewhat dyslexic American grunt
using the swipe and auto correct functions on my phone that couldn't spell without the impediments.
Here's another question I have. Malone claims a "vaccine" injury. If this is true then it wouldn't make any sense that he'd have taken his own poison, would it?
It certainly is pretty dubious.
For that matter, there's a whole boat-load of stuff that makes no sense as far as how Malone represents himself. Unless he just happens to be in a huge struggle to maintain control of the corona debate as a gatekeeper in the medical freedom movement and "controlled opposition" working for the pharmaco-military industrial community --as he has for his entire career.
They're all at the fake James Bond Spectre table of make-believe BS. I believe none of them, except Paul.
His soul is intact and he ain't a money and fame whore.
When the truth finally comes out - like it did much later in the US Civil rights movement - you found out it was actually whites who were the proper marionettes of blacks behind the scenes still enfeebling the blacks but in a highly sophisticated malevolent charade manner.
Life is interesting.
Don't take any of this bollocks too seriously. I wouldn't hang Steve's hat on any of it. It's 3am here in Cape Town, South Africa and I have to be up in 4 hours to run an insolvency enquiry involving even bigger liars; so I bid you good gentlemen "goodnight".
See you at The Club ;))
Good luck with your Easter egg hunt! 😉