What you're describingiscalled "emotional reasoning" and although it's considered fallacious and a cognitive distortion common in mental illness in most parts of the world it has been accepted as evidence in US legal proceedings. In other countries it would nit be allowed in evidence or thrown out. Clearly it's good enough evidence for most of the commenters here.
What you're describingiscalled "emotional reasoning" and although it's considered fallacious and a cognitive distortion common in mental illness in most parts of the world it has been accepted as evidence in US legal proceedings. In other countries it would nit be allowed in evidence or thrown out. Clearly it's good enough evidence for most of the commenters here.
What you're describingiscalled "emotional reasoning" and although it's considered fallacious and a cognitive distortion common in mental illness in most parts of the world it has been accepted as evidence in US legal proceedings. In other countries it would nit be allowed in evidence or thrown out. Clearly it's good enough evidence for most of the commenters here.