I insert a critical paragraph for your review, and the links are interactive for deeper reading, but is is very eye opening...it is what we knew but we need to show the research too...
My daughter who was seven months pregnant in January 2021 got the jabs.... She works in the medical field and was expected to get the jab and was told it was safe and effective🥶
She developed severe Bell’s palsy and one eye is still weak all these months later... Several months after getting the jabs and having her baby her thyroid swelled up to the point where it was hard for her to swallow so she had her thyroid removed... I am convinced it was the vaccines that caused these issues...
How terrible. It's an adjustment enough welcoming a child to the family...then to have such simultaneously occurring devastating crushing interference of her health consequences. It kinda shatters things. Hopes and dreams included...My prayers are with you and your family.
The majority of pregnancy loss occurs in weeks 5 and 6 - before most could register as being pregnant and agree to participate in the program. By week 7 the loss rate is 8%. By week 8 it’s 4%. By week 10 it’s 2%.
My point is, unless they are analyzing the specific day/ week of pregnancy loss from the study, the true loss rate over established natural rate of miscarriage, when analyzed by specific week/ days of gestation might tell a worse story that what I’ve seen in these studies....
I think I found the right link, and the text following the quote is also important :
While this post-hoc data analysis of extreme outcomes will be very important for assessing vaccine safety during pregnancy, it does not include more subtle multi-organ developmental changes that would be expected to occur in the fetus during an AVR, and these could lead to an increased risk of disease according to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Hypothesis [12]. We have actually been advised to “feel positive about feeling bad” after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine [13]. However, the desired goal of these vaccines, to drive an anti-viral cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and Type I and II interferons (IFNs)), can also lead to adverse fetal outcomes [14,15].
I know someone who was vaccinated during pregnancy. The baby was born with what has alternately been described as a "hole" or a "lesion" on her lung which will necessitate surgery and possibly removal of 1/3 of the lung. Very concerned.
I found the excerpt at this link, with a bit more from the same section. I think it is right :
While this post-hoc data analysis of extreme outcomes will be very important for assessing vaccine safety during pregnancy, it does not include more subtle multi-organ developmental changes that would be expected to occur in the fetus during an AVR, and these could lead to an increased risk of disease according to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Hypothesis [12]. We have actually been advised to “feel positive about feeling bad” after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine [13]. However, the desired goal of these vaccines, to drive an anti-viral cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and Type I and II interferons (IFNs)), can also lead to adverse fetal outcomes [14,15].
While this post-hoc data analysis of extreme outcomes will be very important for assessing vaccine safety during pregnancy, it does not include more subtle multi-organ developmental changes that would be expected to occur in the fetus during an AVR, and these could lead to an increased risk of disease according to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Hypothesis [12]. We have actually been advised to “feel positive about feeling bad” after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine [13]. However, the desired goal of these vaccines, to drive an anti-viral cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and Type I and II interferons (IFNs)), can also lead to adverse fetal outcomes [14,15].
Who in their right mind takes an EXPERIMENTAL DRUG while they are pregnant?
Don't drink?
Don't smoke?
Don't do drugs?
The crazies are absolutely freaking insane.
It IS a depopulation agenda the big Harma Harmaceuticals hacksxxxxine
My daughter who was seven months pregnant in January 2021 got the jabs.... She works in the medical field and was expected to get the jab and was told it was safe and effective🥶
She developed severe Bell’s palsy and one eye is still weak all these months later... Several months after getting the jabs and having her baby her thyroid swelled up to the point where it was hard for her to swallow so she had her thyroid removed... I am convinced it was the vaccines that caused these issues...
incredibly heartbreaking... praying for her health.
How terrible. It's an adjustment enough welcoming a child to the family...then to have such simultaneously occurring devastating crushing interference of her health consequences. It kinda shatters things. Hopes and dreams included...My prayers are with you and your family.
Thanks for keeping us updated on the specifics. We appreciate and rely on your information in our quest to get the truth out !
Intended consequences
I had a friend who was vaxxed and shortly after tested positive for pregnancy....then a month later miscarried. Very sad.
Errors? Miscalculations?
You don't say.
The majority of pregnancy loss occurs in weeks 5 and 6 - before most could register as being pregnant and agree to participate in the program. By week 7 the loss rate is 8%. By week 8 it’s 4%. By week 10 it’s 2%.
My point is, unless they are analyzing the specific day/ week of pregnancy loss from the study, the true loss rate over established natural rate of miscarriage, when analyzed by specific week/ days of gestation might tell a worse story that what I’ve seen in these studies....
Do a survey of (private) midwives and ask if they have seen a dip in new/repeat customer enquiries.
See also the schoolhouse monologue in the film "Children of Men"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzeHA_xXmow
Link to source, Karrow: "Page not found."
I think I found the right link, and the text following the quote is also important :
While this post-hoc data analysis of extreme outcomes will be very important for assessing vaccine safety during pregnancy, it does not include more subtle multi-organ developmental changes that would be expected to occur in the fetus during an AVR, and these could lead to an increased risk of disease according to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Hypothesis [12]. We have actually been advised to “feel positive about feeling bad” after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine [13]. However, the desired goal of these vaccines, to drive an anti-viral cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and Type I and II interferons (IFNs)), can also lead to adverse fetal outcomes [14,15].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617890/#B11-vaccines-09-01351
I know someone who was vaccinated during pregnancy. The baby was born with what has alternately been described as a "hole" or a "lesion" on her lung which will necessitate surgery and possibly removal of 1/3 of the lung. Very concerned.
I found the excerpt at this link, with a bit more from the same section. I think it is right :
While this post-hoc data analysis of extreme outcomes will be very important for assessing vaccine safety during pregnancy, it does not include more subtle multi-organ developmental changes that would be expected to occur in the fetus during an AVR, and these could lead to an increased risk of disease according to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Hypothesis [12]. We have actually been advised to “feel positive about feeling bad” after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine [13]. However, the desired goal of these vaccines, to drive an anti-viral cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and Type I and II interferons (IFNs)), can also lead to adverse fetal outcomes [14,15].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617890/#B11-vaccines-09-01351
The link to the source did not work.
Here is more to the above quote, and the link :
While this post-hoc data analysis of extreme outcomes will be very important for assessing vaccine safety during pregnancy, it does not include more subtle multi-organ developmental changes that would be expected to occur in the fetus during an AVR, and these could lead to an increased risk of disease according to the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Hypothesis [12]. We have actually been advised to “feel positive about feeling bad” after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine [13]. However, the desired goal of these vaccines, to drive an anti-viral cell-mediated immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and Type I and II interferons (IFNs)), can also lead to adverse fetal outcomes [14,15].
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617890/#B11-vaccines-09-01351
Oops