he ate too much, the food had him deranged...dude was a carpet bagger all along, irrelevant, obnoxious, so much hatred for Trump, jealously, and he worked against his wife, disgusting!
Good for her. I always liked her - during her years of representing President Trump. Truthfully, I haven’t kept up with her since. Brain’s been busy with tyranny.
Definitely! In ALL ways. She always looked tense and unhappy. Obviously she was in an unhappy marriage and who wouldn't be with a spouse constantly betraying and undermining them with their boss at work. She did her best to try to stay sane but she literally reeked of sexual frustration and the whole world could see it. I really don't understand how she could have procreated with such a creature. Any normal woman would be repulsed by him. Plus the teenage daughter was going off the rails and in her situation I would have been wondering"Did he do anything?" There's something about him that reminds me of Biden.
She (KA) chose a weak man (GC) to marry and we could all see very publicly many of the pitfalls of that choice. I did feel bad for her. Now I just see sadness and pain for the children.
Kellyanne did an excellent job as Donald Trump's presidential campaign manager in 2016. She was a clever strategist and a loyal representative throughout the Trump Presidency. I'm glad she's free of her untrustworthy, controlling, disrespectful, undermining, competitive, hideous lump of a husband who was jealous of her high profile and success.
I read the article and comment section of today's (Saturday's) Daily Mail on-line. (The article will likely still be there on Sunday, if you're interested.) I had a great laugh at the well-deserved horrible things the readers had to say about her now ex-husband 'what's-his-name.'
Bingo, Kathleen. Kellyanne is the unsung hero who brought us President Trump. [Any women want to acknowledge this never-before-done accomplishment by a strong woman? Hmmm??] I'm generally dense, but I know enough to pay attention when a woman I respect gets committed to something I don't understand. I didn't see Trump like Kellyanne, Sarah Palin, and Phyllis Schlafley did. But I payed attention. Glad I did.
So sorry to hear about the divorce. But I don't know how she could live in any proximity of that kvetching wuss.
None of the children appear to look like him. There's at most some similarity to men of the same phenotype. That could be a coincidence. I wonder if they were all adopted. I can't think of any other explanation.
That's not very nice. He looks like a toad. The lovely woman who influenced me to not get jabbed is in hospital, being prepared for emergency removal of her gallbladder. She was in a lot of pain and was taken by ambulance. Big stone in the duct. Already infected. They have refused to allow her to have private blood. She's terrified of spike protein. I've tried to reassure her the risks of spike in blood are minimal. She thinks covid is a cold, has never taken tests. Probably has had it repeatedly. I haven't told her, covid attacks the gallbladder. The virus is still there 12 months after infection. I'll get up to see her as soon as the hospital allows. Probably best I don't say anything until she's recovered.
It was hard to believe she could stay with him witnessing his behavior during her appointment in Trumps administration, and he obviously couldn't get over his hatred for Trump, and as you stated trying to make it impossible for her to remain in the administration. Must have been costing him money behind the scenes or something too. However with 4 children it's easy to understand, and she was obviously a devoted wife, or at least to the institution of marriage.
She deserves better, and hopefully she'll find someone now that he's behind her.
I agree that his behavior was obnoxious and it was incredibly disloyal. She was clearly devoted to upholding the institution of marriage. Whether or not she was devoted to upholding the marriage itself, who can say?
Anyone would deserve better than George.
She does not appear to be a particularly good judge of character, based on her taste in men which, unfortunately, does not reflect well on her.
She'll have no trouble meeting men interested in having a meaningful relationship with her, albeit mostly of the overnight variety.
Some would say that there is a statistically greater chance of Nikki Haley securing the GOP nomination than there is of her finding someone long term.
However, there is a type of man who could well be interested and she could even become First Lady, if she plays her cards right, although may have to change her politics
I offer as Exhibit A, a prospective spouse for her, the soon to be 47th president of the United States, Mr Hunter Biden, soon to be confirmed by Dominion Inc as elected in the largest landslide in American history.
Well I personally don't know her well enough to judge her character, or aware of the intricate details of her personal/love life. I'm only aware of Georges actions making headlines regarding Trump as it correlated with the MSM narratives, and it relating towards her as they seemed to enjoy trying to create a divide.
That's how I would describe someone who did everything possible to make his wife's home life so intolerable that she had to quit her very important, high profile position to pick up the pieces at home.
Maybe I could have chosen a better word? But he effectively caused her to resign (on good terms) from her position.
I suspect it was a cover for a pedophile ring. Trump had made combating child sex trafficking a priority. That would not have gone down well with a lot of sexual perverts and RINOs. No wonder they hated his guts.
I never thought about that. Did any of you see I think it's on Black Conservstive Patriot the new info about Seth Rich? The information that he was meeting the FBI with to disclose ( when he was randomly mugged and killed. Never solved) was about HRC emails. But not about the Sanders campaign. They were about the Podesta brothers. Pizzagate. Oh that's tin foil hat stuff! Is it? There's also about 50k children missing from Ukraine. Who would keep a war going to launder billions? To hide bioweapons labs? To traffic kids? Just look at who is over there and who is sending the $$$.
I believe the FBI, so-called, still has possession of one or more of Seth Rich’s lap tops, and have never revealed the contents thereof, in this unsolved murder. And, was it not Seth Rich, of blessed memory, who had revealed the Democrat Party criminal computer records? Was the murder of Seth Rich a type of Arkancide?
Don't know. He had arranged to meet the FBI to turn whistleblower at 4am. I believe he was shot twice. Just days before Black Conservative Patriot gave the update Chris Wray was here in Nebraska. Same city where Rich's parents live. And then coincidentally Rich's parents are on local news. Stated they don't want the case questioned. They have closure. National news said Wray left DC early for Thanksgiving in the Adirondacks. But he made a stop here first. He would have landed at the Air Force Base. Civilians wouldn't see him come and go.
Excellent and highly cogent response! Thank you for educating me. Wow! How can one be “mugged”, I.e., held up allegedly, shot to death, and no theft of possessions/ valuables on body occur? And Wray/ parents connections and post- interview parental plea that there be no investigation- parents! A first ever singularity.
Reminds me a bit of circumstances regarding Arkancidence of poor Vince Foster, and maybe a few more... and Epstein inside the Federal lockup in lower Manhattan , too. Oh, yes-remind me, what was the name of that Democratic Congresswoman who was Chairperson of DNC ? Was she ever questioned as to provenance(s) of documents moved from DNC computers , to ...
I suspect that after Trump was elected, Kelly Anne's husband thought he would get a plum position in the Trump administration by virtue of being KA's husband. When that didn't happen, he turned evil on Trump.
He reportedly thought he was headed for the SCOTUS under Trump. When Trump didn't appoint him he was probably bitter that Trump defeated Cruz for the nomination. Kellyanne had worked for Cruz before Trump. He probably thought Cruz would have appointed him to the SCOTUS. He might have had some dirt on Cruz and didn't have any on Trump. Probably Cruz tried it on with her and she knocked him back. I like Cruz but no normal man would trust Cruz being anywhere near his wife.
Shakespeare wrote - Love is blind and lovers cannot see - in Merchant of Venice, and in Antony and Cleopatra among other plays ; as have many many other authors . We overlook flaws in those we love ( that's good), but love can blind us to serious issues ( that's bad).
This is the only reason I can figure that Kellyanne ended up with her loser of a husband.
I know a woman who went home early from work one day unexpectedly and walked in on her husband in the "female" or "bottom" position being rogered by another man. The husband was a RINO, but I digress. The woman was admitted as an inpatient to a mental health facility. She was on valium for years afterwards. Now she's happily remarried. The RINO died of AIDS. I wonder if a similar incident might have precipitated Kellyanne's divorce. I wouldn't expect that she found him in the "bottom" position with another man. But might she have walked in on him with a small boy? George is a big time RINO and was active in The Lincoln Project which has had pedo scandals. He strikes me as that type.
But late at night, the big old house gets lonely. I guess every kind of refuge has its price. So she tells him she must go out for the weekend, to visit an old friend who's feeling down....
Have you noticed none of the four kids look like him?
Maybe to get away from Atco, N.J., in Camden County? She was very nearby to Berlin Borough, N.J. just a glacial pebble’s throw away. Sort of close to the Pine Barrens of N.J., Atsion Park and Lake, and the great Atco Speedway.
Has she gone on record to delineate her earlier attraction to George, and how that may have changed negatively, especially with regard to the changes in her successes, responsibilities and personal fame and public acceptance?
I'm not a fan of Kellyanne either. She initially did NOT support Trump. She looks like a worn out porn star. Oh, remember that shit she pulled in the oval office? How she sat on the sofa? What a POS.
So that's what she looks like? I knew there was something about her look but I couldn't quite figure out what it was. It all makes sense now. I can see the Stormy Daniels resemblance. Thanks for pointing that out. You think George put her out on the game? And why does he hate Trump so much? I actually am not aware of what shit she pulled and how she sat on the sofa. Curious though. What happened?
I remember her sitting of the sofa. I was torn between she is just making herself comfortable and who knows how long she had been sitting there to gee that's not very professional. However if you follow anyone around with a camera in their face 24/7 I bet you are going to get some unflattering kind of pics. Add the crazy media with their own motives, and sometimes it is hard to know what to believe. I think in the end look at facts. What was concrete about her if you can manage to get that much good info about her. Then decide what kind of person she is.
I actually thought she looked pretty damn hot in that photo. She looked relaxed. It was 2017. There was none of the tension and strain that became apparent later after her cruel husband, for some unknown reason, started fucking her over.
Read her book. Long, but an eye opener. A smart woman.
Feel bad for the kids. They deserved better. Every child deserves parents who are mature and responsible and willing to work hard to get over the tough times.
There is an old saying: “People get divorced just before the miracle happens.”
Dr. Alexander, I'd like to offer some constructive feedback, with full respect. I think it would do you more credit if you eased off of the bombastic writing style, especially the insults. I don't think you're unhinged at all, but if I didn't know you I'd think your writing sounded "over the top" and even unhinged at times.
For some of your longer sentences that run-on, it would help to break them up into 2 or more sentences.
Hey, feel free to ignore it, it's just my opinion. I think I'm correct though, he sounds crazed and unsophisticated and it makes him easy to dismiss or attack quoting his own writing. That should matter to this whole movement if being effective at getting the message out and convincing people with some influence to step into the ring is important to us.
Jared I know you mean well. A gentle reminder.: this plandemic and all the other horrific plans the elite have for us are coming from the most sophisticated, best educated and highest pedigreed people in the world. Working class are often reluctant to voice their opinion or stand their ground because they feel unsophisticated. The freedom movement needs to be welcoming. We need all hands on deck. We're all we have. People won't step in the ring if we are unapproachable. Much love friend.
Yeah, that's something I'm trying to figure out... has it always been the case that the supposedly intelligent, conscientious, intellectually curious people who make up much of the professional and educated classes of the world were so susceptible to these obvious social control efforts? Why is there so little independent thinking, skepticism, pride (like pride in not playing along with manipulative BS) and willful blindness among these people especially in this case?
I have a deep respect for the down to earth and modest working class people (to be distinguished from the shock jock kind who love trading raunchy stories of women they've slept with and who never matured past highschool) I think they make up the majority of people who actually have courage.
I think to flip this script, we need to get through to the educated people and help their denial and cowardice give way finally.
Have you considered a career as a public health bureaucrat Jared? In answer to your question, this, below, taken from what I wrote in another post, may help you figure it out Jared:
Most of them have Hitler's personality disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD; Anakastic Personality Disorder), and in particular the OCPD subtype that Theodore Millon, originator of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' personality disorders classification termed "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." This is the disorder that has driven the bureaucratic incompetence. Understanding it is key to defeating it.
I noted about it previously as follows:
What I think we are up against is OCPD. It's a big part of the reason for the bureaupathology of the vaccine advocates: Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD), which is common in the military, where those with the condition tend to be rapidly
promoted (e.g., Colonel Russell Williams, convicted serial killer and former Commanding Officer of Canada's largest airforce base), law enforcement (e. g., murderer of George Floyd, Derek Chauvin, Idaho killings suspect Bryan Kohberger), academia and serial killers appears also to be common in public health bureaucrats.
OCPD is a disorder of overcontrol. When dialled up, it's similar to psychopathy, with which it is often comorbid. It's characterised by, among other things, self-righteousness, tyrannical or dictatorial tendencies, perfectionism (especially WRT expectations of others), neatness ("serial killer neat"), punctuality, the ability to dial down or turn off empathy, perspective shifting deficits, rigidity, overconscientious and enjoyment of creating fear in subordinates. It has links to sadism, especially "enforcing sadism with compulsive features," "tyrannical sadism" mooand "spineless sadism."
People with the condition are functionally rigid, stubborn and tend to think they are "always right" and that there is only one correct way of doing things, which is their way. Hitler and Ghandi are good examples. They are angered when they don't get their own way and are overconcerned with ethics and morality. (Hitler was vegetarian and Bryan Kohberger is vegan.)
OCPD individuals are annoyed when proven to be wrong and they double down on their mistakes. Because of their perspective shifting deficits they have trouble with alternative hypothesis generation and are unsuited to be scientists. They are also unsuited for management roles and unsuited to be public health bureaucrats although, due to attention to detail, can make good accountants. A big part of their problem is their perspective taking deficits and cognitive distortions and fallacies in their reasoning. They can do well on tasks requiring attention to detail but they can't readily adjust their perspective to identify and correct for weaknesses in theory or methodology.
They tend to rise to the top in ethics councils, professional associations, regulatory bodies and the military as well as, it appears, the public health bureaucracy. Present them with evidence of vaccine harms and individuals with OCPD can't adjust their perspective or admit their mistakes and instead they just double down, and then seek revenge. Because it's an egosyntonic disorder they have no idea of how fucked up they are and how much harm they cause.
To further understand OCPD, consider the following description of Anthony Fauci by Scott Sturman M.D:
"The mindset of Field Marshal Douglas Haig, World War I’s worst general, springs to mind, when drawing a comparison to Anthony Fauci. By some historical accounts Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig bears the distinction of WWI’s worst general. He rose to Commander of British Expeditionary Forces and led Allied armies during the slaughter and futility at the battles of the Somme and Passchendaele.
Known for his self confidence and inflexibility, he repeatedly ordered soldiers over the top to “no man’s land” and into the path of German machine guns. No number of casualties or unachieved objectives could dissuade him from his singular approach to combat. Nigel Davies, historian and educator, points out that General Haig was emblematic of the chateau general - dictating and directing but far removed from the battlefield: They were Chateau Generals in approach and in attitude.
They drew lines on maps without adequately considering the terrain, issued impossible instructions without looking at the state of the ground, and ran completely inadequate communications that were far from capable of keeping track of, or controlling, a modern battlefield.
In a similar respect, despite his academic and professional accomplishments, Dr. Anthony Fauci has no background or experience in clinical medicine and is ill equipped to lead the SARS-CoV-2 response. His purview is that of a research scientist and entrenched bureaucrat, who is far removed from patient contact. His career is enmeshed with the pharmaceutical industry, whose financial ties with federal medical regulatory institutions are well described.
Throughout his career he has denied patients easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective treatments in lieu of patented medications with high risk profiles and of dubious efficacy. In 1987 despite overwhelming clinical evidence, he told AIDS activists that the prophylactic use of the common antibiotic Bactrim to treat pneumocystis carnii pneumonia was ineffective and possibly dangerous. Through private donations the company Lymphomed circumvented the NIAID and conducted successful clinical trials.
The delay cost the lives of nearly 17,000 immunocompromised patients."
Long sentences without proper punctuation is called poor grammar.
I agree that Dr. A could do better, & gain more credibility with newbies by toning down the over zealous rhetoric.
He does a great job calling out bad actors & terrible policies, but that can be overshadowed by his rants.
I’ve hesitated to share some of his posts with those I’m trying to reach. Credibility is important. We stick with him, but a new inductee may not.
Change of subject; I subscribed for a year after his plea @ $49.99.
Soon after he lowered amt. to $39 PLUS free book he wrote. I wrote & asked if I could get a free book since just days before (new offer) I’d subscribed.
He responded I could.
Never received my book. Have inquired at least 2 or 3 times; no response; no book.
Another reader posted no promised book either. Not a good look - but - I’m still here.
Well said; it's funny that we have AwakeNotWoke calling you a grammer nazi for something so straightforward and sensible. I'm sure he'd be so forgiving and constructive in his criticism if it was Robin D'Angelo writing we were talking about.
I think he's intelligent, intellectually curious, discerning and has some real moral fortitude.
I just think he could reach more of the people we'd want to reach if he was less bombastic. There's a place for righteous anger, but for this media/social media environment, we need to conduct ourselves in the most dignified way.
I don't think it's difficult to understand what I've written. If I had grown an audience like dr. Alexander had, I'd be sure to consider how I deliver my message, how best can I have a positive impact, etc. I'd be open to constructive feedback, it's the adult thing to do and we're in extremely important times.
Give me a reason why you think I'm wrong; we don't need to have a pissing match.
I just don't think that overstepping your bounds by criticizing and attempting to revamp the stack author's writing style is a wise course of action. According to your profile you don't even subscribe here, even for free. I couldn't care less, but it's odd that you're so concerned.
LOL what a passive aggressive weakling move: you supposedly "couldn't care less" while you're taking offense on behalf of Dr. A for my mild criticism, and replying with petty non-arguments... oh but you add "it's odd you're so concerned".
You argue like a 14 year old valley girl. Grow up.
I'm subscribed to Dr. A on my Gmail but logged into my Protonmail account right now.
If you think you're the king of pedantrt, paranoid and quick to fault find and take offence Jared, relax. You're a rank amateur. You ain't seen nothing yet
Jealousy - you got it. A small man in all ways.
Good for her. I always liked her - during her years of representing President Trump. Truthfully, I haven’t kept up with her since. Brain’s been busy with tyranny.
Definitely! In ALL ways. She always looked tense and unhappy. Obviously she was in an unhappy marriage and who wouldn't be with a spouse constantly betraying and undermining them with their boss at work. She did her best to try to stay sane but she literally reeked of sexual frustration and the whole world could see it. I really don't understand how she could have procreated with such a creature. Any normal woman would be repulsed by him. Plus the teenage daughter was going off the rails and in her situation I would have been wondering"Did he do anything?" There's something about him that reminds me of Biden.
She (KA) chose a weak man (GC) to marry and we could all see very publicly many of the pitfalls of that choice. I did feel bad for her. Now I just see sadness and pain for the children.
Finally she’s getting rid of that TOAD !!🐸
Kelly Ann is a spitfire and was dynamite 🧨 in the Trump Administration!👏👏👏👏
Ugh , I couldn’t stand seeing that little tubby Toad 🐸 next to her !!
It was obvious he was so envious of her status...
Trump got it right when he said that her husband was her purse 👛 holder🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Good riddance Toady !! 😉👍
Kellyanne did an excellent job as Donald Trump's presidential campaign manager in 2016. She was a clever strategist and a loyal representative throughout the Trump Presidency. I'm glad she's free of her untrustworthy, controlling, disrespectful, undermining, competitive, hideous lump of a husband who was jealous of her high profile and success.
I read the article and comment section of today's (Saturday's) Daily Mail on-line. (The article will likely still be there on Sunday, if you're interested.) I had a great laugh at the well-deserved horrible things the readers had to say about her now ex-husband 'what's-his-name.'
Bingo, Kathleen. Kellyanne is the unsung hero who brought us President Trump. [Any women want to acknowledge this never-before-done accomplishment by a strong woman? Hmmm??] I'm generally dense, but I know enough to pay attention when a woman I respect gets committed to something I don't understand. I didn't see Trump like Kellyanne, Sarah Palin, and Phyllis Schlafley did. But I payed attention. Glad I did.
So sorry to hear about the divorce. But I don't know how she could live in any proximity of that kvetching wuss.
None of the children appear to look like him. There's at most some similarity to men of the same phenotype. That could be a coincidence. I wonder if they were all adopted. I can't think of any other explanation.
I think they all look like him, especially the eldest. They have his nose/mouth/chin.
That's not very nice. He looks like a toad. The lovely woman who influenced me to not get jabbed is in hospital, being prepared for emergency removal of her gallbladder. She was in a lot of pain and was taken by ambulance. Big stone in the duct. Already infected. They have refused to allow her to have private blood. She's terrified of spike protein. I've tried to reassure her the risks of spike in blood are minimal. She thinks covid is a cold, has never taken tests. Probably has had it repeatedly. I haven't told her, covid attacks the gallbladder. The virus is still there 12 months after infection. I'll get up to see her as soon as the hospital allows. Probably best I don't say anything until she's recovered.
Sending best wishes for a healthy recovery.
Thank you.
It was hard to believe she could stay with him witnessing his behavior during her appointment in Trumps administration, and he obviously couldn't get over his hatred for Trump, and as you stated trying to make it impossible for her to remain in the administration. Must have been costing him money behind the scenes or something too. However with 4 children it's easy to understand, and she was obviously a devoted wife, or at least to the institution of marriage.
She deserves better, and hopefully she'll find someone now that he's behind her.
I agree that his behavior was obnoxious and it was incredibly disloyal. She was clearly devoted to upholding the institution of marriage. Whether or not she was devoted to upholding the marriage itself, who can say?
Anyone would deserve better than George.
She does not appear to be a particularly good judge of character, based on her taste in men which, unfortunately, does not reflect well on her.
She'll have no trouble meeting men interested in having a meaningful relationship with her, albeit mostly of the overnight variety.
Some would say that there is a statistically greater chance of Nikki Haley securing the GOP nomination than there is of her finding someone long term.
However, there is a type of man who could well be interested and she could even become First Lady, if she plays her cards right, although may have to change her politics
I offer as Exhibit A, a prospective spouse for her, the soon to be 47th president of the United States, Mr Hunter Biden, soon to be confirmed by Dominion Inc as elected in the largest landslide in American history.
Well I personally don't know her well enough to judge her character, or aware of the intricate details of her personal/love life. I'm only aware of Georges actions making headlines regarding Trump as it correlated with the MSM narratives, and it relating towards her as they seemed to enjoy trying to create a divide.
Was he controlling?
That's how I would describe someone who did everything possible to make his wife's home life so intolerable that she had to quit her very important, high profile position to pick up the pieces at home.
Maybe I could have chosen a better word? But he effectively caused her to resign (on good terms) from her position.
Okay, fair enough, point taken.
The entire Lincoln Project was a fraud. It supported some huge losers and pedos.
I suspect it was a cover for a pedophile ring. Trump had made combating child sex trafficking a priority. That would not have gone down well with a lot of sexual perverts and RINOs. No wonder they hated his guts.
I never thought about that. Did any of you see I think it's on Black Conservstive Patriot the new info about Seth Rich? The information that he was meeting the FBI with to disclose ( when he was randomly mugged and killed. Never solved) was about HRC emails. But not about the Sanders campaign. They were about the Podesta brothers. Pizzagate. Oh that's tin foil hat stuff! Is it? There's also about 50k children missing from Ukraine. Who would keep a war going to launder billions? To hide bioweapons labs? To traffic kids? Just look at who is over there and who is sending the $$$.
Thanks for the new info on Seth Rich.
I believe the FBI, so-called, still has possession of one or more of Seth Rich’s lap tops, and have never revealed the contents thereof, in this unsolved murder. And, was it not Seth Rich, of blessed memory, who had revealed the Democrat Party criminal computer records? Was the murder of Seth Rich a type of Arkancide?
Don't know. He had arranged to meet the FBI to turn whistleblower at 4am. I believe he was shot twice. Just days before Black Conservative Patriot gave the update Chris Wray was here in Nebraska. Same city where Rich's parents live. And then coincidentally Rich's parents are on local news. Stated they don't want the case questioned. They have closure. National news said Wray left DC early for Thanksgiving in the Adirondacks. But he made a stop here first. He would have landed at the Air Force Base. Civilians wouldn't see him come and go.
Excellent and highly cogent response! Thank you for educating me. Wow! How can one be “mugged”, I.e., held up allegedly, shot to death, and no theft of possessions/ valuables on body occur? And Wray/ parents connections and post- interview parental plea that there be no investigation- parents! A first ever singularity.
Reminds me a bit of circumstances regarding Arkancidence of poor Vince Foster, and maybe a few more... and Epstein inside the Federal lockup in lower Manhattan , too. Oh, yes-remind me, what was the name of that Democratic Congresswoman who was Chairperson of DNC ? Was she ever questioned as to provenance(s) of documents moved from DNC computers , to ...
I believe he was Arkancided too.
He is Cartman from South Park.
KA Conway was a whackadoodle. Trumps people appeared to be so inept. He needs better, more professional people that the masses trust.
KA has always been a mystery to me. I do not come to any conclusions, but my gut tells me, move along. Wash the hands and begin again.
I suspect that after Trump was elected, Kelly Anne's husband thought he would get a plum position in the Trump administration by virtue of being KA's husband. When that didn't happen, he turned evil on Trump.
He reportedly thought he was headed for the SCOTUS under Trump. When Trump didn't appoint him he was probably bitter that Trump defeated Cruz for the nomination. Kellyanne had worked for Cruz before Trump. He probably thought Cruz would have appointed him to the SCOTUS. He might have had some dirt on Cruz and didn't have any on Trump. Probably Cruz tried it on with her and she knocked him back. I like Cruz but no normal man would trust Cruz being anywhere near his wife.
And then again, maybe she put out when Cruz propositioned her. And George liked it. Some men get off on being cuckolds.
Shakespeare wrote - Love is blind and lovers cannot see - in Merchant of Venice, and in Antony and Cleopatra among other plays ; as have many many other authors . We overlook flaws in those we love ( that's good), but love can blind us to serious issues ( that's bad).
This is the only reason I can figure that Kellyanne ended up with her loser of a husband.
I know a woman who went home early from work one day unexpectedly and walked in on her husband in the "female" or "bottom" position being rogered by another man. The husband was a RINO, but I digress. The woman was admitted as an inpatient to a mental health facility. She was on valium for years afterwards. Now she's happily remarried. The RINO died of AIDS. I wonder if a similar incident might have precipitated Kellyanne's divorce. I wouldn't expect that she found him in the "bottom" position with another man. But might she have walked in on him with a small boy? George is a big time RINO and was active in The Lincoln Project which has had pedo scandals. He strikes me as that type.
He was a vile petty man who only got airtime because he was opposition to Trump. He'll be in rehab soon
Never understood why she married such an effeminate, mealy mouthed man.
The usual reason. He wasn't short of a dollar.
But late at night, the big old house gets lonely. I guess every kind of refuge has its price. So she tells him she must go out for the weekend, to visit an old friend who's feeling down....
Have you noticed none of the four kids look like him?
Maybe to get away from Atco, N.J., in Camden County? She was very nearby to Berlin Borough, N.J. just a glacial pebble’s throw away. Sort of close to the Pine Barrens of N.J., Atsion Park and Lake, and the great Atco Speedway.
So, she needed to marry an androgynous, neo-con dwarf so she could move to a better neighborhood? She was very cute in her younger days.
I'd still do her right now.
Get your eyes checked.
Has she gone on record to delineate her earlier attraction to George, and how that may have changed negatively, especially with regard to the changes in her successes, responsibilities and personal fame and public acceptance?
Plus the fact that he probably can't get it up any more. Closing his eyes and imagining she's a small boy no longer suffices.
I just have one question: How did HE end up with HER in the first place? Look at him.
Money
I'm not a fan of Kellyanne either. She initially did NOT support Trump. She looks like a worn out porn star. Oh, remember that shit she pulled in the oval office? How she sat on the sofa? What a POS.
Sick analysis. Voting this line of rude inappropriate bashing down.
So that's what she looks like? I knew there was something about her look but I couldn't quite figure out what it was. It all makes sense now. I can see the Stormy Daniels resemblance. Thanks for pointing that out. You think George put her out on the game? And why does he hate Trump so much? I actually am not aware of what shit she pulled and how she sat on the sofa. Curious though. What happened?
I remember her sitting of the sofa. I was torn between she is just making herself comfortable and who knows how long she had been sitting there to gee that's not very professional. However if you follow anyone around with a camera in their face 24/7 I bet you are going to get some unflattering kind of pics. Add the crazy media with their own motives, and sometimes it is hard to know what to believe. I think in the end look at facts. What was concrete about her if you can manage to get that much good info about her. Then decide what kind of person she is.
I don't recall the sofa thing Dorothy. I guess I'll have to look it up. I hope it's not what it sounds like.
Oh big deal! Now I remember. I'd forgotten about it. So she made herself comfortable. Who cares!
I actually thought she looked pretty damn hot in that photo. She looked relaxed. It was 2017. There was none of the tension and strain that became apparent later after her cruel husband, for some unknown reason, started fucking her over.
LOLOL!!! Oh Dr Alexander, how you make me laugh!!! Thank you!!
Read her book. Long, but an eye opener. A smart woman.
Feel bad for the kids. They deserved better. Every child deserves parents who are mature and responsible and willing to work hard to get over the tough times.
There is an old saying: “People get divorced just before the miracle happens.”
Dr. Alexander, I'd like to offer some constructive feedback, with full respect. I think it would do you more credit if you eased off of the bombastic writing style, especially the insults. I don't think you're unhinged at all, but if I didn't know you I'd think your writing sounded "over the top" and even unhinged at times.
For some of your longer sentences that run-on, it would help to break them up into 2 or more sentences.
Please consider!
Give it a rest Jared. No one cares.
Hey, feel free to ignore it, it's just my opinion. I think I'm correct though, he sounds crazed and unsophisticated and it makes him easy to dismiss or attack quoting his own writing. That should matter to this whole movement if being effective at getting the message out and convincing people with some influence to step into the ring is important to us.
Jared I know you mean well. A gentle reminder.: this plandemic and all the other horrific plans the elite have for us are coming from the most sophisticated, best educated and highest pedigreed people in the world. Working class are often reluctant to voice their opinion or stand their ground because they feel unsophisticated. The freedom movement needs to be welcoming. We need all hands on deck. We're all we have. People won't step in the ring if we are unapproachable. Much love friend.
Yeah, that's something I'm trying to figure out... has it always been the case that the supposedly intelligent, conscientious, intellectually curious people who make up much of the professional and educated classes of the world were so susceptible to these obvious social control efforts? Why is there so little independent thinking, skepticism, pride (like pride in not playing along with manipulative BS) and willful blindness among these people especially in this case?
I have a deep respect for the down to earth and modest working class people (to be distinguished from the shock jock kind who love trading raunchy stories of women they've slept with and who never matured past highschool) I think they make up the majority of people who actually have courage.
I think to flip this script, we need to get through to the educated people and help their denial and cowardice give way finally.
Have you considered a career as a public health bureaucrat Jared? In answer to your question, this, below, taken from what I wrote in another post, may help you figure it out Jared:
Most of them have Hitler's personality disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD; Anakastic Personality Disorder), and in particular the OCPD subtype that Theodore Millon, originator of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders' personality disorders classification termed "bureaucratic compulsive with narcissistic features." This is the disorder that has driven the bureaucratic incompetence. Understanding it is key to defeating it.
I noted about it previously as follows:
What I think we are up against is OCPD. It's a big part of the reason for the bureaupathology of the vaccine advocates: Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD), which is common in the military, where those with the condition tend to be rapidly
promoted (e.g., Colonel Russell Williams, convicted serial killer and former Commanding Officer of Canada's largest airforce base), law enforcement (e. g., murderer of George Floyd, Derek Chauvin, Idaho killings suspect Bryan Kohberger), academia and serial killers appears also to be common in public health bureaucrats.
OCPD is a disorder of overcontrol. When dialled up, it's similar to psychopathy, with which it is often comorbid. It's characterised by, among other things, self-righteousness, tyrannical or dictatorial tendencies, perfectionism (especially WRT expectations of others), neatness ("serial killer neat"), punctuality, the ability to dial down or turn off empathy, perspective shifting deficits, rigidity, overconscientious and enjoyment of creating fear in subordinates. It has links to sadism, especially "enforcing sadism with compulsive features," "tyrannical sadism" mooand "spineless sadism."
People with the condition are functionally rigid, stubborn and tend to think they are "always right" and that there is only one correct way of doing things, which is their way. Hitler and Ghandi are good examples. They are angered when they don't get their own way and are overconcerned with ethics and morality. (Hitler was vegetarian and Bryan Kohberger is vegan.)
OCPD individuals are annoyed when proven to be wrong and they double down on their mistakes. Because of their perspective shifting deficits they have trouble with alternative hypothesis generation and are unsuited to be scientists. They are also unsuited for management roles and unsuited to be public health bureaucrats although, due to attention to detail, can make good accountants. A big part of their problem is their perspective taking deficits and cognitive distortions and fallacies in their reasoning. They can do well on tasks requiring attention to detail but they can't readily adjust their perspective to identify and correct for weaknesses in theory or methodology.
They tend to rise to the top in ethics councils, professional associations, regulatory bodies and the military as well as, it appears, the public health bureaucracy. Present them with evidence of vaccine harms and individuals with OCPD can't adjust their perspective or admit their mistakes and instead they just double down, and then seek revenge. Because it's an egosyntonic disorder they have no idea of how fucked up they are and how much harm they cause.
To further understand OCPD, consider the following description of Anthony Fauci by Scott Sturman M.D:
"The mindset of Field Marshal Douglas Haig, World War I’s worst general, springs to mind, when drawing a comparison to Anthony Fauci. By some historical accounts Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig bears the distinction of WWI’s worst general. He rose to Commander of British Expeditionary Forces and led Allied armies during the slaughter and futility at the battles of the Somme and Passchendaele.
Known for his self confidence and inflexibility, he repeatedly ordered soldiers over the top to “no man’s land” and into the path of German machine guns. No number of casualties or unachieved objectives could dissuade him from his singular approach to combat. Nigel Davies, historian and educator, points out that General Haig was emblematic of the chateau general - dictating and directing but far removed from the battlefield: They were Chateau Generals in approach and in attitude.
They drew lines on maps without adequately considering the terrain, issued impossible instructions without looking at the state of the ground, and ran completely inadequate communications that were far from capable of keeping track of, or controlling, a modern battlefield.
In a similar respect, despite his academic and professional accomplishments, Dr. Anthony Fauci has no background or experience in clinical medicine and is ill equipped to lead the SARS-CoV-2 response. His purview is that of a research scientist and entrenched bureaucrat, who is far removed from patient contact. His career is enmeshed with the pharmaceutical industry, whose financial ties with federal medical regulatory institutions are well described.
Throughout his career he has denied patients easily accessible, inexpensive, and effective treatments in lieu of patented medications with high risk profiles and of dubious efficacy. In 1987 despite overwhelming clinical evidence, he told AIDS activists that the prophylactic use of the common antibiotic Bactrim to treat pneumocystis carnii pneumonia was ineffective and possibly dangerous. Through private donations the company Lymphomed circumvented the NIAID and conducted successful clinical trials.
The delay cost the lives of nearly 17,000 immunocompromised patients."
Hey, this is a pretty good essay, thanks for sharing. Can't finish it all now, will try later.
The long sentences are a reflection of his intelligence. It's called integrative complexity.
Long sentences without proper punctuation is called poor grammar.
I agree that Dr. A could do better, & gain more credibility with newbies by toning down the over zealous rhetoric.
He does a great job calling out bad actors & terrible policies, but that can be overshadowed by his rants.
I’ve hesitated to share some of his posts with those I’m trying to reach. Credibility is important. We stick with him, but a new inductee may not.
Change of subject; I subscribed for a year after his plea @ $49.99.
Soon after he lowered amt. to $39 PLUS free book he wrote. I wrote & asked if I could get a free book since just days before (new offer) I’d subscribed.
He responded I could.
Never received my book. Have inquired at least 2 or 3 times; no response; no book.
Another reader posted no promised book either. Not a good look - but - I’m still here.
Well said; it's funny that we have AwakeNotWoke calling you a grammer nazi for something so straightforward and sensible. I'm sure he'd be so forgiving and constructive in his criticism if it was Robin D'Angelo writing we were talking about.
You're wrong yet again as per usual Jared.
(You must hear that a lot.)
It's Robin D'Angelo's writing, not "Robin D'Angelo writing."
Please try harder to remember to include the apostrophe and 's' in such writing in the future.
It detracts from the quality of your communication and interferes with reader comprehension when you do this.
Please try to lift your game and do better.
There really is no excuse for your laziness.
You should know better.
Please accept this necessary constructive criticism with good grace and desist from such piss poor performance in the future.
Being a grammar Nazi is called Fauci/Walensky. He doesn't have OCPD. High IQ people tend to be messy, tardy and stay up late.
I think he's intelligent, intellectually curious, discerning and has some real moral fortitude.
I just think he could reach more of the people we'd want to reach if he was less bombastic. There's a place for righteous anger, but for this media/social media environment, we need to conduct ourselves in the most dignified way.
No, that would be boring. He's Trumpian, not on the autism spectrum
Dr. Alexander doesn't need you defending him against mild and obvious criticism.
And I suppose you'd call your reply clear and concise writing?
Make my point for me why don't you.
I don't think it's difficult to understand what I've written. If I had grown an audience like dr. Alexander had, I'd be sure to consider how I deliver my message, how best can I have a positive impact, etc. I'd be open to constructive feedback, it's the adult thing to do and we're in extremely important times.
Give me a reason why you think I'm wrong; we don't need to have a pissing match.
I just don't think that overstepping your bounds by criticizing and attempting to revamp the stack author's writing style is a wise course of action. According to your profile you don't even subscribe here, even for free. I couldn't care less, but it's odd that you're so concerned.
No need to reply. I won't be. HAGD
LOL what a passive aggressive weakling move: you supposedly "couldn't care less" while you're taking offense on behalf of Dr. A for my mild criticism, and replying with petty non-arguments... oh but you add "it's odd you're so concerned".
You argue like a 14 year old valley girl. Grow up.
I'm subscribed to Dr. A on my Gmail but logged into my Protonmail account right now.
If you think you're the king of pedantrt, paranoid and quick to fault find and take offence Jared, relax. You're a rank amateur. You ain't seen nothing yet
Sorry that sticking up for Dr. Paul offends you. Too much time on your hands.
I do
What do you do?
She's thinking out loud, I assume. In her mind, she's standing at an altar. Mr Kellyanne, George, is available now.