Key messages from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, and Dr. Michael Palmer on deadly Pfizer mRNA technology based gene vaccine, spike protein, S 1 sub-unit: pharmacokinetics and toxicity
Key messages from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, and Dr. Michael Palmer on deadly Pfizer mRNA technology based gene vaccine, spike protein, S 1 sub-unit: pharmacokinetics and toxicity
SOURCE: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Pfizer-pharmacokinetics-and-toxicity.pdfAlexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
how does this study and all others that keep talking about the mRNA virus relate to the information that people like Brian Ardis are promoting that the toxin is a snake venom. Ardis notes many studies that identify snake venom molecules in these drugs and in people after vaccination. Can these spike proteins which are lab contrived duplicate the venom RNA in the mRNA formulation? And then once in the body as a S protein is what is shed and affecting other people?
Will Pfizer just get a slap on the wrist and pay a fine which has been the norm when Big Pharma kills? Isn’t time for a Criminal Prosecution!
Yep, we are in very deep shit
https://jimychanga.substack.com/p/vax-shedding-is-real-and-can-kill
how does this study and all others that keep talking about the mRNA virus relate to the information that people like Brian Ardis are promoting that the toxin is a snake venom. Ardis notes many studies that identify snake venom molecules in these drugs and in people after vaccination. Can these spike proteins which are lab contrived duplicate the venom RNA in the mRNA formulation? And then once in the body as a S protein is what is shed and affecting other people?
STAKE COUNT boarula and pfizer demons
I JUST listened to Brian Rose on London Real interviewing
Dr. Robert Malone who said, in my words, the results of the
mRna jab were inconclusive, 'depended on what you read'?
He then argued how lockdowns WERE negatively conclusive,
for sure.
I thought the damage IS CONCLUSIVE?
Anyone help?