I think I need this watered down. So if you got the experimental gene altering Covid injection first and then got Covid, it
Elicited a different immune response than if you are unvaccinated post Covid infection or got the infection first and then got the experimental gene altering Covid injections. Which scenario had the better outcome?
My understanding is that the higher IgG4 - resulting from mRNA vaccination prior to infection - leads to a significant 'narrowing' of the immune system. This has significant implication for both the ability of the immune system to counter other pathogens and non-self cell formations ( which can lead to tumors and cancers ), whilst also reducing the capacity to adapt to future variants of SARS-CoV-2.
So, vaccination with mRNA prior to infection is not good. The more vaccinated, the greater the imprinting, the higher the IgG4, the worse the outcome.
They have known mRNA was deadly and stopped all hearts of the participants in the 2013 trail of 200,000 people where only 5 are still alive today in ICU, etc.
It was labelled, "not to be used on humans" after that trial, but the DOD is now using it as a biological weapon in a "killbox" program to depopulate the earth.
The spike protein was patented as bioweapon in 2013 by the NIH. ‘In some embodiments, the small molecule is a toxin, a toxin from a chemical weapon, an agent of biowarfare.’
The problem seems to be the consequences of igG4 ... these are disulphide bonds that can split and mix with igG1 which confuses the immune system even more... P53 guardian of the genome gets down regulated which gives musfolded proteins free reign to divide and divide without the immune system keeping check ... the BIG C can grow without brakes.
There was a video of a participant on Tiktok. it was heart wrenching to hear him discuss all the complications. As Peter said, the fellow's doctor told him of 200,000 participants. He is one of 5 survivors! The all had heart stoppages.
So is the person better off who first had a naturally acquired Covid infection, and later was given a covid jab than the person who first was jabbed than later got sick? Thanks. Just checking to be sure I understand. But of course the unvaccinated is best off ...
I think I need this watered down. So if you got the experimental gene altering Covid injection first and then got Covid, it
Elicited a different immune response than if you are unvaccinated post Covid infection or got the infection first and then got the experimental gene altering Covid injections. Which scenario had the better outcome?
My understanding is that the higher IgG4 - resulting from mRNA vaccination prior to infection - leads to a significant 'narrowing' of the immune system. This has significant implication for both the ability of the immune system to counter other pathogens and non-self cell formations ( which can lead to tumors and cancers ), whilst also reducing the capacity to adapt to future variants of SARS-CoV-2.
So, vaccination with mRNA prior to infection is not good. The more vaccinated, the greater the imprinting, the higher the IgG4, the worse the outcome.
Keep plugging this, Doc! The world needs to Get It. Asap!
They have known mRNA was deadly and stopped all hearts of the participants in the 2013 trail of 200,000 people where only 5 are still alive today in ICU, etc.
It was labelled, "not to be used on humans" after that trial, but the DOD is now using it as a biological weapon in a "killbox" program to depopulate the earth.
The spike protein was patented as bioweapon in 2013 by the NIH. ‘In some embodiments, the small molecule is a toxin, a toxin from a chemical weapon, an agent of biowarfare.’
this is the first I have heard of that trial, do you have a link to that info?
Yes I would like a link to anything that can verify that comment... respectively and thank you‼️♥️
The problem seems to be the consequences of igG4 ... these are disulphide bonds that can split and mix with igG1 which confuses the immune system even more... P53 guardian of the genome gets down regulated which gives musfolded proteins free reign to divide and divide without the immune system keeping check ... the BIG C can grow without brakes.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oXhMTROlMyoH/
There was a video of a participant on Tiktok. it was heart wrenching to hear him discuss all the complications. As Peter said, the fellow's doctor told him of 200,000 participants. He is one of 5 survivors! The all had heart stoppages.
So is the person better off who first had a naturally acquired Covid infection, and later was given a covid jab than the person who first was jabbed than later got sick? Thanks. Just checking to be sure I understand. But of course the unvaccinated is best off ...