Konstantin Föhse et al; key paper swept under the rug, I re-highlight "The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses"
Konstantin Föhse et al; key paper swept under the rug, I re-highlight "The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses"
Key statement for our purposes: "the mRNA 49 BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development...of vaccines"
“The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. "
Surely this is wildly untrue?
IRR and ARR issues aside, all that they looked for (end point) was the prevention of one or more of the symptoms?
Also for annual flu shots, it is assumed that our immune systems have an unlimited capacity. But capacity must be limited, and maybe protection against any one specific pathogen generally causes a reduction in other protections.
This important paper, dated 5-06-21, has still not been peer-reviewed. 🤔
and now this:
https://interestingengineering.com/child-died-acute-hepatitis-who?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-24-04-2022
So many studies need to be done!!!
“The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. "
Surely this is wildly untrue?
IRR and ARR issues aside, all that they looked for (end point) was the prevention of one or more of the symptoms?
Also for annual flu shots, it is assumed that our immune systems have an unlimited capacity. But capacity must be limited, and maybe protection against any one specific pathogen generally causes a reduction in other protections.