Konstantin Föhse et al; key paper swept under the rug, I re-highlight "The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses"
Konstantin Föhse et al; key paper swept under the rug, I re-highlight "The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses"
Key statement for our purposes: "the mRNA 49 BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development...of vaccines"
That's exactly the same with me. 2.5 years of digging and finally grasping what my own profession was all about... Btw. don't have 'my doctor' and it feels so good without that doctor :)
Good for you. I haven t seen my doctor in 2 years. Have my annual coming it!! This will be really interesting and tell me all I ' NEED' to know. I hope he's on the ' Right' side of medicine. He used to be, we shall see.
“The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. "
Surely this is wildly untrue?
IRR and ARR issues aside, all that they looked for (end point) was the prevention of one or more of the symptoms?
Also for annual flu shots, it is assumed that our immune systems have an unlimited capacity. But capacity must be limited, and maybe protection against any one specific pathogen generally causes a reduction in other protections.
This important paper, dated 5-06-21, has still not been peer-reviewed. 🤔
no, so thats why I re-highlight but your point maybe is the key issue.
If they don't look, it won't hurt?
Why you haven’t share your interview TNT radio?? ❤️❤️ https://open.spotify.com/episode/74L02G1ZA1fiBNZ9OBjLuZ?si=zIzr2dboSn2g9L2ZZog9sQ
and now this:
https://interestingengineering.com/child-died-acute-hepatitis-who?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=mailing&utm_campaign=Newsletter-24-04-2022
Dr. Alexander, this hepatitis issue is something our team should get ahead of and research before it turns into an inoculation push for the children.
and how do you know that it is not caused by the global shedding or the injections of the children, which already started?
So many studies need to be done!!!
there are enough studies already, for the last 2.5 years. The only issue is the LIES AND TIWSTED 'truths' in their interpretation...
I wasn't serious. I probably should have made it more obvious it was a joke. Although none of this is funny.
yeah, the joke was not obvious, to me... Always to naive...
It's ok. All I have done fo least last two and a half years is research. I probably know more than my doctor at this point. It's been exhausting.
That's exactly the same with me. 2.5 years of digging and finally grasping what my own profession was all about... Btw. don't have 'my doctor' and it feels so good without that doctor :)
Good for you. I haven t seen my doctor in 2 years. Have my annual coming it!! This will be really interesting and tell me all I ' NEED' to know. I hope he's on the ' Right' side of medicine. He used to be, we shall see.
Recommend reading - Professor Frances Boyle - Bioterrorism and Warfare (2005)
“The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. "
Surely this is wildly untrue?
IRR and ARR issues aside, all that they looked for (end point) was the prevention of one or more of the symptoms?
Also for annual flu shots, it is assumed that our immune systems have an unlimited capacity. But capacity must be limited, and maybe protection against any one specific pathogen generally causes a reduction in other protections.