23 Comments

Early in the pandemic the Lancet conveniently did not publish the truth. It’s always about money and power.

Expand full comment

Baric.

Expand full comment

Not Wuhan Laboratory? Oh, this will get interesting.....

Expand full comment

More 'uproar!' We want more. There remains a severe uproar deficit.

Expand full comment

We need an army of honey badgers to call out and prosecute every criminal. We need to demand morals values intellectual integrity in all disciplines without it in health care we are doomed! Stones need to be elevated and explained to the Pebble Flintstones of the world!

Expand full comment
founding

why is no one looking at Winnipeg, it is a gain of function lab. What if the scientists who were fired took the virus somewhere else. Viruses from that lab were sent to China.

Expand full comment

Sorry, I am not trusting any of these medical rag publishers. They can do an 180 and do another 180 in a heartbeat.

Expand full comment

The comments on the source article for yahoo…times are changing. I was expecting a bunch of liberal trump hating/anti vaccine rhetoric. Not even close. Wow.

Expand full comment

No deadly pathogen exists ...other crap is killing millions...

As a matter of fact and I know you don't agree ...viruses do not exist atf all...not just this whopper of a bloody lie lol.

Expand full comment

I cannot quantify my anger that the "scientific" community has chosen for politics over science when it comes to the origins of the virus (even though I am baffled how this can possibly be political at all), however I did look through the Lancet report website and was extremely encourated they at least, as you have detailed here, noted the following in their primary infographic in their own words: "COVID-19 response: A massive global failure". The infographic has the following points on it:

- "failures of prevention"

- "failures of rationality"

- "failures of transparency"

- "failures of to follow normal public health practice"

Among other things

This is progress, although of course it is profoundly sad we need to identify this as "progress"

Expand full comment

Jeffrey “huawei” Sachs was red pilled somewhere? I’m an idiot. But Sachs isn’t an idiot, and he didn’t suddenly become aware... What does “we welcome him” look like in action? He doesn’t need admiration from the plebs. So why does what we “feel” towards him even matter? He will publish & speak regardless of what average people think, in any manner that suits his end goals. (Ask him to tear his shirt a little, like he’s been in a fight, and tell him to rub dirt on his cheeks like he’s been sleeping outdoors).

He’s a man who said Lancet commission needed a geopolitically free man to investigate Wuhan... and he selected the farthest thing from that. Peter Daszak who accepted funding from NIH, DHS, and DoD to work with Wuhan virology Institute on bat coronaviruses, where gain of function research occurred. Yes gain of function research occurred in the states as well. That’s publicly facing.

Sachs wasn’t even concerned with skillfully feigning ignorance. So that’s NOT a man who needs us to grant him grace or any plausible deniability to achieve his end goals. I do wonder why you need readers to give Sachs plausible deniability. Peter obscured his authorship of a Lancet opinion piece calling lab leaks conspiracy.

Even if the US is not funding Ecohealth Alliance anymore. Peter Daszak is also treasurer of Global Virome Project, member of creepy coalition Trinity Health Challenge, & Biden just press released his plan to expand the biotech market. While Joe Jimenez waits with an open mouth.

Joe Jimenez was a blackrock advisor, then VP of Oracle which was a CIA project & which went on to develop VSAFE, the measure that records all c19 vax recipients & collects info on injuries. Joe later became CEO of Novartis and knew ex-Novartis employees, FDA CBER Director Peter Marks and woke-Whitey shaming CDC ACIP chairman Carol Holland & whatever other Novartis fleas litter the DHHS. (Check the FDA’s CORE, then check BioMilq)

Peter Marks rapidly approved Novartis gene therapy products (neatly skipped over the Novartis FDA scandal), and approved the covid vaccine products. Even when OVRR’s Gruber and Krause quit that banana bullsh--.

Now Joe Jimenez is working with Aditium Bio, a biotech firm snapping up medical companies like Motric Bio! Which focuses on Spasticity Neurological Injuries, and Nova Viral therapeutics. Does the spike protein cause amyloidosis, and could the spike lead to amyloid plaques in the brain? A series of serendipitous career moves?

MRNA injuries aside. There’s a lot of open mouths waiting as the eugenics market grows. Kids are being sterilized and left with profitable lifelong health complications & women are being reduced to “birthing” persons. Globally, same script from the funders. Except in China, but I bet only because they have a concentration camp full of “participants” and organs. Little pieces setting a path. (Ask Sachs if he knows what China’s concentration camps are yet)

Sachs hamming #methree disoriented victim of deception goes over like a lead balloon. I don’t need to grant him grace. He’ll be alright without it.

Expand full comment

They must be reading our substack posts...

https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/vaxscam?s=w

"Occam's Razor tells me that the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" is an semi-artificial entity that acts like a virus in how it infects, reproduces, and spreads, but in fact was intentionally invented and manufactured expressly to provide the situation in which mRNA injections could be foisted on as many billion humans as possible. (1)"

Expand full comment

Nah, this is not what it seems. The Lancet is just pushing the CCP narrative that the virus came from a US lab.

Expand full comment

He's going ape over the covid lab leak theory because he is one of the researchers making covid in the lab. https://reporter.nih.gov/search/VcMKZfjY10CZfegz5z_9Sg/projects

Expand full comment

Peter Hotez only has his NIH patents on anthrax, poxvirus, flavivirus, hendra, nipha virus, & nucleic acid proteins to hide.

Expand full comment