Liberal legal scholar Dershowitz over the target dropping a BOMB: 'Trump Indictment Beginning to ‘Look Like Banana Republic Land’; “We know that President Biden urged his attorney general to indict
Liberal legal scholar Dershowitz over the target dropping a BOMB: 'Trump Indictment Beginning to ‘Look Like Banana Republic Land’; “We know that President Biden urged his attorney general to indict
the man who he knew was going to be the leading opponent if against him,” Dershowitz said. “That begins to look like banana republic; Turley supports Dershowitz
Yeh. The USA is just now 'beginning' to look like a banana republic. I'm pretty sure the banana republic was signed sealed and delivered when Biden's puppeteers stole the 2020 election.
Same "DERSHOWITZ" is #1 customer along with CHOMSKY at 'fuck-a-kid' Island, Lolita-Express frequent flyer program.
All ran by Epstein&TRUMP +20 years, and you people of the gall to put Dershowitz on display as 'law&order"?? Of exactly what? Sodom&Gomorrah, or Moloch&Satan?
Now in her mid-30s, Giuffre is an advocate for sex trafficking victims and claims Maxwell groomed her when she was still a teenager to be a sex slave for Maxwell, Epstein, Prince Andrew, and other prominent men — including Dershowitz.
“You have no right not to be vaccinated. You have no right not to wear a mask. You have no right to open up your business …. If you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm". — Alan Dershowitz
... good to know that Trump has “liberal” “legal scholar” [FFS!!] Dershowitz in his corner.
I see 15 min post interval 24/7, that 96 posts a day, so your saying somehow during the good doc's regular 8hr day human shift that he can post 96 random posts all set for 15 min delay 24/7 without using a BOT?
Dershowitz spent a ton of time at Epstein Island, where he "kept his underwear on" as 14 year old girls or boys massaged him.
You keep holding up the worst people, like Loomer and Naomi Wolfe as champions of Conservatism and Christianity, but the truth is they despise the Christian founding of most Western, once white nations. They are jews, the most expelled, and disingenuous, most morally bankrupt, gay, pedophilic people in human history.
To the good people of united America of these United States:
The current problems with America's rogue judiciary and rogue idiocracy of both military & law enforcement universally, is because Congress does nothing to stop their treason or rape of America.
THIS IS TREASON!!!!
Consider:
US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821) “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” It is the same when any officer stops you for no reason other than to rob your of your hard-earned labor and property anytime they stop you on the highways of America to threaten arrest or pay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Especially, when no harm has been done to private property or as they say "corpus delicti."
Why?
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262, (1969) If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966) Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, (1886) An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486,489 The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
“To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.” Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 303 (1885).
And:
Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326 When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost.
The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent 'contract.' See, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.” CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70
FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT
McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372 (1987), Quoting U.S. v. Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307: “Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears in the statute, see United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir. 1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him, and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud.
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237,243. (1895) We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905). "The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now."....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now consider why your sovereign witness of the good people of united America of these United States know without question, every policeman, every judge and every politician is guilty of TREASON against their people!!! Give me liberty or Your DEATH{.}
SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 April 21, 1969 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE.
I was acting within my Rights with respect to the use I made of my property as is defined in Spann vs City of Dallas, Tx SC (1921).
The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. .
.. Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872.
The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts. People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971).
The word operator shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation. Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.833.
The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a
mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012, and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E. 579.
"NO STATE GOVERNMENT ENTITY HAS THE POWER TO ALLOW OR DENY PASSAGE ON THE HIGHWAYS, BYWAYS, NOR WATERWAYS... TRANSPORTING HIS VEHICLES AND PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR EITHER RECREATION OR BUSINESS. TRAVEL IS NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING, VEHICLE REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCES." CHICAGO COACH CO. V. CITY OF CHICAGO, 337 ILL. 200, 169 N.E. 22.
"TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS ARE NOT A CRIME." PEOPLE V. BATTLE
"PERSONS FACED WITH AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LICENSING LAW WHICH PURPORTS TO REQUIRE A LICENSE AS A PREREQUISITE TO EXERCISE OF RIGHT... MAY IGNORE THE LAW AND ENGAGE WITH IMPUNITY IN EXERCISE OF SUCH RIGHT." SHUTTLESWORTH V. BIRMINGHAM 394 U.S. 147 (1969).
“OUR NATION HAS THRIVED ON THE PRINCIPLE THAT, OUTSIDE AREAS OF PLAINLY HARMFUL CONDUCT, EVERY AMERICAN IS LEFT TO SHAPE HIS OWN LIFE AS HE THINKS BEST, DO WHAT HE PLEASES, GO WHERE HE PLEASES.” ID., AT 197. KENT VS. DULLES SEE VESTAL, FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT, 41 IOWA L.REV. 6, 13—14.
Bottom line:
“A PERSON DETAINED FOR AN INVESTIGATORY STOP CAN BE QUESTIONED BUT IS “NOT OBLIGED TO ANSWER, ANSWERS MAY NOT BE COMPELLED, AND REFUSAL TO ANSWER FURNISHES NO BASIS FOR AN ARREST.” JUSTICE WHITE, H IIBEL
Take note:
Authority AFFIDAVIT V. MOTION
Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all DENIED.
Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits.
Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!!
Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true, correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS is it???...lol
Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2d 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 states, “Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.”
Never forget:
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237,243. (1895) We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905). The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.
“The supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S. Ct. 241, 28 L. Ed. 825, holds that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”
AND -
‘The Necessary and Proper Clause cannot be utilized to “pass laws for the accomplishment of objects” that are not within Congress’ enumerated powers.’ Bondi v. Sebelius - 780 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (N.D. Fla. 2011).
In all-fathers House of Honor we have "High Standards" to uphold. DEATH TO TYRANTS!!!
The tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of good people, only because those entrusted and paid, are now the criminals!!!!!!!!!!!!! Criminals that control all media to try you in public court, then in courts of law that are never open to cameras or a real Court of Record...lol. Why? Because without independent cameras and recordings, they'll throw away the key to your freedom away, while lying to the public so easily deceived....lol
"I do not ask Thee to take them out of the world, but to keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. Sanctify them in the truth; Thy word is truth. As Thou didst send Me into the world, I also have sent them into the world.” John 17:15
Chose in action wisely & Normal Law will reign both by Golden Rule & Castle Rule and in thy day of testing all things by divine providence and goodly spirit of wisdom, honor is thy crown of living, eternal forevermore.
Whatever you will it shall be "Living with Honor" or DEATH by DISHONOR!!! Be wise, safe and blessed...., while your coin of time remains to rightly chose in action, service in honor for honor above all else, eternally forevermore. Arthur
Beginning?
Yeh. The USA is just now 'beginning' to look like a banana republic. I'm pretty sure the banana republic was signed sealed and delivered when Biden's puppeteers stole the 2020 election.
Same "DERSHOWITZ" is #1 customer along with CHOMSKY at 'fuck-a-kid' Island, Lolita-Express frequent flyer program.
All ran by Epstein&TRUMP +20 years, and you people of the gall to put Dershowitz on display as 'law&order"?? Of exactly what? Sodom&Gomorrah, or Moloch&Satan?
Who cares what this disgusting pedophile says! That man is evil.
Dersh, Dersh, wherefore art thou? You'd tie us down and shoot us with poison, but today you speak common sense. Go figure.
It already looked like Banana 🍌 Republic when they stole the elections from us
An Eye-Opening interview on Trump's Upcoming Trial
https://wltreport.com/2023/08/04/heres-why-trump-has-waited-so-long-play/?utm_source=newsletter_randy&fbclid=IwAR2E5PKsU4h7p_VZEbRugUKjICHTcS4iWhDTn8e9XhXBBGmy7-9xHaxVVmY
Ya think
https://youtu.be/bphR-6Xi1_I
Now in her mid-30s, Giuffre is an advocate for sex trafficking victims and claims Maxwell groomed her when she was still a teenager to be a sex slave for Maxwell, Epstein, Prince Andrew, and other prominent men — including Dershowitz.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad-link-is-worth-digging-into/
“You have no right not to be vaccinated. You have no right not to wear a mask. You have no right to open up your business …. If you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm". — Alan Dershowitz
... good to know that Trump has “liberal” “legal scholar” [FFS!!] Dershowitz in his corner.
I see 15 min post interval 24/7, that 96 posts a day, so your saying somehow during the good doc's regular 8hr day human shift that he can post 96 random posts all set for 15 min delay 24/7 without using a BOT?
I find this implausible;
Dershowitz spent a ton of time at Epstein Island, where he "kept his underwear on" as 14 year old girls or boys massaged him.
You keep holding up the worst people, like Loomer and Naomi Wolfe as champions of Conservatism and Christianity, but the truth is they despise the Christian founding of most Western, once white nations. They are jews, the most expelled, and disingenuous, most morally bankrupt, gay, pedophilic people in human history.
To the good people of united America of these United States:
The current problems with America's rogue judiciary and rogue idiocracy of both military & law enforcement universally, is because Congress does nothing to stop their treason or rape of America.
THIS IS TREASON!!!!
Consider:
US v Will, 449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens V Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5LEd 257 (1821) “When a judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” It is the same when any officer stops you for no reason other than to rob your of your hard-earned labor and property anytime they stop you on the highways of America to threaten arrest or pay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Especially, when no harm has been done to private property or as they say "corpus delicti."
Why?
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262, (1969) If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966) Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, (1886) An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d. 486,489 The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
“To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.” Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 303 (1885).
And:
Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020, 451 U.S. 939, 68 L.Ed 2d 326 When a judge knows that he lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly valid statutes expressly depriving him of jurisdiction, judicial immunity is lost.
The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent 'contract.' See, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.” CRUDEN vs. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70
FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT
McNally v. U.S., 483 U.S. 350, 371-372 (1987), Quoting U.S. v. Holzer, 816 F.2d. 304, 307: “Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears in the statute, see United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir. 1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him, and if he deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud.
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237,243. (1895) We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905). "The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now."....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now consider why your sovereign witness of the good people of united America of these United States know without question, every policeman, every judge and every politician is guilty of TREASON against their people!!! Give me liberty or Your DEATH{.}
SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U. S. 618 April 21, 1969 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the purpose of [COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE.
I was acting within my Rights with respect to the use I made of my property as is defined in Spann vs City of Dallas, Tx SC (1921).
The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. .
.. Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872.
The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts. People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971).
The word operator shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation. Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.833.
The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a
mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012, and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E. 579.
"NO STATE GOVERNMENT ENTITY HAS THE POWER TO ALLOW OR DENY PASSAGE ON THE HIGHWAYS, BYWAYS, NOR WATERWAYS... TRANSPORTING HIS VEHICLES AND PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR EITHER RECREATION OR BUSINESS. TRAVEL IS NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING, VEHICLE REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCES." CHICAGO COACH CO. V. CITY OF CHICAGO, 337 ILL. 200, 169 N.E. 22.
"TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS ARE NOT A CRIME." PEOPLE V. BATTLE
"PERSONS FACED WITH AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LICENSING LAW WHICH PURPORTS TO REQUIRE A LICENSE AS A PREREQUISITE TO EXERCISE OF RIGHT... MAY IGNORE THE LAW AND ENGAGE WITH IMPUNITY IN EXERCISE OF SUCH RIGHT." SHUTTLESWORTH V. BIRMINGHAM 394 U.S. 147 (1969).
“OUR NATION HAS THRIVED ON THE PRINCIPLE THAT, OUTSIDE AREAS OF PLAINLY HARMFUL CONDUCT, EVERY AMERICAN IS LEFT TO SHAPE HIS OWN LIFE AS HE THINKS BEST, DO WHAT HE PLEASES, GO WHERE HE PLEASES.” ID., AT 197. KENT VS. DULLES SEE VESTAL, FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT, 41 IOWA L.REV. 6, 13—14.
Bottom line:
“A PERSON DETAINED FOR AN INVESTIGATORY STOP CAN BE QUESTIONED BUT IS “NOT OBLIGED TO ANSWER, ANSWERS MAY NOT BE COMPELLED, AND REFUSAL TO ANSWER FURNISHES NO BASIS FOR AN ARREST.” JUSTICE WHITE, H IIBEL
Take note:
Authority AFFIDAVIT V. MOTION
Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all DENIED.
Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits.
Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!!
Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true, correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS is it???...lol
Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2d 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 states, “Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.”
Never forget:
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237,243. (1895) We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.
S. Carolina v. U.S., 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905). The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.
“The supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S. Ct. 241, 28 L. Ed. 825, holds that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”
AND -
‘The Necessary and Proper Clause cannot be utilized to “pass laws for the accomplishment of objects” that are not within Congress’ enumerated powers.’ Bondi v. Sebelius - 780 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (N.D. Fla. 2011).
In all-fathers House of Honor we have "High Standards" to uphold. DEATH TO TYRANTS!!!
The tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of good people, only because those entrusted and paid, are now the criminals!!!!!!!!!!!!! Criminals that control all media to try you in public court, then in courts of law that are never open to cameras or a real Court of Record...lol. Why? Because without independent cameras and recordings, they'll throw away the key to your freedom away, while lying to the public so easily deceived....lol
"I do not ask Thee to take them out of the world, but to keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. Sanctify them in the truth; Thy word is truth. As Thou didst send Me into the world, I also have sent them into the world.” John 17:15
Chose in action wisely & Normal Law will reign both by Golden Rule & Castle Rule and in thy day of testing all things by divine providence and goodly spirit of wisdom, honor is thy crown of living, eternal forevermore.
Whatever you will it shall be "Living with Honor" or DEATH by DISHONOR!!! Be wise, safe and blessed...., while your coin of time remains to rightly chose in action, service in honor for honor above all else, eternally forevermore. Arthur