127 Comments
User's avatar
Vinu Arumugham #MAHA's avatar

"who is funding this"

The same criminals who funded the original, NIH/NIAID/Fauci of course.

"This work was

437 supported by Boston University startup funds (to MS and FD), National Institutes of Health, NIAID

438 grants R01 AI159945 (to SB and MS) and R37 AI087846 (to MUG), NIH SIG grants S10-

439 OD026983 and SS10-OD030269 (to NAC), Peter Paul Career Development Award (to FD), and

440 BMBF SenseCoV2 01KI20172A (AE) and DFG Fokus COVID-19, EN 423/7-1 (AE)."

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 16, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Vinu Arumugham #MAHA's avatar

There are hundreds of biolabs in the US creating new viruses. I suspect the only difference is the military will do it secretly. The civilian Nazis publish their work.

https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/biolabs/

Expand full comment
Джил's avatar

Thank you. My list was two years old......

Expand full comment
mothman777's avatar

Jews, not 'Nazis', are entirely behind the creation of the COVID bioweapon, and they celebrate that among themselves, as has been revealed in video recordings of their events.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

I hope your mom is as ashamed of you as she should be

Expand full comment
mothman777's avatar

U Rotter

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 16, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

Different list than Vinu's ~ BLS-4 facilities in the U.S. as of 2007:

https://www.liquisearch.com/biosafety_level/list_of_bsl-4_facilities

FTA: "According to the United State Government Accountability Office (GAO) report published on October 4, 2007, a total of 1356 CDC/USDA registered BSL-3 facilities were identified throughout the United States (GAO-08-108T ). This represents a very conservative estimate of the number of facilities in the US in 2007. Approximately 36% of these laboratories are located in academia. Only 15 BSL-4 facilities were identified at the time, including 9 at federal labs."

Expand full comment
Don's avatar

This study was conducted in a BSL-3 lab; Wuhan is BSL-4. (YIKES!)

Expand full comment
Eric Hoffman's avatar

80% kill rate would be just about right for their great reset depopulation plans. Stop with the "conspiracy theory" deflection. These people are real and they really want us "useless eaters" dead... and no later than 2030.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

80 percent is what the study says, no point in blaming USA today.

Expand full comment
Alan R's avatar

Dr. A you are absolutely 100% correct that "they" have no intention of this ending, ever. Frankly, I am baffled, to put it mildly, that so many still do not realize the depopulation agenda that is in full force and accelerating as we speak, going into Winter 2022/2023 and beyond. If 80% lethality is even remotely true the term "dark Winter" doesn't come close to describing what may be coming :o

Expand full comment
Phyllis B's avatar

I'm shocked at the amount of obedience without research, etc. Husband went fishing with his younger brother and some other guys. I heard they were talking about about their wives being opinionated. Apparently my brother-in-law thinks I have "extreme views." :O To my knowledge I think I only defended natural immunity to him about a year ago (big no-no with this crowd (the in-laws))

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

"When the government lies, the truth becomes a traitor." Governor Jesse Ventura.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Smart husbands hear their wives out. I believe husband is head of family... But women have much wisdom. Feminism as is known is from commies.

My wife over and over is right, much if time.

Expand full comment
Linda E.'s avatar

I think they have a natural intuition or instinct about things.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Old Testament women heroes.

A man stares into fridge for 5 min, lost in thought! At least I di. Daughter came home a little worried I'd be mad at her purple hair...

She finally told me after purple hair was gone! I was starting at her, didn't notice

If I'm lying I'm dying

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Extreme views can be right... In this age, doubly so

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

The duty elucidated in the Declaration of Independence is what really needs to happen.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Not yet, but it may be getting close....

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

The vast majority of Americans don't remember what the duty is.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

They'll end when 500 million left

Expand full comment
Johnny truthseeker's avatar

I have a perfect solution.

We give these scientists all the germs they want, we build them a dream lab, with everything they could ever ask for. Unlimited funding.

Then in the night we round them up, because “SURPRISE COCKBAGS!!!” The lab is actually built on one of Elon Musks spaceships.

Then we blast them towards Mars, where they can work on whatever they want, to their hearts content.

We make a holiday in their names, for their selfless sacrifice.

And if they survive the mars landing, Elon Musk gets to claim that he put men on mars.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

It would be more useful to have the long overdue American Nuremberg trails and execute them this time instead of emigrating them to another country as was done under Operation Paperclip.

Expand full comment
Dow Hurst's avatar

Research like this comes from bright people seeking funding. It is the set goals from government agencies, and the volunteer reviewers of research grants, that define what is fundable. The scientists that review grants have a mindset, an opinion, about what makes a good grant worth funding. But, once you get the money, you are able to work on more than just what the grant is about. Imagine you have two or three grants that will last 5 years each and overlap over 8 years due to when you got the awards. That frees you to explore not only the original grant’s specific aims, but other side projects that could yield new ideas resulting in new grants. Anytime a funding agency puts out a request for new grants based on a topic, there are lots of researchers that apply. Research is a business where you are constantly looking for overlap in what you are interested in researching and a source of funding. You have to produce results in “quality” journals related to your grant’s stated Specific Aims or reviewers will consider you aren’t worth funding. But side projects and cross collaboration with other researchers leads to new grants, new ideas, and grows funding. It’s a good system until ethics, morals, and open minds become skewed, bad, and closed, respectively. This is obviously an exciting idea that should never have been explored except over coffee and/or tea. Whoever said, “Go ahead, let’s do it!”, is walking a dark road to hell, ethically.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Well explained, thank you. I’m not completely on board with the whole WEF owns the world theory.

My encounters with government ( in all its forms) lead me to believe you are correct.

The Fauci fiefdom theory seems much more plausible to me...... and NIAID appears to have partially funded this monstrosity also.....

Expand full comment
Conspiracy Sarah's avatar

I try to refrain from excessive cursing, so apologies in advance, but...

What in the actual fuck??? There are so many different ways that this is completely, blatantly, IN YOUR FACE WRONG. Makes me just think we are completely fucked. I keep going back to a terrible 3am infomercial....you literally cannot imagine it getting worse...BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!

It's the part where a large percentage of the population will just blankly nod and talk about something else...like this isn't happening. Or isn't concerning. wtf.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Do you think God likes Harrari?

Expand full comment
Linda E.'s avatar

NO! HARRARI WILL SOON BE TOAST.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

So my point: Jews were God's people in Old Testament. When they committed evil and more evil, God allowed pagan nations to punish them... But, He relented, and punishing nations destroyed.

Harrari is a tool that God will be glad to see destroyed. His statements are so outrageously anti God his day is marked. So too his freakish bastard outrageous subhuman friends

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

I think Harrari's god likes him. The real one doesn't.

Edited, because I STILL can't type. 🙄

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

Actually satan hates his servants. My guess. Satan isn't A warm and cuddly boss

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

I should have known that from watching "Supernatural." 😉

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

I'll give you a like, in gp's, no idea about Supernatural...

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

It was a show that ran for 15 years, about these 2 guys (+relatives and friends) "hunting" vampires, ghosts, many other different "monsters," the devil, and demons. They had an angel sidekick that helped fight and tried to keep them safe.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

What the hell is "the S gene of Omicron?"

Expand full comment
Dr. Paul Alexander's avatar

the spike glycoprotein

Expand full comment
Yal NA's avatar

Well hear Karon Kingston out. She says that the actual virus is the LPN and the spikes are labcreated 'warheads' stuck on the lpn in the lab and they have done in the past and called it a bioweapon and when you look at it under microscope it looks exactly as they depict the sars cove virus. Its an intelligent nanoparticle. And now they went back and updated the warhead part by implementing some of the omicron spike to make it more transmissible even but have it lethal as the original Wuhan only that one didn't really spread well. But Now they got it. They release this there will be panic and jab uptake will be enormous and same thing again all over with only now with a real threat. I am very worried.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

Are glycoproteins now considered genes instead of them being a result of a gene expression? What is the difference between the spike on the alpha and the spike on the omicron? Are they not both unnatural things to find on coronaviruses?

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

Show us the physical virus and its provenance, transmissability and pathogenicity, not in silico polynucleotide computer generated sequences accompanied by an awful lot of hand waving in an intentional fear inducing polemic.

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

On virus debate... I'm too unlearned.

But hearing they made a computer printout, then made a vax!?? Over a weekend then roll out to THE WORLD. On this.. YES, THIS IS COMPLETELY MESSED UP!!!!!

Expand full comment
DrLatusDextro's avatar

It's only ever about the vax, hence the unfettered smash and grab for every breathing body to be jabbed ~ except those deemed of clear visible political risk ~ transgressing every sacred sensibility, every medical ethical imperative, every scientific ethical imperative, while at the same time receiving extraordinary remuneration for delivering the shot.

This is and continues to be the gravest premeditated assault on humanity.

Expand full comment
BubbaMac's avatar

Exactly do any of them even exist in actuality, or are they just meta viruses

Expand full comment
John Raymond's avatar

They.Want.Us.Dead.

Nuremberg. Nuremberg Nuremberg

Expand full comment
JerryB's avatar

I just made a thermonuclear device in my basement. It vaporized a couple of mice. Now I don't know how to disable it. I didn't mean to hurt anyone.

It's like a Larson "Far Side" convention of mad scientists. Used to make a funny cartoon. Now it's us or them.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

Fortunately you ran out of tritium quickly.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

This is why these medical terrorists can't release an 80% killing virus since they would be as much at risk as anyone. Maybe they might claim to have an antidote but they could never be sure it would work especially against such a violent pestilence.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

I'm more worried about "escape" versus "release". Work like this, on a virus with an 80% IFR, should only be done in a BLS-4 lab. Of course, I don't think work like this should be done at all. These people are crazy and have no moral/ethical boundaries...

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

IMO, anyone stupid enough to make this particular combo, would be evil enough to release it. --- These people think they are above God.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

You are right ~ I was giving them too much credit.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

I still think that maintaining a 25(OH)D level of 60ng/ml in one's blood is the best antidote ever.

Expand full comment
MarieS's avatar

unfortunately with priming of the immune system with the vaccine Vitamin D is like a pellet gun against King Kong

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

A malnourished immune system cannot be primed.

Expand full comment
Guy LeBlake's avatar

Hard to understand what you are saying...but 80% says plenty.

There was a WEF/UN promise of a decade of pandemic....2020- 2030.

It appears they will kerp their word.

The msm will certainly continue to cheerlead...and the msm zombies in front of their televisions will continue to agree.

Expand full comment
Linda E.'s avatar

You know how the cabal set fire to many food production facilities to try and starve the people and cut off their food supplies? Well maybe someone will burn down their bio weapon labs and burn up their gof germs... they have my blessings.

Expand full comment
KuhnKat's avatar

80% mortality for a population that has not had Covid. How about a population that has recovered from Covid??

Expand full comment
Head Scullery Maid's avatar

And just in time for Halloween!

Expand full comment
abstraktername's avatar

Lol they are not even trying to hide the gain of function xD This is insane.

Expand full comment
Unapologetically Me's avatar

Tamara Ungolini of Rebel News is in Berlin, covering the World Health Summit.

She managed to get close enough to the (virtue masked) director of the W.HO. for him to drape his arm around her shoulders...

However this disgusting Raton scurried away upon being asked a question about the "pandemic" era lockdowns:

https://rumble.com/v1o9i55-asking-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-who-director-a-question-about-lockdowns.html

Expand full comment
The Train!'s avatar

Did anyone catch what they claimed to be the reason for this research? I think they were trying to establish whether the mutations to the S protein were the sole reason for Omicron's reduced lethality.

My questions are: 1. Was this the best way to answer this question? 2. What is the value of answering this question?

I'm not saying the question has no value--I'm just wondering what could be done with an answer to the question.

Hopefully some smart person sees a way to use the results of this study for something good, because with my limited knowledge all I can see is irresponsible researchers doing something because they could without thinking about whether they should.

Expand full comment
Vonu's avatar

The natural tendency in viruses is toward greater transmissibility with reduced virulence, as has been observed among the Covid viruses.

Expand full comment
Eric Hoffman's avatar

It occurred to me that this research could be used to deflect blame (for pathogenicity) away from the spike protein, and by proxy away from the vaccine spike as well. I know this is not a logical conclusion, but the popular 'scientism' press could easily spin it that way, and the sheep would gladly lap it up. I suspect that either (1) the neurotoxicity and the 80% mortality is an (possibly intentional) artifact of the mouse model, or (2) they just made it up out of thin air, AKA research fraud, with the goal of making the toxic spike vaccine seem safer and more appealing (and of course the added fear factor, i.e. impress on the public that Omicron variants could become deadly...).

Expand full comment
The Train!'s avatar

I'm glad you said that about the 80% mortality. The ancestral strain was nowhere near that lethal and I was curious how they could have made it so deadly.

Expand full comment