This was a different kind of sickness than influenza, with the initial low fever and unproductive cough. Very different in onset and course. If as stated, in May 2020 many people had crossreactivity: First, May 2020 was long into the circulation of that sickness and I can well imagine that many had encountered it by then. Second, didn't Canada have a lot of SARS classic before (not sure), so the crossreactivity could have come from that? It can still have been a different and in some ways (furin cl. site, other inserts) 'novel' coronavirus? But I think both SARS classic and the new one, both of them leaked from labs (SARS classic more than once), and presumably both were GoF engineered, right?
This explains why about 80% of the US population could not be infected. Early on, there was evidence showing that 70% of the surface proteins of SARS-CoV2 were identical to that of the common cold coronavirus. That info was quickly removed from sight. Some people get the cold and/or flu every year. (They probably get the flu vaccine each year.) For those that get ill annually, the virus probably hit them much harder due to compromised immune systems.
Then there was the naval ship that had an outbreak early on in the hype, yet most of the shipmen never got ill. It would have been a perfect study, since no social distancing due to space confines, yet only a very small percentage of the seamen became ill. So, they hushed all of that up too, because it did not feed the fear they needed to shove their experimental gene therapy jabs on the masses.
We were blatantly lied to about everything related to CoVid by the medical establishment. The lies were not only illogical and dangerous but frankly ridiculous. Why should we accept Virology as being valid and not another deception that generates untold wealth and profits for both researchers and Big Pharm?
Your assertion should be accompanied with an explanation for proven reactivities, demonstrable contagion, unique symptomology and classic phases during illness.
There is no 'demonstrable contagion'. No one proved COVID is contagious, especially the so-called asymptomatic transmission (a study on 3 million people in China proved that's false). As for symptomatic transmission that is bogus as well, as you don't know why some people got sick. How did people on cruise ships sailing for weeks suddenly got sick with COVID? Where did COVID come from.. from the dolphins?
And symptomatic transmission alone, cannot explain the large number of COVID 'cases'. If COVID doesn't spread asymptomatically, how else could it be transmitted? Unless it's cause is completely different than a 'virus' (such as poisoning or EMF radiation) - this would explain the disease better than a 'virus' would.
There is no 'unique symotomology', people dying from all causes (including motorcycle accidents and falling down the stairs) have been added to COVID deaths.
Classic phases during illness - what does that even mean? Of course if people get sick of something, they will have different phases of diseases, regardless of the cause. Even if you get sick because of EMF radiation, you get similar symptoms as 'COVID'.
Here's a more detailed article for you, if you care for the truth.
Otherwise, you can live in fear of deadly 'viruses' for the rest of your life, it's up to you.
Your link to viral delusion has a lot of good observations that largely cherry picked to support a contention that Covid-19 illness doesn’t begin with SarsCov2 infection…yet without any attempt at explanation for the disease.
Throwing all that information against the wall inadequately negates the massive amount of anecdotal evidence that concludes (often by logical inference) that a new pathogen has beset the world. Of course continued vaccinations are perpetuating whatever we’re facing so there’s no argument that this all hasn’t been intentional. Nor does it refute claims that the illness arrives through a series of cofactors, perhaps including graphene and EMRs such as 5G. So I recommend that you redirect your hostility toward solving the puzzle rather than attempting to describe what it isn’t. Peace
Contagion and symptoms are correlations they do not imply causation. There is no scientific paper showing any isolation and purification of pathogenic “viruses” using any controls to validate the results. It’s not up to skeptics to prove viruses don’t exist it’s up to Virologists to prove they do.
Medicine often uses massive data to presume correlation and probable causation. True, skeptics aren’t responsible for determining the cause but a skeptic with critical thinking can offer alternative explanations.
Not living in fear…never got the vaxx… relying on good health, ivermectin and my Healer.
Contagion is massively supported anecdotally while symptoms differ from typical flu strains as radical onset to lungs and multi-organ failure. Ivermectin (as an antiviral against 22 viruses) is highly efficacious against Covid-19 so there are many ways to demonstrate that viral replication has occurred.
That antibodies from previous coronavirus infections cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 to various degrees. Doesn't mean these antibodies offer any protection.
This was a different kind of sickness than influenza, with the initial low fever and unproductive cough. Very different in onset and course. If as stated, in May 2020 many people had crossreactivity: First, May 2020 was long into the circulation of that sickness and I can well imagine that many had encountered it by then. Second, didn't Canada have a lot of SARS classic before (not sure), so the crossreactivity could have come from that? It can still have been a different and in some ways (furin cl. site, other inserts) 'novel' coronavirus? But I think both SARS classic and the new one, both of them leaked from labs (SARS classic more than once), and presumably both were GoF engineered, right?
Support and share
https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com/trailer/
Get the Covidians in front of this and we win
This explains why about 80% of the US population could not be infected. Early on, there was evidence showing that 70% of the surface proteins of SARS-CoV2 were identical to that of the common cold coronavirus. That info was quickly removed from sight. Some people get the cold and/or flu every year. (They probably get the flu vaccine each year.) For those that get ill annually, the virus probably hit them much harder due to compromised immune systems.
Then there was the naval ship that had an outbreak early on in the hype, yet most of the shipmen never got ill. It would have been a perfect study, since no social distancing due to space confines, yet only a very small percentage of the seamen became ill. So, they hushed all of that up too, because it did not feed the fear they needed to shove their experimental gene therapy jabs on the masses.
There is no virus
We were blatantly lied to about everything related to CoVid by the medical establishment. The lies were not only illogical and dangerous but frankly ridiculous. Why should we accept Virology as being valid and not another deception that generates untold wealth and profits for both researchers and Big Pharm?
Here's some sources for 5g connection to COVID
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34778597/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31991167/
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/covid19-symptoms-identical-to-electro?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ewsVigdyQA7X/
https://www.globalresearch.ca/expert-report-fifth-generation-5g-directed-energy-radiation-emissions-context-nanometal-contaminated-vaccines-include-covid-19-graphite-ferrous-oxide-antennas/5786727
Your assertion should be accompanied with an explanation for proven reactivities, demonstrable contagion, unique symptomology and classic phases during illness.
There is no 'demonstrable contagion'. No one proved COVID is contagious, especially the so-called asymptomatic transmission (a study on 3 million people in China proved that's false). As for symptomatic transmission that is bogus as well, as you don't know why some people got sick. How did people on cruise ships sailing for weeks suddenly got sick with COVID? Where did COVID come from.. from the dolphins?
And symptomatic transmission alone, cannot explain the large number of COVID 'cases'. If COVID doesn't spread asymptomatically, how else could it be transmitted? Unless it's cause is completely different than a 'virus' (such as poisoning or EMF radiation) - this would explain the disease better than a 'virus' would.
There is no 'unique symotomology', people dying from all causes (including motorcycle accidents and falling down the stairs) have been added to COVID deaths.
Classic phases during illness - what does that even mean? Of course if people get sick of something, they will have different phases of diseases, regardless of the cause. Even if you get sick because of EMF radiation, you get similar symptoms as 'COVID'.
Here's a more detailed article for you, if you care for the truth.
Otherwise, you can live in fear of deadly 'viruses' for the rest of your life, it's up to you.
https://theviraldelusion.substack.com/p/its-time-to-end-the-tragically-misguided
And a paper that suggests that coronaviruses might not be 'viruses' at all
https://www.academia.edu/12968949/INFLUENZA_AND_THE_TUBERCULOSIS_CONNECTION_Part_1?email_work_card=abstract-read-more
Bingo.
Here's that study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.05.20206664v7
Could not previous coronavirus infections explain this, and the degree to which some immmunity is heritable?
Yep, that's what the study concludes.
It was out of the Wuhan lab since October or November of 2019, but may also have been released from labs in the Ukraine and other places.
Your link to viral delusion has a lot of good observations that largely cherry picked to support a contention that Covid-19 illness doesn’t begin with SarsCov2 infection…yet without any attempt at explanation for the disease.
Throwing all that information against the wall inadequately negates the massive amount of anecdotal evidence that concludes (often by logical inference) that a new pathogen has beset the world. Of course continued vaccinations are perpetuating whatever we’re facing so there’s no argument that this all hasn’t been intentional. Nor does it refute claims that the illness arrives through a series of cofactors, perhaps including graphene and EMRs such as 5G. So I recommend that you redirect your hostility toward solving the puzzle rather than attempting to describe what it isn’t. Peace
Contagion and symptoms are correlations they do not imply causation. There is no scientific paper showing any isolation and purification of pathogenic “viruses” using any controls to validate the results. It’s not up to skeptics to prove viruses don’t exist it’s up to Virologists to prove they do.
Medicine often uses massive data to presume correlation and probable causation. True, skeptics aren’t responsible for determining the cause but a skeptic with critical thinking can offer alternative explanations.
Not living in fear…never got the vaxx… relying on good health, ivermectin and my Healer.
Contagion is massively supported anecdotally while symptoms differ from typical flu strains as radical onset to lungs and multi-organ failure. Ivermectin (as an antiviral against 22 viruses) is highly efficacious against Covid-19 so there are many ways to demonstrate that viral replication has occurred.
What of this?
A NEW STUDY SHOWING LUNGS AGE ~15 YEARS POST-COVID. SPED EXPLAINS THE FINDING.
https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/a-new-study-showing-lungs-age-15?utm_medium=reader2
What can be inferred from this?
That antibodies from previous coronavirus infections cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 to various degrees. Doesn't mean these antibodies offer any protection.