Making the case that COVID-19 virus was NEVER ever 'novel' or new, it was circulating for many years & we had some level of cross-reactive immunity; Majdoubi & Lavoie & Pelech key Vancouver May 2020
Making the case that COVID-19 virus was NEVER ever 'novel' or new, it was circulating for many years & we had some level of cross-reactive immunity; Majdoubi & Lavoie & Pelech key Vancouver May 2020
This was a different kind of sickness than influenza, with the initial low fever and unproductive cough. Very different in onset and course. If as stated, in May 2020 many people had crossreactivity: First, May 2020 was long into the circulation of that sickness and I can well imagine that many had encountered it by then. Second, didn't Canada have a lot of SARS classic before (not sure), so the crossreactivity could have come from that? It can still have been a different and in some ways (furin cl. site, other inserts) 'novel' coronavirus? But I think both SARS classic and the new one, both of them leaked from labs (SARS classic more than once), and presumably both were GoF engineered, right?
This explains why about 80% of the US population could not be infected. Early on, there was evidence showing that 70% of the surface proteins of SARS-CoV2 were identical to that of the common cold coronavirus. That info was quickly removed from sight. Some people get the cold and/or flu every year. (They probably get the flu vaccine each year.) For those that get ill annually, the virus probably hit them much harder due to compromised immune systems.
Then there was the naval ship that had an outbreak early on in the hype, yet most of the shipmen never got ill. It would have been a perfect study, since no social distancing due to space confines, yet only a very small percentage of the seamen became ill. So, they hushed all of that up too, because it did not feed the fear they needed to shove their experimental gene therapy jabs on the masses.
Your link to viral delusion has a lot of good observations that largely cherry picked to support a contention that Covid-19 illness doesn’t begin with SarsCov2 infection…yet without any attempt at explanation for the disease.
Throwing all that information against the wall inadequately negates the massive amount of anecdotal evidence that concludes (often by logical inference) that a new pathogen has beset the world. Of course continued vaccinations are perpetuating whatever we’re facing so there’s no argument that this all hasn’t been intentional. Nor does it refute claims that the illness arrives through a series of cofactors, perhaps including graphene and EMRs such as 5G. So I recommend that you redirect your hostility toward solving the puzzle rather than attempting to describe what it isn’t. Peace
Not living in fear…never got the vaxx… relying on good health, ivermectin and my Healer.
Contagion is massively supported anecdotally while symptoms differ from typical flu strains as radical onset to lungs and multi-organ failure. Ivermectin (as an antiviral against 22 viruses) is highly efficacious against Covid-19 so there are many ways to demonstrate that viral replication has occurred.
This was a different kind of sickness than influenza, with the initial low fever and unproductive cough. Very different in onset and course. If as stated, in May 2020 many people had crossreactivity: First, May 2020 was long into the circulation of that sickness and I can well imagine that many had encountered it by then. Second, didn't Canada have a lot of SARS classic before (not sure), so the crossreactivity could have come from that? It can still have been a different and in some ways (furin cl. site, other inserts) 'novel' coronavirus? But I think both SARS classic and the new one, both of them leaked from labs (SARS classic more than once), and presumably both were GoF engineered, right?
Support and share
https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com/trailer/
Get the Covidians in front of this and we win
This explains why about 80% of the US population could not be infected. Early on, there was evidence showing that 70% of the surface proteins of SARS-CoV2 were identical to that of the common cold coronavirus. That info was quickly removed from sight. Some people get the cold and/or flu every year. (They probably get the flu vaccine each year.) For those that get ill annually, the virus probably hit them much harder due to compromised immune systems.
Then there was the naval ship that had an outbreak early on in the hype, yet most of the shipmen never got ill. It would have been a perfect study, since no social distancing due to space confines, yet only a very small percentage of the seamen became ill. So, they hushed all of that up too, because it did not feed the fear they needed to shove their experimental gene therapy jabs on the masses.
There is no virus
Bingo.
Here's that study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.05.20206664v7
Could not previous coronavirus infections explain this, and the degree to which some immmunity is heritable?
It was out of the Wuhan lab since October or November of 2019, but may also have been released from labs in the Ukraine and other places.
Your link to viral delusion has a lot of good observations that largely cherry picked to support a contention that Covid-19 illness doesn’t begin with SarsCov2 infection…yet without any attempt at explanation for the disease.
Throwing all that information against the wall inadequately negates the massive amount of anecdotal evidence that concludes (often by logical inference) that a new pathogen has beset the world. Of course continued vaccinations are perpetuating whatever we’re facing so there’s no argument that this all hasn’t been intentional. Nor does it refute claims that the illness arrives through a series of cofactors, perhaps including graphene and EMRs such as 5G. So I recommend that you redirect your hostility toward solving the puzzle rather than attempting to describe what it isn’t. Peace
Not living in fear…never got the vaxx… relying on good health, ivermectin and my Healer.
Contagion is massively supported anecdotally while symptoms differ from typical flu strains as radical onset to lungs and multi-organ failure. Ivermectin (as an antiviral against 22 viruses) is highly efficacious against Covid-19 so there are many ways to demonstrate that viral replication has occurred.
What of this?
A NEW STUDY SHOWING LUNGS AGE ~15 YEARS POST-COVID. SPED EXPLAINS THE FINDING.
https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/a-new-study-showing-lungs-age-15?utm_medium=reader2
What can be inferred from this?