407 Comments

Dr. Alexander, I admire you and your outspokenness. However, for Heaven’s sake, your obsession with Malone is not useful in this fight. Malone had the vax and his second dose hurt him. He is on the right side. The last thing we need is infighting.

Fight the GOOD fight. Leave ad hominem attacks alone unless you’re going after real villains like Fauci et al.

Expand full comment
author

Lucy, you are wrong, this is not ad hominem, I am asking serious questions. First, did you know he caused threats on my life and my families on Twitter? Did you know he even attacked Dr. McCullough's wife? Did you know how many people he is suing for asking questions? Do you know what you are talking about? Di you believe he took the shots because he told you?> I dont as is my right. I believe nothing these people say, nothing. You 'want' to believe because you still cannot believe the govn did the things it did to you and us all. Do not respond to my questions in my substack by attacking me. Do not please. I make this open. Write your own or do not follow this substack. Do you know he sued the Breggins for 25 million? why? because they defended McCullough etc. Because they do not ascribe to his thoughts? why? do you know how he has attacked Dr. McCullough? why not defend McCullough? do you know what you are even talking about? Please understand and know the backstory before you write that as you did above. I am being respectful of you so be respectful of me. Do not read my substack if that is better for you. Go read what he did and does people on Twitter. Go read. and it is and was me inside the govn fighting Fauci et al. while most stared at their navels. again, read the history, it is out there.

Expand full comment

I would like actual evidence that he attacked McCullough, whom I revere, along with you. I am a paid contributor to your substack,btw. I just think it is lamentable that people who are on the same side are tearing each other up. We need unity on this.

Expand full comment

If I am reading Dr. Paul right, maybe we need to confirm someway that Dr. Malone is on the same side. There are things that 'bother' me about Dr. Malone. I can't put my finger on it outright but my intuition speaks, and when it does - I listen. If he is on our side (which I know it looks like he is), then I agree we must come together from the same side. I just don't want to see Dr. Paul get sued as Dr. Malone is doing to others.

Expand full comment

Your intuition unfortunately is wrong this time. Listen to some of the interviews or Twitter Spaces George Webb has done over the past week revealing who and what Malone is. Verifiable with receipts. Let Malone try to shut that one down. I wonder if his "partners page" is still up on his website? He AND his wife Jill, are both neck deep in this Covid plandemic. And if by some chance they are not, they are definitely all for profiteering on it with their business and military associations.

Expand full comment

Attempted to find George Webb’s materials to no avail. Could you provide a link(s) please?

Thanks

Expand full comment

More corporate "directed evolution" connections to Bob Malone including his contract with Hanson AFB.

https://twitter.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1630993565399613441?s=20

Expand full comment
Mar 6, 2023·edited Mar 6, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFv0n5jEqPY Go to the 5:15 mark where Desmit brings up Malone's "addition" to his term. Check out George Webb's Twitter account and the research he's done into Malone (March 1st - 3rd) including his twitter spaces on March 2nd https://twitter.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/1631288624225419264?s=20 . There's more... a Rumble interview with Dr. Jane Ruby around the same period. Also on Webb's Twitter is a video that shows Malone's website and his business dealings. Etc. Odysee has some videos about Malone as well. The fact that he still recommends the mRNA shot for "some groups" or says that there is no "conspiracy" speaks volumes. There's a lot to digest for those looking and willing to admit they may have been wrong. Considering the endeavors he hopes to spearhead in our future, he may well be worse than Fauci.

Expand full comment

George Webb is on Twitter and Substack , you odviously didn’t try very hard and expect someone else to do the due diligence for you!??

He is easily available to find his work

Expand full comment

Dr Malone has tried to explain so much about this pandemic for so long and people just don't read blogs or watch the interviews but other snippets from that wormtongue that has caused way more damage to the anti-covid vax movement with so much misinformation. I have known people who were vax injured looking into alternative media but got repelled by the obvious nonsense conspiracies and they turn away from looking further. They continued to suffer and some got boostered and injured more until some other injured who were enlightened managed, in their own poor health barely recovering, to reach out and spend more time explaining to those earlier repelled by wormtongue slime.

Dr Alexander can choose to disbelieve and doubt but Dr Malone spent his time on repurposed drugs. If he knew about the vax development and details for covid vax. Knowing mRNA technology doesn't mean he knows the full ingredients used in covid vax... maybe only 'just a chemist' would understand the significance in the difference in details. Just like the same silhouette doesn't mean the same objects.

I don't see why Malone shouldn't sue and force an arbitration on the false accusations that he knows is false. Based on the success rate of overturning mandates, the justice system still seems to be fair.

You will never get all the doctors to agree 100% on everything and that is perfectly fine because I don't agree with all the doctors on 100% of the things they say as well and there's no need to attack. Why get embroiled on whether you hear someone says something at the time you expect them to or not?

Beware, beware when someone tells you someone says something. Verify.

Work together, step up in whatever imperfections but dwell not on the imperfections. Don't work on the belief system. Work together objectively.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yes, that caused me to stop and raise my eyebrows big time. Could they not have worked things out? It just niggles at me; that and other things about Dr. Malone. I actually tried posting a comment on his substack about that issue and of course, because I am not a paid subscriber, I couldn't. I wanted to put it point blank to him.

Expand full comment

☝️

Expand full comment

Breggins lawsuit was based on him accusing Malone of being controlled opposition (not because Breggins defended McCullough) which stems from certain PhD in Medical marketing who goes around wearing white coat... the latter who accused Malone and many others of not endorsing the narrative of 'graphene' in vax.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

It's called having a difference of opinion. So what do you suggest - who is going to move to the side they don't believe in - Dr Alexander or Dr Malone? Because that's what it means to pretend they are united on issues. This idea about infighting is fallacious because we are all different and we cannot all agree, in fact no two people can agree on everything. But what you're asking for is for one to back down - just so they can pretend to say they are not infighting. Call it something else other than "infighting" that's a term like "conspiracy theorist" - meant to close down debate, meant to pummel a different opinion. Don't you want to know about the ones who bully others?

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

Well seeing as Malone is a staunch advocate of deploying lawfare against those MANY Dr's who debate his viewpoints, I'd say the winner is the one who has the most backing to deploy the biggest army of lawyers. Seems Malone has some big boys in his corner (as he puts it) to "square the circle". A brief overview of his business partnership page would give anyone pause as to why he is going into business with companies developing particle delivery systems. The guy even breeds horses for the Knights of Malta! LOL He has a list of circumstantial evidence, proving he's a con man, a mile long. His detractors are singling him out for a reason, and it's not for monetary gain (unlike Malone).

Expand full comment

Determining the whole truth should be the only metric being sought after. Everything that does not lead to a full and complete disclosure is unhelpful. No one is above suspicion except God.

Expand full comment

Yes that's it - seeking the truth is the ultimate goal of all. I don't think god is truth I think that's another humdinger lie and I'd be happy to debate it.

Expand full comment

Here ya go: http://alturl.com/ipt83

Expand full comment

Thanks Ian.

Do you know who wrote the email Balone refers to in the post above that got his delicate sensitivities so disturbed?

Expand full comment

Are you referring to TEXT MESSAGE (no mention of email) "from a supporter, who (with the best of intent) is offering to mediate a resolution to a bunch of lies" . Just as Breggins is sensitized to the use of the term 'mass formation psychosis', perhaps accuracy to terms would facilitate communication if you intent for communication instead of just an opportunity to join the unproductive cacophony with "Balone and delicate sensitivities"?

Expand full comment

Your name is not Ian.

But never mind.

I was curious as to who the supporter is that wrote the missive "offering to mediate a resolution".

Do you know who it might be Xht?

I found it a very good and thoughtful offer.

Expand full comment

Scientific understanding comes about when there is open scientific debate. I hope that people on this stack can see that we all need to welcome an opportunity for Dr. Malone to explain what his knowledge was of the risks and benefits of mRNA technology in February, 2020 when Moderna filed for their IND (Investigational New Drug)--to open human clinical trials prior to the WHO declaring a pandemic. There was an article Malone wrote on Researchgate in the first quarter of 2020, several weeks ago. This paper is important in answering some of the questions raised here by Dr. Alexander. I cannot locate it there now. I will continue to look for it. The development of these products was all done under the umbrella of being 'prepared' for either bioweapons or zoonotic pathogens. But as Dr. Alexander says--that is all garbage. This dangerous experimentation ought not to have been carried out.

Expand full comment

In looking for the 2020 Malone paper on ADE/corona vaccines, I stumbled across this. I am unable to underline or highlight anything on substack. If I could I would underling this sentence from the long excerpt below--

"First reported to be restricted to muscle, subsequent studies demonstrated that a wide range of tissues are transfected by direct polynucleotide injection."

Perhaps, I am mis-reading this, but it seems as if Malone knew 22 years ago, that injection with polynucleotides would end up transfecting a wide range of body tissues. Someone with more molecular biochem than me--please feel free to correct me, if I am misunderstanding this paper.

Of additional interest to readers here, might be a later section in the paper titled:

"Use of Pulsed Electrical Fields to Enhance Direct in Vivo

Transfection and Nucleic Acid Vaccination" in which Malone and Glasspool-Malone described that electric pulses enhance by 1000 fold the transfection of tissues by nucleic acids, this process is referred to as 'electroporation'.

Here is the citation for the paper. (sci-hub.se is helpful for many researchers)

Glasspool-Malone, J., & Malone, R. W. (2002). [4] Enhancing direct in vivo transfection with nuclease inhibitors and pulsed electrical fields. Gene Therapy Methods, 72–91. doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(02)46049-1

"It is our belief that the lack of effective, reproducible, and safe gene

therapies are the consequence of a lack of polynucleotide delivery technologies

that are effective, reproducible, and of no or low toxicity in humans. Therefore,

for the past decade our work has focused on the in vivo development, testing,

and improvement of gene delivery systems rather than the development of "gene

therapies. Both viral and nonviral delivery systems may be safe at low doses, but are often toxic at the higher doses required to achieve therapeutic levels of transgene expression. In general, recombinant viral vector-based treatments have been associated with complications that reflect evolved viral biology and/or host/parasite interactions. Nonviral delivery systems are often compromised by inefficiency, in vivo clearance, and formulation/manufacture complexities."...

Surprisingly, higher levels of transgene expression were observed with the "naked" polynucleotide injection than with lipoplexes incorporating the same polynucleotides (unpublished data, R. Malone, J. Wolff, and P. Feigner, 1989). This observation, compared by some to "cold fusion" at the time of initial publication, has turned out to be robust and reproducible.

First reported to be restricted to muscle, subsequent studies demonstrated that a

wide range of tissues are transfected by direct polynucleotide injection. 2-8 Since

that time, many different viral vector systems have been developed, and a new

subdiscipline known as nonviral gene therapy has emerged. However, no other

method yet approaches the simplicity and safety of direct polynucleotide (naked

DNA) injection. Unfortunately, direct delivery systems are typically inefficient,

and hence clinical development has been largely restricted to use for vaccination

(e.g., DNA vaccines). Factors that reduce the efficiency of direct in vivo transfection include nuclease-mediated clearance of the polynucleotide (both extra- and intracellularly), and the transport of high molecular weight charged polynucleotides across cytoplasmic membranes. By addressing both of these issues using methods described herein, levels of transgene expression and transfection efficiency may be markedly enhanced.

1 j. A. Wolff, R. W. Malone, E Williams, W. Chong, G. Acsadi, A. Jani, and E L. Feigner, Science

247, 1465 (1990).

I am assuming that Dr. Alexander has sifted through this research, and believes that anyone steeped in the development of gene therapy delivery mechanisms, whose career has been situated within the biodefense industry would be a wealth of information about how we might interrupt unwanted transfection from mRNA.

There is reference to EDTA and citrate as inhibitors of transfection. I would be very interested to know more about such possibilities from someone so well versed in this research. As I stated a few days ago, I would be very happy to pay for a tix to an event in which I could listen in on a conversation between these two scientists. Certainly Dr. Malone has responded positively to this invite?

Expand full comment

Agree on the scientific debate. Perhaps Dr Alexander can unblock Malone on Twitter and read Malone's contribution to the scientific debate re this accusation? There are so much information it is understandable that Dr Alexander in his busy schedule, not caught up on all that Malone has done and in his stirred up emotions, in his usual rhetoric, hurled unnecessary, unjustified accusations. Hopefully, open debate continues, objectively. https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/regarding-covid-19-pseudo-mrna-vax

Expand full comment

Malone admits to being in bed with the Deep State... he takes pride in it

Expand full comment

This is so far beyond ridiculous.

Expand full comment

If you ignore the evidence of his own words, it would seem ridiculous. Ask Bob how to "square the circle" on that one or ask him why he breeds horses for the Knights of Malta. LOL Or why he has business associations with multiple companies developing particle distribution systems. Or ask him why his wife Jill Malone, lists these 4 people as among her top 7 influencers:

1. Bill Gates

2. Melinda Gates

3. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

4. Richard Branson, billionaire associate of Bill Gates

Expand full comment

He admits to working with the CIA. Ya it is a bit ridiculous

Expand full comment

Most doctors that administer vaccines or medications in the past 50 years are all likely part of the manipulations of 'Deep State'. Lucky the ones who have the title but not have to plunge the needle in arms. Everyone takes time to wake up. Many doctors still believe that vaccines work and are good or that you need to suppress all fevers with anti-pyretics.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

He is suing Dr Bregan and Dr Ruby for 25 million for speaking out against Dr Malones POV. That's one fact. Can't speak for the other facts, but it is unlikely that Dr Alexander would lie. He is in a fight for all our lives. Dear lord...isn't it obvious by now. Reverse transcriptase is and has always been known. So has antibody dependant enhancement. The animals studies of disease and death have been well documented along with the fraudulent Pfizer human trials..it's not hard to understand, nor is it hard to explain. EXCEPT for Malone. He doesn't seem to grasp it all....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Expand full comment

But he HAS grasped it all.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/regarding-covid-19-pseudo-mrna-vax?

Expand full comment
Mar 6, 2023·edited Mar 6, 2023

Well I was being cheaky. Actually I know he is smart. I did manage to read most of his substack.article and he certainly goes into detail about ADE AND his work with many companies in the past to clear the air. The question others have in this regard is his being late to the game in February 2021 in talking about ADE AND the fact that he has not dealt with the issue of reverse transcriptase in mrna modeling. Definitely the most crucial bit of info. Also, his and Dr. Ryan Coles inability to corroborate the info by La Quinta Columba and many others On the finding of structural nanotechnology materials effected by 5G IN THE VAX, along with giant non biological white fiberous clots found in the injected dead after death. He has no right to ask fellow scientists to be quite. Who.does he think he is?? He is not THE SCIENCE...There is more that he will be late to the game on. He also took Matias Desmets work and changed the criteria for Mass formation to Mass formation Psychosis, which Dr Andrew Breggin vehemently opposed. Opinion or fact who knows. And now he is suing Dr Breggan.

However, there are decenters of Malones position. The question is...why sue for a difference of opinion . That is supposed to be what science is sll about All will be revealed I am sure.

Expand full comment

if you had the time to watch the various podcasts from early 2020, then you would have heard Malone's contribution. Know what you see/ hear from the horses mouth and not 'know' based on the absence which is just what is not known to you. What you don't know doesn't mean it doesn't exist. He did not "take Mattias' work". Any person can take someone's information and give his own interpretation. Please, do your homework, read Malone's substack response before making the claims you make above.

Expand full comment

https://twitter.com/realgeorgewebb1/status/1632760198816227329?s=46&t=0aBJtSHgRHZJiWFY09QbZQ

Click the link and you find all that you need to get going . Malone is controlled opposition and can NOT be trusted

Expand full comment

I have been banned for asking why - if there is no malicious intent - did they give Midazolam to people dying from respiratory diseases...

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/yet-another-leak-reveals-that-covid

I was trying to follow up on that with this:

Hmmm... so Matt Hancock... is using Whatsapp to discuss what is a highly classified operation ... hatched at the DOD.... and reveal stuff that could lead to him being hung at Nuremberg 2.0.

And SS is alight with celebrations of this 'leak'

Yep the SSers are telling us the end is nigh ... these nasty villains are going to the gallows -- and nobody questions what is going on.

What is going on is the end game is approaching ... nobody is going to hang... but because the anti vaxxers believe they are on the verge of a massive win ... they do not pick up pitch forks and rampage...

Nope... they high five and get the Champagne ready.

Don't get me wrong... I don't want anyone to pitch fork the folks who are exterminating us...

If they fail the Gates of Hell will open... nobody wants that .... we need the plan to complete -- without people trying to tip over the table https://www.headsupster.com/forumthread?shortId=220

Expand full comment

I wouldn't bother, Lucy. This man's reply to you above, whilst denying being ad hominem, is just another ad hominem piece per se. To quote a well-known troll on Twitter named Garland Nixon, " No matter how absurdly satirical you make your tweet, there is always that one brain dead schmuck that is going to ask you for a "source." Nor would I bother therefore about his true colors. I'll just unsubscribe, period.

Expand full comment

Amen- We do need unity. We are fighting the same villains that took away our freedoms/ lied about what was going on/ and have injured millions of people for ever.

Expand full comment

It looks like many in this discussion don't understan concept of unity. The only base for unity is honestly and truth. If tuth and only tuth is not our common ground than there is no unity. Unity has its price and that's truthfulness and honestly. Whoever wants unity must be prepared to pay it.

Expand full comment

I love this. Yes we can be united under one thing - truth! Thank you for that brilliant insight. We all have different truths but if we speak our own truth, the real truth will come out. So lies are the antithesis to truth and to unity. Fabulous thought!

Expand full comment

I hear you but we needn't put our energy to fighting them as that only saps our energy and grows theirs. What we need to do is put our energy into building alternatives to their systems. As long as we use their systems, we're feeding them.

Expand full comment

So you think we can built a system that will be free from corruption without exposing it? That would be indeed something unique.

Expand full comment

This is a bit of a twister. You see most people believe we need "governance" and we really don't. We only have representative government because the system was built at a time when people couldn't speak for themselves - they were illiterate and they didn't have the internet. But things have changed since then and now we are both educated and have this marvelous tool to speak our minds to people all over the world. So why do things in the same old way? We simply need the software to find the exact number of people who are for a proposal. We vote on them and we also make the proposals. Those that obtain a vast majority of approvals, go right into implementation. This is the most democratic way possible, it gives everyone the opportunity to fulfill their dreams as long as they have broad appeal. But most people are so entrenched in supplicating overlords, that they will dismiss this availability and continue in the same mindset. We can make the internet totally transparent and then exposure will come naturally. We're just doing everything wrong and thinking in terms of that kind of thinking instead of the new thinking with the new paradigm that technology has brought.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately you are wrong. Obviously you have somehow forgotten the maxim "if you can't beat them join them".

Expand full comment

Except you don't use the phrase "square the circle" in a documentary or raise horses for the Knights of Malta, unless you're one of the "architects". The rest of the huge body of "circumstantial" evidence against Malone merely makes perfect sense that he (and his wife Jill) were in on this from its inception, including his corporate and military connections.

Expand full comment

The Knights of Malta are now basically a Catholic charity group. They are not the illumanati or the boogey man.

Expand full comment

They are an offshoot of the masons from a time when the Catholic church excommunicated anyone involved with Freemasonry. Do your research instead of consuming the propaganda put out by secret societies.

Expand full comment

Yes they are charity just like the society of Loyola.

Expand full comment

"I believe nothing these people say, nothing."

Yes!!!! I'm totally with you on that. I don't believe anything they say, including politicians who supposedly got the injections. I don't believe any of them.

Expand full comment

You're not alone -- they've had saline, if anything.

Expand full comment

Exactly!!!

Expand full comment

No, you are NOT providing just a question !!

You accuse Dr. Malone WITHOUT where/how/when factual evidence that he knew something horrible while staying quiet. WHERE is your evidence for that accusation -- about Dr. Malone who was anything but quiet.

I find you and your approach and accusation deeply offensive.

Expand full comment

I beg to differ, You don’t know Robert Malone , maybe only the past three years, what do you know about him from the 80’s thru 2019! This guy is controlled opposition and seems to be pretty damn good at it!

Defamation lawsuit against people who are fighting the same fight is not one on our side.

Seems as though he may be trying to silence some if not many? My opinion of course

Expand full comment

If you look at Dr Malone's response you'll see it makes perfect sense. If Antibody dependent Enhancement was a huge issue a lot more people would be dead by now, from put of control Covid. But they're dying from the vax. Please call a truce Dr Alexander ....with each other! We need our side to be united!

Expand full comment
Mar 6, 2023·edited Mar 6, 2023

Obviously you are a Bob Malone fan girl. And also, you obviously do not want to even consider all of his business associations and dealings with nanoparticle distribution and payload system companies as relevant to the discussion. Or his contract with Hanson AFB or any of the other mountains of evidence against him. That's fine. Even your defense of secret societies such as the Knights of Malta speaks to your naivety OR purposeful obfuscation of the facts. The "why can't we all get along" argument is disingenuous and misguided at best. You don't work with the enemy and expect positive results in defeating him. People are dying and it was NOT an accident.

Expand full comment

He worked for Pharma, so did many, many other academics, it doesn't make them all deep state actors. If he was, do you think he'd be talking about it in this paranoid time?

Expand full comment

This comment of yours, more than any, indicates a lot of where you current "thinking" is. Ask yourself, do you believe the govt's unemployment statistics? How about the rate of inflation? Do you think it's anywhere close to the claimed 5-7%? Now let's do Covid. Do you believe the govt's stance on masks being necessary, then useless, then useful (and mandatory) again? How about the Covid shot? Guaranteed to work, then not so "safe and effective" and now risky? And finally ask yourself, is this paranoia? Or is it simply that the source is incapable of truth? Are you paranoid? I'd say most of us are not. We're just tired of listening to sources that are categorically untrue! Bob Malone is not only dishonest, he's a dangerous conman who old ladies at home, craving a father figure, gravitate towards as a source of wisdom and truth. He's a duplicitous conman and opportunist, who has his hands in technological advancements that take our freedoms away. And he's debatably a member of a secret society which sees us as cattle needing to be guided through their dystopian ideal of what our future should look like. I'd say it's not so much our times are paranoid, but rather some people such as yourself are so entranced by the media narrative and it's 24/7 fear messaging, you're willing to line up in front of the first messenger of "hope" that knocks on your door. Very unwise. Sounds like you could use a little more of that "paranoia" and a little less naivety.

Expand full comment

United in what? Lies? Unity doesn't come by one side backing off. Why don't you ask Malone to unite? You're not asking him to. The idea of unity is backassward - it's something we do with like minded people who unite naturally over common ideas - we are all different, we are not all the same like robots. Sure we can have unity if that's all we're after but only if there is force or pressure to comply with opinions we don't agree with. Humans are different each and every one. Having differences of opinion is natural and healthy. But our society is too used to being treated like cattle, everyone in the same pen.

Expand full comment

Follow George Webb on Twitter or find some of his recent interviews on Rumble. There is hours of evidence questioning who and what Malone (and his wife) are. And do it before some of the evidence is removed. His business partnerships alone should stop most of his cult members to take pause and stop them dead in their tracks.

Expand full comment

Any specific link I should see for any of your assertions?

Expand full comment

No you do your own homework. You're just biased towards him, probably because you admire him, you've been sucked in by him. Just like people got sucked in to taking the jab. What evidence could we show for that? There wasn't any at the time, just uncommon sense.

Expand full comment

I am biased against rude accusations without factual evidence.

When I ask for a link toward evidence -- you respond that you don’t want to do work for me.

By now you have lost all credibility... ;-))

Expand full comment

I find that you can't see his conflict of interest highly offensive. He worked on the mRNA vaccine - that's enough to indict him and all the others who work on these technologies "just because they can".

Expand full comment

You are spewing nonsense

Expand full comment

He worked on it & shelved it as...unworkable as a vaccine delivery system. He spent years on it & it ended up being zero and he admitted it, openly. Pfizer & Moderna KNEW it was a dangerous way to deliver vaccines and they knew his and many, many others work on mRNA and they used it anyway. Fauci knew. Francis Collins knew. Ralph Baric at Chapel Hill, NC knew. Point your guns where they SHOULD be firing!

Expand full comment

Paul, you do not have to justify your thoughts to anyone! Period! Your thoughts are yours and not up for debate unless you find it necessary to come to a truth. Malone has many skeletons in his closet, we just need to expose him for what he is, a jealous, self-righteous POS! IMO of course.

Dr . Paul, keep on keeping on good sir. When someone asks how you prepare for the storm , just inform them, you are the storm

Expand full comment

Dr. Alexander, please, can you be more specific regarding the details? How did he attack his wife? How is he attacking people?

Expand full comment

How do I know what you are saying is more true that what Dr.Malone is saying? Perhaps you could post references of proof of long listing here. If you’ve been attacked with untruths have you sued?

Expand full comment

Please see the Glasspool-Malone & Malone paper I have cited with commentary above. Malone has known for at least 22 years that IM injected gene therapy does not stay in the muscle tissue; and yet he lectured in Florida in December, 2021 as if it were a surprise that was just discovered with the SARS COV2 vaccine.

Expand full comment

There are papers all over the science journals about it's failure. This is why I couldn't understand all of the researchers/scientists who defended it. The work was omnipresent but if you talked about you were banned from Twitter & Facebook, etc. They were (and are) censoring us so that the mad injection frenzy can continue and our governments are the biggest cheerleaders as citizens become disabled & die. Fear is a strong emotion & motivator.

Expand full comment

I don't know how anyone who reads Dr. Alexander's substack could question his total sincerity, openness, honesty, or Christian love for everyone. He wants to get to the bottom of this. So do I. I trust he knows how to do that. I hope he receives the response he's seeking.

Expand full comment

He worked on the experimental vaccine that was going to change its victims into a new species called "homoborgenesis" which are now patented as GMO's and he said nothing until most of the population had taken it. You really think that shows integrity? The guy is a money chaser.

Expand full comment

Worse than that. He is a skin without substance.

Expand full comment

Now i understand, and didn’t know the malfeasance committed against you. Which is consistent with the virtue signalling we witness by the one who is running, scared to answer again, instead taking the low road of legal action vs peaceful means. The onus is on that party, who happens to be one of us who was in on it despite signals adding up to future indictment.

When i run for the bus after exiting the bank, i feel like i’m doing what a thief would be doing. Rather calmly walk, and represent my real innocence.

Expand full comment

There is no "us", there is only the complete truth.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

This is no way ad hominem just because it violates your sensitivities. It’s a direct and meaningful question. He had to have known, and why didn’t he contribute it to the sum of information?

And shouldn’t you be on his page scolding him about suing people, then?

You can’t just ignore this stuff. We need to understand where everyone’s coming from. This is no time for the benefit of the doubt.

Expand full comment

It seems obvious to me that Malone must have thought the vax would be ok. He learned differently, the hard way.

Expand full comment

That’s insufficient if he had particular knowledge that should’ve suggested otherwise. I think people are on sensible ground questioning Malone. He’s more than a tad suspicious.

Expand full comment

Seems like a big "if" Ian. So now we're convicting people "if" they had knowledge and because they're allegedly "suspicious." That's ridiculous. In any case, Malone's "contribution" to mRNA science was decades ago. It's ridiculous to suggest he ever would've thought bad actors decades later would use his early work to poison the world. Indeed, I've not seen anybody even attempt to make the case that Malone had any role whatever in converting his early work into the actual deadly COVID-19 injections. Moreover, Malone has no obligation to answer questions that start out accusatory in their very nature and that are couched in ad hominem attacks. Before accusing and attacking, somebody should attempt to lay out a factual basis for those attacks. That hasn't happened. Accusatory questions are not facts.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

But Malone didn't leave the business years ago and go off in a different direction. He's been on the inside his entire life. He knows exactly what's happening.

Expand full comment

It has happened. Your characterization is a bad joke. Where are the ad hominem attacks here? He’s requesting an answer to a specific question. What conviction? Who said anything about conviction? Why make all these linguistic leaps if your position is so defensible? Hm?

He’s suspicious. Of course he is. Anytime someone drops out of the ether with incredible/instant social media traction & polished interviewee skills, you should raise an eyebrow (the same goes for his buddy with the silly mass formation hypothesis). You should raise another when he starts suing parts of the movement over trivialities only his ego is concerned about.

He should just answer the fucking question.

Expand full comment

So I assume you'll give POTUS Trump the same break. Right? Considering he knows absolutely NOTHING about the technology.

Expand full comment
Mar 7, 2023·edited Mar 7, 2023

"Hard way" being payed by the department of defence and MIC. However I do agree a life without moral compass is a hard life but it doesn't quality a person for being a victim.

Expand full comment

You have to be a paid subscriber to make a comment on Dr. Malone's. I haven't become one but I am of Dr. Paul.

Expand full comment

Cuz he doesn't want anyone dissenting and calling him out

Expand full comment

Nope, I don't pay, but I comment. There's a bot of a trick to it though.

Expand full comment

Plus, I don’t know anything about lawsuit. Would be interested to know.

Expand full comment

Thanks. I lost interest in the Breggins when they went after the notion of Mass formation which makes a lot sense to me. Im on Desmet and Malone’s side in this, but the lawsuit seems dumb and an overreaction.

Expand full comment

Desmet never added the word psychosis in his "mass formation" Malone did that. Desmet told Malone to stop using that word because it make it look he was blaming the victims. I believe Desmet and Malone are not on good terms and Malone is suing everyone because of them saying he shouldn't have used that word. Yes the lawsuit is dumb and I believe it'll be thrown out.

Expand full comment

But in the meantime it’ll distract a lot of people and bog useful members of the movement down in a legal nightmare. Convenient for the guilty parties in all this...

Expand full comment

Agree..I believe the real issue is the mass psychosis was a preplanned well executed mass propaganda machine initated by DOD/CIA.

Expand full comment

Interesting and good point.....There is a big difference between a mass formation reaction by the public in response to something that they are exposed to AS COMPARED TO a propaganda machine designed to manipulate the masses.

In the first instance, the suggestion is that the public when presented with a fearful situation like a pandemic ceased to be able to think rationally and out of fear became intolerant of others and insist on compliance as a means of relieving their anxiety induced by circumstances.

In the second instance, we are not talking about some psychological phenomena. Rather we are talking about a purposeful and intentional manipulation of reality and truth in a fraudulent manner for the purpose of encouraging reliance on the falsehoods. To what end...to weaponize the public and manipulate the behavior and reactions of the public.

In the first instance, one could argue that the pandemic/COVID crisis was real and that people lost their ability to cope due to fear and that the result was that a psychosis ensued through no fault of any malevolent force with designs on controlling the populace or inducing them to behave a particular way.

Malone has suggested, just recently, that there is no evidence of a plan to depopulate or intentional malevolence on the part of those pushing the jabs. He insists that he "knows these people" (meaning the government bureaucrats) and he says that they are stupid and that we are dealing with a administrative state that has been layered over to the point of being maybe susceptible to forces of greed, but not evil. Also, his substack on the "Evil of Banality" suggests the same.

By comparison,

In the second instance, the suggestion is that the propaganda of those pushing forth a false narrative are knowingly perpetuating a fraud for their own purposes and doing it in hopes of inducing certain actions by the public.

I am confused these days about whether the MFM spokespersons/individuals feel that we are up against an actual opponent or whether the last three years are just a product of a bloated system lacking in oversight (which they have until the pandemic participated in without giving much thought to the issues they are now all selling books about!).

Seems to change from day to day----particularly with Malone.

But maybe I am being too concerned with details or reading something into the various substacks that I read which is not there....thoughts?

I personally feel that we are dealing with forces that are intentionally pushing us towards outcomes/crisis that will advance their agenda. And at the end of the day, the agenda is not about what is in our best interest.....and they know that.

Expand full comment

Malone also withheld info on Pepcid AC/Famotadine early studies. He's now a "Renaissance Man," pontificating on all sorts of psychological topics, 5G warfare, etc. Family ties to IC. Suing Dr Peter Breggin (a real medical hero - look him up if you don't know @ him) and Dr Jan Ruby for MILLIONS.

Expand full comment

Can you provide a link to the Pepcid allegation? I’ve never heard of it.

Expand full comment

Why would Malone take the covid death shot if he knew it would not stay at the injection site?

Something doesn't add up.

Expand full comment

He said in an interview he thought the shots would help against his Long Covid (whatever that is). But what is the scientific rationale behind such a statement? Shouldn't he have known better? Something doesn't add up indeed.

Expand full comment

There was never any justification for people who had already contracted Sars-CoV-2 for getting injected--none. Any properly educated immunologist/virologist would know that. Nothing of the sort had ever been done or advocated for in the past. Natural immunity is the gold-standard and the perpetrators tried to hide that from people.

Expand full comment

Where's the proof he did?

Expand full comment

Malone admitted on Bannon's WarRoom he took the covid death shot.

Expand full comment

"Admitted"? Give me a break. Freemasonic teachings are to LIE to the general public. And this guy has a rap sheet a mile long proving he's a high level mason. His primary purpose is to social engineer. His profiteering is merely a sideline taking advantage of a situation he is creating while he hides among "freedom fighters". Look at his business partnerships on his website while he still is bold enough to keep them up. What's with all the companies involved with nanoparticle distribution systems? Research who and what his wife Jill are all about.

Convincing people of the deceptiveness of Malone is going to be as hard as convincing people about the truth behind Covid. You're all so in fear and desperate to believe in something- ANYTHING - that you latch on to the first person offering a "solution" and waiting to take advantage of your emotional state. Perfect Masonic ordo ab chao move Malone! Well done. Looks like you've nabbed yourself some unshakeable groupies!

Expand full comment

I am not a Malone cheerleader...I simply answered that Malone admitted to taking the covid shot in response to a person who asked the question.

So...tone it down.

Expand full comment

My reaction is to the stark difference between an admission and a bald faced LIE.

Expand full comment

If memory serves, something about needing the shot to travel abroad. Though I'm doubtful & think it may just be another ploy for sympathy & to pose as a "regular guy."

Expand full comment

I'm sure he has enough contacts to get out of having the shots before traveling and a whole lot more.

Expand full comment

100% disagree - Malone is playing everyone.

He insists there is no malicious intent.

Seriously?

Expand full comment

Nailed it. "Insists there in no malicious intent" while laying the groundwork for the medical profession apology tour and conducting business ventures into future betrayals of mankind. Malone serves a number of functions for his masters. My only regret is that Dr. Alexander didn't dig deep enough. Malone has a background as dark as the pits of hell.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

The evidence is in Malone's own words. For God's sake, do some research on this guy. Yeah, lots of us were on the same page as this traitor. And for some of us, admitting our foolishness in trusting him stung, but this guy has a visible trail of deceit that anyone with any open mind would come to the same conclusion. Do you think Dr. Alexander even covered it all? Why did Malone do a video with Desmit explaining why he added the word "psychosis" to the term "mass formation"? Even more curious is his use of the term "Let me square the compass" in answering the question. Who the hell talks that way? Look it up. He's a Freemason sweetie! He even breeds horses for the Knights of Malta! Now I don't care what you think about "conspiracy theorists" etc, but if you honestly think these high level masons have our best interest at heart, YOU are the one who is delusional. Have you ever looked into the companies this snake oil system has partnerships with? Is it another mere coincidence that many of them are companies working with delivery systems (HVAC/HEPA) for particle distribution of vaccines and nanoparticles? Even a vape company! Ask Malone what "Nicotine 3.0" is? Start listening to some of what George Webb has dug up in the guy. His wife, Jill Malone, lists these 4 people as among her top 7 influencers:

1. Bill Gates

2. Melinda Gates

3. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

4. Richard Branson, billionaire associate of Bill Gates

There's more. Just leave the cult of personality you're a victim to and start doing your own research rather than depending on others to do it for you.

Thank you Dr. Alexander for all you do in waking up those that are ready for it. It seems as if perhaps Lucy is not ready yet.

Expand full comment

Very well stated. Unless attacks like Alexander’s stop, it will splinter the movement and lead us to defeat. I have enjoyed Alexander’s SubStack up until now. I am compelled to unsubscribe because my loyalty is to the movement and not to one man or one opinion. A man would go to another man and workout or settle their differences. There is so little statesmanship, civility and commitment these days. Mine must reside with honorable and faithful men. I will, truthfully, miss this SubStack.... but it is a price that must be paid.

Expand full comment

Malone is not part of any movement, except his own personal enrichement & ego gratification. His recent statements are completely off the mark & not in his areas of expertise, ranging from psychological analyses to anti-govt stances. He likes being the "hero," but he was right in there w/Big Pharma and the Deep State. These days, I'm very, very wary of any whistleblower who feathered their nest working for the "bad guys," then - when they're financially comfortable - come out to hawk their tell-all book.

Expand full comment

Before you leave the conversation here, we value your input and thoughts.... I would encourage you to stay a little longer. Please consider this quote exerpted from Dr. Malone's paper published on March 8, prior to the announcement by the WHO of a pandemic.

It is clear from this paper that Dr. Malone was very aware of the dangers of using any kind of vaccine against SARS COV2.

Medical Countermeasures Analysis of 2019-nCoV and Vaccine Risks for Antibody-Dependent

Enhancement (ADE). Ricke, D.O.; Malone, R.W. Preprints 2020, 2020030138 (doi:

10.20944/preprints202003.0138.v1). May, 2020

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3646583 C

Prior to the nomeclature 'COVID19' being used in the media:

"This leads to the prediction that new attempts to create either SARS-CoV-1 vaccines, MERS-CoV vaccines, or SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have potentially higher risks for inducing ADE in humans facilitated by antibody infection of phagocytic immune cells. This potential ADE risk is independent of the vaccine technology or targeting strategy selected due to predicted phagocytic immune cell infections upon antibody uptake."

To say this in 'plain English': any SARS COV2 vaccine, regardless of the type of vaccine, was expected to be able to induce 'ADE: Antibody Dependent Enhancement'; which is a a potentially very dangerous and fatal problem which has been documented to occur with vaccines in the past (dengue fever vaccine).

The danger of ADE (otherwise known as pathogenic priming) was also being written about by James Lyons-Weiler, PhD. in April, 2020. You can read his paper here:

Lyons-Weiler J. (2020). Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity. Journal of translational autoimmunity, 3, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtauto.2020.100051

An important take-away from this is that--scientists familiar with the basic biological and immunological dynamics were able to predict that we might induce disaster upon humanity if we utilized a vaccine to address a coronavirus illness. Lyons-Weiler published a warning and did not stop talking about it.

Malone published March 8, 2020 in a pre-print and then basically did not enter the public sphere until much, much later. Why not? When I spoke with him in August, 2021 he had just interviewed on the DarkHorse podcast the week before. When asked, he declined taking a public stand against the vaccine. If he knew that ADE was a significant threat, it would have been so appreciated if he had entered the conversation much earlier to share his knowledge with clinicians and the lay public about the dangers of ADE. It interviews with Geert Vanden Bosche, PhD (former vaccinologist with GAVI) that seemed to really raise this issue more broadly among the public.

Expand full comment

Please note that the citation for Malone's 2020 paper came from his own CV, provided to the courts: https://ia802509.us.archive.org/27/items/gov.uscourts.flmd.395057/gov.uscourts.flmd.395057.30.6.pdf.

However, when one goes to the paper now using the address I provided above, or the following address here:

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/XWVOA8

only Darrell Ricke is listed as an author. Malone's name is no longer there. I had been able to locate this paper at Malone's Researchgate site a couple of weeks ago. It seems he has lost interest to be identified as one of the authors of this paper.

Expand full comment

Wormtongue at work ... the cabals' agents infiltrate to divide.

Everyone is imperfect to someone and while Dr Alexander's rhetoric is masochist and angry, I try to look beyond the styles and pick what is significant content. Sadly the worm has gotten him hurling him into emotional turbulence and flailing words to hurt as much as possible. "just a chemist"? Everyone has an equally important role and no one is 'just' a someone.

Pity. Hope Dr Alexander will calm down and eyes unglaze from the venoms whispered into his ears.

Expand full comment
deletedMar 5, 2023·edited Mar 6, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Ha ha ha--you've destroyed the defend-Maloners movement with devilish good humor.

Expand full comment

Malone should have never ever been trusted from day 1.

I have written about his untrustworthiness over 2 years ago.

He is controlled opposition at best.

Expand full comment

Anytime they come out of the woodwork with an instant fan base and the focus of the media, BEWARE. Especially when they’re suing people and throwing out red herrings and they have a history of association with the Deep State.

Expand full comment

I still don’t fully understand Malone’s beef with Breggin et al. If anyone can be criticised for making ad hominem attacks, it’s Malone himself. To put it another way, asking legitimate questions for clarification about these shots from someone who should know is very different to suing the bejesus out of someone for a perceived slight.

Expand full comment

Exactly!!! I've been awake and a "truther" for many years. I've seen how they operate. And YES, always be suspicious of anyone who suddenly had lots of followers and gets media time.

Expand full comment

I don't know the facts but they clearly wanted to doxx off the oldies as always (Social Security for one reason) and he recommended they have the poison.

Expand full comment

Yep, he certainly was successful in herding geriatrics at the start of the eugenics program that he is certainly a part of.

Expand full comment

To be human is to make mistakes. Malone took the shots himself in the early days - nearly killed him.

Ordinary mRNA breaks down quickly, in a matter of hours, so guessing he probably wanted it to work (out of hubris) and he might have been thinking it wouldn’t be around long enough to do that much harm.

Don’t forget he didn’t invent the pseudo mRNA.

Sure Malone was part of the industry - but the Dark Horse podcast was quite early on and helped many by confirming there was medical theory why the vaccines could be causing the harms that were already evident in VAERS and Yellow Card.

We need scientific debate - personal attacks unfortunately cloud and distract the issues and won’t elicit the technical answers he may or may not have.

Expand full comment

To be clear, he SAID he took the shot.

Expand full comment

Yes he said he had the Moderna in a video many mos ago -- at that time only the 1st "vaccination" was available.

Expand full comment

Informative post and 'pseudo' (I assume) changes the equation.

Expand full comment

Yup -- think you're spot on. I was under impression he worked on the mRNA for cancer purposes initially or heard something like that. Boy if that wouldn't snuff the poor souls out -- scary.

Expand full comment

He quit working on it because he realized it did not work... do you not know of how his patent was rejected after years, and then how Pharma picked it up? Do your homework!

Expand full comment

I've not had time for this C-19 horror -- you do your homework!!

Expand full comment

Perhaps. Or, your comment can make YOU look like controlled opposition.

Expand full comment

OR reverse psychology reversed and reversed again: fuk off.

Expand full comment

That's just plain rude.

Expand full comment

There are substantive observations that suggest we should be wary of Malone. Anyone who replies to mentions of those with “you’re controlled opposition for noticing” is at a minimum unhelpful. These are the games the State and big industries play to derail social movements. You best take them quite seriously, because it’s going on. This technique and others have an incredible capacity for upending such things. Vigilance is essential, or all this momentum we’ve built up will be chipped away at and negated.

The lawsuit is a massive red flag.

Expand full comment

And you just helped me understand how overstated '2nd Smartest Guy in the World' is.

Expand full comment

All of us who stayed awake in medical school knew that the injection could not, would not simply stay in the arm. Centuries-long knowledge of circulation and lymph drainage told us that. Every cell in the body is less than a fingernail's thickness away from the nearest blood vessel. Countless capillaries are pierced and disrupted by Trojan horse needle piercing flesh to a depth of 5/8" inch or similar. (Worse vaccine reactions possibly correlated with larger blood vessel accidentally pierced.)

If local vs systemic were the main consideration regarding these toxic shots, where mRNA had killed all the test animals, and no coronavirus vaccine had ever been successful, and LNPs create havoc at cell membranes.... If local arm vs systemic considerations were primary, any one of us could have rung the alarm, and we all should have. (I was first with comprehensive warnings of these vaccines on 2/21/21, https://www.primarydoctor.org/covidvaccine.) But this was not the first or most alarming red flag.

Anyway, faulting Malone for not warning about non-confinement to shoulder, is like faulting the Department of Motor Vehicles for not warning drivers to not accelerate while aiming the car toward a tree.

I also have not gone around warning people not to run toward a cliff, because they could crash and die. Does that put me at fault for cliff-jumpers' calamities?

Expand full comment

You make an excellent point. I’m not a Doctor and I knew no injection stays at its entry site.

But you do realize the Narrative everyone was/is propagandized with specifically and repeatedly lied by claiming the Vaccine remains where it’s injected, right?

There were and still are numerous falsehoods being told about the ClotShots through all forms of Media and whorish medical mouthpieces re-educating people into deception.

Not everyone can think clearly when they’re constantly told they’re being hunted down by death.

Expand full comment

Of course countless lies were and are told by MSM and govt.

But this suggestion that those of us who were censored, kicked off the largest social media platforms and have been warning every person who would stand still long enough to listen, and have been writing constantly about these topics on Substack - where we are not censored - should somehow be blamed for Person A listening to the lies of Entity B is total and absolute nonsense.

Expand full comment

I’m not blaming you, Colleen. I’m simply pointing out a lot of people trusted the wrong sources, that’s all. And believed things you’d think they’d have understood were nonsense.

From what you’ve written, you’ve obviously done a lot of good and have been persecuted for it.

Expand full comment

Poor analogy. It takes special knowledge of Molecular Biology, Virology, Immunology, to understand this shit, however not driving a car off a cliff, just takes common sense. Capeesh? 🤪

Expand full comment

No. No injected liquid stays in the shoulder, and many of us have been saying this ever since such idiocy was pronounced from 'public health.'

You also know this from men who get testosterone shots. Does the deltoid site of injection get muscular, but not the rest of the body?

No, and you and everyone else can see that.

But for people to blame those of us who were censored and deplatformed for not somehow out-shouting mainstream media's and government's megaphones really doesn't work. Capice?

Expand full comment

Common sense: That which is borne of a lie can never be for good.

The CV pandemic was a lie. No worse than a severe flu season. They lied to us about the risk. Sensationalized fear was the contagion. Mask were/are lies, enlisted to help spread fear widely, visual reminders that caution death may be nearby. PCR tests were/are lies, designed to detect dinosaur DNA fragments in fossils, not dinosaurs, a knob on the fear stereo to blare "Cases!!" at will, more tests=more cases, not more infections. The flu completely disappearing in 2020-2021 was a lie, all respiratory deaths were called CV to artificially increase deaths attributed to it to justify the authoritarian controls. Experimental biotech that never cleared safety and efficacy trials prior to 2020 becoming miraculously safe and effective was/is a lie.

It takes no special knowledge of molecular biology, virology or immunology to understand this shit. It just takes common sense. Those experts who have lied to you every single step down a path of so much fear that suspend critical thinking and skepticism and take a product into your body from companies with known track records of fraudulent and dangerous safety claims resulting in massive penalties and civil payouts for harms (who could forget the late night "Have you been injured by XYZ drug? Then call the the law firm of Dowee, Cheetham & Howe" ads?) should never have been trusted.

Media that lied/lie to you about Russia! Russia! Russia!, Pentagon colonels set US foreign policy, not presidents, men winning Olympic gold medals against women weightlifters is laudatory, cow's farting will destroy our climate, election counting shutting down on election night in five swing states and changing results overnight was the most secure and accurate election ever, media that is "brought to you by Pfizer" should never have been trusted.

Lie after lie after lie after lie. It just takes common sense to never trust known liars. But a lot of spouses stay married to their known cheating partners, believing they won't cheat again. All friends who see it can do is be supportive and be there to help when the spouse is ready for the truth, or to help them pick up the pieces of their lives when the relationship finally comes to an end. It doesn't take a psychologist, marriage counselor or therapist to understand that shit.

Common sense is our most important defense to those who would do harm to us. It's why Thomas Paine wrote and titled the book, Common Sense, which inspired a nation to revolt against oppressive tyranny. It didn't take historians or trained public policy experts to know tyranny is wrong.

Enough with this deference to experts, appeals to authority who know better. Lean into common sense. About everything. All one needs to be armed with is curiosity and discernment. Access to information helps. And we are in the Information Age. So it's there. It's all there. It's all been there. Those who were curious and used their discernment early in 2020 when great sacrifices were being demanded of us found the truth early on. The trusting, too busy to care, the ideologues followed blindly. To their own harm.

This quibbling over a poison leaving an injection site is meaningless. It's harmful in either location. Supposing it's true or not what is to be gained by knowing if that's the only lesson learned from the past three years? The most important lesson is the one Rene Descartes counseled in 1619 when he pioneered the scientific method: "Question everything." Don't trust. Do your own research.

Media and medical experts are only expert liars in our times. You have a brain and can learn anything a purported expert has learned. If you desire to. I know these people who set public health policy and opine on medical science personally. And I know those in major media. Most ain't that smart. They imagine their framed parchment papers hanging on walls means they are smarter than the rest of us. They ain't.

Expand full comment

Very well said, true on every single point.

Expand full comment

Just one bone to pick.

If covid in early 2020 was no worse than seasonal flu, why were patients so desperately ill and not responding to the standard remedies and procedures? Why were docs frantically networking to find something that would work? Why was Dr. Z networking with Didier Raoult in Marseille, about HCQ/zinc/Azithromycin? I have relatives that were given this combo in the hospital, who lost a son on a ventilator.

It's seasonal flu now, but it sure as hell was not back then.

Expand full comment

Ventilators and Remdesivir and Midazolam/morphine combo were deadly. Yet this was not only hospitals' murderous policy of "standard of care," but they also fired docs and nurses who refused to play the deadly game.

Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, zinc, vitamin D all very quickly resolved COVID illness. I've treated COVID patients for 3 years with some combo of these and other treatments, as per individual needs. Not one of my COVID patients was hospitalized. Most were in their '70's.

So what happened with the thousands of docs like me? Censor and de-platform, so the public can't learn about this.

Expand full comment

Agree with it all 👍🏻, and much thanks for your work. I too used FLCCC protocols, prophylaxis and treatment for a nothing burger delta case.

Because I know people who were VERY sick, very early on, I always give the side-eye when someone says it was no worse than seasonal flu. If it were no different or worse, how is it that all these off-label meds had to be discovered to be effective and put into use? As opposed to the standard treatments. I certainly had never heard of ivermectin apart from the paste or heartgard, or HCQ except for people taking Plaquenil for lupus/RA.

It was a nightmare, to be sure.

Expand full comment

Jonesy, I can confirm having had a severe case of 'covid' in mid-February 2020. Such a severe headache for so many days that I believed I might have a brain aneurysm or a rare disease. I hand-wrote a will. I was not the only one to say later that a VERY BAD "cold" was going around. I have no doubt 'something' had been 'unleashed' upon us.

Expand full comment

It was more like a viral sepsis, replete with a cytokine storm in its later phase of the illness, with a description of "ground glass opacities" showing up on plain film chest xrays". I have not seen a flu quite like that.

Expand full comment

A lot of truth 👍

Expand full comment

It does not take a specialized degree to understand molecular biology, virology and immunology. I agree wholeheartedly it only takes reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, which even among many well educated medical and science professionals, seemed to have missed or escaped class the day of subject presentation. As retired RN of 37 years I was and still appalled how quickly so many forgot just basic infection and virus versus bacteria mediation. There is lots of info on Covid that is a bit above my ability to speak on it however; I do know that there has never been a successful vaccine developed for this category of virus. Bingo.....basically that’s the first red flag the second being the lack of studies and the ignoring of the cruise ship of 1500+ people with Covid in early 2020, with large elderly cruising people, and what was it, one death? I could go on. There are many many who have been maligned, cancelled etc. who have been vocal against this whole debacle. Now we get to watch as this plays out in real time and all this conspiracies seem to not been so far fetched.

Expand full comment

Well, some of us do need to be told not to put Tide Pods in our mouth...

Live and learn.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Sheesh, now you tell me? 🤣

Expand full comment

But why did you not warn people? Isn't that your job as a doctor? How can lay people possibly know what you, presumably, learned in med school and over your years as a practicing doctor?

Expand full comment

Why did I not warn people??? I've been warning *constantly.* I wrote the first comprehensive warnings of the multiple dangers of the clotshot at link above. I chose to actually lose money on writing the most thoroughly researched book on the hazards of the COVID vaccines: https://www.amazon.com/Neither-Safe-Nor-Effective-Evidence/dp/B0B1C1F5HB/ref=sr_1_1 I do pro bono medical expert witness testimony in court cases to protect people from vaccine mandates. I have angered my medical board in writing hundreds of medical exemptions, never refusing, over the last two years. Exactly how many arteries am I supposed to open to get people to stop lining up to be injected with poison? Again, I draw the line here: I do not stand on every highway with a sign saying, 'stop driving drunk and blindfolded against traffic.'

Expand full comment

Thank you doctor! I admit that I assumed that too few doctors were doing anything to warn people, but I realize now that far more were doing the right thing, but the massive censorship apparatus was quite effective in concealing these good-works from the public. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-022-09479-4

Expand full comment

Most of us truth-tellers were de-platformed. I was "permanently suspended" from Twitter the day that I tweeted a true, accurate and verifiable quote from a mainstream news source - with a link that still works - where Infectious Diseases Professor Hervé Seligmann warned that the Pfizer shot was dozens of times more dangerous for seniors than COVID, and hundreds of times more dangerous for younger. Let me find this quote now . . . https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/297051

I wrote about my Twitter suspension here:

https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/the-old-twitters-meanness

Expand full comment

Thank you for all your excellent work. It has not gone unnoticed or unappreciated! :)

Expand full comment

Bought a copy! Arrives tomorrow. Thank you for sharing. 💙

Expand full comment

Poor analogy. It takes special knowledge of Molecular Biology, Virology, Immunology, to understand this shit, however not driving a car off a cliff, just takes common sense. Capeesh? 🤪

Expand full comment

Very poor analogy--as in failed analogy.

Expand full comment

This isn't the first use of lipid technology to deliver medication. The purpose and reason for using LNP to achieve enhanced or specific distribution and delivery hardly seems a mystery as you allude to.

Expand full comment

Doesn't matter. Still toxic. First do no harm --> Don't do it.

Expand full comment

If this is litigated, trust me, they will call in experts in the fields I just mentioned to give expert testimony, and not just John Q. Public. Capeesh? 😇

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

My strong preference would be that any questions like this are asked much further down the line after, you know, people like you/Dr Malone/us have ultimately stopped world governments from ever having the power to mandate untested harmful experimental injections into every human. Until then, please can everyone on the right side just stick together :-)

Expand full comment

It’s patently ridiculous to say that about the guy who’s suing and attacking people all over the movement. Go fix him and then try to silence others. In the meantime, read about the Soviet operation called “the Trust” and the FBI operation called “COINTELPRO.” We cannot afford to naively strive.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

I never said the question shouldn't be asked... Right now, the pressing if not immediate need is to stop the evil maniacs in power from creating a digital gulag that may stop humans being able to survive unless they take the requisite amount of deadly """"""""""vaccine""""""""""" ...Malone is a strong headwind against that. Once we have that pillar secured, then further concerns and issues can be addressed

Expand full comment

You might not fully understand (and who does, really?) how controlled oppo works. It's much too successful a strategy to not consider seriously when considerable evidence (if you can recognize it) arises. If one is unaware on one's own of such evidence, it behooves to actively attend to the insights offered by those looking into it. The alternative is accepting "safe and effective", because obviously it must be if everyone says so...

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

I'm certainly aware and understand the concept of controlled opposition... Whatever his understanding/motive, I've watched Malone go from on the face of it naïve statements about risk reward through to then only saying the """vaccines""" may benefit a very narrow set of v old or frail people to now saying they don't benefit anyone and increased statements/awareness of the harms and deaths they are causing.... My point is that his **current** stance would (when compared with an average normie) - given his clout and fame - be helpful in swinging the pendulum of government control and mandating of vaccines back towards more 'normal' and reasonable.... If Malone starts showing signs of saying the vaccines are beneficial and/or not harmful again then he should be heavily questioned at that point and either way ultimately at a later point.... However questioning/discrediting him now could well lead to losing a strong headwind against the government evil/insanity (imho)

Expand full comment

If you honestly think that Malone is not developing a vaccine for a Covid cold you are silly and mistaken, imho Malone is only attacking this jab so it fails then will promote his inhaler that will surely in his words be safe and effective. Funny thing is he don’t talk much about what he is doing only what he wants you to know about others and what they are doing. I say , WHO IS ROBERT MALONE?

There is surely more to him then meets theys or the ear for that matter!

Expand full comment

I've not said/implied he won't develop and promote something like that if not already; it'll be interesting to see what he does do over time... I'm basically just saying he is helpful as a headwind against the global elites' evil atm - I'm not saying him, or indeed anyone, shouldn't have a close eye kept on them

Expand full comment

Is that the reason for his recent attack on a man of impeccable character in the antiCOVID camp? What about damage control and a desperate attempt to regain credibility?

Expand full comment

Do you have a link for this, it might have passed me by? ... I've seen him defend himself against people who've tried to claim he didn't have certain patents/original research etc.

Expand full comment

Apparently he called for forgiveness of BP crimes as well.

Expand full comment

Link has been posted by others in the discussion.

Expand full comment

Thanks, I'll have a read

Expand full comment

We ain't gonna get where you (and all of us honest players) want to get without a lot of folks showing their cards. Now is the time, or our game gets stopped here.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

I'm certainly aware and understand the concept of controlled opposition... Whatever his understanding/motive, I've watched Malone go from on the face of it naïve statements about risk reward through to then only saying the """vaccines""" may benefit a very narrow set of v old or frail people to now saying they don't benefit anyone and increased statements/awareness of the harms and deaths they are causing.... My point is that his **current** stance would (when compared with an average normie) - given his clout and fame - be helpful in swinging the pendulum of government control and mandating of vaccines back towards more 'normal' and reasonable.... If Malone starts showing signs of saying the vaccines are beneficial and/or not harmful again then he should be heavily questioned at that point and either way ultimately at a later point.... However questioning/discrediting him now could well lead to losing a strong headwind against the government evil/insanity (imho)

Expand full comment

He def follows the narrative

Expand full comment

Does Robert Malone still collect a salary from the DOD? DARPA?, is he controlled or on the take or is he developing a new vaccine of his own? What are his connections to BCG and EcoHealth alliance, or his team/colleagues in Wuhan? IMO Robert Malone tries to play both sides of the equation. Who is Robert Malone and exactly where does he stand in this . George Webb has many thoughts on one Robert Malone, and they don’t add up to his actions here in the near past.

He does have some nice horses tho! One would wonder where he acquired them? Are they not a treasure in the equestrian world. Maybe Robert Malone is a master equestrian along with the many other titles he suggests you acknowledge.

Expand full comment

Yea it seems like he understands well Hegelian dialectic.

Expand full comment

I admire his love for wide open spaces and horses. He and his wife have been into horses since teens and certainly know a lot about them. He even worked as a farm hand in his early yrs. I hope he's not suffering/ill (nor anyone else) from this "vaccination" mess fest but, unfortunately, many are.

Expand full comment

Doc, i love you like a brother. But i remain unconvinced. So even if Dr Malone has been doing damage control all along( which i have No reason to believe), who claims the moral authority to cast a stone, especially one of the first?

Don’t sell a fraction of your soul to the devil, or satan wins via division, the last thing we need. The good fight depends on good guys like you, and friends do what it takes not to be popular, but to reign in our instincts that get away on us sometimes. Im the first to admit keeping anger under control has been challenging, and i’m humbly learning. If thousands of truckers can meet peacefully as they did, we can do the same! Godspeed, Dr Alexander🚚🚜🇨🇦🇺🇸🌎🙏🏽❤️

Expand full comment

Beautifully stated.

Expand full comment

Be very careful who you trust.

Many people are "on the payroll" to warp your thinking and create propaganda, which leads people away from TRUTH.

Critical thinking is destroyed by propaganda. Be careful.

Dr. Alexander is lifting the veil a bit. Watch and learn from this.

Expand full comment

If Mal one got the mRNA shots as he claims, given his supposed intimate knowledge of the technology and its flaws, doesn’t that disqualify him from an self-appointed status as an “expert”? At best, getting the shot demonstrates lack of common sense.

Expand full comment

That’s like people believing Ohio’s Governor actually drank a glass of East Palestine water 😂😂😂

Expand full comment

Robert Malone should absolutely have to explain himself, after all he's suing multiple people over his suggested embarrassment by others. If he could have stopped these mRNA LNP shots, he darn well should have. That's all I have to say about that.

Expand full comment

Defamation of character is a little more than just “embarrassment”.

Expand full comment

Yeah but they didn't defame his character, they embarrassed him. He put defamation of character in his lawsuit because the truth wouldn't have sold.

Expand full comment

Accusing someone of being a fraud, a Deep State operative, is potentially damaging to a guy in Malone’s position. Breggin has been given an opportunity to prove these allegations in court. I’ll be watching.

Expand full comment

Well he will be cross questioned by the defence lawyers too. Keep watching!

Expand full comment

Dr. Malone was silenced like the rest. He did take the jab and he himself is suffering from the side effects. I heard him say it wasn't meant to be used as a vaccine. He was canceled by twitter. Fb any site that he spoke on.

Expand full comment

Do we know, absolutely, that he took the jab? Or is it a good story to go with the narrative?

Expand full comment

Dr. Tenpenny, that is exactly what I’d like to know.

Expand full comment

One would wonder, after all money could easily buy a vaccine card to get on a plane and back into the country. Many have been caught with fraudulent vax cards. And he knew what the consequences were . IMHO he is controlled opposition and he is good at it!

Expand full comment

Do you have proof that Malone is lying? Should we not take him at his word?

Expand full comment

He has been cought lying

at least in one instance saying that mRNA cannot change human genome. Later on Swedish doctors proved in the laboratory using human hepatocytes that it does. I personally heard him saying that on video.

Expand full comment

No people cannot testify for themselves. Everything should be based on 2 or 3 witnesses

Expand full comment

He 'professes' to have taken the Moderna frankenjab -- he was quite ill with the 'virus' and not recovering or still having issues so thought if he was "vaccinated" he'd improve (per an old video). Doesn't make sense to me but I'm a skeptic. If, in fact, he was jabbed to travel to help spread facts it's admirable.

Expand full comment

Nancy, I disagree with "If, in fact, he was jabbed to travel to help spread facts it's admirable". One would never take the jab to travel if they knew the destruction they could cause. No matter what. He could use Zoom.

Expand full comment

We've no evidence he didn't and no way of knowing -- he had a cough on a video interview and I was skeptical he'd raced down to be "vaccinated" knowing the mRNA. It's krazy!! I haven't followed him in literally mos other than to look at pics of his ranch/horses and Friday Funnies or whatever couple of times. Didn't realize he went after Dr. McCullough - WOW! Dr. McCullough seems ethical but I've not followed much recently.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Teresa L -- have you link/website to follow Dr. Tenpenny? I had listened to couple videos moons ago (beginning of C-19 "vaccinations") on some site - never see them any more but I've been out of the loop/lack of time. She's quite knowledgeable. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Great -- thanks so much. I'll check out now.

Expand full comment

That may be true. But Malone must speak for himself. He should answer these very straightforward, extremely legitimate questions. It is high time for scientists to submit their work ethos to moral examination. I can imagine many intelligent, gifted scientists getting swept up in the "genius" of their innovations, and suppressing their moral compunctions along the way. Isn't that how we got the atomic bomb? Perhaps this is the real and needed, brutal lesson of this moment in history: just because we can, should we?... Scientists... all scientists... must come clean in this discussion. It will not be easy.

Expand full comment

I agree with just because we can should we. Do I think anyone in the medical community or scientists are good and genuine? No I dont trust any of them. But I have heard Dr. Malone many times say it was never meant to be used as a vaccine

Expand full comment

Why would he be inoculated if he knew! Just doesn't make sense.

Expand full comment

Wanted to see what happened

Expand full comment

Sure. He wanted wanted to be a test subject.

Expand full comment

You make some good points. I heard Malone respond to this I think in his substack

Expand full comment

He spoke to Dan Bongino on his podcast on Rumble also Unfiltered. He does speak about it.

Expand full comment

He needs to be cross questioned by professional people by all means.

Expand full comment

For what it is worth, I thought it was common knowledge in the medical field , nano particles go everywhere and cross the blood brain barrier . As a Lehman one would think that they were designed and developed to do just that

Expand full comment

Hasn’t it been used in brain cancer treatment because it crosses the barrier? For years!

Expand full comment

My point exactly nano particles were initially for brain cancer to get across the blood brain barrier!

So where were all the brain surgeons whenever this concoction was being brought forward

Expand full comment

Thank you for controlling your tone here. Honestly I think you’ll get a lot further asking at the question as you did in this post than the way you’ve gone about it in the past. That is not to say that I don’t appreciate your tenacity and your passion it’s just that you get more flies with honey than vinegar. That’s some thing I learned in the south having been from the north. Maybe he would answer that question if there was somebody asking that he found to be neutral, I would really like to know the answer as I know you would, and many others would. Thank you for posing it.

Expand full comment

"Dr" Malone made many millions of dollars - hes prolly also under an nda cos the folks making the stuff wanted to make many millions of dollars

Everyone lied and folks died cos of their pursuit of more dollars

Expand full comment

He is part of the swamp for sure. Sad but true...

Expand full comment

https://rumble.com/v261e7m-our-birthright.html Please watch this video PlandemicSeriesOfficial Our Birthright. United we stand, divided we fall!!!!!

Expand full comment

Paul Alexander and other commenters…you all need to see this Hawaiian beach scene where Malone and wife ‘answer’ questions from all ages of school children in October, 2021…yes, October 2021!

https://drmorse.tv/video/children-covid-talk-story-doctors-robert-jill-malone/

Paul Alexander…Malone and wife’s responses should be transcribed so you, Paul can tear apart many of these responses to these school children in a separate substack communication!

By October 2021…the best of the best in medicine and research and military were calling all of this COVID virus and shot….bioterrorism…except Malone!

Listen to his measured answers to these poor school children…

Malone has been around government insiders for many years as he has said for years…and his wife!

How could you trust the Malones saying what they said to these school children October 2021 when ALL AWAKE persons were shouting NO to ALL mandates and shots at that time!

Malone was not awake October 2021???

What has happened to serious critical thinking skills/discernment?

We are on the the verge of World War 3…only thing that matters to me if we survive this most serious time in American history is…

Robert Malone will not allowed in any public health leadership position guiding health policy!

Yes…Paul Alexander, Peter McCullough and a few others should be guiding the public health of this country when this war is over!

We are on a difficult journey to get to that point, right?

Expand full comment

I’m two, three minutes in and he’s saying “they’re pretty good at keeping people that take them from dying or getting sick.” We knew that to be an outright lie by that date. There was a mountain of contrary data and analysis by that date.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2023·edited Mar 5, 2023

Dr. Malone and MANY others believed AT THAT TIME that the jab benefited OLDER ADULTS (as he stated here) for very short periods of time, due to the very generalized nature of the induced immune response. It essentially boosted immunity to EVERYTHING, for about a month. Then it narrows its focus to the spike protein only. There was never any secret about that. Many argued against the merits of that opinion. Malone, and many others like Dr. John Campbell, came to question that opinion over time and eventually reversed it due to the emerging risk/benefit analysis that became more apparent in the months following the jab rollout.

Expand full comment

It's not a matter of believing or not believing It's science not a religion. He should have answered: I don't know instead of sharing his believes which have been proved scientifically false later on..

Expand full comment

🔥🔥🔥

Expand full comment