and in good faith (tacit lead by Dr. Urso & Dr. Alexander) was that TWC (The Wellness Company) will try to bridge Malone-McCullough divide & Urso et al. will try to bridge the Malone-Breggin split
"We appreciate Dr. Alexander’s concerns, but we had no foreknowledge of it whatsoever and only learned about this meeting when we received his Substack announcement today. Justice and Constitutional rights will only be achieved with Dr. Malone’s withdrawal of the invalid $25 million lawsuit against us without reservation or limitation to our rights to free speech about any topic we choose. We will not abandon our defense of freedom of speech and we won’t abandon anyone who is being oppressed in their health freedom reform efforts.
Not so fast there Dr. Alexander. Malone needs to explain to the world at large why he failed to speak out agst. the shots which contained his beloved mRNA technology BEFORE the shots were administered. As Malone stated to Glenn Beck, mRNA creates a back door to the modification of the human genome as part of a transhumanism agenda. It’s widely known that this plan is supported by the Military Industrial Complex & the Globalist-Elites.
Malone has never come out as a legitimate whistleblower agst. the MIC or CIA. He has yet to disavow the CIA who was his former EMPLOYER. Sorry, but I’m of the belief that once a person is a CIA PAID agent, thery’re in for life UNLESS they become a BONAFIDE whistleblower. Malone has not done this.
Also suspect is Maloney’s refusal to speak about synthetic snake venom peptides in the shots. They have been shown to be present in the injectables (see Karen Kingston Substack). Likewise, he along with Dr. Ryan deny the existence of nanotechnology in the “vaccines”. But lipid nano particles (LNPs), which Malone helped to develop, is scientifically considered NANOTECHNOLOGY!
No, Malone has a lot to answer for. It is hard to believe that he is anything but controlled opposition. I believe he is still a CIA OPERATIVE which makes him a Judas Iscariot as far as the Freedom-Truth movement is concerned.
YOU CANNOT MAKE FRIENDS WITH THE DEVIL & expect him to be ‘nice’ & trustworthy. TWC has made the WRONG MOVE! You all have struck a compromise for political and/or financial motives.
TRUMP IS NOT FIT TO LEAD OUR NATION!Whether wittingly or unwittingly, he unleashed this biological weapon of mass destruction upon humanity & in so doing he strengthened the hands of the MIC & helped to usher in the NWO/OWG surveillance state.
All those including yourself who continue to support Trump are but the blind leading the blind. Dr. Alexander, I love you but your & many others’ continued support for 45 makes you all complicit in the genocide & democide that is presently occurring. And to this day, TRUMP continues to laud the “vaccines”! What the bloody hell?! HE IS COMPROMISED! No one turns a blind eye to the facts or Truth unless they’re compromised.
Matthew 13:14-
“With them indeed is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah that says:
‘You will indeed listen, but never understand, and you will indeed look, but never perceive. For people’s heart has grown dull, and their ears are hard of hearing, and they have shut their eyes; so that they might not look with their eyes, and listen with their ears, and understand with their heart and turn -- and I would heal them.’”
I find it difficult to believe that Dr. Malone, who must have followed closely the progression of mRNA technology and experiments, took any mRNA shot. If he did, what does that say of his knowledge or ability to analyze anything, including the claims he is making in his suit? Or was it a placebo taken knowingly.
This always sticks in my mind. Note this planning was shortly after the genome was identified: https://archive.org/details/RebuildingAmericasDefenses/page/n71/mode/1up/search/bio-weapon (And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target "specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool." page 60 )
Now we find there are placebos? Ha ha ha. Of course, that's needed when planning a full-scale eugenics campaign to cull humanity. Due to the grace of God, Martin Armstrong's site, and my level-headed doctor, I did not take the jab and will never again take another so-called vaccine (sorry, genetic therapy). Whether they meet divine justice, I want earthly justice, and I want it to be extremely painful. Too many I know were harmed because of their trust.
1) My comment, if you follow the lines, is to the comment above me.
2) For what would I sue? I did not take the jab. Consequently, I have no legal standing. I guess you didn't read that far.
3) I did not ask Dr. Alexander to be my personal hatchet man, nor is there anything in my statement saying so. I think he is trying to resolve a matter, but it is misguided as long as Malone is who he is: a trojan horse in the health freedom area. And I have every right to say I think Malone is a fraud.
4) I put my money on the line: I support those who are suing.
So take your nasty, capitalized rant and put it back in the dark smelly place where your ignorant assumptions oozed from.
Thank you for being able to articulate what I've been thinking but haven't been able to so beautifully express. At this point I don't see how anyone can trust Malone's intentions and be an enthusiastic supporter of Trump.
The Dr. Alexanders of the Alt-Sphere really need to stop relying on We the People, We Peasants, if they're not going to be responsive to our concerns. Dr. Alexander needs to do some 'splainin' YESTERDAY, without our reminders.
You know how they rely on us? By publishing substacks and YouTubes etc. -- i.e., by being active in the Communications Wing of social media on this issue. And why is it that We Ordinary Peasants knew a good year or two before these Vaunted Experts like Malone and Alex Berenson et al. that Covid was screamingly hinky such as to reasonably conclude there's an international conspiracy afoot?
Glad to see your comment has made it to the top at least as of now. I personally don't expect to see Dr. Alexander reply to you here publicly, but would hope he's taken note and will be contacting the both of you regarding all of this privately, and somehow can come to a reasonable conclusion though it hardly seems likely from what I've read in Dr. Alexander's statements and seemingly IMO why you weren't invited or informed.
Diana West in her posting on this had an amusing (in a black humor sort of way) observation:
Dr. Alexander's post is here. Not only has he put a rhetorical lid on all of his earlier outrage, his prose has that frozen aspect of, say, a hostage note: "I will work with Dr. Malone in the future. It is imperative we work this out." Take me to your leader?
If Malone wants any healing he knows exactly what he needs to do: withdraw the frivolous lawsuit designed to silence legitimate criticism of his and Mattias Desmet's work, a lawsuit designed to censor opposition and questions.
We shouldn't be surprised that Malone is deaf to the true origins of totalitarianism in censorship/propaganda, which tactic he's using in his attempt to suppress the speech of Breggin et al. After all, Desmet's book deflects from this true origin and urges us to believe that we, the people, are the true originators of totalitarianism in our penchant for mechanistic thinking, and that there is no evil plot based on censorship of the truth (Desmet: there is no conspiracy!)
The truth isn't like a lion at all. The truth doesn't go out there and tear its enemies apart once unleashed. The truth is like a lamb that needs to be protected and defended and preserved against all assaults, including assaults disguised as an insult to one's "integrity" and manifesting as a lawsuit intended to set forward one's own narrative as the sole legitimate truth.
🐴 is on Tommy's Podcast (Rumble) stating that the RFK Jr. team (Charles Eisenstein is helping Kennedy with his "messaging") don't want him publicly connected to the Kennedy campaign and then Malone mentioned his lawsuit against the Breggins. (It was recorded on Father's Day and the title has to do with Peter Hotez).
Many Conservatives who support CHD have called out 🐴 for creating division within the MFM with his unfounded, vicious lawsuit against the Breggins. This viciousness by the Malones is negatively affecting the Kennedy campaign as folks like me continue to publicly criticize Kennedy for his hypocrisy. We're just getting started.
I just read somewhere that this is a big psyop and that the Breggins are playing along. Looks like the flying monkeys and cultists are attempting to smear the strongest, most honest, ethical and loving duo in the medical field by claiming they're playing along with 🐴bullying tactics. I hope I took a screenshot of the asinine comment.
First of all I love your Substack “handle”! (I believe I have commented on a comment of yours in past, as such.)
🐴 is not to be trusted…that’s why the Kennedy24 campaign is “distancing” themselves from 🐴. From an ‘intuitive’ level I never cared for the guy and felt he was an opportunistic ‘grifter’, shifting his attention to wherever he could gain more notoriety and fame. He has so much ‘baggage’ with his long standing connection (financial) with Pharma (R&D) and the DOD and it’s various ‘vaxx development’ programs, that also clouds the issue surrounding his ‘intentions and character’.
(Fortunately there are a few Substacker that have brought that to light for us all.)
Well the batches like most all of the numbers are skewed. Many of us have known there were placebo batches involved but this information just came out.
I understand the playbook, but thanks for the links. I was just showing how the placebos would make it appear as if only some of the batches were bad and why not everyone getting them was being affected by the side affects, and thus convincing those who've had the jabs have a hard time believing they were bad and be easier to convince them of exactly what you're saying.
I still wonder about how the Cabal is/was concretely deploying a mix of genocide + placebos. Does a Cabal member put on a blindfold, drink a shot of tequila and throw darts at a world map? If it's not arbitrarily random, how concretely would they calibrate it -- and then how would that planned calibration be implemented as billions of vials are shipped out and fan out to millions of different locations not only geographically, but also institutionally (clinics, hospitals, pharmacies, supermarkets, shopping malls, mobile vaxx units, etc.)? If one is going to theorize conspiracy, it's nice to at least speculate how the nuts and bolts actually play out in a plausible way.
There are multiple vials all with coding numbers. No one is saying they were being administered by the same doctors, in the same clinics, pharmacies, or hospitals. We also know there are bad batches that were sent out that mostly went to Red states too, according to the 2nd smartest guy in the world here are 2 more links
CDC confirms 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced & the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA
So pleased to hear of everyone’s commitment to coalesce and form a more cohesive and united front on these matters. Bravo for “taking the high road!”👌👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
It seems Dr. Paul Alexander failed to invite or even notify Peter and Ginger Breggin that there was a meeting, let alone inform them of what happened during it before posting this.
WTF Dr. Alexander is this TRUE?????
If so pretty bad optics and not in good faith as you claim.
Breggins Were Excluded and Had No Knowledge of the "Sensitive Meeting" Called the "Malone, Breggin, McCullough Update Meeting"
Yes I want to know also. Daily consistent curse word filled writings of Malone being a murderer then suddenly we’re supposed to believe they’re buddies? Sorry, not buying it.
In 2011, he twitted “National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) has now voted to recommend AVA (Biothrax) anthrax vaccine testing in pediatric population.” 1 This defies many human rights: you cannot under any circumstance experiment on healthy children (like they did with the COVID shots). Needless to say that vax poison completely failed and harmed those children. No retraction from Malone.
By 2014 he was an depopulation fanatic (masons or their mercenaries, are usually depop-nazis), when commenting “The world is becoming more violent. Here are the most and least peaceful countries”, he twitted “yet another predictable consequence of unchecked global population growth.”
There’s no overpopulation, not only because well developed humans contribute more than they use but also because births are shrinking year after year. More problematic of his lack of common sense on that topic, is that he is calling for policies against unchecked population: not a single one of them has been done without violating basic human rights and freedoms… especially informed consent (typical violation by the COVID shots, which by the way were sucessful in Malone’s goal of checking global population growth), yet Malone calls himself a freedom fighter (!) and of course, never retracted.
By the way, those twits are easy to verify and still online as of 23 Jun 2023, unlike this one which can’t be found in his account (it could have been deleted by Malone) and is probably a forgery considering the cursors are not Twitter’s (maybe they belong to the image editor?) and that there’s a strange square with lines in the bottom right corner.
Worked under Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He has a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 2):
“I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.” 3
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 4
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? US patents expire in 20 years: how many of those are still valid? If he could have blocked vax manufacturers, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide? By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding came from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
It’s like a physicist who worked in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. government research project (1942–45) that produced the first atomic bombs, alleging that he didn’t know his theoretical and practical knowledge would be weaponized, even though he was hired by the military and knew it could be weaponized. Worse if his patents could have stopped the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All those lives would be in his conscience.
April 2021. He said he took 2nd Moderna shot: “almost did me in. As in I almost died.” Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defense and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? He said he was expecting the EU to require it but it wasn’t required back then (took without coercion!) and hoped the vax would (magically?) kill his post-COVID cough (!). He almost died, yet he didn’t warn everybody in the interviews to avoid this huge risk until … 13 Jan 2022. 6 Not in Puerto Rico 3 Oct 2021. Not in Hawaii 18 Oct 2021.7
24 Jun 2021 Malone twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ 1 Malone didn’t answer, maybe he didn’t read it and wasn’t aware of Hill’s 180° genocidal mercenary turnaround against ivermectin. Malone surely supported ivermectin afterwards. Was he buying time for more COVID and clot-shot deaths until it was evident that he’d be charged as being controlled opposition unless supporting ivermectin? There’s a pattern: no apologies.
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 2 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 3
He also attacked Harvey Risch, MD; Judy Mikovits, MD; Paul Alexander, Ph.D.; and The Wellness Company.4
Some argue that this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.5 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such reality. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people, not the oppressors. Either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination: useless armchair warriors. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, even Desmet might just be a fooled, repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Elon’s Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 6, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections ... 3 years too late: by Jan 2020, Malone had published a paper showing that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 7 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
“He didn't come forward expressing remorse, as lots of great inventors have done before him,8 rueing their sometimes literally earth-shaking inventions, from the atom bomb9 and the Kalishnakov, to the office cubicle and the labradoodle. Notably, as of June 2023, "The History of mRNA Vaccines" still unfolds under a spray of lovely pink blossoms on Malone's website.10” 11
8 Jun 2023. “In some cases I have proceeded to delivering a cease and desist and that was enough. Dr. Richard Fleming was one such case. I sent him a letter, and he stopped… if I win a case, this will become a disincentive for those prone to this sort of behavior in the future, directed towards me or to others… Spreading hate can be quite lucrative in the age of the internet, where attention seeking behavior can be monetized.” 12
Comment: no mention of the scientific dissent causing his lawsuit. Using the “hatred” argument is an ad hominem fallacy proving lack of arguments of the self-victimized.
13 Jun 2023. When asked “What are you doing to find a way to blunt the effects of your invention?"
can taco john's block taco bell from using the words "Taco Tuesday" do they have the money to even try? apparently they have the money... we'll find out sometime.
however Bayer lost the patent on aspirin because of their in
Everyone arrives at different aspects of self-realization on their life’s journey in their own time. I applaud all who rise up (especially those who make their commitments publicly) to enable positive changes that in the end benefit us all.
I guess that's why, almost from the instant he spoke against the jabs and against the intel and 3 and 5 letter agencies, substacks like George Webb's and Sage Hana's began to attack Malone and many if not most of the commenters on this substack began to express a deep hatred and distrust of Malone.
Bravo for "taking the high road"?! After railing - almost daily, for months - against Malone? (I think that one of us doesn't really grasp the meaning of "taking the high road"...)
Breggin made a public statement that he wasn't included in this at all. I don't think he'd lie. So what is this? A pretend cumbaiya? to wash over the nuclear option Malone took?
You're replying to Bruce? There may be a misunderstanding. It appears you are taking the wide path and entering through the wide gate. Bruce is taking the narrow path and entering through the narrow gate. Most here have chosen the path you have chosen. Few find the path Bruce has chosen.
Yes Bruce Nan's grasp of the high road regarding the current aspect of Dr. Alexander's attempt at mitigation regarding the circumstances is more on target than your deferring to the historical aspects of them.
So I agree with her assessment of Dr. Alexanders attempt at trying to take the high road. However from those of us dissenting with her opinion that she is "pleased to hear of everyone’s commitment to coalesce", was inconsistent with information she was likely unaware of when she made it, regarding the fact that Dr. Alexander included the Breggins name in his title yet failed to notify and invite them to the meeting or even before he posted this article as if he had done so.
The "high road" is the road of the living, the "low road" is the path of the spirits of the departed. The "high road" does not have any specific relationship to morality or goodness per se, but one of a longer journey as the physical body is still required to navigate the opposition in the physical realm.
Sort of hard to make a bridge to Malone. Study his history. Look at who he is suing for telling the truth. LOOK at who has been filling his pockets all of these years.
Having done 14 episodes analyzing Malone's history, public statements, and lawsuit against the Breggins, I'm glad to hear someone who doesn't think this is a personal tiff to shake hands over and let bygones be bygones. Do others believe that the agenda is now over, we survived Covid and the vaccine, and now everything's back to normal? We're still in the thick of it, and need to bring critical thinking. In this one, I talk about controlled op being the sheepdog they send to round up the runaways and lead them through a different route back to the slaughterhouse: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-slaughterhouse-four.
David Martin recently was handed an envelope and it was about what is coming next. Starts with an M and ends with a G. He knows they have no intention of stopping their campaign. He was just on News Real. Worth watching.
I understand your concern Joy in light of Dr. Malone's relentless exposes of intelligence agencies and lawsuits against institutions such as The Washington Post. Whether we like itor not, the agencies play a legitimate role and do not need the scrutiny Malone is putting them under and, although we may disagree, the Washington Post has a right to promote the official covid narrative and to say whatever it likes. They should not have to fear defamation suits. I am sure that most on this substack would agree with you about Malone Joy. He should drop his lawsuit against the Washington Post immediately and cease his incessant critiques of the 3 and 5 letter agencies.
GCHQ, JTRIG, Five Eyes and COVIDcrisis PsyWar. How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
ANW, I can't tell if you're serious here. You're talking about "relentless exposure of intelligence agencies" but his article is about UK intelligence agencies, not US. And of course you know that no one cares about him suing WaPo. It would be disingenuous to conflate his lawsuit against the Breggins with one against WaPo.
He goes on about "Philip Cross" editing his Wikipedia page, but he's been trotting out that horse for at least a year. His WikiSpooks reference got me to 'out' my friend to him who took over for the founder, back when I was a Malone-believer. Liam Sturgess, who works with Mathew Crawford, is another WikiSpooks editor and they are both exposing Malone, along with JJ Couey, Mark Kulacz, Diana West and others.
The US uses UK agencies to investigate US citizens to circumvent US law. It was ecposed many years ago during the Obama regime. But many Americans are still ignorant about it. Malone is just making some more aware. UK agencies were used to spy on Trump and carry out other clandestine activities. Why do you think Christopher Steele compiled the dirty dossier? Thanks for the links.
Malone has many direct sources within the DoD and CIA. Jill's dad was in intelligence, she's a 2nd gen spook. If he wants to be a whistleblower, he doesn't need to 'out' foreign agencies or quote 2014 Greenwald articles citing Snowden. We can go direct to those sources, yes? He has 20+ yrs consulting for the DoD, so why is it the rest of us who are exposing the projects he was involved in, like testing the anthrax vaccine on kids or getting e-cig prototypes for the DoD just before the vaping 'flu-like' epidemic? I'd sure like to see him blow the whistle on these things. But according to his book and statements in interviews, he is "in no way, shape or form an anti-vaxxer." His working hypothesis is that there's nothing nefarious going on. If you agree with that, he's your guy.
Most spooks are lowly paid compared to scientists who are themselves not particularly highly paid. Look at Chelsea Manning. Although he probably required a high level clearance for some of his projects, most of those Malone worked on were probably fairly mundane. He would know little and it's perfectly understandable that what little he does know he's not prepared to disclose. Jill's dad's work in intelligence means nothing. She is not him. He would have had to access anddisclose information only on a need to know basis. People need to stop developing these elaborate delusions and get back in touch with reality. It"s those sorts of delusions that no doubt led Timothy McVeigh to target the people working in the Oklahoma building he blew up. Many probably had similar connections and career backgrounds to Malone. Regardless of who they worked for they were not nefarious people snd I can see nothing nefarious about Malone.
Wait, did you just compare me to Timothy McVeigh? You've certainly confirmed my point by inferring that I'm a delusional conspiracy theorist, one step from blowing up buildings, while those who work for the DoD and CIA and FBI are not nefarious at all. I'll go back to doing serious research for those who care about the facts.
Convenient to leave out the fact he IS suing the biggest and MOST truthful voices, RedVoice media, (Stew Peter's network).
He tells HALF truths and he never tells the WHOLE truth. I know where he got almost all of his $$$, and it's straight from the people trying to maim and kill us. He's for damage control.
How unethical of him not to keep his mouth shut and become a mainstream shill for the mRNA jabs like Hotez, Offit and Gorski. How unethical for him to.rail against the intel.agencies. Big Pharma must have been unwilling to keep paying him those big $$$. Very unethical to get himself labelled as an anti-vaxx nutjob and censored misinformation spreader by the mainstream instead of a reputable scientist by the billions who believe in the jabs.
Excellent news🙏🏼♥️‼️The division cut deep. We need each other! We even need the ones still asleep to wake up and join us. Division is the enemy’s strategy.
See his substack. Is this pretend world so people are forgiving of Malone's nuclear option against someone we respect and trust? I don't know but let's make sure we're not mislead.
Interesting.... I will hold positive thoughts that just having this conversation will prompt a positive outcome for all of these concerned scientists and MDs 🤞
The Breggins have documented the corruption in the medical industrial complex including the government agencies. They see how people were driven to desperation in fear of C-19. They wrote and spoke of the tragedies and were targeted and cancelled by the media. They were also targeted by Malone for opposing his efforts to “diagnose” groups of people as having mental disorder. Malone is a lab man with no credentials related to psychiatry. I don’t know about you, but he can take his mass formation (psychosis) and shove it. Do you really think pharma and government will sit back and twiddle their thumbs at the idea of mass formation? They never miss an opportunity to act. Never let a crisis go to waste. 💉
Thanks, Paul. I can appreciate good intentions here, but it's not leaving me feeling warm and fuzzy. Reconciliations only work when all parties are being honest and transparent. This is simply not the case with RM. I hope you're reading George Webb's work. There's a tangled knot with Malone and our DOD and intelligence agencies, and it would take a lot of honest answers from him, before I would consider him an earnest participant. If there is no accountability what's the point? I see how it benefits him, but I do not see how it helps the 'medical freedom movement." Who's trying to take over this movement and guide it for their purposes? I think we know. And I think we know who's been working hand-in-hand with them for years.
Dr. Alexander is a busy man and a scientist. He's read some of Webb's work. Dr. Alexander is not a crackpot following tangled knots down rabbi holes. Why on earth would he want to read any more of Webb? He's got more important things to do with his time.
Yup, lynch mobs don't assemble by themselves. Being a Trump apologist when he still thinks Warp Speed was great is so difficult. I like Paul but wish the scales would fall from his eyes.
Were the Breggin’s notified of this high-level discussion about them in their absence? You know, out of respect and as a decent courtesy? At best, even as an obligation?
I have, after reading his alarming post about the surprise and his way of discovering the meeting by way of a substack email. I had to comment there as well, to which he replied with great disappointment. Again, I say, rude!
Outstanding! Bravo! 👏 Excellent work Doc, thank you for going the extra miles (sic), all of you. I know how highly challenging this kind of work can be and what it takes to even begin to approach the parties involved. Excellent!
Hopefully you won't all need couples counseling🤣🇺🇸
Good luck. But there is something rotten in Denmark.
Defend the Breggins; they are our elders in the fight for humanity, and until Malone exhibits genuine and profound remorse for the horror his "invention" has visited upon the women of this world, and owned up to the possibilities of it re-writing the next generations' DNA, as well as all the "side casualties," I have zero trust in this man.
His actions, not his words, are what must be examined.
And Dr. Peter McCullough is one of the most brave, most decent, most honest, most giving individuals I have ever had the honor to know of.
That he and Malone are at odds should tell you everything.
Breggin just released a statement that you have literally left him completely out of this. Is that true? I Dom't think he'd lie. Also, as much as I appreciate what Epoch has exposed, who owns them, funds them? All of that has to be out in the open because if they have an agenda we don't want to be pulled into it if suddenly their direction goes in an unexpected direction. Transparency is all we want. Not including the Breggins is the opposite of that.
Phony title. You imply the Breggins were there. That's a big lie. You lie. "Neither Dr. Peter Breggin nor Ginger Breggin has been approached, informed, or in any way contacted about the above supposed sensitive meeting. We had no information that there was a meeting, a goal to reach "unity", or a goal to "bridge the Malone-Breggin split." We were not informed that a public announcement would be made of this meeting, in which we were discussed but excluded.
"We do not have “a split” with anyone. We brought forth vital intellectual and political opinions and insights about a controversial public figure and were sued for $25 million dollars by Dr. Malone. We have not, and will not give up our free speech under any circumstances."
? We need to support and encourage one anothe? - those of good faith. Why weren't the Breggins included in the 'high level talks'? Malone must be excluded presently- "All you need to know is that he's suing his colleagues, the Breggins for $25,000,000"!!
i thought right from the beginning that they had better settle or get a lawyer or take their stuff and go beyond the courts jurisdiction .
i assume they got a lawyer. how much does their lawyer cost?
now i don't know where the truth lies with respect to the legality of "validness / in-validness" goes...
now i don't care who wins. but i am pretty sure the lawyers will come out ahead if they aren't doing it for free. and i don't want to contribute to the lawyer's funds.
i'm sure the lawyers are happy to separate their clients from their money.
"We appreciate Dr. Alexander’s concerns, but we had no foreknowledge of it whatsoever and only learned about this meeting when we received his Substack announcement today. Justice and Constitutional rights will only be achieved with Dr. Malone’s withdrawal of the invalid $25 million lawsuit against us without reservation or limitation to our rights to free speech about any topic we choose. We will not abandon our defense of freedom of speech and we won’t abandon anyone who is being oppressed in their health freedom reform efforts.
Please see our full writeup in our substack.
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/breggins-were-excluded-and-had-no
Not so fast there Dr. Alexander. Malone needs to explain to the world at large why he failed to speak out agst. the shots which contained his beloved mRNA technology BEFORE the shots were administered. As Malone stated to Glenn Beck, mRNA creates a back door to the modification of the human genome as part of a transhumanism agenda. It’s widely known that this plan is supported by the Military Industrial Complex & the Globalist-Elites.
Malone has never come out as a legitimate whistleblower agst. the MIC or CIA. He has yet to disavow the CIA who was his former EMPLOYER. Sorry, but I’m of the belief that once a person is a CIA PAID agent, thery’re in for life UNLESS they become a BONAFIDE whistleblower. Malone has not done this.
Also suspect is Maloney’s refusal to speak about synthetic snake venom peptides in the shots. They have been shown to be present in the injectables (see Karen Kingston Substack). Likewise, he along with Dr. Ryan deny the existence of nanotechnology in the “vaccines”. But lipid nano particles (LNPs), which Malone helped to develop, is scientifically considered NANOTECHNOLOGY!
No, Malone has a lot to answer for. It is hard to believe that he is anything but controlled opposition. I believe he is still a CIA OPERATIVE which makes him a Judas Iscariot as far as the Freedom-Truth movement is concerned.
YOU CANNOT MAKE FRIENDS WITH THE DEVIL & expect him to be ‘nice’ & trustworthy. TWC has made the WRONG MOVE! You all have struck a compromise for political and/or financial motives.
TRUMP IS NOT FIT TO LEAD OUR NATION!Whether wittingly or unwittingly, he unleashed this biological weapon of mass destruction upon humanity & in so doing he strengthened the hands of the MIC & helped to usher in the NWO/OWG surveillance state.
All those including yourself who continue to support Trump are but the blind leading the blind. Dr. Alexander, I love you but your & many others’ continued support for 45 makes you all complicit in the genocide & democide that is presently occurring. And to this day, TRUMP continues to laud the “vaccines”! What the bloody hell?! HE IS COMPROMISED! No one turns a blind eye to the facts or Truth unless they’re compromised.
Matthew 13:14-
“With them indeed is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah that says:
‘You will indeed listen, but never understand, and you will indeed look, but never perceive. For people’s heart has grown dull, and their ears are hard of hearing, and they have shut their eyes; so that they might not look with their eyes, and listen with their ears, and understand with their heart and turn -- and I would heal them.’”
I find it difficult to believe that Dr. Malone, who must have followed closely the progression of mRNA technology and experiments, took any mRNA shot. If he did, what does that say of his knowledge or ability to analyze anything, including the claims he is making in his suit? Or was it a placebo taken knowingly.
This always sticks in my mind. Note this planning was shortly after the genome was identified: https://archive.org/details/RebuildingAmericasDefenses/page/n71/mode/1up/search/bio-weapon (And advanced forms of biological warfare that can target "specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool." page 60 )
Now we find there are placebos? Ha ha ha. Of course, that's needed when planning a full-scale eugenics campaign to cull humanity. Due to the grace of God, Martin Armstrong's site, and my level-headed doctor, I did not take the jab and will never again take another so-called vaccine (sorry, genetic therapy). Whether they meet divine justice, I want earthly justice, and I want it to be extremely painful. Too many I know were harmed because of their trust.
Then file a lawsuit. Dr. Alexander is not your personal hatchet man. Sue the govt. Put YOUR MONEY ON THE LINE.
1) My comment, if you follow the lines, is to the comment above me.
2) For what would I sue? I did not take the jab. Consequently, I have no legal standing. I guess you didn't read that far.
3) I did not ask Dr. Alexander to be my personal hatchet man, nor is there anything in my statement saying so. I think he is trying to resolve a matter, but it is misguided as long as Malone is who he is: a trojan horse in the health freedom area. And I have every right to say I think Malone is a fraud.
4) I put my money on the line: I support those who are suing.
So take your nasty, capitalized rant and put it back in the dark smelly place where your ignorant assumptions oozed from.
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Thank you for being able to articulate what I've been thinking but haven't been able to so beautifully express. At this point I don't see how anyone can trust Malone's intentions and be an enthusiastic supporter of Trump.
The Breggins nailed it in their book, which I read. This is just an attack from a Trojan horse named Malone.
Hey Dr Alexander, when your wife and you have a nice romantic dinner, do you invite her, or, just tell her how wonderful it was afterwards?
The Dr. Alexanders of the Alt-Sphere really need to stop relying on We the People, We Peasants, if they're not going to be responsive to our concerns. Dr. Alexander needs to do some 'splainin' YESTERDAY, without our reminders.
You know how they rely on us? By publishing substacks and YouTubes etc. -- i.e., by being active in the Communications Wing of social media on this issue. And why is it that We Ordinary Peasants knew a good year or two before these Vaunted Experts like Malone and Alex Berenson et al. that Covid was screamingly hinky such as to reasonably conclude there's an international conspiracy afoot?
Glad to see your comment has made it to the top at least as of now. I personally don't expect to see Dr. Alexander reply to you here publicly, but would hope he's taken note and will be contacting the both of you regarding all of this privately, and somehow can come to a reasonable conclusion though it hardly seems likely from what I've read in Dr. Alexander's statements and seemingly IMO why you weren't invited or informed.
Diana West in her posting on this had an amusing (in a black humor sort of way) observation:
Dr. Alexander's post is here. Not only has he put a rhetorical lid on all of his earlier outrage, his prose has that frozen aspect of, say, a hostage note: "I will work with Dr. Malone in the future. It is imperative we work this out." Take me to your leader?
https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/4664/The-Plot-Clots.aspx
If Malone wants any healing he knows exactly what he needs to do: withdraw the frivolous lawsuit designed to silence legitimate criticism of his and Mattias Desmet's work, a lawsuit designed to censor opposition and questions.
We shouldn't be surprised that Malone is deaf to the true origins of totalitarianism in censorship/propaganda, which tactic he's using in his attempt to suppress the speech of Breggin et al. After all, Desmet's book deflects from this true origin and urges us to believe that we, the people, are the true originators of totalitarianism in our penchant for mechanistic thinking, and that there is no evil plot based on censorship of the truth (Desmet: there is no conspiracy!)
The truth isn't like a lion at all. The truth doesn't go out there and tear its enemies apart once unleashed. The truth is like a lamb that needs to be protected and defended and preserved against all assaults, including assaults disguised as an insult to one's "integrity" and manifesting as a lawsuit intended to set forward one's own narrative as the sole legitimate truth.
🐴 is on Tommy's Podcast (Rumble) stating that the RFK Jr. team (Charles Eisenstein is helping Kennedy with his "messaging") don't want him publicly connected to the Kennedy campaign and then Malone mentioned his lawsuit against the Breggins. (It was recorded on Father's Day and the title has to do with Peter Hotez).
Many Conservatives who support CHD have called out 🐴 for creating division within the MFM with his unfounded, vicious lawsuit against the Breggins. This viciousness by the Malones is negatively affecting the Kennedy campaign as folks like me continue to publicly criticize Kennedy for his hypocrisy. We're just getting started.
I just read somewhere that this is a big psyop and that the Breggins are playing along. Looks like the flying monkeys and cultists are attempting to smear the strongest, most honest, ethical and loving duo in the medical field by claiming they're playing along with 🐴bullying tactics. I hope I took a screenshot of the asinine comment.
First of all I love your Substack “handle”! (I believe I have commented on a comment of yours in past, as such.)
🐴 is not to be trusted…that’s why the Kennedy24 campaign is “distancing” themselves from 🐴. From an ‘intuitive’ level I never cared for the guy and felt he was an opportunistic ‘grifter’, shifting his attention to wherever he could gain more notoriety and fame. He has so much ‘baggage’ with his long standing connection (financial) with Pharma (R&D) and the DOD and it’s various ‘vaxx development’ programs, that also clouds the issue surrounding his ‘intentions and character’.
(Fortunately there are a few Substacker that have brought that to light for us all.)
¡Nos Vemos en La Calle!
FL
Is that a horse emoticon referring to Malone?
Yes…
¡Pa'lante mi hermana! 😘
👏🏼💪🏼
Do you mean Charles Eisenstein?
It's hard to keep up with all of the games these leaders not leaders are playing.
Well the batches like most all of the numbers are skewed. Many of us have known there were placebo batches involved but this information just came out.
From Kim Iverson Show
https://rumble.com/v2wx3w0-bombshell-one-in-three-pfizer-vaccine-shots-may-have-been-a-placebo.html
Where she got the info from, and we can assume this was the case in most every other country as well.
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/28/pfizer-vaccine-batches-in-the-eu-were-placebos-say-scientists/?
I understand the playbook, but thanks for the links. I was just showing how the placebos would make it appear as if only some of the batches were bad and why not everyone getting them was being affected by the side affects, and thus convincing those who've had the jabs have a hard time believing they were bad and be easier to convince them of exactly what you're saying.
I still wonder about how the Cabal is/was concretely deploying a mix of genocide + placebos. Does a Cabal member put on a blindfold, drink a shot of tequila and throw darts at a world map? If it's not arbitrarily random, how concretely would they calibrate it -- and then how would that planned calibration be implemented as billions of vials are shipped out and fan out to millions of different locations not only geographically, but also institutionally (clinics, hospitals, pharmacies, supermarkets, shopping malls, mobile vaxx units, etc.)? If one is going to theorize conspiracy, it's nice to at least speculate how the nuts and bolts actually play out in a plausible way.
There are multiple vials all with coding numbers. No one is saying they were being administered by the same doctors, in the same clinics, pharmacies, or hospitals. We also know there are bad batches that were sent out that mostly went to Red states too, according to the 2nd smartest guy in the world here are 2 more links
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-study-of-pfizer-covid-vaccine
‘Bombshell’ Study of Pfizer COVID Vaccine Suggests Some People Got Highly Dangerous Shots, Others Got a Placebo,
The second link it right at the top of this article about the Red states
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/cdc-confirms-100-of-reported-covid
CDC confirms 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced & the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA
I believe Malone will be controlling, it's not normal to be lawsuit friendly just because someone disagrees with you.
So pleased to hear of everyone’s commitment to coalesce and form a more cohesive and united front on these matters. Bravo for “taking the high road!”👌👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Everyone's???
It seems Dr. Paul Alexander failed to invite or even notify Peter and Ginger Breggin that there was a meeting, let alone inform them of what happened during it before posting this.
WTF Dr. Alexander is this TRUE?????
If so pretty bad optics and not in good faith as you claim.
Breggins Were Excluded and Had No Knowledge of the "Sensitive Meeting" Called the "Malone, Breggin, McCullough Update Meeting"
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/breggins-were-excluded-and-had-no?
A proof of goodwill? Malone should have dropped the lawsuit against the Breggins before that meeting!
The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: reducing infant mortality, can’t reduce population growth!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth
The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the 2024 International PLANdemc Treaty: it’s the definitions!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic
FREE “wake-up” MOVIES !
15 million watched the first one in 3 days!
Watch as if your lives depended on it: literally!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
2035 You'll go nowhere and you'll be happy =(
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be
Is this pretend world indeed. Hopefully we will get them to address it but I doubt it.
Breggin just wrote about not being aware of this little pow wow at all. So if that is true what is this really?
Yes I want to know also. Daily consistent curse word filled writings of Malone being a murderer then suddenly we’re supposed to believe they’re buddies? Sorry, not buying it.
I really don't know. Breggin's excellent reputation goes decades back so one can't ignore that and shouldn't.
The REAL Robert W. Malone, MD
In 2011, he twitted “National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) has now voted to recommend AVA (Biothrax) anthrax vaccine testing in pediatric population.” 1 This defies many human rights: you cannot under any circumstance experiment on healthy children (like they did with the COVID shots). Needless to say that vax poison completely failed and harmed those children. No retraction from Malone.
By 2014 he was an depopulation fanatic (masons or their mercenaries, are usually depop-nazis), when commenting “The world is becoming more violent. Here are the most and least peaceful countries”, he twitted “yet another predictable consequence of unchecked global population growth.”
https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/479646933737545728
There’s no overpopulation, not only because well developed humans contribute more than they use but also because births are shrinking year after year. More problematic of his lack of common sense on that topic, is that he is calling for policies against unchecked population: not a single one of them has been done without violating basic human rights and freedoms… especially informed consent (typical violation by the COVID shots, which by the way were sucessful in Malone’s goal of checking global population growth), yet Malone calls himself a freedom fighter (!) and of course, never retracted.
By the way, those twits are easy to verify and still online as of 23 Jun 2023, unlike this one which can’t be found in his account (it could have been deleted by Malone) and is probably a forgery considering the cursors are not Twitter’s (maybe they belong to the image editor?) and that there’s a strange square with lines in the bottom right corner.
Worked under Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He has a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 2):
“I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.” 3
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 4
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? US patents expire in 20 years: how many of those are still valid? If he could have blocked vax manufacturers, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide? By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding came from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
It’s like a physicist who worked in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. government research project (1942–45) that produced the first atomic bombs, alleging that he didn’t know his theoretical and practical knowledge would be weaponized, even though he was hired by the military and knew it could be weaponized. Worse if his patents could have stopped the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All those lives would be in his conscience.
April 2021. He said he took 2nd Moderna shot: “almost did me in. As in I almost died.” Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defense and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? He said he was expecting the EU to require it but it wasn’t required back then (took without coercion!) and hoped the vax would (magically?) kill his post-COVID cough (!). He almost died, yet he didn’t warn everybody in the interviews to avoid this huge risk until … 13 Jan 2022. 6 Not in Puerto Rico 3 Oct 2021. Not in Hawaii 18 Oct 2021.7
24 Jun 2021 Malone twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ 1 Malone didn’t answer, maybe he didn’t read it and wasn’t aware of Hill’s 180° genocidal mercenary turnaround against ivermectin. Malone surely supported ivermectin afterwards. Was he buying time for more COVID and clot-shot deaths until it was evident that he’d be charged as being controlled opposition unless supporting ivermectin? There’s a pattern: no apologies.
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 2 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 3
He also attacked Harvey Risch, MD; Judy Mikovits, MD; Paul Alexander, Ph.D.; and The Wellness Company.4
Some argue that this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.5 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such reality. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people, not the oppressors. Either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination: useless armchair warriors. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, even Desmet might just be a fooled, repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Elon’s Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 6, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections ... 3 years too late: by Jan 2020, Malone had published a paper showing that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 7 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
“He didn't come forward expressing remorse, as lots of great inventors have done before him,8 rueing their sometimes literally earth-shaking inventions, from the atom bomb9 and the Kalishnakov, to the office cubicle and the labradoodle. Notably, as of June 2023, "The History of mRNA Vaccines" still unfolds under a spray of lovely pink blossoms on Malone's website.10” 11
8 Jun 2023. “In some cases I have proceeded to delivering a cease and desist and that was enough. Dr. Richard Fleming was one such case. I sent him a letter, and he stopped… if I win a case, this will become a disincentive for those prone to this sort of behavior in the future, directed towards me or to others… Spreading hate can be quite lucrative in the age of the internet, where attention seeking behavior can be monetized.” 12
Comment: no mention of the scientific dissent causing his lawsuit. Using the “hatred” argument is an ad hominem fallacy proving lack of arguments of the self-victimized.
13 Jun 2023. When asked “What are you doing to find a way to blunt the effects of your invention?"
The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Gates-WHO: vaccines can’t reduce population, except by murdering
Proof: reducing infant mortality, can’t reduce population growth!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth
The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the 2024 International PLANdemc Treaty: it’s the definitions!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic
FREE “wake-up” MOVIES !
15 million watched the first one in 3 days!
Watch as if your lives depended on it: literally!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
2035 You'll go nowhere and you'll be happy =(
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be
Great info!
can taco john's block taco bell from using the words "Taco Tuesday" do they have the money to even try? apparently they have the money... we'll find out sometime.
however Bayer lost the patent on aspirin because of their in
actions.
Bayer didn't lose aspirin: the patent expired in spite of their efforts to repurpose it.
If there's anything Pharmafia knows is about extending patents ad nauseam.
btw.... Moderna has sued Pfizer over the mRNA thing...
why am i still seeing Pfizer jab still on the market?????
if it is so easy to stop someone from producing a product?
they lost the right to stop others from calling their production of salicylate aspirin.
Everyone arrives at different aspects of self-realization on their life’s journey in their own time. I applaud all who rise up (especially those who make their commitments publicly) to enable positive changes that in the end benefit us all.
yeah ?...telling lies and supporting liars deffinitely benefits you who do.
No-one else
I guess that's why, almost from the instant he spoke against the jabs and against the intel and 3 and 5 letter agencies, substacks like George Webb's and Sage Hana's began to attack Malone and many if not most of the commenters on this substack began to express a deep hatred and distrust of Malone.
Bravo for "taking the high road"?! After railing - almost daily, for months - against Malone? (I think that one of us doesn't really grasp the meaning of "taking the high road"...)
Breggin made a public statement that he wasn't included in this at all. I don't think he'd lie. So what is this? A pretend cumbaiya? to wash over the nuclear option Malone took?
You're replying to Bruce? There may be a misunderstanding. It appears you are taking the wide path and entering through the wide gate. Bruce is taking the narrow path and entering through the narrow gate. Most here have chosen the path you have chosen. Few find the path Bruce has chosen.
Yes Bruce Nan's grasp of the high road regarding the current aspect of Dr. Alexander's attempt at mitigation regarding the circumstances is more on target than your deferring to the historical aspects of them.
So I agree with her assessment of Dr. Alexanders attempt at trying to take the high road. However from those of us dissenting with her opinion that she is "pleased to hear of everyone’s commitment to coalesce", was inconsistent with information she was likely unaware of when she made it, regarding the fact that Dr. Alexander included the Breggins name in his title yet failed to notify and invite them to the meeting or even before he posted this article as if he had done so.
The "high road" is the road of the living, the "low road" is the path of the spirits of the departed. The "high road" does not have any specific relationship to morality or goodness per se, but one of a longer journey as the physical body is still required to navigate the opposition in the physical realm.
I don't know about that Bruce. It could be an adaptation from Andrew Lang's version of Loch Lomond. Instead of Scotland and Carlisle, substitute DC.
O ye'll tak' the high road, and I'll tak' the low road,
And I'll be in Scotland afore ye,
But me and my true love will never meet again,
On the bonnie, bonnie banks o' Loch Lomond.
And the wuddy has her ain, and we twa are left alane,
Free o' Carlisle gaol in the dawing.
Wuddy means hangman's rope; dawing is dawn.
oh and just sweep the alarming outrageous false accusations before court (against Breggins/Ruby) and the disgusting penalty sought = under the rug?
"have a nice day" on your high road of "let's turn a blind eye..."
Sort of hard to make a bridge to Malone. Study his history. Look at who he is suing for telling the truth. LOOK at who has been filling his pockets all of these years.
Having done 14 episodes analyzing Malone's history, public statements, and lawsuit against the Breggins, I'm glad to hear someone who doesn't think this is a personal tiff to shake hands over and let bygones be bygones. Do others believe that the agenda is now over, we survived Covid and the vaccine, and now everything's back to normal? We're still in the thick of it, and need to bring critical thinking. In this one, I talk about controlled op being the sheepdog they send to round up the runaways and lead them through a different route back to the slaughterhouse: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malone-and-slaughterhouse-four.
David Martin recently was handed an envelope and it was about what is coming next. Starts with an M and ends with a G. He knows they have no intention of stopping their campaign. He was just on News Real. Worth watching.
Maybe he meant, and maybenot, starts with a W and ends with a G.
The Spike Protein, The Warburg Effect and Carcinogenesis. A Molecular Preset for Inducing Cancer
https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/the-spike-protein-the-warburg-effect?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Where can we find this? Can I just search News Real? Is there a paywall?
David E Martin's Apple Podcast with News Real very recent.
Marburg?
It's thanks for people like you that I know about Malone.
Godspeed,
Joy
I believe the most parsimonious interpretation of Malone might be that of a self-serving limited hangout (for hire +/or compromised).
Aside from that, he always sets off my bullshit meter-- ever since his Dark Horse podcast appearance w/ Kirsch.
Agreed!
I understand your concern Joy in light of Dr. Malone's relentless exposes of intelligence agencies and lawsuits against institutions such as The Washington Post. Whether we like itor not, the agencies play a legitimate role and do not need the scrutiny Malone is putting them under and, although we may disagree, the Washington Post has a right to promote the official covid narrative and to say whatever it likes. They should not have to fear defamation suits. I am sure that most on this substack would agree with you about Malone Joy. He should drop his lawsuit against the Washington Post immediately and cease his incessant critiques of the 3 and 5 letter agencies.
GCHQ, JTRIG, Five Eyes and COVIDcrisis PsyWar. How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/gchq-jtrig-five-eyes-and-covidcrisis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
ANW, I can't tell if you're serious here. You're talking about "relentless exposure of intelligence agencies" but his article is about UK intelligence agencies, not US. And of course you know that no one cares about him suing WaPo. It would be disingenuous to conflate his lawsuit against the Breggins with one against WaPo.
He goes on about "Philip Cross" editing his Wikipedia page, but he's been trotting out that horse for at least a year. His WikiSpooks reference got me to 'out' my friend to him who took over for the founder, back when I was a Malone-believer. Liam Sturgess, who works with Mathew Crawford, is another WikiSpooks editor and they are both exposing Malone, along with JJ Couey, Mark Kulacz, Diana West and others.
Curiously, Malone misspelled Glenn Greenwald's name twice when he quoted him, which seems like when he talked about getting his ivermectin at Wallmart (sic). Not a lot of familiarity. Here are articles that give more background: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/phony-maloney-and-wikispooks and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/5th-gen-warfare-isnt-throwing-pixels.
The US uses UK agencies to investigate US citizens to circumvent US law. It was ecposed many years ago during the Obama regime. But many Americans are still ignorant about it. Malone is just making some more aware. UK agencies were used to spy on Trump and carry out other clandestine activities. Why do you think Christopher Steele compiled the dirty dossier? Thanks for the links.
Malone has many direct sources within the DoD and CIA. Jill's dad was in intelligence, she's a 2nd gen spook. If he wants to be a whistleblower, he doesn't need to 'out' foreign agencies or quote 2014 Greenwald articles citing Snowden. We can go direct to those sources, yes? He has 20+ yrs consulting for the DoD, so why is it the rest of us who are exposing the projects he was involved in, like testing the anthrax vaccine on kids or getting e-cig prototypes for the DoD just before the vaping 'flu-like' epidemic? I'd sure like to see him blow the whistle on these things. But according to his book and statements in interviews, he is "in no way, shape or form an anti-vaxxer." His working hypothesis is that there's nothing nefarious going on. If you agree with that, he's your guy.
Most spooks are lowly paid compared to scientists who are themselves not particularly highly paid. Look at Chelsea Manning. Although he probably required a high level clearance for some of his projects, most of those Malone worked on were probably fairly mundane. He would know little and it's perfectly understandable that what little he does know he's not prepared to disclose. Jill's dad's work in intelligence means nothing. She is not him. He would have had to access anddisclose information only on a need to know basis. People need to stop developing these elaborate delusions and get back in touch with reality. It"s those sorts of delusions that no doubt led Timothy McVeigh to target the people working in the Oklahoma building he blew up. Many probably had similar connections and career backgrounds to Malone. Regardless of who they worked for they were not nefarious people snd I can see nothing nefarious about Malone.
Wait, did you just compare me to Timothy McVeigh? You've certainly confirmed my point by inferring that I'm a delusional conspiracy theorist, one step from blowing up buildings, while those who work for the DoD and CIA and FBI are not nefarious at all. I'll go back to doing serious research for those who care about the facts.
Thanks for sending those, coop. I have seen them before but I'm preparing another episode on Malone so it will be good to have them handy.
Convenient to leave out the fact he IS suing the biggest and MOST truthful voices, RedVoice media, (Stew Peter's network).
He tells HALF truths and he never tells the WHOLE truth. I know where he got almost all of his $$$, and it's straight from the people trying to maim and kill us. He's for damage control.
How unethical of him not to keep his mouth shut and become a mainstream shill for the mRNA jabs like Hotez, Offit and Gorski. How unethical for him to.rail against the intel.agencies. Big Pharma must have been unwilling to keep paying him those big $$$. Very unethical to get himself labelled as an anti-vaxx nutjob and censored misinformation spreader by the mainstream instead of a reputable scientist by the billions who believe in the jabs.
Malone defends all of the other poisonous jabs. He is up there for damage control. Controlled opposition.
Thanks. This makes perfect sense considering where Malone got most of his money.
Excellent news🙏🏼♥️‼️The division cut deep. We need each other! We even need the ones still asleep to wake up and join us. Division is the enemy’s strategy.
Breggin was not made aware of any of this and just released a statement on substack about it.. He and his wife not included. So what is this?
Hmmm
See his substack. Is this pretend world so people are forgiving of Malone's nuclear option against someone we respect and trust? I don't know but let's make sure we're not mislead.
Interesting.... I will hold positive thoughts that just having this conversation will prompt a positive outcome for all of these concerned scientists and MDs 🤞
Why on earth would you not reach out to the Breggins to participate in this?
This is very disrespectful to them.
The Breggins have documented the corruption in the medical industrial complex including the government agencies. They see how people were driven to desperation in fear of C-19. They wrote and spoke of the tragedies and were targeted and cancelled by the media. They were also targeted by Malone for opposing his efforts to “diagnose” groups of people as having mental disorder. Malone is a lab man with no credentials related to psychiatry. I don’t know about you, but he can take his mass formation (psychosis) and shove it. Do you really think pharma and government will sit back and twiddle their thumbs at the idea of mass formation? They never miss an opportunity to act. Never let a crisis go to waste. 💉
I’m well-aware of what has transpired, and the players. I don’t need it explained. My comment is directed to Dr. Paul and the TWC group.
Amen. Applause!!
Thanks, Paul. I can appreciate good intentions here, but it's not leaving me feeling warm and fuzzy. Reconciliations only work when all parties are being honest and transparent. This is simply not the case with RM. I hope you're reading George Webb's work. There's a tangled knot with Malone and our DOD and intelligence agencies, and it would take a lot of honest answers from him, before I would consider him an earnest participant. If there is no accountability what's the point? I see how it benefits him, but I do not see how it helps the 'medical freedom movement." Who's trying to take over this movement and guide it for their purposes? I think we know. And I think we know who's been working hand-in-hand with them for years.
Dr. Alexander is a busy man and a scientist. He's read some of Webb's work. Dr. Alexander is not a crackpot following tangled knots down rabbi holes. Why on earth would he want to read any more of Webb? He's got more important things to do with his time.
Do you speak for Dr. Alexander? Or are you just being a presumptuous prat?
The latter, like white on rice.
Yup, lynch mobs don't assemble by themselves. Being a Trump apologist when he still thinks Warp Speed was great is so difficult. I like Paul but wish the scales would fall from his eyes.
I am so so happy to see this happening! I was not enjoying the bashing at all!
See Breggin's recent substack. He was completely uninformed of this little pow wow.
You must be lonely here MJCMimi, not being psychotic, having empathy and being at the upper end of the IQ distribution under that normal curve.
You again. Trying to make friends and influence people. 😂
According to the Breggins, they knew nothing about these discussions and were never found out until they read this substack. Why?
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/breggins-were-excluded-and-had-no/comments?utm_source=substack%2Csubstack&publication_id=731509&post_id=134606397&utm_medium=email%2Cemail&isFreemail=true&comments=true
Were the Breggin’s notified of this high-level discussion about them in their absence? You know, out of respect and as a decent courtesy? At best, even as an obligation?
no. they certainly were not! read what they say.
I have, after reading his alarming post about the surprise and his way of discovering the meeting by way of a substack email. I had to comment there as well, to which he replied with great disappointment. Again, I say, rude!
Outstanding! Bravo! 👏 Excellent work Doc, thank you for going the extra miles (sic), all of you. I know how highly challenging this kind of work can be and what it takes to even begin to approach the parties involved. Excellent!
Hopefully you won't all need couples counseling🤣🇺🇸
Hmmm not sure what’s going on. I’m hearing a different story from the Breggins.
What about Dr Jane Ruby?
Yes, why was she excluded?
Good luck. But there is something rotten in Denmark.
Defend the Breggins; they are our elders in the fight for humanity, and until Malone exhibits genuine and profound remorse for the horror his "invention" has visited upon the women of this world, and owned up to the possibilities of it re-writing the next generations' DNA, as well as all the "side casualties," I have zero trust in this man.
His actions, not his words, are what must be examined.
And Dr. Peter McCullough is one of the most brave, most decent, most honest, most giving individuals I have ever had the honor to know of.
That he and Malone are at odds should tell you everything.
Yet McCullough (who I respect) keeps calling the jab a vaccine. Why?
Breggin just released a statement that you have literally left him completely out of this. Is that true? I Dom't think he'd lie. Also, as much as I appreciate what Epoch has exposed, who owns them, funds them? All of that has to be out in the open because if they have an agenda we don't want to be pulled into it if suddenly their direction goes in an unexpected direction. Transparency is all we want. Not including the Breggins is the opposite of that.
From what I can gather, Malone wasn't there either. It was a meeting of mediators.
A mediator is only a mediator if they are invited by the ones requesting mediation. Otherwise what would you call it?
Do you actually see Malone ever REQUESTING mediation from ANYONE?
Phony title. You imply the Breggins were there. That's a big lie. You lie. "Neither Dr. Peter Breggin nor Ginger Breggin has been approached, informed, or in any way contacted about the above supposed sensitive meeting. We had no information that there was a meeting, a goal to reach "unity", or a goal to "bridge the Malone-Breggin split." We were not informed that a public announcement would be made of this meeting, in which we were discussed but excluded.
"We do not have “a split” with anyone. We brought forth vital intellectual and political opinions and insights about a controversial public figure and were sued for $25 million dollars by Dr. Malone. We have not, and will not give up our free speech under any circumstances."
? We need to support and encourage one anothe? - those of good faith. Why weren't the Breggins included in the 'high level talks'? Malone must be excluded presently- "All you need to know is that he's suing his colleagues, the Breggins for $25,000,000"!!
And maybe threatened to add Dr. Alexander to that list?
Very interesting. Something's afoot!
so how much was Alex Jones sued for $965 million... so that sounds inexpensive by comparison
my view of the validity of the lawsuit wouldn't be any different if it was for $1....
Can I borrow a few million??
can't even borrow $0.01 from me.
i thought right from the beginning that they had better settle or get a lawyer or take their stuff and go beyond the courts jurisdiction .
i assume they got a lawyer. how much does their lawyer cost?
now i don't know where the truth lies with respect to the legality of "validness / in-validness" goes...
now i don't care who wins. but i am pretty sure the lawyers will come out ahead if they aren't doing it for free. and i don't want to contribute to the lawyer's funds.
i'm sure the lawyers are happy to separate their clients from their money.