They dont talk about or reveal the negative effects of mRNA and gene editing. They only show "successes" which are few fleeting and not without significant risk to the poor dying people being used as guinea pigs. If they create a cure you can bet it isnt without a price like selling your soul to the devil. Even antibiotics come with a price. All of science that gave true cures has been hidden to promote this chronic disease model of medicine
I hope Dr. Malone persists with the lawsuits against WaPo and the NYT and drops those against the Breggins and Jane Ruby. I don't think he should drop the lawsuits against WaPo and the NYT. Dr. Malone believes he has been maligned by many, including WaPo and the NYT, and explained himself in an interview recent substack as follows:
Dr. Robert Malone: I don't like conflict, it's honest truth. My bias was when this was happening to just say, 'Oh, well they're assholes and fighting this is a losing battle.' And Jill insisted that we engage. And in fact, she was the one that wrote a ... we had a large box of data that I kept from the Salk Institute and Vical back in the eighties and nineties. And by the way, just a little comment on your lead in, I didn't engineer this particular (COVID) vaccine, I just have a whole army of haters that assert that. And I just want to make that clear.
I was involved in the development of the core technology platform back in the late eighties and early nineties, not for this particular (COVID) vaccine. But Jill insisted that we make an issue out of this and not go along. What she did was she dragged out a large box of data that we kept, move after move after move, over the decades, and plowed through it and pulled out, basically, what you could call it the receipts. The actual primary documents of my invention disclosures and the patent filings and the patent that was filed at the Salk, as well all of other early patents.
Dr. Jill Malone: So Robert was involved in the invention of mRNA vaccines (as a technology), but not in these particular coronavirus “vaccines”.
So what transpired with the COVID vaccine, including the clinical trials, issues with
the lipid nanoparticle that they were using and all of the preclinical data; we were not privy to any of that.
Dr. Robert Malone: The bioethics.
Dr. Jill Malone: The bioethics. And we assumed that it was done correctly and that the safety trials had been done - both preclinical and clinical. And so at that point, I was writing from the fact that this big marketing campaign had occurred, and we were, at that point, we had no reason to be suspicious of these mRNA vaccines.
We assumed that the toxicology issues that we had run into were resolved. The truth is that we abandoned this technology in 2000 because we had toxicology issues -such as inflammation. So we abandoned this line of research 20 some years ago. But we had assurances that these problems had been solved. Someone (Dr. Peter Marks) at the the FDA assured Robert that these were no longer issues. And then what happened was, for the audience that doesn't know, then Robert got the preclinical data package that was submitted in Japan-
See I thought this technology could of been used for good but I was under impression they just used it in a bad way ?? 🫣🫣
They dont talk about or reveal the negative effects of mRNA and gene editing. They only show "successes" which are few fleeting and not without significant risk to the poor dying people being used as guinea pigs. If they create a cure you can bet it isnt without a price like selling your soul to the devil. Even antibiotics come with a price. All of science that gave true cures has been hidden to promote this chronic disease model of medicine
I hope Dr. Malone persists with the lawsuits against WaPo and the NYT and drops those against the Breggins and Jane Ruby. I don't think he should drop the lawsuits against WaPo and the NYT. Dr. Malone believes he has been maligned by many, including WaPo and the NYT, and explained himself in an interview recent substack as follows:
Dr. Robert Malone: I don't like conflict, it's honest truth. My bias was when this was happening to just say, 'Oh, well they're assholes and fighting this is a losing battle.' And Jill insisted that we engage. And in fact, she was the one that wrote a ... we had a large box of data that I kept from the Salk Institute and Vical back in the eighties and nineties. And by the way, just a little comment on your lead in, I didn't engineer this particular (COVID) vaccine, I just have a whole army of haters that assert that. And I just want to make that clear.
I was involved in the development of the core technology platform back in the late eighties and early nineties, not for this particular (COVID) vaccine. But Jill insisted that we make an issue out of this and not go along. What she did was she dragged out a large box of data that we kept, move after move after move, over the decades, and plowed through it and pulled out, basically, what you could call it the receipts. The actual primary documents of my invention disclosures and the patent filings and the patent that was filed at the Salk, as well all of other early patents.
Dr. Jill Malone: So Robert was involved in the invention of mRNA vaccines (as a technology), but not in these particular coronavirus “vaccines”.
So what transpired with the COVID vaccine, including the clinical trials, issues with
the lipid nanoparticle that they were using and all of the preclinical data; we were not privy to any of that.
Dr. Robert Malone: The bioethics.
Dr. Jill Malone: The bioethics. And we assumed that it was done correctly and that the safety trials had been done - both preclinical and clinical. And so at that point, I was writing from the fact that this big marketing campaign had occurred, and we were, at that point, we had no reason to be suspicious of these mRNA vaccines.
We assumed that the toxicology issues that we had run into were resolved. The truth is that we abandoned this technology in 2000 because we had toxicology issues -such as inflammation. So we abandoned this line of research 20 some years ago. But we had assurances that these problems had been solved. Someone (Dr. Peter Marks) at the the FDA assured Robert that these were no longer issues. And then what happened was, for the audience that doesn't know, then Robert got the preclinical data package that was submitted in Japan-
Cancel me Baby.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/cancel-me-baby?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email