Mike Wallace interviews Aldous Huxley, maybe one of the greatest minds to have lived, very prophetic on 20th & 21st century USA & world! "You are being persuaded below the level of choice & reason"
Mike Wallace interviews Aldous Huxley, maybe one of the greatest minds to have lived, very prophetic on 20th & 21st century USA & world! "You are being persuaded below the level of choice & reason"
One may not agree with every thing he said but he is indeed profound and was beyond his years so take from it what you wish and discard what you do not agree with etc. It is up to you.
And a shout out to Dr. Robert Malone, who posted this interview and transcript last week on Substack, with a fascinating insight into Huxley’s brother, who formed UNESCO, and was a promoter of eugenics. Read Malone’s The Future is now, published Sept 17.
The problem with Malone is that he can't seem to avoid leaving some doubt as to where he really stands and often indicates that he is "hedging his bets" or "fence-sitting"; there are countless interviews where he offers a vast storehouse of knowledge and understanding with his characteristic ability to provide honest and evidence-based critical analysis; but then he invariably ends such interviews by stating that the "perpetrators" may be guilty of ignorance or stupidity and maybe some nefarious intent or a combination of both but we still don't know for certain at this point in time; of course that's absolute rubbish because WE DO KNOW and evidence pours in daily to verify that WE DO KNOW! I have the same problem with Mattias Desmet when he downplays "conspiracy theories" and "theorists" when the latest research and evidence have confirmed those conspiracies to be factual and the only conspiracy was to hide the facts and the truth.
but Malone is on our side, just he said he will lose his license etc. so he has to thread lightly...I do not approve of that but if I need a solider, I will fight with him.
Many others have lost their licenses and worse and we know so many who have had death threats; it is time for him to become fully transparent or just less visible and vocal altogether.
Tony, I’ve learned to hold fire when it comes to motive. Anybody’s motive. All
I know is what I see, and there is no doubt that something dramatic and terrible is going on the world over. The problem is, it is a little too soon to erect the gallows for the evil doers. Countless times I have myself been wrong about what I assumed to be the motive of another person—despite what I considered criminal behavior.
There are no doubt bad actors. Human beings are corruptible and lord knows we are seeing it. But it is a complex problem, all of it. All I know is what I see, and there is no person that I’ve seen trying to identify and connect the dots through time and space and culture—better than Dr. Malone. And there are others courageously facing the beast, finding the evidence and spreading the word. They are all the best among us.
You and others could be right—a global conspiracy hidden over many decades, the smoking gun yet to be revealed. We could start with the military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about. Sometimes I feel like Truman in the Truman show; we just see what they want us to see.
But here’s my point: Nobody has it nailed. There are a confluence of historical, cultural, political, ideological, sociological and psychological factors which all converge into this very moment. We face an imposing, dominant and implacable foe. It will take each of us to confront and defeat this threat to all humanity. Allow some among us take time to get it right, better each day. There is still much we don’t know.
But at the very least? Let us not gun down the best among us with friendly fire. We need Malone very much.
Paul, my sentiments precisely. We each have something to contribute and each has to bear the noble burden of being wrong from time to time. For this, we they can be forgiven. For this, we can be forgiving.
Mike Wallace was a master of the psy-op. Most of these interviews he conducted were blatant (and successful) attempts to manipulate the public mind (see the Mike Wallace interview of Henry Kissinger for another textbook example).
Let's analyze some aspects of this interview.
Us Versus Them
The most pervasive element in the interview, which is most apparent after watching the entire interview and reflecting, is the dichotomy presented between communism and freedom. Keep in mind that this is 1958 – you might say "the height of the cold war", which was a war that was drummed up and manipulated by powers out of the public view (see Antony Sutton's works), and which had (and still have) a vested interest in this sort of perpetual conflict. So, it is noteworthy that the tone of the interview surrounds this conflict.
When asked directly to list "the enemies of freedom" that Huxley had referred to in his works, he listed first and foremost that impersonal concept of "over-population", and noted that it was not a problem currently (1958) in the US, but it would be eventually, and it was a major problem throughout the rest of the world. Coincidentally, much of the rest of the world was under the influence of communism (water the seed of fear in the mind of the viewer); therefore, communism and over-population are intrinsically linked (in this psy-op). Furthermore, here at home, the Catholic Church is inadvertently (and paradoxically, according to Huxley) working to further the ends of communism when it opposes birth-control methods. Why, they're the enemies of the US and they don't even realize it! In fact, they're the enemies of freedom! (I'm not Catholic, and my view of the message of the Bible differs greatly from that espoused by the Catholic and Protestant and Orthodox Churches. This is not a defense of any religion or church, or political party, or political ideology. This is just an analysis of a psy-op.)
What Is Eugenics?
Here it is worthwhile to make note of some of the ideas linked to the ideology of eugenics, which is closely linked to Darwinism (neo-Darwinian evolution) and Malthusianism (relationship between the means of life and amount of life on Earth), which are ideas well-connected to Huxley and his family (see Thomas Huxley and Julian Huxley, the former referred to as "Darwin's bulldog", the latter being a director of the British Eugenics Society and the first director of UNESCO). Some of these ideas are: race purity (ie, managing the evolution of the human species), population control (managing the numbers of the human species), meritocracy (ordering the structure of the human species), etc.
Interestingly, sprinkled into the interview were comments such as "coal and oil running out", which in the classification above would fit under meritocracy (who has the right to manage the resources). Global warming anyone? If you aren't yet seeing the links between the "just causes" of today and the ideologies (like eugenics) swirling around the elite (like Huxley), then I advise you to look a little closer. These are not new ideas.
Another gem dropped innocently into the interview was Huxley's praise for the "pharmacological revolution" that was producing more and more substances "like soma" that would produce the mind-altering effect without all those undesirable side-effects (like inexplicable homicidal tendencies). (Soma is the drug that had been developed in by-gone days that was a major underpinning of the Brave New World that Huxley envisioned. Without it, the "epsilons" would not have been able to "enjoy their servitude", which roughly translated means they were drugged into a stupor that prevented them from seeing how miserable and devoid of any noble purpose their lives were.
The Freedom of Mind-Controlled Individuals
Throughout the interview, Huxley (the "prophet of decentralization") and Wallace converse about the methods of "brainwashing" which are so closely related to advertising (see Edward Bernays, Propaganda) and how they can be so easily implemented on the masses. Meanwhile, another idea threaded throughout the interview is the importance of democracy (or decentralization, or individuality), which are fundamental to "our way of life" (remember this is us vs them, or the free world vs the communists). So, on the one hand we have the importance of respecting the individual's viewpoints, and on the other we have the ease with which those viewpoints can be manipulated, or outright invented by a third party (the ruling class with access to the means to accomplish the task – mass media). It almost seems like they're telling you the game they're playing on us and they know we won't notice it. Event 201 (and the several other similar events) before the fraudulent "covid" pandemic? Readiness exercises for planes flying into skyscrapers just before (and on) 9/11/2001? What are they telling you today?
An Insight On How It's Done (and Mike Wallace Slips)
During the interview, a fundamental element of mind-control was mentioned. In order to install the new mental structure into the subject, the old mental structure must be broken down. This is age-old and well-known by those who are practicers of this black magic. Remember this when you see the society around you (which has plenty of short-comings) purposefully degraded and destroyed. What will be put into its place? Who will put it there? Is all of this just happening organically?
As brilliant as he was at executing the psy-op, Mike Wallace slipped a bit when reading the cue-cards. [At about 24:40] Wallace: "Well Mr Huxley [in a mildly antagonistic tone], take a look again, at the country which is in the stance of our opponent anyway it would seem...[and then he corrects the emphasis]...anyway, it would seem to be there...the Soviet Union." This is subtle, but it indicates that this is not an off-the-cuff conversation or back and forth, but is carefully scripted and Wallace glitched briefly. Mike Wallace plays the part of interviewer, and at times mild antagonist, but in reality this entire interview was carefully choreographed – like a dance, or theater. What was its desired effect?
"But, I mean, imagine which must be the situation in all communist countries where the television, where it exists, is always saying the same things the whole time; it’s always driving along."
This is a genocide and there is nothing Innocent about the perpetrators. How long or secretly they planned their actions is irrelevant. At the end of the day, they are responsible for the death of 1%
of the approximately 5 billion people who took the shot and that equals about 500 million. There has to be a Nuremberg type trial for those who planned and executed this genocide. Lots more devastation is yet to come.
I don't experience Aldous Huxley as "beyond his years" as he was in his time and with his tribe...I don't experience the man as profound in the same order that I would not consider Bill Gates, Schwab and others (although there are many who admire these individual but we are not them). One must do deep, deep homework on these individuals. Look at their blood lines, who they were influenced by and who they were related to...I think it is more than "it is up to me." It is doing one's deep dive. Much like now. We need to hold each other accountable or we will go down the sink hole.
If anything, not even Huxley knew how widespread and devastating the new technology and electronic media would become and the extent to which they would be abused ; more recently we need to revisit the work of Marshall McLuhan who sounded the alarm with similar warnings as Huxley ; I suspect that neither Huxley nor McLuhan could have foreseen the extent to which elitist forces have taken over in their quest to destroy democracy and sovereignty world-wide; "nefarious" is too nice a sounding word when describing the intentions of these perpetrators when the correct term should be planned and EVIL intent.
And a shout out to Dr. Robert Malone, who posted this interview and transcript last week on Substack, with a fascinating insight into Huxley’s brother, who formed UNESCO, and was a promoter of eugenics. Read Malone’s The Future is now, published Sept 17.
The problem with Malone is that he can't seem to avoid leaving some doubt as to where he really stands and often indicates that he is "hedging his bets" or "fence-sitting"; there are countless interviews where he offers a vast storehouse of knowledge and understanding with his characteristic ability to provide honest and evidence-based critical analysis; but then he invariably ends such interviews by stating that the "perpetrators" may be guilty of ignorance or stupidity and maybe some nefarious intent or a combination of both but we still don't know for certain at this point in time; of course that's absolute rubbish because WE DO KNOW and evidence pours in daily to verify that WE DO KNOW! I have the same problem with Mattias Desmet when he downplays "conspiracy theories" and "theorists" when the latest research and evidence have confirmed those conspiracies to be factual and the only conspiracy was to hide the facts and the truth.
but Malone is on our side, just he said he will lose his license etc. so he has to thread lightly...I do not approve of that but if I need a solider, I will fight with him.
Many others have lost their licenses and worse and we know so many who have had death threats; it is time for him to become fully transparent or just less visible and vocal altogether.
Wow, people here are so ignorant.
Both Huxleys were part of New World Order global government.
Aldous did the predictive programming on us. He said it wasn't fiction. It was the plan.
Julian helpd design the brainwashing for public education using UNESCO, the same way Bill Gates uses UN WHO to inject us with graphene.
Do not admire the Huxleys, they were human trash, and your enemies.
They were not forecasting, they were planning it.
Quite right!
yes, I love the guy but I want him to be more declarative...
Tony, I’ve learned to hold fire when it comes to motive. Anybody’s motive. All
I know is what I see, and there is no doubt that something dramatic and terrible is going on the world over. The problem is, it is a little too soon to erect the gallows for the evil doers. Countless times I have myself been wrong about what I assumed to be the motive of another person—despite what I considered criminal behavior.
There are no doubt bad actors. Human beings are corruptible and lord knows we are seeing it. But it is a complex problem, all of it. All I know is what I see, and there is no person that I’ve seen trying to identify and connect the dots through time and space and culture—better than Dr. Malone. And there are others courageously facing the beast, finding the evidence and spreading the word. They are all the best among us.
You and others could be right—a global conspiracy hidden over many decades, the smoking gun yet to be revealed. We could start with the military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about. Sometimes I feel like Truman in the Truman show; we just see what they want us to see.
But here’s my point: Nobody has it nailed. There are a confluence of historical, cultural, political, ideological, sociological and psychological factors which all converge into this very moment. We face an imposing, dominant and implacable foe. It will take each of us to confront and defeat this threat to all humanity. Allow some among us take time to get it right, better each day. There is still much we don’t know.
But at the very least? Let us not gun down the best among us with friendly fire. We need Malone very much.
There are many great folk among us, including you and many in this stack. Do not put eggs in one basket. Support all waging the fight.
Paul, my sentiments precisely. We each have something to contribute and each has to bear the noble burden of being wrong from time to time. For this, we they can be forgiven. For this, we can be forgiving.
Thank you for this note.
How do you really feel about Malone?
Stellar interview—I featured it in the following post last month:
• "Letter to the German Bundestag" (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-german-bundestag)
Your points are well taken on Huxley but like a globalist schills he was part of the take down of humanity.
The Anatomy of a Psy-Op
Mike Wallace was a master of the psy-op. Most of these interviews he conducted were blatant (and successful) attempts to manipulate the public mind (see the Mike Wallace interview of Henry Kissinger for another textbook example).
Let's analyze some aspects of this interview.
Us Versus Them
The most pervasive element in the interview, which is most apparent after watching the entire interview and reflecting, is the dichotomy presented between communism and freedom. Keep in mind that this is 1958 – you might say "the height of the cold war", which was a war that was drummed up and manipulated by powers out of the public view (see Antony Sutton's works), and which had (and still have) a vested interest in this sort of perpetual conflict. So, it is noteworthy that the tone of the interview surrounds this conflict.
When asked directly to list "the enemies of freedom" that Huxley had referred to in his works, he listed first and foremost that impersonal concept of "over-population", and noted that it was not a problem currently (1958) in the US, but it would be eventually, and it was a major problem throughout the rest of the world. Coincidentally, much of the rest of the world was under the influence of communism (water the seed of fear in the mind of the viewer); therefore, communism and over-population are intrinsically linked (in this psy-op). Furthermore, here at home, the Catholic Church is inadvertently (and paradoxically, according to Huxley) working to further the ends of communism when it opposes birth-control methods. Why, they're the enemies of the US and they don't even realize it! In fact, they're the enemies of freedom! (I'm not Catholic, and my view of the message of the Bible differs greatly from that espoused by the Catholic and Protestant and Orthodox Churches. This is not a defense of any religion or church, or political party, or political ideology. This is just an analysis of a psy-op.)
What Is Eugenics?
Here it is worthwhile to make note of some of the ideas linked to the ideology of eugenics, which is closely linked to Darwinism (neo-Darwinian evolution) and Malthusianism (relationship between the means of life and amount of life on Earth), which are ideas well-connected to Huxley and his family (see Thomas Huxley and Julian Huxley, the former referred to as "Darwin's bulldog", the latter being a director of the British Eugenics Society and the first director of UNESCO). Some of these ideas are: race purity (ie, managing the evolution of the human species), population control (managing the numbers of the human species), meritocracy (ordering the structure of the human species), etc.
Interestingly, sprinkled into the interview were comments such as "coal and oil running out", which in the classification above would fit under meritocracy (who has the right to manage the resources). Global warming anyone? If you aren't yet seeing the links between the "just causes" of today and the ideologies (like eugenics) swirling around the elite (like Huxley), then I advise you to look a little closer. These are not new ideas.
Another gem dropped innocently into the interview was Huxley's praise for the "pharmacological revolution" that was producing more and more substances "like soma" that would produce the mind-altering effect without all those undesirable side-effects (like inexplicable homicidal tendencies). (Soma is the drug that had been developed in by-gone days that was a major underpinning of the Brave New World that Huxley envisioned. Without it, the "epsilons" would not have been able to "enjoy their servitude", which roughly translated means they were drugged into a stupor that prevented them from seeing how miserable and devoid of any noble purpose their lives were.
The Freedom of Mind-Controlled Individuals
Throughout the interview, Huxley (the "prophet of decentralization") and Wallace converse about the methods of "brainwashing" which are so closely related to advertising (see Edward Bernays, Propaganda) and how they can be so easily implemented on the masses. Meanwhile, another idea threaded throughout the interview is the importance of democracy (or decentralization, or individuality), which are fundamental to "our way of life" (remember this is us vs them, or the free world vs the communists). So, on the one hand we have the importance of respecting the individual's viewpoints, and on the other we have the ease with which those viewpoints can be manipulated, or outright invented by a third party (the ruling class with access to the means to accomplish the task – mass media). It almost seems like they're telling you the game they're playing on us and they know we won't notice it. Event 201 (and the several other similar events) before the fraudulent "covid" pandemic? Readiness exercises for planes flying into skyscrapers just before (and on) 9/11/2001? What are they telling you today?
An Insight On How It's Done (and Mike Wallace Slips)
During the interview, a fundamental element of mind-control was mentioned. In order to install the new mental structure into the subject, the old mental structure must be broken down. This is age-old and well-known by those who are practicers of this black magic. Remember this when you see the society around you (which has plenty of short-comings) purposefully degraded and destroyed. What will be put into its place? Who will put it there? Is all of this just happening organically?
As brilliant as he was at executing the psy-op, Mike Wallace slipped a bit when reading the cue-cards. [At about 24:40] Wallace: "Well Mr Huxley [in a mildly antagonistic tone], take a look again, at the country which is in the stance of our opponent anyway it would seem...[and then he corrects the emphasis]...anyway, it would seem to be there...the Soviet Union." This is subtle, but it indicates that this is not an off-the-cuff conversation or back and forth, but is carefully scripted and Wallace glitched briefly. Mike Wallace plays the part of interviewer, and at times mild antagonist, but in reality this entire interview was carefully choreographed – like a dance, or theater. What was its desired effect?
"But, I mean, imagine which must be the situation in all communist countries where the television, where it exists, is always saying the same things the whole time; it’s always driving along."
Damn, that hit kind of hard.
This is a genocide and there is nothing Innocent about the perpetrators. How long or secretly they planned their actions is irrelevant. At the end of the day, they are responsible for the death of 1%
of the approximately 5 billion people who took the shot and that equals about 500 million. There has to be a Nuremberg type trial for those who planned and executed this genocide. Lots more devastation is yet to come.
I don't experience Aldous Huxley as "beyond his years" as he was in his time and with his tribe...I don't experience the man as profound in the same order that I would not consider Bill Gates, Schwab and others (although there are many who admire these individual but we are not them). One must do deep, deep homework on these individuals. Look at their blood lines, who they were influenced by and who they were related to...I think it is more than "it is up to me." It is doing one's deep dive. Much like now. We need to hold each other accountable or we will go down the sink hole.
If anything, not even Huxley knew how widespread and devastating the new technology and electronic media would become and the extent to which they would be abused ; more recently we need to revisit the work of Marshall McLuhan who sounded the alarm with similar warnings as Huxley ; I suspect that neither Huxley nor McLuhan could have foreseen the extent to which elitist forces have taken over in their quest to destroy democracy and sovereignty world-wide; "nefarious" is too nice a sounding word when describing the intentions of these perpetrators when the correct term should be planned and EVIL intent.
It was a fascinating interview that I’d not seen before.
I see mikes daughter, Chris, traipsing around CNN doing tough interviews with her kind of people. Sad.
Excellent interview. Quite a visionary in many ways
You’re welcome, Dr. Alexander. I’ve begged you to publish the Huxley interview for months. He was a prophet
I would never have imagined Huxley to be a Malthusian.
I fear that if Klaus Schwab's plans come to fruition, most of us will be Epsilons. We are well on the way...
Interesting factoid: Aldous Huxley died the day JFK was assassinated.
We also lost C.S. Lewis that day.
Thanks. I didn't realize that and I've read more of Lewis' work ~ 🤦♀️.
If Klaus Schwab's come to fruition, they won't need Bokanovsky's Process.