27 Comments

And a shout out to Dr. Robert Malone, who posted this interview and transcript last week on Substack, with a fascinating insight into Huxley’s brother, who formed UNESCO, and was a promoter of eugenics. Read Malone’s The Future is now, published Sept 17.

Expand full comment

Stellar interview—I featured it in the following post last month:

• "Letter to the German Bundestag" (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-the-german-bundestag)

Expand full comment

Your points are well taken on Huxley but like a globalist schills he was part of the take down of humanity.

Expand full comment

The Anatomy of a Psy-Op

Mike Wallace was a master of the psy-op. Most of these interviews he conducted were blatant (and successful) attempts to manipulate the public mind (see the Mike Wallace interview of Henry Kissinger for another textbook example).

Let's analyze some aspects of this interview.

Us Versus Them

The most pervasive element in the interview, which is most apparent after watching the entire interview and reflecting, is the dichotomy presented between communism and freedom. Keep in mind that this is 1958 – you might say "the height of the cold war", which was a war that was drummed up and manipulated by powers out of the public view (see Antony Sutton's works), and which had (and still have) a vested interest in this sort of perpetual conflict. So, it is noteworthy that the tone of the interview surrounds this conflict.

When asked directly to list "the enemies of freedom" that Huxley had referred to in his works, he listed first and foremost that impersonal concept of "over-population", and noted that it was not a problem currently (1958) in the US, but it would be eventually, and it was a major problem throughout the rest of the world. Coincidentally, much of the rest of the world was under the influence of communism (water the seed of fear in the mind of the viewer); therefore, communism and over-population are intrinsically linked (in this psy-op). Furthermore, here at home, the Catholic Church is inadvertently (and paradoxically, according to Huxley) working to further the ends of communism when it opposes birth-control methods. Why, they're the enemies of the US and they don't even realize it! In fact, they're the enemies of freedom! (I'm not Catholic, and my view of the message of the Bible differs greatly from that espoused by the Catholic and Protestant and Orthodox Churches. This is not a defense of any religion or church, or political party, or political ideology. This is just an analysis of a psy-op.)

What Is Eugenics?

Here it is worthwhile to make note of some of the ideas linked to the ideology of eugenics, which is closely linked to Darwinism (neo-Darwinian evolution) and Malthusianism (relationship between the means of life and amount of life on Earth), which are ideas well-connected to Huxley and his family (see Thomas Huxley and Julian Huxley, the former referred to as "Darwin's bulldog", the latter being a director of the British Eugenics Society and the first director of UNESCO). Some of these ideas are: race purity (ie, managing the evolution of the human species), population control (managing the numbers of the human species), meritocracy (ordering the structure of the human species), etc.

Interestingly, sprinkled into the interview were comments such as "coal and oil running out", which in the classification above would fit under meritocracy (who has the right to manage the resources). Global warming anyone? If you aren't yet seeing the links between the "just causes" of today and the ideologies (like eugenics) swirling around the elite (like Huxley), then I advise you to look a little closer. These are not new ideas.

Another gem dropped innocently into the interview was Huxley's praise for the "pharmacological revolution" that was producing more and more substances "like soma" that would produce the mind-altering effect without all those undesirable side-effects (like inexplicable homicidal tendencies). (Soma is the drug that had been developed in by-gone days that was a major underpinning of the Brave New World that Huxley envisioned. Without it, the "epsilons" would not have been able to "enjoy their servitude", which roughly translated means they were drugged into a stupor that prevented them from seeing how miserable and devoid of any noble purpose their lives were.

The Freedom of Mind-Controlled Individuals

Throughout the interview, Huxley (the "prophet of decentralization") and Wallace converse about the methods of "brainwashing" which are so closely related to advertising (see Edward Bernays, Propaganda) and how they can be so easily implemented on the masses. Meanwhile, another idea threaded throughout the interview is the importance of democracy (or decentralization, or individuality), which are fundamental to "our way of life" (remember this is us vs them, or the free world vs the communists). So, on the one hand we have the importance of respecting the individual's viewpoints, and on the other we have the ease with which those viewpoints can be manipulated, or outright invented by a third party (the ruling class with access to the means to accomplish the task – mass media). It almost seems like they're telling you the game they're playing on us and they know we won't notice it. Event 201 (and the several other similar events) before the fraudulent "covid" pandemic? Readiness exercises for planes flying into skyscrapers just before (and on) 9/11/2001? What are they telling you today?

An Insight On How It's Done (and Mike Wallace Slips)

During the interview, a fundamental element of mind-control was mentioned. In order to install the new mental structure into the subject, the old mental structure must be broken down. This is age-old and well-known by those who are practicers of this black magic. Remember this when you see the society around you (which has plenty of short-comings) purposefully degraded and destroyed. What will be put into its place? Who will put it there? Is all of this just happening organically?

As brilliant as he was at executing the psy-op, Mike Wallace slipped a bit when reading the cue-cards. [At about 24:40] Wallace: "Well Mr Huxley [in a mildly antagonistic tone], take a look again, at the country which is in the stance of our opponent anyway it would seem...[and then he corrects the emphasis]...anyway, it would seem to be there...the Soviet Union." This is subtle, but it indicates that this is not an off-the-cuff conversation or back and forth, but is carefully scripted and Wallace glitched briefly. Mike Wallace plays the part of interviewer, and at times mild antagonist, but in reality this entire interview was carefully choreographed – like a dance, or theater. What was its desired effect?

Expand full comment

"But, I mean, imagine which must be the situation in all communist countries where the television, where it exists, is always saying the same things the whole time; it’s always driving along."

Damn, that hit kind of hard.

Expand full comment

This is a genocide and there is nothing Innocent about the perpetrators. How long or secretly they planned their actions is irrelevant. At the end of the day, they are responsible for the death of 1%

of the approximately 5 billion people who took the shot and that equals about 500 million. There has to be a Nuremberg type trial for those who planned and executed this genocide. Lots more devastation is yet to come.

Expand full comment

I don't experience Aldous Huxley as "beyond his years" as he was in his time and with his tribe...I don't experience the man as profound in the same order that I would not consider Bill Gates, Schwab and others (although there are many who admire these individual but we are not them). One must do deep, deep homework on these individuals. Look at their blood lines, who they were influenced by and who they were related to...I think it is more than "it is up to me." It is doing one's deep dive. Much like now. We need to hold each other accountable or we will go down the sink hole.

Expand full comment

If anything, not even Huxley knew how widespread and devastating the new technology and electronic media would become and the extent to which they would be abused ; more recently we need to revisit the work of Marshall McLuhan who sounded the alarm with similar warnings as Huxley ; I suspect that neither Huxley nor McLuhan could have foreseen the extent to which elitist forces have taken over in their quest to destroy democracy and sovereignty world-wide; "nefarious" is too nice a sounding word when describing the intentions of these perpetrators when the correct term should be planned and EVIL intent.

Expand full comment

It was a fascinating interview that I’d not seen before.

Expand full comment

I see mikes daughter, Chris, traipsing around CNN doing tough interviews with her kind of people. Sad.

Expand full comment

Excellent interview. Quite a visionary in many ways

Expand full comment

You’re welcome, Dr. Alexander. I’ve begged you to publish the Huxley interview for months. He was a prophet

Expand full comment

I would never have imagined Huxley to be a Malthusian.

Expand full comment

I fear that if Klaus Schwab's plans come to fruition, most of us will be Epsilons. We are well on the way...

Interesting factoid: Aldous Huxley died the day JFK was assassinated.

Expand full comment