9 Comments
User's avatar
Bob Macadam's avatar

I think back to one of the original “white lies”, a “sin of omission”, the broadcasting of relative risk reductions of the two mRNA vaccines of 95% and 94%, when the more personally relevant absolute risk reductions were only approximately 1%.

These are the only stats I need to memorize and refer to.

And this was the best case scenario, new vaccine against original Wuhan Covid, not this third derivation Omicron variant.

Richard Seager's avatar

No dose of any vaccine was ever needed. It's a war industry product.

SusanSays's avatar

For a virus with a 99% recovery rate for most.

You now have a greater chance of adverse effects from the experimental jab than dying of the disease itself.

TSMe's avatar

Yeh, okay. So, the 4th dose is of no benefit, but trust us, the sixth and seventh dose are rippers , and you can't have them until you've had the fourth and fifth. Just wait until you get number 13, then you'll se some real action...

TD's avatar

Safe and effective. Really? If it was effective, why do you need 4 doses? If it was safe, there would not have been deaths. All about money, power, depopulation.

The Motherlord's avatar

And yet...I heard a commercial on the radio today in Los Angeles, reminding people to get their 4th dose.

Skeptical Actuary's avatar

The Jerusalem Post had an article several months back which was trying to make the case that the third shot was safe. It stated that chest pains and/or shortness of breath only affected 0.3% or 0.4% of people getting the shots. Those are pretty high rates for potentially serious effects IMO.

Potatohead's avatar

There is though. It helps reinforce fear and compliance

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 18, 2022
Comment deleted