28 Comments

It is called the Military-Industrial-Complex for a reason and it operates under the guise of "Pacts, Treaties, etc."

***Side bar: It is actually more appropriately called the The Military Money Laundering-Industrial Complex but that is a topic for another day.

If the MIC was not trying to start wars all the time then it would just be the USA military without the industrial complex corruption. The MIC would wither and die. At that point the USA military would properly be utilized as opposed to the current usage as purely the strong arm of the MIC.

It is also called "peace through strength" for a reason. Peace through strength does NOT require the existence of the MIC. Trump knows that and so does the MIC.

Expand full comment

boom, excellent statement "If the MIC was not trying to start wars all the time then it would just be the USA military without the industrial complex corruption. The MIC would wither and die. At that point the USA military would properly be utilized as opposed to the current usage as purely the strong arm of the MIC."

Expand full comment

I don't think Baker lied, couldn't have foreseen the lying cheating Demorat complex.

Expand full comment

actually you may be correct, I argued that recently

Expand full comment

And you would be correct. Russians have broken every agreement (pie crusts) they have ever made, most before the ink was dry on the paper (Reagan's IRBM Treaty).

Expand full comment

All roads to hell are paved with good intentions

Expand full comment

It's truly a disturbing spectacle to witness a group of greedy liars orchestrating this end-of-the-world charade.

Expand full comment

yes Sir

Expand full comment

Same old same old that warns of wars and rumors of wars, the exponential increase in evil and the wa"rning not to be missed that when peace is assured, sudden destruction cometh.

The decline of the USA came as ordinarily decent people followed the rules in the Word of God and worshipped Him but the decline included the use of aborticide, criminal coddling, legalization of homosexuality, etc but not to forget all those but also MAID under the rule of the DICKtator turdo.

I want him to know his father is in hell according to the Word of God and it is not my opinion but it is fact based on the "Book of Rules" that designate clearly who are the saved and who are the unsaved.

I do not judge, but the record of His judgments are here for us to know what is acceptable and what is a sin. When will things really go all to hell in the USA? Whenever some fool damocrap or atheist tries to have "In God we trust" removed from the US money.

Expand full comment

It will be nice to have an administration that loves the USA.

Expand full comment

🇺🇸

Expand full comment

Sachs ought to ask himself why all former members of the Warsaw Pact are now members of NATO. Russia’s neighbors hate Russia for good reasons. They lived under Russia’s thumb and don’t want to live that way. People prefer political freedom to dictatorships.

Expand full comment

US control and treatment of Ukraine has been no better, actually bringing hot war to their nation against an adversary they cannot possibly defeat. Is that not the highest level of abuse, the highest level of evil? About the only more evil thing the US deep state demons could do is push it to the next level - World War 3. It seems crystal clear that this is very definitely their intent.

Expand full comment

excellent post

Expand full comment

It all comes down to how much you love freedom and liberty, doesn’t it? Do you understand people who love it this much, or do you think they’re foolish?

"If this long island story of ours is to end, let it end here, in this island, in this place, and let us go on fighting, even if we are to lie choking on our blood, lying on the ground."

- Winston Churchill

Expand full comment

Casting me as one who doesn't value freedom and liberty is a dirty b***h tactic and a wildly wrong and stupid insinuation to make.

Those who have cheered on the dark sacrificing of Ukraine in the defense of freedom and liberty are ignorant fools believing marxist globalist propaganda designed to scramble minds and lead people willfully to their own dissemblance and destruction.

Expand full comment

The "intent" is global. Biden brought us to the brink and Kamala was supposed to push us over. But I believe the US has at least 4 years to avoid WW3, depending on what happens 12/20/24. Trump will soothe feathers (if left to his own devices), but those feathers will ruffle again without him or someone like him. Even then, there will be a third world war. Just hoping it's as far into the future as it can go...

Expand full comment

Don't confuse the Russian Federation of today with the old Soviet Union of communism. Putin knows who his enemy is, and it is the globalist regime along with the US deep state and NATO. Same enemy of the American people.

Expand full comment

boom...."Don't confuse the Russian Federation of today with the old Soviet Union of communism. "

Expand full comment

The difference is, the American people, as a whole, don't understand who their enemy is, imo.

Expand full comment

OnTheJump - Very true.

Expand full comment

Every player has a "deep state." Everyone of them

Expand full comment

yes yes yes

Expand full comment

very nice post

Expand full comment

How free were the Germans during their government's warmongering? Don't misunderstand. I agree with your comment. Global leaders rise by stepping on their own people first.

Expand full comment

What neighbors? Could you please be more specific?

Expand full comment

Steven Moore co-wrote a great article via Substack

"NATO expansion did not provoke Putin to invade Ukraine".

The underpinning of the "NATO expansion" theory is that NATO promised the Soviet Union in 1990 that it would not move "one inch" eastward, implying that all of the countries that joined NATO later broke a promise from the US to Russia.

The problem is that nobody who was involved in the actual negotiations corroborates that claim. Not even then-Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev....

James Baker, who as George H.W. Bush's Secretary of State negotiated many agreements ending the Cold War, did indeed say that NATO wouldn't go

"one inch" further East if the Soviet Union agreed to allow Germany to reunite. This wasn't, however, a discussion about countries joining NATO. It was simply a promise that NATO troops would not move into East Germany. This wasn't about NATO expansion, it was about the location of NATO forces in a soon-to-be unified Germany.

"Putin has come up with numerous justifications for invading Ukraine."

“Countries that had lived under the Soviet boot were quick to want to join NATO after the fall of the Soviet Union. Demand for membership increased in 1994 as the world began to see that Russia had not shed its aggressive nature. "

China Russia together = One Clenched Fist. KGB defectors like Golitsyn and Lunev warned us decades ago.

Expand full comment

Jeffrey Sachs? The same Sachs who is a stooge of the Communist run UN and all its communist propaganda efforts via climate change and “sustainability”? Leake’s post is illustrative of so much propaganda being pushed via the political Right these days.

The Communist movement overtook the Democrat Party in the 80’s (about 1984 when Jesse Jackson ran for Prez) and they’re working hard to infiltrate and take the political Right with these kinds of propaganda stories and commentaries that twist facts to suit their own agenda, pro Russia, pro Putin.

Russia is no friend of the U.S. Neither is China. They both want to destroy the U.S.

Expand full comment