Natural Immunity WINS again!! BOOM! "Our study showed that natural immunity offers stronger and longer-lasting protection against infection, symptoms, and hospitalization compared to vaccine-induced
Natural Immunity WINS again!! BOOM! "Our study showed that natural immunity offers stronger and longer-lasting protection against infection, symptoms, and hospitalization compared to vaccine-induced
immunity." Uusküla et al. (NATURE); Research findings matches seminal paper published Brownstone (Dr. Paul Alexander) showing BODY of evidence that NATURAL immunity superior to vaccinal immunity, 100%
I am compiling nearly 4 years of research and writing a book on the Spike protein and how to heal from its effects. I will cover the research on the toxicity of Spike to the various body systems, the difference between the jab and the virus, vaccine shedding, the toxicity of all of the components in the jab, DNA integration, and many other topics. I will also cover in depth the natural molecules and methods that can combat Spike and lead to healing.
.
If you preorder the book, you will be the first to receive copies, and you will also receive an electronic bibliography that hyperlinks to all of the reference articles. I plan to have the book finished in 2-3 months.
.
Also, forgot to mention- there’s free shipping if you preorder.
.
💙Question
Any research / insight on if “carriers” pass on any DNA changes resulting from the vaccine?
Once again it becomes necessary to address the many canards that pop up when people talk about “natural immunity” without bothering to understand the processes involved.
There’s innate immunity and adaptive immunity.
Both are natural immunity.
All adaptive immunity, whether gained by suffering a disease or by means of a vaccination, is natural immunity BECAUSE THE PROCESS BY WHICH SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND T CELLS ARE GENERATED IS EXACTLY THE SAME.
The innate immune system collects and presents antigens from pathogens to the B and T cells of the adaptive immune system by antigen presenting cells. If they’ve never been encountered before, the B cells design unique antibodies to epitopes on the antigens and the T cells are imprinted to bind to epitopes on the antigens, regardless of its origin (infection or immunization with one or more pathogen antigens.
Outcomes may vary, but that has nothing to do with the “naturalness” of the process.
1. If you have an anergic adaptive immune system, you have a greatly diminished response.
2. If you had only a very small amount of the antigen, you may have a correspondingly weak adaptive response.
3. If you had only a single antigen you will have a more limited adaptive immune response than if you had a variety of antigens from the same pathogen.
The smallpox vaccine in the 1950s had something like 500 different viral protein antigens. If your adaptive immune system was working properly then you will have had more than enough antigens (both quantity and variety) to create a great enough variety of antibodies and T cells to take out the smallpox viruses acquired from any normal exposure.
But if you were to give that successfully vaccinated person (or even one who had “naturally” recovered from smallpox) a large enough initial bolus of the virus, it wouldn’t make any difference how robust his original adaptive immune response was, he’ll be dead meat if he doesn’t have sufficient antibodies and T cells to counter the virus—and it only takes less than ten virions to initiate the disease state in a smallpox-naive person.
If you were to give someone a vaccine with only a single smallpox viral protein antigen, he will NATURALLY make specific antibodies and T cells to the epitopes on just that single antigen. Is that “natural immunity”? Yes. Will it be sufficient to knock out a real smallpox infection before it can present as a clinical case? Maybe. Maybe not.
Apparently so, in the case of some single antigen HepB vaccines made by recombinant means.
Apparently not, in the case of a single C19 viral antigen, whether produced by recombinant means* or as the result of being infected with the gene coding for it introduced by any of several cell transfection methods employed by viral RNA products.
But neither has anything to do with the “naturalness” of the adaptive immune response.
I remember reading that there was in fact NO IMMUNITY from the vaccine, that is one of the reasons why even calling it a vaccine was wrong! It did not prevent the illness, the virus was still able to be transferred, did I miss something?
I shake my head when I see morons taking 5,6,7 and 8 shots thinking they're protected, plus telling pregnant women the shots are safe after they're told not to eat processed food while pregnant, alrighty then. My natural immunity has kept me healthy my entire life, my last jab was when I was 10, that was 61 years ago.
The research paper got it right! I see it all around me. Not only natural infection is more powerful but is much longer lasting that any covid shots if there was ever any immunity from it. The price to pay for that " little immunity" was absolutely atrocious.
Both my children are vaccine free from birth and will remain that way while I live with unknown vaccines banged into me via the armed forces. Never again will I succumb to any procedure that is invasive or unwarranted unless I know the FULL background on it and it's ingredients first!
It's really not a case of natural immunity since there is no other kind. It is not either or. You will never obtain immunity using any type of vaccination because viruses do not exist in the wild.
who woulda thought ability provided by God was greater than an injection provided by Satan?
DR DOUG NEW BOOK
https://twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/status/1725200751452991533
I am compiling nearly 4 years of research and writing a book on the Spike protein and how to heal from its effects. I will cover the research on the toxicity of Spike to the various body systems, the difference between the jab and the virus, vaccine shedding, the toxicity of all of the components in the jab, DNA integration, and many other topics. I will also cover in depth the natural molecules and methods that can combat Spike and lead to healing.
.
If you preorder the book, you will be the first to receive copies, and you will also receive an electronic bibliography that hyperlinks to all of the reference articles. I plan to have the book finished in 2-3 months.
.
Also, forgot to mention- there’s free shipping if you preorder.
.
💙Question
Any research / insight on if “carriers” pass on any DNA changes resulting from the vaccine?
.
❤️Answer
Yes, I will cover that
⬇️
https://checkout.square.site/buy/WJGQADLNP4727Q22DEIBYPBW
Part 1:
Once again it becomes necessary to address the many canards that pop up when people talk about “natural immunity” without bothering to understand the processes involved.
There’s innate immunity and adaptive immunity.
Both are natural immunity.
All adaptive immunity, whether gained by suffering a disease or by means of a vaccination, is natural immunity BECAUSE THE PROCESS BY WHICH SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND T CELLS ARE GENERATED IS EXACTLY THE SAME.
The innate immune system collects and presents antigens from pathogens to the B and T cells of the adaptive immune system by antigen presenting cells. If they’ve never been encountered before, the B cells design unique antibodies to epitopes on the antigens and the T cells are imprinted to bind to epitopes on the antigens, regardless of its origin (infection or immunization with one or more pathogen antigens.
Outcomes may vary, but that has nothing to do with the “naturalness” of the process.
1. If you have an anergic adaptive immune system, you have a greatly diminished response.
2. If you had only a very small amount of the antigen, you may have a correspondingly weak adaptive response.
3. If you had only a single antigen you will have a more limited adaptive immune response than if you had a variety of antigens from the same pathogen.
The smallpox vaccine in the 1950s had something like 500 different viral protein antigens. If your adaptive immune system was working properly then you will have had more than enough antigens (both quantity and variety) to create a great enough variety of antibodies and T cells to take out the smallpox viruses acquired from any normal exposure.
But if you were to give that successfully vaccinated person (or even one who had “naturally” recovered from smallpox) a large enough initial bolus of the virus, it wouldn’t make any difference how robust his original adaptive immune response was, he’ll be dead meat if he doesn’t have sufficient antibodies and T cells to counter the virus—and it only takes less than ten virions to initiate the disease state in a smallpox-naive person.
If you were to give someone a vaccine with only a single smallpox viral protein antigen, he will NATURALLY make specific antibodies and T cells to the epitopes on just that single antigen. Is that “natural immunity”? Yes. Will it be sufficient to knock out a real smallpox infection before it can present as a clinical case? Maybe. Maybe not.
Apparently so, in the case of some single antigen HepB vaccines made by recombinant means.
Apparently not, in the case of a single C19 viral antigen, whether produced by recombinant means* or as the result of being infected with the gene coding for it introduced by any of several cell transfection methods employed by viral RNA products.
But neither has anything to do with the “naturalness” of the adaptive immune response.
Part 2 follows
I remember reading that there was in fact NO IMMUNITY from the vaccine, that is one of the reasons why even calling it a vaccine was wrong! It did not prevent the illness, the virus was still able to be transferred, did I miss something?
I shake my head when I see morons taking 5,6,7 and 8 shots thinking they're protected, plus telling pregnant women the shots are safe after they're told not to eat processed food while pregnant, alrighty then. My natural immunity has kept me healthy my entire life, my last jab was when I was 10, that was 61 years ago.
The research paper got it right! I see it all around me. Not only natural infection is more powerful but is much longer lasting that any covid shots if there was ever any immunity from it. The price to pay for that " little immunity" was absolutely atrocious.
Natural Immunity works for us.
That's what I love "body of evidence" forensic investigation into the C0VID experts that cant.
Both my children are vaccine free from birth and will remain that way while I live with unknown vaccines banged into me via the armed forces. Never again will I succumb to any procedure that is invasive or unwarranted unless I know the FULL background on it and it's ingredients first!
https://citizengo.org/en/node/212347?utm_source=link&utm_medium=social&utm_content=tyflow&utm_campaign=
Great work ,we are continuing our freedom campaign for justice , The Light Australia uncensored truth, thanks Paul and your team of experts
When you do nothing and nothing happens, nothing is going on.
Gonna have to reorder those custom Titleist golf balls with 'Natural Immunity for the Win' on the side ;)
It's really not a case of natural immunity since there is no other kind. It is not either or. You will never obtain immunity using any type of vaccination because viruses do not exist in the wild.