wow, did you see that written? thats a great sharing and I dont doubt it....I am trying to bring to the debate now 'is it or was it needed'...not just safe and effective
wow, did you see that written? thats a great sharing and I dont doubt it....I am trying to bring to the debate now 'is it or was it needed'...not just safe and effective
I just made up "more safer and more effectiver"...
I have found that if you take propaganda and make it seem comically assinine, then its easier for people to see through the bullshit being propagandized...
"safe and effective" is PURE propaganda...
So yes, the new shots are definitely " more safer and more effectiver " 😎
wow, did you see that written? thats a great sharing and I dont doubt it....I am trying to bring to the debate now 'is it or was it needed'...not just safe and effective
I just made up "more safer and more effectiver"...
I have found that if you take propaganda and make it seem comically assinine, then its easier for people to see through the bullshit being propagandized...
"safe and effective" is PURE propaganda...
So yes, the new shots are definitely " more safer and more effectiver " 😎
.... it is NOT needed.
(I'd suggest Primum non nocere was being sarcastic in describing how pharma intends to market their "new and improved" mRNA products.)
Your suggestion is correct.