The experience you are talking about of Dr. Coleman or others on vaccines could be about the rich Western Countries. From the 1940s, 1950s through the next 50 years, the worst affected third world countries including India from various classical infectious diseases were also the best beneficiaries from vaccines of those times, some still…
The experience you are talking about of Dr. Coleman or others on vaccines could be about the rich Western Countries. From the 1940s, 1950s through the next 50 years, the worst affected third world countries including India from various classical infectious diseases were also the best beneficiaries from vaccines of those times, some still available perhaps. So please research into the history of vaccines in those decades in those countries and then please conclude and comment. They represent perhaps two thirds of humanity who have traditionally suffered from want of good medicines and practices ( not any more, if Covid story is an indication). Like you said of modern medicines, vaccines are twin edged interventions. And they do have their downsides, like individual reactions. But where they have been used in the past decades with very good clinical understanding of the diseases, quality of the vaccine products, other options available for preventing the disease spread etc, there is no doubt they have been saviours. I am 78, from India, and into my school days in the 1950s I must have had my quota of child hood vaccinations ( I remember one or two) and I have not had any major health issues so far. I can count a hundred of friends and relatives from my age group with a similar story. With very good advances in medicines in these decades, that provide for individual centric targeting, vaccines and mass vaccinations might be slowly becoming obsolete interventions. But they have to be scientifically reviewed and protocols redesigned. Not these shrill voices against vaccines in general. That said, I would wholeheartedly say that the Covid vaccine intervention was unscientific ( because of product nature), unnecessary, ill timed. One can speak about it separately, but it should not become the springboard for a whole sale tirade against vaccines.
But where they have been used in the past decades with very good clinical understanding of the diseases, quality of the vaccine products, other options available for preventing the disease spread etc, there is no doubt they have been saviours....we agree, but the issue is mRNA vaccines that are death shots, wrongly developed and the move is to make mRNA part of life and the issue is 'safe and effective'...thats the key...they are not today...once something is safe and effective, truly, then that is a different conversation...and NEEDED. NEEDED
Precisely what I said earlier. m-RNA vaccine is an unmitigated aberration, disaster - not just the product, but the way it was pushed all over. Don’t take it as the leading example, only example often, to band together all vaccines as rubbish and dangerous. That is what you do in most of your presentations. You are a doctor and you must see the science correctly and impartially. As I requested you, please do a research piece on the history of legacy vaccines in third world countries, over decades, the benefits, downsides all - before continuing to parrot jaundiced views on vaccines. And do a thorough review of the childhood vaccine protocol in the USA, which can be eliminated, which can continue and which one to be added, all based on long term product safety. That will be very useful to all.
The experience you are talking about of Dr. Coleman or others on vaccines could be about the rich Western Countries. From the 1940s, 1950s through the next 50 years, the worst affected third world countries including India from various classical infectious diseases were also the best beneficiaries from vaccines of those times, some still available perhaps. So please research into the history of vaccines in those decades in those countries and then please conclude and comment. They represent perhaps two thirds of humanity who have traditionally suffered from want of good medicines and practices ( not any more, if Covid story is an indication). Like you said of modern medicines, vaccines are twin edged interventions. And they do have their downsides, like individual reactions. But where they have been used in the past decades with very good clinical understanding of the diseases, quality of the vaccine products, other options available for preventing the disease spread etc, there is no doubt they have been saviours. I am 78, from India, and into my school days in the 1950s I must have had my quota of child hood vaccinations ( I remember one or two) and I have not had any major health issues so far. I can count a hundred of friends and relatives from my age group with a similar story. With very good advances in medicines in these decades, that provide for individual centric targeting, vaccines and mass vaccinations might be slowly becoming obsolete interventions. But they have to be scientifically reviewed and protocols redesigned. Not these shrill voices against vaccines in general. That said, I would wholeheartedly say that the Covid vaccine intervention was unscientific ( because of product nature), unnecessary, ill timed. One can speak about it separately, but it should not become the springboard for a whole sale tirade against vaccines.
But where they have been used in the past decades with very good clinical understanding of the diseases, quality of the vaccine products, other options available for preventing the disease spread etc, there is no doubt they have been saviours....we agree, but the issue is mRNA vaccines that are death shots, wrongly developed and the move is to make mRNA part of life and the issue is 'safe and effective'...thats the key...they are not today...once something is safe and effective, truly, then that is a different conversation...and NEEDED. NEEDED
Precisely what I said earlier. m-RNA vaccine is an unmitigated aberration, disaster - not just the product, but the way it was pushed all over. Don’t take it as the leading example, only example often, to band together all vaccines as rubbish and dangerous. That is what you do in most of your presentations. You are a doctor and you must see the science correctly and impartially. As I requested you, please do a research piece on the history of legacy vaccines in third world countries, over decades, the benefits, downsides all - before continuing to parrot jaundiced views on vaccines. And do a thorough review of the childhood vaccine protocol in the USA, which can be eliminated, which can continue and which one to be added, all based on long term product safety. That will be very useful to all.