I admire that you have come, crossed over & welcome you, but you are being made a hero when you were part of the harms that accrued, so start by explaining how truckers knew more than you!
Here is the truth. If Aseem's father hadn't untimely passed (jab-induced heart attack), he would still be pushing the poison and wouldn't question a damn thing. How is this any different from Nazi doctors saying: "Sorry, I didn't know. I've seen new evidence. Now I'm on your side. Let me help you." ?
Of course dr Malthotra would still push it on the elderly over 70.
The bigger picture here is that the ever-growing mountain of evidence of harms from the mRNA jabs is so enormous that in spite of the relentless pro-vax propaganda, that the public is slowly waking up to that truth . And as a result Big Pharma is now willing to throw the Covid-19 vax under the bus, for fear that in its wake it will create hesitancy against ALL other vaccines (and rightly so). The billion-dollar vax industry has to be protected at all cost, so let's create a limited hang-out against the Covid-19 jab, to convince the people that Big Pharma is trustworthy (hahaha) in its quest for safety and is willing to admit that this particular product was not as safe and effective as they promised. That will cost them dearly (Pfizer may go down all together), but they will do it without any hesitation if that will save the bread and butter that the other vaxxes generate.
Well said. I think several other "leaders" are limited hangouts also - just too many questions about them, their REAL intents, the REAL supporters, HOW they know certain things yet apparently don't know others that are readily apparent to the rest of us, etc. Like "good" Doc Malone - who very recently "discovered" some new info - yet, never explained HOW he "discovered" it and no-one else did - so many questions about Malone.
No. I think now he finally recognizes there is no reasonable application of the mRNA vaxxx. However, he should have known far sooner. Now, it is becoming realized that the old are far mare endangered by the vaxxx than by covid, whatever that is.
I'm not in the medical field, but speaking as a rational lay person poison is poison. Very, very, very rarely is poison the answer to a problem. I can't say never, but for the most part poisoning anyone isn't an over all healthy thing to do no matter what age group.
Thank you for saying that. ""vaccines" are the slow kill method to cause disease." Most people don't understand that at all. It upsets me that I vaccinated my kids, starting from birth. So now I wonder about if the reason they were so sick all the time was because of that. I remember trying to object with a doctor/nurse and getting back the reply "the government demands it", and you won't be able to send your child to school. I wanted my child to have a normal life, have friends etc.. .It is kind of like well you don't have to take a "vaccine" but if you don't then you can't work here. As a new Mom I questioned it but didn't know what I know now.
In defence of Dr Malhotra, when you make public arguments, you have to stand on ground that is reasonably irrefutable or you get washed away by the surge. Eliminating the over 70's put his position on strong ground, including them would have resulted in a mud fight with no winner, it takes the noise out of the debate.
Really? Not the comorbidities, the covid exposure due to policy on care homes, frail immune system, inappropriate use of Midazolam, inappropriate use of ICU's.
There is NO data which accurately contributes deaths of over 70's to the jab, far too much noise, therefore this is a futile argument to make, which was my point.
No, Gordon, Cato and many others "comprehend" quite well. And disagree with you. Disparaging the comprehension of others is no way to defend your own errors.
"Disparaging the comprehension of others" is not the point being made here... The point being made here is about "I think he would still push it on the elderly over 70."
Only when his father was ill did he change his tune despite the vast evidence of ill effects around us all well before that.9
I can assure him that my refusal of the jab was wholly logical based on the then growing adverse evidence, a long standing deep distrust of Government utterances and that at the time the testing time had been ridiculously short so No one could say it was safe so refusal was perfectly logical.
He deserves credit for changing his mind, sure. It isn’t a bad thing to have a noted medical professional speak out as he has. But he needs to own the fact that he was duped and give those that saw through the BS the respect they deserve. His mindset feels rooted in the toxic notion that ‘doctors know better’. There’s an arrogant superiority there that I cannot abide. There’s a real difference between recognizing the insight doctors and medicine in general can sometimes bring and recognizing that regular people can guide their own health and are the real experts about themselves. He lacks real humility about his own lack of insight into the catastrophe of the jabs. I’ve never heard him say, “I’m truly sorry that I ever recommended this for anyone.” It’s not necessary to punish him for this shortfall, but there’s no contrition—as things stand, he’s not the hero he’s made out to be.
Actually, professionals who recommended the jab initially have to be carefully what they say so as not to be held accountable in court: to be expected they will minimize and deflect even when they come over to the right side.
Wow. I am fuming at this commentary by Malhotra. A doctor who, like too many among his profession, did not show due diligence in upholding the tenets of that profession nor in using his mental faculties to assess the situation. He simply rolled up his sleeve like an inmate, and looked the other way. He failed to asses the risks associated with the “vaccine” and he failed to acknowledge the relative risk of the “virus” - ie which deaths were being counted and publicised then - as opposed to now.
The argument has often been made, to de-legitimise reasonable concerns and rational consideration, that fear of needles was the reason many did not queue up for the jab: fear of needles may certainly account for a relatively small number of refuseniks but for the rest of us, we did not succumb to any fear drive and we used our critical thinking to asses, not only the risks surrounding both “virus” and “vaccine” but also to reject the assault on our bodily integrity, our inalienable rights and our intelligence. Malhotra is throwing us under the bus and he will know his language is treacherous. To those who would say he’s doing his best and is now on the right side of history - I say, Malhotra hold your tongue rather than doing everyone, including yourself, a disservice by denying the truth.
When I received the first boxes of vaccines into the pharmacy where I work, I immediately pulled out the package/product insert that accompanies EVERY bottle of medication. It was completely blank!
I don’t believe it was irrational of me to think “I’m going to wait.” Since the manufacturer refused to be transparent regarding the contents of the vials, it is perfectly rational to pause and not immediately put unknowns into my body.
Please continue to call out this weapons grade bullshit from Malhotra and Emily Oster, Dr. Alexander. Malhotra and Oster have things ARSE ABOUT FACE. People like you and me and many of the readers of this substack and the Canadian truckers refused to take the jabs because of our JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF (KNOWLEDGE) that the jabs were unsafe and ineffective. People like Malhotra and Oster and Malone took the jabs because of their IRRATIONAL FALSE BELIEF (DELUSION) that the jabs were safe and effective. In Western philosophy, the sub-branch of philosophy that deals with KNOWLEDGE VS OPINION is called Epistemology. We all have a personal epistemology. People like Malhotra and Malone and Oster have either a NARCISSISTIC EPISTEMOLOGY or an AUTHORITARIAN EPISTEMOLOGY. A narcissistic epistemology is when you either do not question the validity of your beliefs or you think they must be true just because you have them or that they must be true because you're hot shit, the great you. This is what Malone and Malhotra and Oster have. They believe their brain farts, because they had them. Others, who have an authoritarian epistemology, believe that things are true because an authority figure, like Malhots or Fauci or GW Bush or Colon Powell said so. Remember the people who believed that Saddam had WMDs. Have you ever met one person who believed Saddam had WMDs who was not a complete and total dumbfuck!? Those WMD believers had mostly an authoritarian epistemology. You and me and many of the readers of this substack and the Canadian truckers, on the other hand, have what's called a LOGICAL AND EMPIRICAL EPISTEMOLOGY. That means that we infer what is true and what is bullshit based on the principles of sound logical and hypothetico-deductive reasoning and empirical and scientific evidence. That's what most of the jab resisters have done.
Please also consider/remember/point out that Malhotra didn’t change his mind while unrelated people were dying all around him…their lives didn’t matter one iota…only his dad dying mattered…if his dad hadn’t died he’d still be pushing the poison shot whilst people continue to die.
This is not at all a reasonable interpretation. How do you know that it wasn't because he had a fuller picture of what was going on with his Dad from being closer to him and seeing just how things played out? I think Malhotra changed his mind and started to speak out following this experience in 2021 before the ripple of adverse events and their meaning started taking off... recall, lay people and medical practioners were beong bombarded with claims from "authoritative sources" that these events were likely from COVID, even undiagnosed COVID.
We shouldn't go attacking people like Malhotra who did eventually overcome the programming and then did not just stay silent, but went public. Too much is being made of his Tweet.
If we demonize him then it's less likely that more people in medicine will throw off their blinders and grow some courage also... we don't want to purity spiral
Spoken like a “typical” egotistical physician. It reminds me of the medical residents who laughed at me during numerous arguments over my refusal to be jabbed (as a “high risk” patient). And I’ll bet they are still insulting (and killing) patients with their haughtiness and malpractice! They still promote the kill shot, require masks and admit no wrong! This kind of offensive, superiority complex must be taught early on in medical school. It pains me to say I’ve lost all respect and confidence in medical (un)professionals!
As a veterinarian, it absolutely floored me that the vast majority of physicians were proudly lining up like vaccine zombies in 2020. Many of my veterinarian colleagues had discussions about our reservations concerning these jabs . The more I researched them , the less I liked them . I knew ivermectin was vastly safer & being falsely attacked. Dr. Aseem was indeed a vaccine zombie himself completely unable to think for himself & leading others into the “jab showers “ . He needs to acknowledge his part in helping harm others .
Thank , Dr. Alexander, my friend & fellow soldier fighting under the flag of TRUTH.
I have boxes of heart worm medicine for our dogs, ivermectin very clear on the label. Thankful for my integrative medicine doctor getting me a prescription. I took it every week for a year after bleeding in menopause around vaccinated injured elderly family.
I took it every week for a year for shedding problems. From a compounding pharmacy. My dr wouldn’t give me any more prescriptions.I have some horse paste in the refrigerator.
I believe he has acknowledged that. I’ve seen several interviews where he has acknowledged his mistake. At the end of the day, people can still decide if the jab is best for them or not. 🤷♀️. It’s when they were mandated that made it wrong.
Malhotra's credibility is shot (no pun intended). The only way to begin to salvage it is by withdrawing or amending his stupid tweet and owning up to being no better than the rest of the lazy, incompetent, unthinking doctors and other medical personnel who pushed shots, mandates and other life and freedom destroying measures and vowing to do better, to do the research before ever pushing experimental, unproven therapies again. Until then, he is still part of the problem and will repeat past behavior.
It was rational to avoid taking repeated doses of a drug with no long term data on its effects. It was also rational to not trust the people who took a wrecking ball to human culture, human rights, our businesses, and our children's education for the year prior to the shots. It was rational to not trust them when they breached medical ethics and coerced. All of that was rational. None of it was "intuitive" or simply good luck.
It was they who behaved irrationally. Who suddenly regressed to superstitious simpletons with their mask talismans and obsessive needle rituals, covering their ears and stomping their feet like toddlers when presented with facts.
It took massive strength of mind and spirit to maintain rationality, and compassion, while the supposed 'smartest guys in the room' went off the rails.
PROOF THAT ROBERT MALONE HAS DEEPLY NEFARIOUS CONNECTION TO CATIONIC LIPOSOMES AS PROVEN BY KAREN KINGSTON 2 DAYS AGO. WATCH VIDEO, ESPECIALLY STARTING AT 8 MIN, 30 SECONDS.
Dr .. your point is absolutely correct but we need to rise above of whatever happened in the beginning. The price Dr Aseem has paid by loosing his dad, is bigger than any apology. The fact that he is working to let the world know of these dangerous fraud jabs is very admirable too. He truly showed that he could rise above what people will say etc.
And Dr Alexander I am a big admirer of all your work and God Bless you and eternally grateful to you for all you do.
The ones who need to go behind bars are unfortunately still there.
And yet HE is looking back, he is insulting those who thought critically from the beginning when he did not. HE is still labelling those people as irrational and suggesting others lucked out on their intuition!!! What a stupid and utterly distasteful comment to throw out to all those who did take the “vaccine” and are now suffering, realising the error of trusting the white coats, as much as to those who refused for legitimate reasons.
How many millions of people have also paid the price by seeing loved ones suffer brain injury, life-changing stroke, lost limbs and death or become victim themselves to the fraud??
It is disgraceful to slur swathes of people in hindsight and position oneself as the good guy. He didn’t have to do that. He could, as you suggest, focus on looking forward and stopping what’s been started.
In my opinion, his Tweet is mot beong interpreted fairly by dr. Alexander here... "many" does not mean most, it can just mean "a considerable portion" really, like a large number in absolute terms, but not relative to the whole setbof dissenters.
To me, Malhotra could wasily be saying to the pro-vaxers "sure, many people had irrational and poorly researched reasons for not taking the vax in 2021 and others were going on intution alone, but either way, that led them to the correct choice ultimately and certainly now in 2023, everyone choosing not to get boosted are doing it for rational reasons as the facts and arguments are more widely available day after day".
I think he should have made it a few tweets instead of one so he could first say "many people did find good information and reasons to inform their decision not to take the jab from the start, but even for those who didn't..." and then go on to say what I outlined above.
I mean, it's not clear that he meant what I'm saying, but it's not unlikely. Besides, a gentle correction is probably all that's needed to get him to revise his statement or clear up whether he didn't mean to say nobody had it figured out early on. We shouldn't pile on so readily because of an errant Tweet when otherwise he did ultimately do the right thing, even if he was late and mistaken to begin with.
NO ONE has the authority to claim that someone unwilling to be a test subject for a dubious experimental medical procedure can ever, in good faith, be called "irrational."
Malhotra's was not an "errant tweet." It was self-serving. It reminded me of the same nonsense from Scott Adams.
Did you read his Tweet? It had none of the condescension of Scott Adams.
I think you've also got him wrong, he wasn't necessarily saying that it was irrational for anyone to refuse the vaccine in 2021. He's more conceding to the provax crowd that "sure, many people who refused the vaccine did so for irrational reasoning, and many made that decision based on intuition alone. It still led them to the correct decision..." that's not controversial.... many people had rational reasons for refusing it, he's not talking about them here, he's saying "even those people who made that choice not based on careful thinking or sound arguments still ended up making the right choice, their instincts were better tuned than people who just automatically trusted those presenting themselves as scientific authority".
"Many" does not mean "all", "most" or even "the preponderance of". And certainly there were people who simply didn't do it at first because they just don't like being told what they ought to do, and who didn't yet understanding things like the precautionary principle, risk benefit analysis, that the vax doesn't prevent infection or transmission, etc.
Many people did have rational reasonse; I think Malhotra was referring to the "antivaxers" that the COVIDIANS think refused the vax "because they didn't want to be chipped by Bill Gates"... It's a way of responding to that objection from the COVIDIANS.
Besides, go look at his other tweets. He's drawing attention to some of the most important ongoing problems, calling for justice, calling for removing mandates, showing the data, protecting pregnant women and kids, getting help for the vax injured. We shouldn't be denouncing him over over an ungenerously reading of one Tweet when he's doing a lot of good and bringing more official attention and perceived legitimacy to our side of the fight. Any ill-conceived witch-hunts will set the movement back. He's in no way a Scott Adams.
Malhotra is certainly investing a lot of energy into saving face and obscuring his responsibility for promoting dangerous covid mRNA LNP shots he SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER than to endorse. Some of us aren't fooled. And never were.
I have great respect for Dr Malhotra for his bravery and courage to see his wrong and correct it! He has done what we need these other doctors to do. Dr Malhotra would be the perfect dr who could convince the fearful ones to come out of their trance and repent for misleading their patients. We need more Dr Malhotra’s!!!!!
Deliberately misleading the people, causing many of them a lot of horrible pains. In his position, or you know for sure what you are saying if you start endorsing this product, or you stay on the safe side. He has chosen to put this trustworthiness on the balance, so now he should be held accountable for the damage he caused. I hope many of the damaged people start a class action against him.
Well, I do not have to prove anything, I didn’t believe in the jab since the start, I didn’t take it, and I did not endorse it on people who believe in me, and I am not a doctor, he is, a famous one with a lot of trusting followers. All the doctors who warned against the experimental shot have all been purged, and yet you want to crown him as the king of truth?
Bottom line: Malhotra is a sheep and he's not alone. Every cardiologist I know socially is a sheep in an N95 mask who is totally ignorant of the scientific literature on adverse jab reactions. With the exception of Peter McCullough, I have no respect for cardiologists. Imagine being the patient of one of these sheep!!
Here is the truth. If Aseem's father hadn't untimely passed (jab-induced heart attack), he would still be pushing the poison and wouldn't question a damn thing. How is this any different from Nazi doctors saying: "Sorry, I didn't know. I've seen new evidence. Now I'm on your side. Let me help you." ?
https://twitter.com/B33Mello/status/1608570760125349889
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1608570760125349889.html
Exactly. Thank you for pointing that out.
100 per cent correct..you said exactly the truth
Thanks but no thanks. Am well over 70, lead a healthy lifestyle, and will pit my immune system against their garbage any day. Not sick one day.
Of course dr Malthotra would still push it on the elderly over 70.
The bigger picture here is that the ever-growing mountain of evidence of harms from the mRNA jabs is so enormous that in spite of the relentless pro-vax propaganda, that the public is slowly waking up to that truth . And as a result Big Pharma is now willing to throw the Covid-19 vax under the bus, for fear that in its wake it will create hesitancy against ALL other vaccines (and rightly so). The billion-dollar vax industry has to be protected at all cost, so let's create a limited hang-out against the Covid-19 jab, to convince the people that Big Pharma is trustworthy (hahaha) in its quest for safety and is willing to admit that this particular product was not as safe and effective as they promised. That will cost them dearly (Pfizer may go down all together), but they will do it without any hesitation if that will save the bread and butter that the other vaxxes generate.
Well said. I think several other "leaders" are limited hangouts also - just too many questions about them, their REAL intents, the REAL supporters, HOW they know certain things yet apparently don't know others that are readily apparent to the rest of us, etc. Like "good" Doc Malone - who very recently "discovered" some new info - yet, never explained HOW he "discovered" it and no-one else did - so many questions about Malone.
Yup, you raised some very good points. Thanks
Great point! Seems H1N1 is up next.
I want a vaccine against big pharma. It needs a siren to sound the alarm if you come too close.
No. I think now he finally recognizes there is no reasonable application of the mRNA vaxxx. However, he should have known far sooner. Now, it is becoming realized that the old are far mare endangered by the vaxxx than by covid, whatever that is.
I'm not in the medical field, but speaking as a rational lay person poison is poison. Very, very, very rarely is poison the answer to a problem. I can't say never, but for the most part poisoning anyone isn't an over all healthy thing to do no matter what age group.
Exactly. Unfortunately there are too many sheeple who blindly follow the "experts" and are not interested in the real goal.
Thank you for saying that. ""vaccines" are the slow kill method to cause disease." Most people don't understand that at all. It upsets me that I vaccinated my kids, starting from birth. So now I wonder about if the reason they were so sick all the time was because of that. I remember trying to object with a doctor/nurse and getting back the reply "the government demands it", and you won't be able to send your child to school. I wanted my child to have a normal life, have friends etc.. .It is kind of like well you don't have to take a "vaccine" but if you don't then you can't work here. As a new Mom I questioned it but didn't know what I know now.
In defence of Dr Malhotra, when you make public arguments, you have to stand on ground that is reasonably irrefutable or you get washed away by the surge. Eliminating the over 70's put his position on strong ground, including them would have resulted in a mud fight with no winner, it takes the noise out of the debate.
Age stratified jab fatality data show that was mainly the elderly who Malhotra was killing with these jabs.
Really? Not the comorbidities, the covid exposure due to policy on care homes, frail immune system, inappropriate use of Midazolam, inappropriate use of ICU's.
There is NO data which accurately contributes deaths of over 70's to the jab, far too much noise, therefore this is a futile argument to make, which was my point.
Yes, true.
Nope, you are failing to comprehend the problem
No, Gordon, Cato and many others "comprehend" quite well. And disagree with you. Disparaging the comprehension of others is no way to defend your own errors.
"Disparaging the comprehension of others" is not the point being made here... The point being made here is about "I think he would still push it on the elderly over 70."
I am deeply distrustful of Malhotra .
Only when his father was ill did he change his tune despite the vast evidence of ill effects around us all well before that.9
I can assure him that my refusal of the jab was wholly logical based on the then growing adverse evidence, a long standing deep distrust of Government utterances and that at the time the testing time had been ridiculously short so No one could say it was safe so refusal was perfectly logical.
He deserves credit for changing his mind, sure. It isn’t a bad thing to have a noted medical professional speak out as he has. But he needs to own the fact that he was duped and give those that saw through the BS the respect they deserve. His mindset feels rooted in the toxic notion that ‘doctors know better’. There’s an arrogant superiority there that I cannot abide. There’s a real difference between recognizing the insight doctors and medicine in general can sometimes bring and recognizing that regular people can guide their own health and are the real experts about themselves. He lacks real humility about his own lack of insight into the catastrophe of the jabs. I’ve never heard him say, “I’m truly sorry that I ever recommended this for anyone.” It’s not necessary to punish him for this shortfall, but there’s no contrition—as things stand, he’s not the hero he’s made out to be.
Actually, professionals who recommended the jab initially have to be carefully what they say so as not to be held accountable in court: to be expected they will minimize and deflect even when they come over to the right side.
So their patients and the public pay the price of their silence?
Not good enough.
Wow. I am fuming at this commentary by Malhotra. A doctor who, like too many among his profession, did not show due diligence in upholding the tenets of that profession nor in using his mental faculties to assess the situation. He simply rolled up his sleeve like an inmate, and looked the other way. He failed to asses the risks associated with the “vaccine” and he failed to acknowledge the relative risk of the “virus” - ie which deaths were being counted and publicised then - as opposed to now.
The argument has often been made, to de-legitimise reasonable concerns and rational consideration, that fear of needles was the reason many did not queue up for the jab: fear of needles may certainly account for a relatively small number of refuseniks but for the rest of us, we did not succumb to any fear drive and we used our critical thinking to asses, not only the risks surrounding both “virus” and “vaccine” but also to reject the assault on our bodily integrity, our inalienable rights and our intelligence. Malhotra is throwing us under the bus and he will know his language is treacherous. To those who would say he’s doing his best and is now on the right side of history - I say, Malhotra hold your tongue rather than doing everyone, including yourself, a disservice by denying the truth.
When I received the first boxes of vaccines into the pharmacy where I work, I immediately pulled out the package/product insert that accompanies EVERY bottle of medication. It was completely blank!
I don’t believe it was irrational of me to think “I’m going to wait.” Since the manufacturer refused to be transparent regarding the contents of the vials, it is perfectly rational to pause and not immediately put unknowns into my body.
Please continue to call out this weapons grade bullshit from Malhotra and Emily Oster, Dr. Alexander. Malhotra and Oster have things ARSE ABOUT FACE. People like you and me and many of the readers of this substack and the Canadian truckers refused to take the jabs because of our JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF (KNOWLEDGE) that the jabs were unsafe and ineffective. People like Malhotra and Oster and Malone took the jabs because of their IRRATIONAL FALSE BELIEF (DELUSION) that the jabs were safe and effective. In Western philosophy, the sub-branch of philosophy that deals with KNOWLEDGE VS OPINION is called Epistemology. We all have a personal epistemology. People like Malhotra and Malone and Oster have either a NARCISSISTIC EPISTEMOLOGY or an AUTHORITARIAN EPISTEMOLOGY. A narcissistic epistemology is when you either do not question the validity of your beliefs or you think they must be true just because you have them or that they must be true because you're hot shit, the great you. This is what Malone and Malhotra and Oster have. They believe their brain farts, because they had them. Others, who have an authoritarian epistemology, believe that things are true because an authority figure, like Malhots or Fauci or GW Bush or Colon Powell said so. Remember the people who believed that Saddam had WMDs. Have you ever met one person who believed Saddam had WMDs who was not a complete and total dumbfuck!? Those WMD believers had mostly an authoritarian epistemology. You and me and many of the readers of this substack and the Canadian truckers, on the other hand, have what's called a LOGICAL AND EMPIRICAL EPISTEMOLOGY. That means that we infer what is true and what is bullshit based on the principles of sound logical and hypothetico-deductive reasoning and empirical and scientific evidence. That's what most of the jab resisters have done.
AwakeNotWoke
Great comparative analogies re Epistemological framing. Thanks!
My pleasure! I was inspired by a philosophy book I read called "Believing Bullshit." it featured a section on Bush and Biden.
🤣🤣🤣 AwakeNotWoke
Thanks for the chuckle!
Really strikes a chord with me. Thank you for writing this!
You're welcome!
Please also consider/remember/point out that Malhotra didn’t change his mind while unrelated people were dying all around him…their lives didn’t matter one iota…only his dad dying mattered…if his dad hadn’t died he’d still be pushing the poison shot whilst people continue to die.
This is not at all a reasonable interpretation. How do you know that it wasn't because he had a fuller picture of what was going on with his Dad from being closer to him and seeing just how things played out? I think Malhotra changed his mind and started to speak out following this experience in 2021 before the ripple of adverse events and their meaning started taking off... recall, lay people and medical practioners were beong bombarded with claims from "authoritative sources" that these events were likely from COVID, even undiagnosed COVID.
We shouldn't go attacking people like Malhotra who did eventually overcome the programming and then did not just stay silent, but went public. Too much is being made of his Tweet.
If we demonize him then it's less likely that more people in medicine will throw off their blinders and grow some courage also... we don't want to purity spiral
Spoken like a “typical” egotistical physician. It reminds me of the medical residents who laughed at me during numerous arguments over my refusal to be jabbed (as a “high risk” patient). And I’ll bet they are still insulting (and killing) patients with their haughtiness and malpractice! They still promote the kill shot, require masks and admit no wrong! This kind of offensive, superiority complex must be taught early on in medical school. It pains me to say I’ve lost all respect and confidence in medical (un)professionals!
As a veterinarian, it absolutely floored me that the vast majority of physicians were proudly lining up like vaccine zombies in 2020. Many of my veterinarian colleagues had discussions about our reservations concerning these jabs . The more I researched them , the less I liked them . I knew ivermectin was vastly safer & being falsely attacked. Dr. Aseem was indeed a vaccine zombie himself completely unable to think for himself & leading others into the “jab showers “ . He needs to acknowledge his part in helping harm others .
Thank , Dr. Alexander, my friend & fellow soldier fighting under the flag of TRUTH.
Billy Davis , DVM
I have boxes of heart worm medicine for our dogs, ivermectin very clear on the label. Thankful for my integrative medicine doctor getting me a prescription. I took it every week for a year after bleeding in menopause around vaccinated injured elderly family.
Ivermectin got me better in three days
I took it every week for a year for shedding problems. From a compounding pharmacy. My dr wouldn’t give me any more prescriptions.I have some horse paste in the refrigerator.
I believe he has acknowledged that. I’ve seen several interviews where he has acknowledged his mistake. At the end of the day, people can still decide if the jab is best for them or not. 🤷♀️. It’s when they were mandated that made it wrong.
As long as people know it’s not a traditional vaccine, more of a bio weapon.
Malhotra's credibility is shot (no pun intended). The only way to begin to salvage it is by withdrawing or amending his stupid tweet and owning up to being no better than the rest of the lazy, incompetent, unthinking doctors and other medical personnel who pushed shots, mandates and other life and freedom destroying measures and vowing to do better, to do the research before ever pushing experimental, unproven therapies again. Until then, he is still part of the problem and will repeat past behavior.
It was rational to avoid taking repeated doses of a drug with no long term data on its effects. It was also rational to not trust the people who took a wrecking ball to human culture, human rights, our businesses, and our children's education for the year prior to the shots. It was rational to not trust them when they breached medical ethics and coerced. All of that was rational. None of it was "intuitive" or simply good luck.
It was they who behaved irrationally. Who suddenly regressed to superstitious simpletons with their mask talismans and obsessive needle rituals, covering their ears and stomping their feet like toddlers when presented with facts.
It took massive strength of mind and spirit to maintain rationality, and compassion, while the supposed 'smartest guys in the room' went off the rails.
https://rumble.com/v2basju-plandemic-depopulation-plan-exposed-big-pharma-creates-bioweapon-to-profit-.html
PROOF THAT ROBERT MALONE HAS DEEPLY NEFARIOUS CONNECTION TO CATIONIC LIPOSOMES AS PROVEN BY KAREN KINGSTON 2 DAYS AGO. WATCH VIDEO, ESPECIALLY STARTING AT 8 MIN, 30 SECONDS.
BOOM!!!
Will watch tomorrow, it’s 1:40 am here right now. Overloaded. Thanks.
Definitely worth a watch. Karen Kingston never fails to bring the tea!!!
Inventing the lipid nano that allows the mRNA into a cell does not determine how others abused the technology in the COVID19 jabs.
Dr .. your point is absolutely correct but we need to rise above of whatever happened in the beginning. The price Dr Aseem has paid by loosing his dad, is bigger than any apology. The fact that he is working to let the world know of these dangerous fraud jabs is very admirable too. He truly showed that he could rise above what people will say etc.
And Dr Alexander I am a big admirer of all your work and God Bless you and eternally grateful to you for all you do.
The ones who need to go behind bars are unfortunately still there.
Thank you
BOOM
amen
And yet HE is looking back, he is insulting those who thought critically from the beginning when he did not. HE is still labelling those people as irrational and suggesting others lucked out on their intuition!!! What a stupid and utterly distasteful comment to throw out to all those who did take the “vaccine” and are now suffering, realising the error of trusting the white coats, as much as to those who refused for legitimate reasons.
How many millions of people have also paid the price by seeing loved ones suffer brain injury, life-changing stroke, lost limbs and death or become victim themselves to the fraud??
It is disgraceful to slur swathes of people in hindsight and position oneself as the good guy. He didn’t have to do that. He could, as you suggest, focus on looking forward and stopping what’s been started.
In my opinion, his Tweet is mot beong interpreted fairly by dr. Alexander here... "many" does not mean most, it can just mean "a considerable portion" really, like a large number in absolute terms, but not relative to the whole setbof dissenters.
To me, Malhotra could wasily be saying to the pro-vaxers "sure, many people had irrational and poorly researched reasons for not taking the vax in 2021 and others were going on intution alone, but either way, that led them to the correct choice ultimately and certainly now in 2023, everyone choosing not to get boosted are doing it for rational reasons as the facts and arguments are more widely available day after day".
I think he should have made it a few tweets instead of one so he could first say "many people did find good information and reasons to inform their decision not to take the jab from the start, but even for those who didn't..." and then go on to say what I outlined above.
I mean, it's not clear that he meant what I'm saying, but it's not unlikely. Besides, a gentle correction is probably all that's needed to get him to revise his statement or clear up whether he didn't mean to say nobody had it figured out early on. We shouldn't pile on so readily because of an errant Tweet when otherwise he did ultimately do the right thing, even if he was late and mistaken to begin with.
Jared: Let me be CRYSTAL CLEAR here.
NO ONE has the authority to claim that someone unwilling to be a test subject for a dubious experimental medical procedure can ever, in good faith, be called "irrational."
Malhotra's was not an "errant tweet." It was self-serving. It reminded me of the same nonsense from Scott Adams.
Did you read his Tweet? It had none of the condescension of Scott Adams.
I think you've also got him wrong, he wasn't necessarily saying that it was irrational for anyone to refuse the vaccine in 2021. He's more conceding to the provax crowd that "sure, many people who refused the vaccine did so for irrational reasoning, and many made that decision based on intuition alone. It still led them to the correct decision..." that's not controversial.... many people had rational reasons for refusing it, he's not talking about them here, he's saying "even those people who made that choice not based on careful thinking or sound arguments still ended up making the right choice, their instincts were better tuned than people who just automatically trusted those presenting themselves as scientific authority".
"Many" does not mean "all", "most" or even "the preponderance of". And certainly there were people who simply didn't do it at first because they just don't like being told what they ought to do, and who didn't yet understanding things like the precautionary principle, risk benefit analysis, that the vax doesn't prevent infection or transmission, etc.
Many people did have rational reasonse; I think Malhotra was referring to the "antivaxers" that the COVIDIANS think refused the vax "because they didn't want to be chipped by Bill Gates"... It's a way of responding to that objection from the COVIDIANS.
Besides, go look at his other tweets. He's drawing attention to some of the most important ongoing problems, calling for justice, calling for removing mandates, showing the data, protecting pregnant women and kids, getting help for the vax injured. We shouldn't be denouncing him over over an ungenerously reading of one Tweet when he's doing a lot of good and bringing more official attention and perceived legitimacy to our side of the fight. Any ill-conceived witch-hunts will set the movement back. He's in no way a Scott Adams.
Malhotra is certainly investing a lot of energy into saving face and obscuring his responsibility for promoting dangerous covid mRNA LNP shots he SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER than to endorse. Some of us aren't fooled. And never were.
I have great respect for Dr Malhotra for his bravery and courage to see his wrong and correct it! He has done what we need these other doctors to do. Dr Malhotra would be the perfect dr who could convince the fearful ones to come out of their trance and repent for misleading their patients. We need more Dr Malhotra’s!!!!!
No we don’t. We should put him in jail
Why should he be in jail? What is his crime?
Deliberately misleading the people, causing many of them a lot of horrible pains. In his position, or you know for sure what you are saying if you start endorsing this product, or you stay on the safe side. He has chosen to put this trustworthiness on the balance, so now he should be held accountable for the damage he caused. I hope many of the damaged people start a class action against him.
Deliberately misleading? Prove he did it deliberately! Doubt you can....
Well, I do not have to prove anything, I didn’t believe in the jab since the start, I didn’t take it, and I did not endorse it on people who believe in me, and I am not a doctor, he is, a famous one with a lot of trusting followers. All the doctors who warned against the experimental shot have all been purged, and yet you want to crown him as the king of truth?
Anyone who has done honest, basic research will already know that:
1. The drugs are not vaccines.
2. The drugs are ineffective.
3. The drugs have not been tested adequately (i.e. 7 to 10 years).
4. The drugs are uniquely dangerous and proven lethal.
5. The drugs would not be required, even if 1, 2, 3 & 4 were not true.
I welcome Malhotra's 'conversion', but either (a) he fails to understand 1 to 5, or (b) he is trying to maintain that he was less than 100% wrong.
Bottom line: Malhotra is a sheep and he's not alone. Every cardiologist I know socially is a sheep in an N95 mask who is totally ignorant of the scientific literature on adverse jab reactions. With the exception of Peter McCullough, I have no respect for cardiologists. Imagine being the patient of one of these sheep!!
I agree, Paul.
Malhotra committed murder. He only took a deep dive into these garbage jabs when his father died.
Gross.