Each claim of a conspiracy theory is a component that needs to be verified. Often, of course, the components are inter-related in a tight nexus; but they remain distinct in terms of verification. I singled this one component out just to see if the theorist has grounding for his entire tapestry, or if it's woven of conjecture and rumor rather than fact.
Each claim of a conspiracy theory is a component that needs to be verified. Often, of course, the components are inter-related in a tight nexus; but they remain distinct in terms of verification. I singled this one component out just to see if the theorist has grounding for his entire tapestry, or if it's woven of conjecture and rumor rather than fact.
Each claim of a conspiracy theory is a component that needs to be verified. Often, of course, the components are inter-related in a tight nexus; but they remain distinct in terms of verification. I singled this one component out just to see if the theorist has grounding for his entire tapestry, or if it's woven of conjecture and rumor rather than fact.
Well, you won that argument without having to lift a finger. And a Pyrrhic victory to be sure. Happy weaving in your tapestry.
I just want Prof. Nazar to answer the Goddamned question.