192,405,448 persons receiving a total of 354,100,845 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines during the study period, there were 1,991 reports of myocarditis to VAERS & 1,626 of these reports met case definition
I don't think we should use the VAERS argument, generally. Those are undoubtedly enormous under estimates to the point where using VAERS minimizes the issue. Especially since a lot of vaccine enthusiastic doctors are not reporting these things. I know two personally where there was no follow up for heart conditions in young men that started within a couple days of the vaccine. Neither were reported.
From the paper: "This risk [of Myocarditis] should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination."
If the researchers truly did the latter, they would recommend ceasing administration of the "vaccines" in all but the oldest and those with comorbidities. Of course, if early treatment were allowed, the "vaccines" wouldn't be necessary for those groups either. Unfortunately, one must support the vaccinate/boost all narrative in order to get published....
VAERS is only the tip of the iceberg. It is grossly under-reported and only 50 employees handling the avalanche of adverse events reports. All reports go through a multi-layer approval process stalling the process even further. We should estimate that they are at least 10-12 months behind.
This is a video post from a person jab-injured explaining what she is going through in order to get her injury report posted into VAERS. If it wasn't so pathetic it would be laughable.
Then take a read through Spiro Pantazatos manuscript "Covid vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk". He is estimating 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021. That was one year ago -- I would double that number at a very minimum for today.
Besides the ridiculously low rates, this occludes the obviously significantly high rate of serious heart complications as demonstrated by collapse and death of footballers and other athletes. Sometimes many weeks after administration. Recent news that the adrenals are involved in such events seems to match the Japanese animal data that shows the lipids have a natural affinity for the adrenal glands in males. All we can really conclude from such information is many young men are walking around undiagnosed and 'asymptomatic'. It should be noted that ALL suspected adverse events are supposed to be reported for new medicines as per the Black Triangle scheme in the UK & EU (for 2 years). I don't know what the equivalent scheme is elsewhere. The fact that ALL suspected reactions are not being reported by medical professionals is just one more scandal in the long queue of bioethical violations. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/the-black-triangle-scheme-or
Also, is there any legit, aka vetted, update on release of 55,000 pages of Pfizer/FDA data that was supposed to be made available March 1, 2022? Maybe Del Bigtree will tell us how icandecide.org and lawyer Aaron Siri and his team are doing getting and interpretting this data tommorrow at 12:00p.m. noon MST USA on thehighwire.com
I don't think we should use the VAERS argument, generally. Those are undoubtedly enormous under estimates to the point where using VAERS minimizes the issue. Especially since a lot of vaccine enthusiastic doctors are not reporting these things. I know two personally where there was no follow up for heart conditions in young men that started within a couple days of the vaccine. Neither were reported.
URF of 41 according to Steve Kirsch.
From the paper: "This risk [of Myocarditis] should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination."
If the researchers truly did the latter, they would recommend ceasing administration of the "vaccines" in all but the oldest and those with comorbidities. Of course, if early treatment were allowed, the "vaccines" wouldn't be necessary for those groups either. Unfortunately, one must support the vaccinate/boost all narrative in order to get published....
Accountability is most important
VAERS is only the tip of the iceberg. It is grossly under-reported and only 50 employees handling the avalanche of adverse events reports. All reports go through a multi-layer approval process stalling the process even further. We should estimate that they are at least 10-12 months behind.
This is a video post from a person jab-injured explaining what she is going through in order to get her injury report posted into VAERS. If it wasn't so pathetic it would be laughable.
https://www.facebook.com/510870023/videos/363420762259543/
Then take a read through Spiro Pantazatos manuscript "Covid vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk". He is estimating 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021. That was one year ago -- I would double that number at a very minimum for today.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk
Besides the ridiculously low rates, this occludes the obviously significantly high rate of serious heart complications as demonstrated by collapse and death of footballers and other athletes. Sometimes many weeks after administration. Recent news that the adrenals are involved in such events seems to match the Japanese animal data that shows the lipids have a natural affinity for the adrenal glands in males. All we can really conclude from such information is many young men are walking around undiagnosed and 'asymptomatic'. It should be noted that ALL suspected adverse events are supposed to be reported for new medicines as per the Black Triangle scheme in the UK & EU (for 2 years). I don't know what the equivalent scheme is elsewhere. The fact that ALL suspected reactions are not being reported by medical professionals is just one more scandal in the long queue of bioethical violations. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/the-black-triangle-scheme-or
Also, is there any legit, aka vetted, update on release of 55,000 pages of Pfizer/FDA data that was supposed to be made available March 1, 2022? Maybe Del Bigtree will tell us how icandecide.org and lawyer Aaron Siri and his team are doing getting and interpretting this data tommorrow at 12:00p.m. noon MST USA on thehighwire.com
Damn. At least it's published. Anyone aware of the current consensus of the Under Reporting Factor? Is it still 41? Or 30? Or what? Anyone?