Oster et al. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24110.; risk of MYOCARDITIS after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is increased across multiple age & sex strata & highest after second vaccination dose
palexander.substack.com
Oster et al. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24110.; risk of MYOCARDITIS after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is increased across multiple age & sex strata & highest after second vaccination dose
192,405,448 persons receiving a total of 354,100,845 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines during the study period, there were 1,991 reports of myocarditis to VAERS & 1,626 of these reports met case definition
Oster et al. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24110.; risk of MYOCARDITIS after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines is increased across multiple age & sex strata & highest after second vaccination dose
Regardless of if Pfizer or Moderna, we see heart inflammation and serious life altering life ending risk due to myocarditis, and I argue, these vaccine makers, these beasts, the CDC and NIH knew the risk, yet kept pushing this reckless vaccine mandate; now they are running to lift them, but we have to ‘circle back’ and go after all who did wrong for the last 2 years…all whose decisions costed lives…do not be afraid to face it that it may be someone you supported in govn etc.
I don't think we should use the VAERS argument, generally. Those are undoubtedly enormous under estimates to the point where using VAERS minimizes the issue. Especially since a lot of vaccine enthusiastic doctors are not reporting these things. I know two personally where there was no follow up for heart conditions in young men that started within a couple days of the vaccine. Neither were reported.
From the paper: "This risk [of Myocarditis] should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination."
If the researchers truly did the latter, they would recommend ceasing administration of the "vaccines" in all but the oldest and those with comorbidities. Of course, if early treatment were allowed, the "vaccines" wouldn't be necessary for those groups either. Unfortunately, one must support the vaccinate/boost all narrative in order to get published....
I don't think we should use the VAERS argument, generally. Those are undoubtedly enormous under estimates to the point where using VAERS minimizes the issue. Especially since a lot of vaccine enthusiastic doctors are not reporting these things. I know two personally where there was no follow up for heart conditions in young men that started within a couple days of the vaccine. Neither were reported.
From the paper: "This risk [of Myocarditis] should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination."
If the researchers truly did the latter, they would recommend ceasing administration of the "vaccines" in all but the oldest and those with comorbidities. Of course, if early treatment were allowed, the "vaccines" wouldn't be necessary for those groups either. Unfortunately, one must support the vaccinate/boost all narrative in order to get published....