pregnant mice rapidly circulated in maternal blood and crossed the placenta within 1 h to spread in the fetal circulation'; means vaccinating a pregnant woman IS vaccinating unborn child with mRNA
About 230 days into Trump 2.0 --- still a big, fat *NOTHING*!!! All the COVID criminals unaccountable, enjoying their loot and freedom. Meanwhile, victims continue suffering and dying.
Yup, Trump & Co, are doing a great MAGA, protecting the country and its people. Let's have more!!
"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) strongly recommends that pregnant individuals be vaccinated against COVID-19. ACOG continues to recommend that all pregnant and lactating individuals receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine or “booster.”"
Hi, guess what came up on the naked emperor's substack. I discovered this independently once before. it's a shame the focus is so narrow but the issue probably affects a lot of Americans:
Also, I recall that you are or were an admirer of MTG. I quite like her too. I don't know if you've seen the recent reports but she's sounding a bit like the late Virginia Roberts Guiffre. You might have seen my recent message to you about Charlie Kirk. It sounds like MTG is a bit scared.
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she is 'not suicidal' amid Epstein files fight
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Drops Chilling Warning: 'I’m Not Suicidal — If Something Happens to Me, Find Out Which Foreign Government or Powerful People Would Take Heinous Actions to Stop the Information from Coming Out' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
PS: I do not know if you will see this message or the one below, so I have posted the one below to Dr Paul Alexander's more recent substack entitled "I do NOT believe POTUS Trump took the mRNA vaccine or FLU shot! No, he knows former is deadly & latter never works! COVID taught me one thing, some of the biggest thieves and crooks and low lifes and ..."
I did not post it there directly in reply to you, which might have been a mistake on my part because you might not see it. I may have to repost it again.
How long I may need to leave it up for, or how many times I may need to repost it, I do not know.
Note, if you see it, how I took care to de-identify you.
This is despite the fact that all that I have posted is the truth.
By the way, it was after seeing your name in that substack with your comment there that I thought of you.
I don't know whether you have seen my private communications so am reposting them. Here's one. I'll get around to the others later.
Hi. Thank you for your message on public substack of Oct 3 [below]. I appreciate your acceptance of my apology with regard to any misunderstanding on my part as to why you sent me seemingly intensely affectionate messages daily over a long time then appeared to abruptly limit communication after receiving a photo from me, as you had requested.
I would like you to know that I particularly appreciated from your message your statement,"I understand that you are under serious stress, as all of us are in one way or another, at one time or another."
I appreciated that you were sensitive enough to not downplay the gravity of a cancer diagnosis and the direct acknowledgment of the specific emotional and physical toll of cancer, including on the endocrine and immune systems, when someone is also subject to other stressors.
On the Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale, or Social Readjustment Rating Scale, a tool that measures the cumulative stress in a person's life and risk for stress-related physical illness by assigning points to different life events, relationship breakup ranks above personal injury or illness and death of a close family member, even when the breakup is less than a divorce or marital separation.
I appreciate that you did not make my hardship sound like just another form of stress, which could feel invalidating.
To have subtly diminished my experience of a potentially life-threatening illness and compared it to ordinary stressors could have come off as insensitive.
It was gracious of you to not shift the focus away from my uniquely challenging circumstances to your perceived hurt.
While it's not wrong to express personal feelings, in this context, I appreciate that you did not attempt to draw attention away from the significant emotional weight I'm carrying and to focus on how you have been hurt by my actions
I appreciate that you did not engage in shaming or gas-lighting, guilt-tripping or subtle manipulation or self-promotion, self-aggrandizement or over-emphasis on your virtue.
I understand that emotions have been running high. I understand the stress and hurt that you felt. I regret that you frightened yourself in response to my reaction. I like how you took responsibility for your own emotional state and also how you directly addressed my concerns and emotions in a constructive way, so as not to alienate or invalidate my experience. I’m focused on my own healing process, and I hope you find peace as well.
It was kind of you to not drop a long, loaded message or blame-laden exit narrative and then engage in classic silent treatment, preemptively cutting off my ability to respond, leaving me unsettled. This aligning with “emotional withdraw and silencing” and leaving me unsettled.
I shall respect your wishes and refrain from further communication, as it seems this is what you need for your own peace of mind.
With regard to your suggestions with regard to treatment and support I appreciate your input, but I’m focusing on the course of action that feels right for me right now.
On looking back, I assume now that you might have had a liaison with someone else, possibly the expert witness, at the time of the two day court hearing and that was why you did not contact me on the second day, contrary to what you had said you would do. In that case, I have had a very lucky escape from this relationship. Loyalty is very important to me. The "idealization" phase of the cycle shifted to "devaluation" of me after the court hearing and after I sent you my photograph before progressing rapidly to the "discard" or "reverse discard" stage. I wonder how you would have felt if I had ignored you or become cold after you sent me photographs of yourself.
That is not who I am. I would never do such a thing to a woman.
I understand that you need space to focus on other matters at this time.
I need to prioritize my own well-being right now. I hope you understand.
I genuinely wish you the best moving forward, and I hope that you find the clarity and peace you deserve.
Take care
Your Message of Oct 3: I have been considering unsubscribing from the Substack app altogether. It's poorly organized, scrolling is interrupted, it's not possible to enlarge sections of the screen, errors cannot be edited, and you seem to point to other disadvantages with the direct message feature in particular.
In any case, I'm taking a break from social media to rest and attend to other matters of importance that had been given less priority during the past several months.
Of course I accept your apology. It is appreciated.
I wish you had simply waited for my reply rather than making a bad situation worse - revealing frightening anger, hostility, suspicion, mistrust, and contempt toward me. You don't seem to realize the level of discouragement and demoralization it caused me. And I haven't forgotten what you have said several times in the past about the role of contempt in interpersonal connections.
I know myself. I am honest, loyal, sweet, feminine, unselfish, and very bright. To have been questioned as to my motives in researching and connecting you with medically knowledgeable sources to provide you with informed consent as to your options may have been the worst blow of all.
I am innocent of all your accusations, regardless of whatever misunderstanding there was on your part.
I understand that you are under serious stress, as all of us are in one way or another, at one time or another. I have great empathy for your situation. That is why I took time out from my own research to assist you with yours. What I provided is yours to reject. But I do hope you will at least consider making the contacts I provided before rejecting an option because you have rejected the source in coming from me.
Please know that I wish you everything that is good and true, healthy and wholesome. And since you mentioned her, I wonder if that single mother you referenced isn't a better confidante than I am, she having known you for so long and being right there 'under your nose' yet possibly overlooked.
I look forward to the time when the lovely things about knowing you won't be overshadowed by your words of the past week or so. They can be forgiven but how could the hurt ever be forgotten?
I will tell you now, so there will be no doubt, that I will not see your reply if there is one. I am retreating for my own peace of mind.
Anyone with a brain cell knew this wasn't an ordinary vaccine (it was a transfection. Tried and true in labs for years). And pregnant mothers? WTF were they thinking ooh. That's right. They weren't thinking at all.
Hi Steve, I know a woman who was pregnant and got the covid bioweapon in late 2021. Nurses and doctors made her scared to death thinking she would be responsible for killing her baby if she didn't get the booster, because "if she got covid, it was going to be BAD and could lose her child". I do not think they meant any malice, they were listening to the CDC as they were trained. Luckily, the child is fine. The future of her fertility is unknown. The fear of harming your child is terrifying. The "perpetrators" ,of course, knew this.
THANKS for this, Diane. And of course you are right. My anger should more appropriately be aimed at the real culprit, but it doesn't have a face: Mass Compliance. Hopefully, mothers have learned an important lesson!
Thanks Steve. Yes, the woman regrets everyday having gotten the shots and booster now that she is aware. Obstetricians have been giving the flu shot to pregnant women for awhile now, something I found very questionable when I found out. I think this practice may have led to women not being as concerned about the Covid shot as they should have been. Maybe this practice was started by the culprits to soften young woman's minds regarding vaccines. hmmm EVIL
Helen, I was referring to the pregnant women. HG Wells was very prophetic back in 1895. So many "innocents" these days are really just Eloi. Food for the DOD, big Pharma, big government Morlochs.
No surprise here.
About 230 days into Trump 2.0 --- still a big, fat *NOTHING*!!! All the COVID criminals unaccountable, enjoying their loot and freedom. Meanwhile, victims continue suffering and dying.
Yup, Trump & Co, are doing a great MAGA, protecting the country and its people. Let's have more!!
NOTHING....I agree
Maybe Trump's too busy playing 5-D chess? What will it take, Dr. A, what will it take?
"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) strongly recommends that pregnant individuals be vaccinated against COVID-19. ACOG continues to recommend that all pregnant and lactating individuals receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine or “booster.”"
https://www.acog.org/programs/immunization-infectious-disease-public-health/tools-and-resources/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians
bunch of raving lunatics
more like professional opportunists addicted to both the power and money/perks that come with these medical societies
FYI: Moderna is a Gold Level ACOG donor.
https://www.acog.org/giving/corporate-giving
Click on view 24-25 catalog
They are criminals
This is interesting:
WATCH: Trump Says Youth Vaccine Mandate Rollback is a “Very Tough Position” – “They Just Pure and Simple Work… I Think Those Vaccines Should be Used”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/watch-trump-says-youth-vaccine-mandate-rollback-is/
Hi, guess what came up on the naked emperor's substack. I discovered this independently once before. it's a shame the focus is so narrow but the issue probably affects a lot of Americans:
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/sam-sugar-guardianships-and-the-elderly
Also, I recall that you are or were an admirer of MTG. I quite like her too. I don't know if you've seen the recent reports but she's sounding a bit like the late Virginia Roberts Guiffre. You might have seen my recent message to you about Charlie Kirk. It sounds like MTG is a bit scared.
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she is 'not suicidal' amid Epstein files fight
https://thehill.com/homenews/5527057-marjorie-greene-epstein-files/
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Drops Chilling Warning: 'I’m Not Suicidal — If Something Happens to Me, Find Out Which Foreign Government or Powerful People Would Take Heinous Actions to Stop the Information from Coming Out' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
https://share.google/qfp55r4l7CNeIuDAP
PS: I do not know if you will see this message or the one below, so I have posted the one below to Dr Paul Alexander's more recent substack entitled "I do NOT believe POTUS Trump took the mRNA vaccine or FLU shot! No, he knows former is deadly & latter never works! COVID taught me one thing, some of the biggest thieves and crooks and low lifes and ..."
I did not post it there directly in reply to you, which might have been a mistake on my part because you might not see it. I may have to repost it again.
How long I may need to leave it up for, or how many times I may need to repost it, I do not know.
Note, if you see it, how I took care to de-identify you.
This is despite the fact that all that I have posted is the truth.
By the way, it was after seeing your name in that substack with your comment there that I thought of you.
I don't know whether you have seen my private communications so am reposting them. Here's one. I'll get around to the others later.
Hi. Thank you for your message on public substack of Oct 3 [below]. I appreciate your acceptance of my apology with regard to any misunderstanding on my part as to why you sent me seemingly intensely affectionate messages daily over a long time then appeared to abruptly limit communication after receiving a photo from me, as you had requested.
I would like you to know that I particularly appreciated from your message your statement,"I understand that you are under serious stress, as all of us are in one way or another, at one time or another."
I appreciated that you were sensitive enough to not downplay the gravity of a cancer diagnosis and the direct acknowledgment of the specific emotional and physical toll of cancer, including on the endocrine and immune systems, when someone is also subject to other stressors.
On the Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale, or Social Readjustment Rating Scale, a tool that measures the cumulative stress in a person's life and risk for stress-related physical illness by assigning points to different life events, relationship breakup ranks above personal injury or illness and death of a close family member, even when the breakup is less than a divorce or marital separation.
I appreciate that you did not make my hardship sound like just another form of stress, which could feel invalidating.
To have subtly diminished my experience of a potentially life-threatening illness and compared it to ordinary stressors could have come off as insensitive.
It was gracious of you to not shift the focus away from my uniquely challenging circumstances to your perceived hurt.
While it's not wrong to express personal feelings, in this context, I appreciate that you did not attempt to draw attention away from the significant emotional weight I'm carrying and to focus on how you have been hurt by my actions
I appreciate that you did not engage in shaming or gas-lighting, guilt-tripping or subtle manipulation or self-promotion, self-aggrandizement or over-emphasis on your virtue.
I understand that emotions have been running high. I understand the stress and hurt that you felt. I regret that you frightened yourself in response to my reaction. I like how you took responsibility for your own emotional state and also how you directly addressed my concerns and emotions in a constructive way, so as not to alienate or invalidate my experience. I’m focused on my own healing process, and I hope you find peace as well.
It was kind of you to not drop a long, loaded message or blame-laden exit narrative and then engage in classic silent treatment, preemptively cutting off my ability to respond, leaving me unsettled. This aligning with “emotional withdraw and silencing” and leaving me unsettled.
I shall respect your wishes and refrain from further communication, as it seems this is what you need for your own peace of mind.
With regard to your suggestions with regard to treatment and support I appreciate your input, but I’m focusing on the course of action that feels right for me right now.
On looking back, I assume now that you might have had a liaison with someone else, possibly the expert witness, at the time of the two day court hearing and that was why you did not contact me on the second day, contrary to what you had said you would do. In that case, I have had a very lucky escape from this relationship. Loyalty is very important to me. The "idealization" phase of the cycle shifted to "devaluation" of me after the court hearing and after I sent you my photograph before progressing rapidly to the "discard" or "reverse discard" stage. I wonder how you would have felt if I had ignored you or become cold after you sent me photographs of yourself.
That is not who I am. I would never do such a thing to a woman.
I understand that you need space to focus on other matters at this time.
I need to prioritize my own well-being right now. I hope you understand.
I genuinely wish you the best moving forward, and I hope that you find the clarity and peace you deserve.
Take care
Your Message of Oct 3: I have been considering unsubscribing from the Substack app altogether. It's poorly organized, scrolling is interrupted, it's not possible to enlarge sections of the screen, errors cannot be edited, and you seem to point to other disadvantages with the direct message feature in particular.
In any case, I'm taking a break from social media to rest and attend to other matters of importance that had been given less priority during the past several months.
Of course I accept your apology. It is appreciated.
I wish you had simply waited for my reply rather than making a bad situation worse - revealing frightening anger, hostility, suspicion, mistrust, and contempt toward me. You don't seem to realize the level of discouragement and demoralization it caused me. And I haven't forgotten what you have said several times in the past about the role of contempt in interpersonal connections.
I know myself. I am honest, loyal, sweet, feminine, unselfish, and very bright. To have been questioned as to my motives in researching and connecting you with medically knowledgeable sources to provide you with informed consent as to your options may have been the worst blow of all.
I am innocent of all your accusations, regardless of whatever misunderstanding there was on your part.
I understand that you are under serious stress, as all of us are in one way or another, at one time or another. I have great empathy for your situation. That is why I took time out from my own research to assist you with yours. What I provided is yours to reject. But I do hope you will at least consider making the contacts I provided before rejecting an option because you have rejected the source in coming from me.
Please know that I wish you everything that is good and true, healthy and wholesome. And since you mentioned her, I wonder if that single mother you referenced isn't a better confidante than I am, she having known you for so long and being right there 'under your nose' yet possibly overlooked.
I look forward to the time when the lovely things about knowing you won't be overshadowed by your words of the past week or so. They can be forgiven but how could the hurt ever be forgotten?
I will tell you now, so there will be no doubt, that I will not see your reply if there is one. I am retreating for my own peace of mind.
This experiment killed 17 millions, lost pregnecies, and the carnage still happening, worst than the Nazi, rope for those criminals is justified.
Anyone with a brain cell knew this wasn't an ordinary vaccine (it was a transfection. Tried and true in labs for years). And pregnant mothers? WTF were they thinking ooh. That's right. They weren't thinking at all.
Hi Steve, I know a woman who was pregnant and got the covid bioweapon in late 2021. Nurses and doctors made her scared to death thinking she would be responsible for killing her baby if she didn't get the booster, because "if she got covid, it was going to be BAD and could lose her child". I do not think they meant any malice, they were listening to the CDC as they were trained. Luckily, the child is fine. The future of her fertility is unknown. The fear of harming your child is terrifying. The "perpetrators" ,of course, knew this.
THANKS for this, Diane. And of course you are right. My anger should more appropriately be aimed at the real culprit, but it doesn't have a face: Mass Compliance. Hopefully, mothers have learned an important lesson!
Thanks Steve. Yes, the woman regrets everyday having gotten the shots and booster now that she is aware. Obstetricians have been giving the flu shot to pregnant women for awhile now, something I found very questionable when I found out. I think this practice may have led to women not being as concerned about the Covid shot as they should have been. Maybe this practice was started by the culprits to soften young woman's minds regarding vaccines. hmmm EVIL
It’s worse because they WERE thinking. They knew.
And still encouraged pregnant women to be vaccinated.
Helen, I was referring to the pregnant women. HG Wells was very prophetic back in 1895. So many "innocents" these days are really just Eloi. Food for the DOD, big Pharma, big government Morlochs.
📕🔥🔥🔥🔥 AARON SIRI NEW BOOK OUT NOW
It's out!
Vaccines, Amen
https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/its-out