42 Comments

Asking a serious question--I have wondered why Moderna (patent Fauci/NIH) seems to escape the intense focus/scrutiny. Only occasionally are they named. However I believe they are equally complicit/harmful and deceptive. Any theories?

Expand full comment
author

its called kickbacks. A proper investigation will show that. big people in US gov got big money

Expand full comment
author

Boom

Expand full comment

There will never be an investigation and Fauci will never be held responsible. Our government knows exactly how the virus was leaked and who did it but they will never divulge this information to the public. Our politicians, both sides, are using covid for their own political agendas but they have no clue either to the truth. It’s actually a good thing that the virus was leaked prematurely by accident because it was meant to be deadlier and used for nefarious reasons.

Expand full comment

Worldwide Pfizer jabs killed more people per million jabs than Moderna, which is interesting because there was more mRNA in Moderna jabs.

I am currently working on the different LNPs used and quality control.

Pfizer had massive Particle contamination in some lots.

Endotoxins appear to be much more of a problem in Pfizer, coming from use of E Coli bacteria in production, and they go to great lengths to hide actual measurements.

Pfizer changed formulation in late 2021 with no separate trial, replacing the Phosphate buffer with Tromethamine.

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/relative-lethality-of-covid-19-vaccines

Expand full comment

just my guess why pfizer bears the brunt of more scrutiny: the firm earned more as a result of the fascism.

2022 revenues for pfizer: (not sure of the biontech share of the revenues*)

covid shots: $37.8 billion

paxlovid: $18.9 billion

moderna 2022 revenue for its 1 covid therapy: $18 billion

* BioNtech's 3rd qtr 2022 financial results:

For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, revenues of €13.0 billion1 (9M 2021: €13.4 billion1), net profit of €7.2 billion (9M 2021: €7.1 billion) and fully diluted earnings per share of €27.70 or $29.472 (9M 2021: €27.46 or $32.852)

Expand full comment

Great data. thanks

Expand full comment

I've heard Karen Kingston say that that Pfizer had 63% of the market:

https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/us-government-forfeits-all-ownership

Expand full comment

Idaho legislators are pushing to criminalize the clot shot. They want to make it a misdemeanour to inject someone with it.

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/idaho-leading-the-charge-to-criminalize

Expand full comment

Misdemeanour? It's attempted first degree murder.

I guess it's a start.

Expand full comment

how many more deaths and injuries were just hidden by kicking them out of the study and pretending "it wasn't the vaccine that did it"? Can this data be determined?

Expand full comment

Good questions. What happened to the "Few participants (who) had adverse events leading to study withdrawal"?

Exactly how many participants had adverse events? What were they? How many DIED?

Expand full comment

Unbefuckinglievable

Expand full comment

+all the dead people that they removed from the study...

Expand full comment

What the heck is in the placebo concoction that 14 people died?!? Not simple saline... Is it the base substance (LNP, PEG etc) minus the mRNA? If yes, then they should be reevaluating that. But my expectations of criminals and psychopaths is very low....

Expand full comment

The Placebo was 0.9% Sodium Chloride provided by 2 suppliers. Covid19 was killing millons during the trial period.

Expand full comment

Covid 19 shots you mean?

In fact covid 19 deaths were quite low. A forensic audit in thr UK showed less than 7,000 " covid only deaths.

There were many assisted killings with remdesivir, midazolam, morphine, end of life protocol drugs to assist with the finish, which would be inaccurately counted as flu deaths. There were also heart attack, trauma patients driven to and denied care, to be included in those numbers. Out of 10 injected in our family 2 dead (41 & 42 0 comorbities, no terminal illness and no covid infection at TOD) , 2 losing their eyes sight, 1 diagnosed with RA within 3 months (page 37 clinical trial data)

Pretty high casualty count for a flu with .02 death rate, rounding up of course.

Expand full comment

Discussing Death rate for Covid19 requires the CFR versus age.

Expand full comment

They lied and people died, Im so angry because I knew early on this entire thing was a farce. We need to wake more people up, perhaps we do that locally, in our communities, building by building if need be, bring receipts so they can't argue with us. Things are starting to turn in our favour, we just have to get more creative and get the truth out however we can, we will need all of us to succeed in saving our countries and stopping Klaus and his evil minions.

Expand full comment

How bout No!

No brainier and the sample size is small according to Harvey Risch

Expand full comment

Therefore if the difference between the groups is not significant, then you could be looking at type II error. If the difference is significant then Wow!

Expand full comment

Therefore one must factor in as many other variables as possible before injecting a potentially life-threatening or life-ending foreign untested and highly risky toxin into one's blood bone marrow lymph nodes reproductive system etc.

Expand full comment

Stupid and/or unethical not to do so.

Expand full comment

This was not a vaccine in any sense of the word but a prototype countermeasure (you can create your own definition of a countermeasure and it will fit) created under the EUA and that means it needed no trials or testing to get approved. That further means that according to the DOD it was not a pharmaceutical and therefore not subject to any trials or approval based on trial results. Doesn't matter anyway because if thousands died during the fake trials, the FDA would have green lighted it with no second thoughts.

Expand full comment

Or really?? Did you find this out with the data release by Pfizer last year? The reason I am surprised is that according to the book Turtles All The Way Down, they never use little old saline as a placebo, but rather OTHER vaccines (previous versions for example) or various components. I look forward to your source 🙏🏻☺️

Expand full comment

AstraZeneca used another jab. Pfizer only used Saline. You can search many of the US Court ordered release of their trial documents by keyword here:

https://vaccines.shinyapps.io/abstractor/

Many of the documents were released as XPT format and are huge, so a number of our nerds are working on extraction alogorithms to get the data in useful form. Some documents have not been released.

Expand full comment

Then there are the hundreds Withdrawn, Discontinued and "Lost to Follow-up" from the various Pfizer trials. Not included as Dead are foetuses who did not make it from 50 pregnancies arising, despite stringent rules of trial subject contraception.

I am still building my multiple Pfizer trials page.

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-biontech-covid19-jab-multiple

Expand full comment

I have a question about this: are the 5 more deaths a statistically-significant number? I ask not to sound dismissive, but because, as a researcher, I want to be precise in what I say.

Expand full comment

The sample size, was reportedly small, so if there was no statistically significant difference between the groups, it means fuck all. One would have to strongly suspect type II error.

Expand full comment

Something was in the placebo to screw with the overall numbers. So now wheb people get saline it kills them. Sure...

Expand full comment

What did the placebo group people died of? How could the placebo kill them?

Expand full comment

What did the placebo group people died of? How could the placebo kill them?

Expand full comment

Yes in 2022 after the Judge ruled against Pfizer. A Pfizer study fake-check stated was completely false. From FOIA data. 1,200 died and 3 paged of side effects. YouTube disabled it from play mode. Anyone who downloaded a copy. I don't know if it works. But take YouTube to court and force them to reactivate the video. Or if you have or can get the document. That would be better. At the time like some of you. Kind of oblivious to what was happening.

Expand full comment