20 Comments

with all due respect to Professor Dalgleish and his views on the tumours being driven by the boosters but not the primary series, i disagree. by the early fall i already came across patients who rapidly developed golf ball size lymphomas, which progressed very aggressively. all of them were in cancer remission and BOOM, it was back with a vengeance within a few weeks of their second dose! 1 exception was a healthy 18 year old male who developed a golf sized tumour in his calf within 2 weeks of the second shot … he had no previous history.

imo, it’s safe to assume that it was present from the beginning and only accelerated from there as more and more doses piled up.

if i’m not mistaken, Pfizer is pivoting into cancer research because they believe it will be in every household … fancy that.

“trust the science”

never forget

Expand full comment

Same Remi- two perfectly healthy good friends had had the first two and were diagnosed within 6mos. One with stage 4 turbo stomach & liver cancer. She’s since died. And the other with stage 4 lung cancer. Will likely die this year.

Expand full comment
Feb 4·edited Feb 4

What's interesting about Disease X is that the perps are not promoting a fake virus, just inventing X so that the fake pandemic stays fresh in minds that don't read, study or use much reasoning skills. Quite creative of NWO/WHO nerds in promoting the constant fake virus niche for funding rip off purposes. White collar criminals are so common but hidden when each perp follows lock-step Communist-NAZI style.

Expand full comment

Our daughter is a family practice PA and she has seen a surge of aggressive cancers, particularly in younger patients. And it remains the elephant in the room….

Expand full comment

May I ask where she is based?

Expand full comment

Yes, central Illinois, small community (12k), but draws from surrounding rural areas.

Expand full comment

Ty, do you think should we be open to chatting with me via email? I am a PharmD/MS student interested in looking at the impacts of mRNA technology for my thesis topic.

Expand full comment

Malone is part of the evil group. He created the MRNA knowing what it can do in the wrong hands. He got big bucks for his invention. He also plays both sides meaning that he invented the mRNA and he took the jab and you should too. To it is bad and I wish I didn’t take the shot. And he is smart so you can’t say he didn’t know what way to go.

Expand full comment
Feb 4·edited Feb 4

QUOTE >> There are several reports of PET scan mapped tumours exploding at the site and draining area of covid injections with the advice to inject covid vaccines away from known cancers! << UNQUOTE

How in the world can public health authorities deny a connection between the jabs and an increase of cancers AT THE SITE OF THE SHOT AND ITS DRAINAGE AREA??? Why aren't they looking into this?

They show no interest in saving lives, only making profits and defying responsibility at any bureaucratic or industrial level.

What if the problem is something like the shoddy metal used in these cheap syringes manufactured by the billions? Don't they care it might be something like that? Maybe there are multiple contributors or even a toxic combo of factors? The only way they want to acknowledge a problem is as an avenue of making MORE money, more Public Health Profiteering, more Cancer Industry Profit Share.

Expand full comment

Using Bourla and Malone in the same sentence is slander against Malone, who has totally changed nearly every opinion he once held. Try reading his Substack.

Bourla is a fascist. Malone is a warrior for freedom. Same with Kirsch, who lost all of his friends because of totally revised opinions.

Expand full comment

Bourdain and Bourla are not the same person! Bourdain is dead, Bourla is not. Bourdain was not a fascist.

Malone changed his views? ahhh … then why is he still recommending the vaccine schedule for kids? are you a fan of autism in black boys? not sure which substack you are referring to … but Berenson was 100% right when he looked at Malone: Malone is a fucken fraud, his early patents are with regards to nanotechnology being used to insert genes from some species into others … that’s transfection btw. please do yourself a favour and actually look at Malone’s early work before defending him.

Expand full comment

EARLY work. He has not recommended the jabs for kids in years.

Bourla. Damned auto-correct. Fixed.

Expand full comment

yes, that kind of early work that got him promoted up the chain,

unlike

Dr W. Thompson who got demoted!

… was ordered to destroy the CDC numbers showing increased % of autism in black boys following the MMR shot compared to standard … the court case that helped Wakefield to prove his point even though he had his licence revoked in the UK.

Malone supported the shots … ?

where the money flows …

Expand full comment

EARLY work. He has completely changed.

I do not understand people who cannot forgive those who have changed their stripes. It takes extraordinary integrity to change, especially doing a 180, to admit that one's prior life was completely wrong.

You and I may not agree with Malone on everything. You and I would not agree on everything. That does not mean you don't forge alliances. To preclude that allows the fascists to win the war.

We cannot allow that to happen because if they do, we lose not only the United States, but also Western Civilization, without which humanity reverts to the barbarism of the past.

I don't agree with Alexander on everything, but I'm willing to ally myself with him. But the infighting has got to stop. Humanity is at stake.

Expand full comment

i don’t oppose forgiveness Doug but would you forgive Bourla if he recanted his position tomorrow because he “did a 180”? Bancel … Fauci … Daszak … Baric … the 2 former FDA commissioners who now work for Pfizer and Moderna? … i would much rather they all spend the remainder of their lives behind bars, stripped of all personal belongings and given covid boosters every 6 months … for their protection. maybe i’m just mean, but i cannot forgive or forget the damage caused by this fake exercise (event 201).

there can be no forgiveness without accountability!!!

Dr Malone is NOT innocent. he made $ millions off his position at the NIH where (people might forget) he is is still a non-voting member on some committees.

Malone is a research scientist who did not treat people who got sick with covid. he’s a research expert not a medical expert (unlike like Dr Marik, Dr Kory, Dr Hoffe, Dr McCullough, and many others who actually treated people who came down with covid-symptoms). but Dr Malone was “offended” when an ad for the supplement nattokinase was posted in the ticker tape under the interview that he was giving at the time … he was offended because THAT brand of nattokinase was being sold by another company (TWC where McCullough, Alexander, Risch and Makis work now) while his own version of THE SAME supplement was on its way to the market. if somebody really cared about human wellbeing, do you think it would matter where the help came from? unfortunately for Malone, money and status are the primary drivers … he’s angry that he was NOT included in the Nobel Prize nomination with Kariko and Weissman … Weissman is the true originator of the mrna concept and predated Malone’s work by about 10 years.

Malone also sued Jane Ruby and the Breggins … 3 members of the movement who have opposed the Pharma complex for many years prior to Malone’s 180 … but they also exposed some of his shady past … in response he took them to court where his suit was tossed out.

I was a fan of Malone early on … yes, he was the first NIH member who GOT MEDIA ATTENTION for opposing the covid vaccine mandates … do you know that even at that time he still supported these vaccines for the elderly? a research scientist who’s a supposed expert in mrna/ nanotech doesn’t know about the problems encountered in the mrna vaccine animal trials (2014, 2015)? an expert who apparently himself took 2 Moderna shots … despite lack of any trials (at that time) beyond Phase 2 … would you trust this expert with expert advice?

i know i sure as hell DO NOT and definitely will not take Malone’s word ever again.

the main reason why he’s still relevant is because he attached himself to RFK Jr and was involved in his book on Fauci … a book notorious for failing to thank one of THE FIRST OPPOSERS to the covid madness: Judy Mikovits! i’ve read the book, it’s well referenced and Malone also got a lot of credit for it due to lending his academic weight. Judy got NOTHING, is still regarded as an outcast in the science community and she recanted for her work with ebola a long time ago … but she’s considered too wild for the freedom movement despite being one of THE FIRST to oppose the covid tyranny ... way ahead of expert Malone.

Malone is a wedge in this movement Doug, that’s why i don’t support him anymore. the more i looked into his past, the more worried i became. Dr Alexander was right to call him out.

we may not agree on everything but i have nothing against you Doug. i do however have something against people who align themselves with certain ideas because it boosts their standing (financial and political). it was clear to Malone a while back that he would not be able to inherit either Fauci or Collins role … Hotez was miles ahead of him in that race … so he switched sides! Malone is no idiot, he’s not innocent and he does NOT represent my views.

i work in healthcare and have seen first hand the damage done by vaccines (not just covid so-called vaccines). vaccines that Malone endorsed until he had some adverse effects … before that he was 100% on the gravy train. now he switched trains … his goals haven’t really changed

Expand full comment

I appreciate your thinking, but I think he switched early enough--albeit due to his own fake-vaxx injury. At some point, the "mistakes" become glaring enough to say, you've had enough time. Changing now doesn't work for me, so Fauci, even if he came clean would, I think, deserve the gallows (or worse--I dream of a long life in prison for him). I think Malone was early enough, with Kirsch and Weinstein on the Dark Horse podcast (what a great discussion!) in mid-'21, to give him leeway there.

I have not figured out the lawsuits, and must admit I wonder about those, but I haven't researched them well. I can't argue about Mikowitz.

But continuing to go after Malone three years after he was fake-vaxx injured and nearly three years after he realized everything is a lie is, I think, at best unhelpful and at worst a seeking of revenge for the sake of revenge and, worse, against the wrong man. Fauci and gang deserve so much more. Focus there, and on the governors, and the other seekers of political power, and the fake scientists who simply follow the money.

Expand full comment

i agree with you on Kirsch, he’s very open about his change in views after taking the first 2 doses … but he’s not always right. at least, he’s open to debate unlike Malone

Expand full comment
Feb 4·edited Feb 4

WAKE UP ALREADY!

Or stop trolling. Whichever applies.

Expand full comment

Bourla, not Bourdain. My bad.

Expand full comment