Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elle's avatar

I'm not sure how old the author is but sex does change as one ages. I've started telling couples in their mid to late 40's, "your relationship better be deeper then sex." Society puts alot of focus on that. Imagine if we nurtured kindness, attention, understanding, selflessness in a relationship.... the strength that would bring to a relationship. Treating each other like you would treat a friend. Heck, maybe if that was nurtured more sex would be had.

I've been married twice. The 1st marriage, sex was manipulative. 2nd marriage, always on his time, not mine. Then there were relationships in between. Sex without attachment. I didn't really think it could exist. For men, clearly yes. Now maybe it's me, BUT shouldn't romance happen before you crawl between the sheets? This is a key component that men miss (from a female perspective)

Relationships between men & women have changed. When I consider my parents/grandparents they were each others friend. BFF's if you will. They had no other place they wanted to be. That nurtured their relationship. That doesn't seem to hold true today. We've fallen into this bizarre behavior of men outings/trips, girls outings/trips. I know where my husband would rather be! Which brings me back to my 1st point, if we worked equally as hard on ALL the other things that make relationships strong, divorce rates wouldn't be what they are. It's not just about sex, it's the entire package.

AwakeNotWoke's avatar

Sexless relationships may sometimes work but not very often. Both spouses need to be comfortable with such a relationship. The link between frustration and aggression is very well established. Frustration feeds the "four horsemen of the apocalypse" (contempt, criticism, stonewalling and defensiveness) found by New York marriage therapist John Gottman and his wife to predict the impending end of a relationship. I have several times warned male friends who were behaving passive-aggressively by sexually neglecting their wives that "If you do not f*ck them they will f*ck off" and that has generally proved to be true. If the level of intimacy exceeds the level of conflict then that's a positive and occasional negative withdrawals will not be harmful but if the converse is true and there's nothing "in the bank" then that's a negative.

This has been expressed in the equation:

F*cks - Fights = +

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?