40 Comments

Bingo, Paul! This is Perhaps the Mother of All Covid scandals. People weren't dying from Covid.

Also, look at who did die - up to 50 percent were nursing home residents and average age of death probably 80 or more. Among those who died between 50 and 75, most or a disproportionate percentage were probably minorities or poor. These are the people that don't have any forceful or influential advocates or deaths that no one would make a fuss over or question.

I bet the vast majority of hospital "Covid" deaths happened in hospitals that serve Medicaid patients ... not hospitals that serve more of the the middle and upper class demos.

Expand full comment

90 % of deaths in Canada were in nursing homes....thye did not die of COVID, you are right

Expand full comment

you are correct too, most deaths in US are minority

Expand full comment

They killed people who nobody would notice or investigate.

Expand full comment

We know entire families who were CONNED into getting jabbed. They are wealthy and ignorant. Dropping like flies.

Expand full comment

I assure you that Hospitald did NOT discriminate. Funding made killing elders profitable regardless of financial status of the patient. Elders knew history and were a burden on a BANKRUPT society. The USA is controlled by CRIMINALS, not by We The People. It is time for REVERSAL of Republic and Constitutional Observation.

Expand full comment

You are probably right. But they would have risked more "blowback" or irate family members if they were killing the well-connected and affluent in just as large numbers as the poor and helpless elderly.

Expand full comment

The rich died too if they fell in the hospital web.

Expand full comment

It would be a very interesting study to graph/plot the "Covid victims" of April and May 2020 by income level. What percentage were on welfare? What percentage were retired and their only income was social security?

Expand full comment

The only analyst I'll listen to these days is Dr. Kevin McCairn. Not only is he thoroughly examining current scientific papers but he's putting in the lab work too. And he can spot the frauds/grifters/incompetents. He's at the bleeding edge of it all IMO: https://t.wtyl.live/w/x2gKPSgAVFuBGZTHHdAmxK

Expand full comment

Rancourt thinks viruses do not exist. I wish we were told more about it. This is such an important but divisive issue. Why? No virus theory doctors are offering 15 mln to anyone able and willing to prove the existence of viruses. Yet… there are no takers! What is this all about? Another gross conspiracy?

What is there to know that we don’t? Why?

Expand full comment

not sure viruses dont exist, I know this one there is an issue...I would even be willing to know if this existed...you do know they could have created this from zero...I do think something other than virus was released, got out...something as a battle field bioweapon

Expand full comment

The infectious clone release sounds most plausible to me.

Expand full comment

Yet there is no scientific evidence of any virus or bioweapon ever, correct? Can you cite even 1 publication containing valid scientific evidence of either, natural or manmade? I think we both know the answer is "no".

All this talk about a purely hypothetical bioweapon distracts from all the known harms that were caused by medical malpractice, etc. And I'm not just talking about fake-covid.

Expand full comment

I nearly died of it, but my husband never got sick at all. Neither did my son.

Expand full comment

I've collected many articles/videos on the topic for people who are new to the no-virus topic:

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/

And literally hundreds of freedom of information responses showing that virology is pseudoscience:

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

All Paul needed to do was spend a few hours reading the initial pseudoscience out of China, which he and his yes-virus colleagues were urged to do many times.

Expand full comment

Thank yiu. I will be visiting.

Expand full comment

Did Rancourt say no viruses exist, or just that he didn't think 'covid' was caused by a virus?

Viruses, more than likely, do exist; why would they not? The perfect evolutionary pathogen, using all the host's energy to procreate.

Kevin McKernan states:

'The ‘no virus camp’ is left with no where to go once you demonstrate you can isolate a pure viroid with an oligo synthesizer and it is infectious and causes transmissible disease. The ‘No pandemic’ folks are equally befuddled as Hop Latent Viroid has been documented in the US, Canada, China, Germany, Brazil and Israel despite no respiratory mode of transmission. It has a broader host range than initially named (Hop, Cannabis, Nettle, Tomato to name a few).'

https://anandamide.substack.com/p/viroids-and-obelisks

Expand full comment

multiple release...

Expand full comment

Thank you for responding. So much uncertainty. I can’t understand why they offer 15 mln and there are no takers, but anyway…. Reality is stranger than fiction. I would be careful to build any theory on 1 paper. There are so many fake papers now…. Looks like most are fake. If they are true, the authors have troubles getting them published! Perilous times indeed.

Expand full comment

You are correct, uncertainty abounds. I think this whole argument should be shelved until the mRNA abominations are banned everywhere on the planet.

Wasting energy on other things is wasting lives.

Expand full comment

It gets much more ridiculous:

1.5 million € prize for proof of a coronavirus! An update from Germany

Professor Ulrike Kämmerer has taken a “novel” approach to the offer: insisting that “viruses exist” and attempting to the claim the prize yet refusing to provide her supposed “proof”. 😂

https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/15-million-prize-for-proof-of-a-coronavirus

Expand full comment

🤣🤣🤣we could do that too!

Expand full comment

There is a huge debate on substack know about virus theory vs terrain. You should follow the substacks. They are all fascinating ..

Expand full comment

You can believe in germs/viruses and terrain. The difference is whether you see the pathogens as dangerous, which need 'medication' to fix, else training for our immune systems which can usually easily deal with them.

Or should be able to, many people's metabolic/immune systems have been so poisoned, that they are unable to function properly. Especially, the jabbed I guess.

Expand full comment

Why not both? I’ve believed both all my life and also called bs on the scamdemic. So far I’m winning!

Expand full comment

Which ones would you recommend? I am new to this field.

Expand full comment

I wanted to comment on that article last week but only paid subscribers can.

Lol, did you notice they are now talking about "viroids" and "obelisks", not "viruses"? No one can cite even 1 valid scientific study showing any alleged "virus", nature or manmade.

So they engage in endless theatre to keep people confused and distract from the fact that no-virus people have been right all along.

My comment on Ana Milhalcea's related article:

The Science magazine article describes as a so-called "viruslike entity" (referred to as an "obelisk") that they say has a genome "seemingly" composed of loops of RNA. And a quote about "creative" work by researchers on "viroids":

"The Stanford search yielded nearly 30,000 PREDICTED RNA circles, each consisting of about 1000 bases and LIKELY representing a distinct obelisk."

It doesn't sound like they're very certain about any of this!

The quantum dot article also uses the term "obelisk" but makes no reference to "virus like particles" or "viruses" and show structures that look very different from the "VLPs" shown in the earlier diagram.

They actually looks like obelisks, those structures found in Washington D.C. and elsewhere.

Something I don't get is how so-called "VLPs" could possibly be visible under a microscope when alleged "viruses" are supposedly too small to see with a microscope.

Also, even if "viruses" (which have never been shown to exist) did exist, how could one open up a nanoscale particle, remove the genetic material, put something else inside - including bacteria and mammalian cells that are larger than alleged "viruses" - and then seal them back up? Sounds pretty ridiculous.

Expand full comment

Apart from thinking that they should exist after billions of years' evolution, since they are the perfect energy conserved pathogen; I cannot say one way or the other.

What little brain-power I have has been spent trying to figure out how to fix a health problem, and prevent any future ones (sans doctors). Also, to look at the mRNA abominations (results here, for what it's worth: https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/).

What I do know, is that the spike protein pathogen does exist and until the genetic injections are banned for all time, all over the planet, little else matters.

It is possible to comment on Kevin McKernan's stack here, so maybe he will be able to give some answers to your questions:

https://anandamide.substack.com/p/obelisks-and-viroids-kryptonite-for/comments

Expand full comment

" they are the perfect energy conserved pathogen " - this is a logical fallacy, to assign properties to something never shown to exist.

Can you share your proof of the spike protein, please? All the studies I've seen were based on indirect tests and/or lab-created ("recombinant") protein. FOIs the CDC did yield any proof either.

The mRNA jabs will continue as long as people believe in imaginary pathogens and that health is to be found via pharma injections. Exposing people to the pseudoscientific nature of virology goes a long way to toward preventing future harm.

All the best with your health problem.

Expand full comment

I never said they *did* exist, just that I think it likely. If that is a logical fallacy, I don't care.

I guess the proteins downloaded from the US database will not convince you, nevertheless:

https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#_Ref83404063

Pathologists staining for spike (Dr. Arne Burkhardt et. al) find it in the organs of the jabbed and infected, further they can differentiate between the 'natural' and mRNA spike.

There are multiple patents for the spike protein.

So no exogenous pathogens exist? Bacteria, fungi all fantasies? Ok, good luck convincing the normies of that. Even if you just mean viruses, you're never gonna convince nearly enough. The only thing I reckon we can convince them of, is that the genetic jabs were intentionally meant to harm.

Just because you believe in (imaginary) pathogens, doesn't mean you have to believe in pharma 'meds'.

Health problem got fixed a while back. AFAIK I'm healthy, but haven't seen a 'doctor' for decades, and have never had any diagnostic tests since a child. Now at 60+.

Expand full comment

What evidence of "SARS-COV-2 spike protein" do you want me to look at in that extremely long blog?

There are patents for imaginary viruses too, but the viruses have never been shown to exist. As a colleague pointed out, you could patent a flying carpet without ever having to demonstrate that you have a working flying carpet.

I don't claim that bacteria and fungi don't exist, it's their alleged pathogenicity that is not supported by valid scientific evidence. Ridiculous, invalid, useless animal torture studies are used to bamboozle people into thinking that some bacteria cause problems. I've published FOI responses from the CDC on a few of them:

https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/cdc-foia-confession-we-have-no-scientific

Loads of people have already caught onto the virus fraud, and we were once "normies" ourselves.

We can spend the rest of our lives fighting over masks, closures, toxic "antiviral" drugs, this jab, that jab, endless details about this pathogen, that pathogen, or simply learn and educate others on the pseudoscience at the heart of it all so that they never get fooled again. It's fear of an alleged pathogen that makes people sooo easy to manipulate and harm, and the harm is not just via jabs.

Anyways, glad to hear your health has improved and you're avoiding the quack MDs. Well done.

Expand full comment

But is this still the same death protocol in place now at the hospitals? Has anything changed?

Expand full comment

The 6 month lag from the mass mRNA jabbings to the excess death peaks. Like shadow images, amplified with every round. All the better to mask the effects. And the conspicuous absence of more recent figures from Australia and NZ, as well as any figures whatsoever on Our World in Data from the least jabbed nations are also telling. And it is colonialist arrogance to think these mostly African nations are all backwaters in which no such figures are kept.

Expand full comment

Soon I will begin researching Bounty Hunter Cross Training. There is a pending need for Bounty Hunters. Nuremberg 2.0.

Expand full comment

". . . the Malone mRNA vaccine . . . "

CORRECTION: there is NO such thing as a "Malone mRNA vaccine". Malone was working on mRNA CANCER therapies, NOT "vaccines"!!!!! Your vendetta against Malone is uncalled for, unwarranted, rediculous, and getting to be DOWNRIGHT EVIL! And we are getting sick and tired of hearing about it!

He DID NOT MAKE the COVID Vaxxes!

ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Malone is complicit. Please don’t try to defend the indefensible.

Expand full comment

Increased deaths increased in 2016 for many northern countries.

Look at graph…something circulating globe and hit Australia in 2017/2018? Look at that increase! That’s the true Covid deaths probably. By 2020 we had immunity!

I swear their supposed lab leak happened in 2015/2016.

Expand full comment

Yes … but all deaths now point to mRNA bio- weapons.. which are the evil 👿 gift that keeps giving death

Expand full comment