Remdesivir is DEADLY, causes acute renal (nephrotoxicity) & liver failure: why is FDA, NIH, Health Canada etc. health officials, doctors, hospitals pushing this on patients? knowing it kills! O Gérard
Remdesivir is DEADLY, causes acute renal (nephrotoxicity) & liver failure: why is FDA, NIH, Health Canada etc. health officials, doctors, hospitals pushing this on patients? knowing it kills! O Gérard
we detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir, deserving a thorough qualitative assessment of all available data.
In February 2022 my unvaccinated, healthy 71-year old husband was diagnosed with a DVT in his left leg and two PEs. We were terrified at his shortness of breath and even more terrified that we had no choice but to go to the hospital. At the hospital he was swabbed for flu and covid. He tested positive for covid (although he’d had a bad case in November 2021). Our small town hospital ambulanced him to a hospital in a city 3 hours away because they thought the blood clots might require surgery and they had no vascular surgeon on staff. Even though I called the city hospital and begged them to let me be with him after I traveled there, they gently refused because of his covid diagnosis. I’m happy to report that he had excellent care at both hospitals, thank the Lord, but the night nurse told him she would return shortly to give him a shot of remdesivir. Thankfully through people like Dr Alexander we knew the dangers. He told the nurse, “I’m going to refuse that shot. If my wife was here she’d be able to tell you why, but anyhow, I refuse to take it.” She said that it was hospital protocol because he’d tested positive for covid , but she backed right off. The information from doctors like Dr Alexander has been life-saving. Thank you.
My wife was in the hospital diagnosed with COVID. They wanted to give her remdesivir but she refused. I am so proud of her. She kicked the “infectious disease” doctor out of her room and didn’t use her any during the rest of her stay.
It's important to acknowledge that certain powerful individuals and groups may have a desire to reduce the population. This was declared at the Rio Summit in 1992, following the same sentiment expressed in the Kissinger Report of 1974.
the renal toxicity of remdesivir was well established even before the "pandemic." it should never have been considered for use. instead, hospitals were incentivized with cash to murder their patients.
Intent to Harm: "There's a Crime Going On" Dr. @P_McCulloughMD: "The reason why I saw that [there was intent] ... Those who were the strongest voices against any forms of treatment are the very ones who are most vigorously promoting the vaccines. They're one and the same."
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: So many things happened from my eye's view in the last three years that, you know, I was a year into it and had decided— I teamed up with best-selling author John Leake. And John Leake is a true crime author, full-time, has several best-sellers. And John approached me, he said, I want to film you, I want to interview you. He said, there's a crime going on. There's elements of crime here. This isn't just a confused public health response. There's a crime.
And we set about to just describe the first part of what went on. And that is the development of early treatment protocols and the enablement of helping people avoid hospitalization and death, those are the two bad outcomes of what can happen, and then the crushing response we had from our federal state agencies, medical boards, health systems, to just crush any covid treatment to the population.
People would ask me, Dr. McCullough, what could be their intention? And I think I first concluded this when I went on Tucker Carlson. And it really disturbed him. I think it's intentional. I said I think there is an intent to promote fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death in order to lay the groundwork to push and then ultimately force mass vaccination. And the reason why I say that now three years into it, those who are the strongest voices against any forms of treatment are the very ones who are most vigorously promoting the vaccines. They're one and the same. And the smaller group who tried everything they could to help patients, do everything they can to provide compassionate care, trying to keep their loved ones out of the hospital, those are the ones who are more circumspect and wanted to look at the vaccines in terms of overall risk benefit analysis. It was those that did not presume the vaccines were safe and effective. Because it's the presumption that they're safe and effective is that drove all this.
Paraquat, when ingested, is extremely toxic. It causes a spectrum of complications including acute respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, hepatotoxicity, and pulmonary fibrosis.
Paraquat is sprayed on dozens of crops, including corn, wheat, almonds, cotton, and strawberries.
Remdesavir. Is this were the saying “whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”? Cause if this sh@t doesn’t kill you maybe high dose Ativan and ventilation will. Still trust your local hospitals? For profits? When hospitals shifted from your physician to the hospital physician to “care” for you, suddenly it was money and NOT health.
"knowing that it kills." Ladies and gentlemen, the current state of our medical establishment and pharmaceutical companies summed up in 4 words.
In February 2022 my unvaccinated, healthy 71-year old husband was diagnosed with a DVT in his left leg and two PEs. We were terrified at his shortness of breath and even more terrified that we had no choice but to go to the hospital. At the hospital he was swabbed for flu and covid. He tested positive for covid (although he’d had a bad case in November 2021). Our small town hospital ambulanced him to a hospital in a city 3 hours away because they thought the blood clots might require surgery and they had no vascular surgeon on staff. Even though I called the city hospital and begged them to let me be with him after I traveled there, they gently refused because of his covid diagnosis. I’m happy to report that he had excellent care at both hospitals, thank the Lord, but the night nurse told him she would return shortly to give him a shot of remdesivir. Thankfully through people like Dr Alexander we knew the dangers. He told the nurse, “I’m going to refuse that shot. If my wife was here she’d be able to tell you why, but anyhow, I refuse to take it.” She said that it was hospital protocol because he’d tested positive for covid , but she backed right off. The information from doctors like Dr Alexander has been life-saving. Thank you.
Please be aware there are 2 names. Hospitals are now using the brand name Veklury as people get wise to Remdisivir.
Generic Name: Remdesivir (RDV)
Brand Name: Veklury.
My wife was in the hospital diagnosed with COVID. They wanted to give her remdesivir but she refused. I am so proud of her. She kicked the “infectious disease” doctor out of her room and didn’t use her any during the rest of her stay.
It's important to acknowledge that certain powerful individuals and groups may have a desire to reduce the population. This was declared at the Rio Summit in 1992, following the same sentiment expressed in the Kissinger Report of 1974.
- Luc
Guess what? To some extent, ALL big pharma drugs are deadly. You will be 1,000 times healthier without them.
Why? Because they don't give a "shit". Sorry for that word but I couldn't address it better than that.
But yet draconian Canada still uses it, go figure.
the renal toxicity of remdesivir was well established even before the "pandemic." it should never have been considered for use. instead, hospitals were incentivized with cash to murder their patients.
Relatedly:
https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1626954330413596674?s=20
@VigilantFox
Feb 17, 2023
Intent to Harm: "There's a Crime Going On" Dr. @P_McCulloughMD: "The reason why I saw that [there was intent] ... Those who were the strongest voices against any forms of treatment are the very ones who are most vigorously promoting the vaccines. They're one and the same."
[video attached]
https://twitter.com/i/status/1626646818619592713
Posted February 17, 2023
[From 2023 Faith and Medicine Conference, February 3, 2023 see https://faithandmedicine.org/]
TRANSCRIPT
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: So many things happened from my eye's view in the last three years that, you know, I was a year into it and had decided— I teamed up with best-selling author John Leake. And John Leake is a true crime author, full-time, has several best-sellers. And John approached me, he said, I want to film you, I want to interview you. He said, there's a crime going on. There's elements of crime here. This isn't just a confused public health response. There's a crime.
And we set about to just describe the first part of what went on. And that is the development of early treatment protocols and the enablement of helping people avoid hospitalization and death, those are the two bad outcomes of what can happen, and then the crushing response we had from our federal state agencies, medical boards, health systems, to just crush any covid treatment to the population.
People would ask me, Dr. McCullough, what could be their intention? And I think I first concluded this when I went on Tucker Carlson. And it really disturbed him. I think it's intentional. I said I think there is an intent to promote fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death in order to lay the groundwork to push and then ultimately force mass vaccination. And the reason why I say that now three years into it, those who are the strongest voices against any forms of treatment are the very ones who are most vigorously promoting the vaccines. They're one and the same. And the smaller group who tried everything they could to help patients, do everything they can to provide compassionate care, trying to keep their loved ones out of the hospital, those are the ones who are more circumspect and wanted to look at the vaccines in terms of overall risk benefit analysis. It was those that did not presume the vaccines were safe and effective. Because it's the presumption that they're safe and effective is that drove all this.
2:23
[END OF CLIP]
Doesn't Fauci get monetary kickbacks from Remdesivir?
They are freaking doctors and nurses! THEY KNEW THEY WERE MURDERING PEOPLE! IT IS DONE ON PURPOSE!
Fauci gets a payment each time Remdesivir is used, that's why they use it and push it.
Sounds a lot like what's on corn flakes:
Paraquat, when ingested, is extremely toxic. It causes a spectrum of complications including acute respiratory distress syndrome, renal failure, hepatotoxicity, and pulmonary fibrosis.
Paraquat is sprayed on dozens of crops, including corn, wheat, almonds, cotton, and strawberries.
Any nurse or doctor still administering Remdesivir is a murderer.
Remdesavir. Is this were the saying “whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”? Cause if this sh@t doesn’t kill you maybe high dose Ativan and ventilation will. Still trust your local hospitals? For profits? When hospitals shifted from your physician to the hospital physician to “care” for you, suddenly it was money and NOT health.