complications following a pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest? He was 33 years old. What would suddenly kill this young man, healthy man? Is it the mRNA technology COVID gene injection?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, I agree with you about the 15 years. Something has been bothering me. I watched the Highwire which had Aaron Siri talking to I think a Arizona state committee (or something similar) it was excellent, as usual his case for maintaining exemption from vaccines and reviewing history of vaccines was excellent. The only little thing that niggled my brain was Dr McCullough’s closing remarks, which usually he seems pretty good but he said to those that have had 2 vaccines and are really worried if you haven’t had a problem yet with a bad initial reaction you are probably going to be fine because it seems only those that reacted quite severely at first are having problems. Hmmm how can he know that…? I mean maybe from his perspective of heart inflammation that might be what he thinks he is seeing but it felt like wishful thinking and placating. It felt like don’t worry , it’s ok but how can he know. And I mean this only weeks after the scandal of dna in shots and just because he thinks it’s what the others had placebos?? Maybe their cocktail causes cancer instead or just sudden death? That is one way to quell a rebellion, oh don’t worry your fine…
Maybe I m too ready to buy into fear and maybe fear is worse then the disease but if the disease is sudden death then 🤔. I just don’t know. I like him but what if I’m mistaken or what if he is.
I think Dr. McCullough is a good-hearted soul who wants people not to unduly worry.
But his background is orthodox medicine. Those of us who have been interested in what they now call "Integrative Medicine" for many years know that apparently little things over many years can have a very big negative impact.
Just look at the excessive use of CT-scans, exposing patients to much more radiation than a simple single X-ray--even though the newer CT Scans use computers so they can still give clear pictures with much less radiation, if I remember correctly.
But over a lifetime repeated exposures raise the risk of cancer. Madame Curie didn't die from eating too many croissants.
He has said in several occasions (the Q&As with Malcolm) that there is a probably 5-year window for any carcinogenic effects and advised some vigilance. Dr. McCullough is a doctor. If he says "I think you will all die of cancer in 5 years", then some might just get cancer from worrying and being depressed about it. If he says "you will probably be fine" but be vigilant in terms of medical checkups etc, that might just have a positive effect and improve someone's chances.
You make some good points. Strange fact- women who had regular mammograms were more likely to get cancer, possibly the yearly x-rays are damaging/cancer causing-also the sooner it’s caught to the sooner it’s treated but the treatments are also possibly dangerous. But agree with you living healthy and keeping stress lowered is way better.
I think this is his educated, highly experienced seeing patients gut feeling and there are no " for sures/guarantees " in medicine however, like you touched on, a doctors job is to reassure ( not empty reassurances ) a patient on the good components of their health.
I don't see how this would have much to do about calming a rebellion. I think all people should be forming at the mouth angry and want action and justice for the murderers. As a society, we have a moral duty to eliminate the murderers among us. Life and society becomes better as a result.
IMO we need much much more of this brainstorming. I, for one, am foaming at the mouth. My cancer returned with vengeance (yes, two jabs) before I was enlightened. Every doc involved is bewildered by the fact that this cancer returned at all. Hmmm….
Thank you for reading. I feel bamboozled at the very least and am in the throws of formulating a plan of attack for dealing with this cancer round. It is said quite often that what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. Not so sure….
Well I trust your plan to rid your body of cancer than any mainstream quack these days. They have proven that they are money driven rather than health driven. Look into intermittent fasting, no sugar. There is also a man on Truth Social called the Sharkman, he has a cancer protocol that cured himself and many others. If I can find a link, I will send it your way. I do believe that stopping the inflow of ulta processed food and chemical products would be a good first step. They are trying to kill us from the multiple approach strategy.
There is an MD earlier mentioned by Dr Alexander who is crying out the String Mechanism to be taken in consideration and stop this vaccine. It is pretty surprising that the “freedom movement “ MDs are not debating it preferring to treat the injured patients? If is not stopped will be more patients to treat further? Or die further? Could be that the deal? If this is not the case, why Dr Lees’ String Mechanism presentation keeps being ignored but not debated instead?
The unfortunate young doctor was brilliant perhaps but not questioning enough. I have a family member who also works at a hospital, whose attitudes are similar--completely accepts the orthodoxy, never questioning it. And clings to it with almost a religious fervor.
Lots of more common folks who ostensibly are less accomplished often seem to have more street smarts. Early in the Plandemic, a Bronx woman contracted Covid and had trouble breathing. She grabbed a cab to run to the hospital. But the cabbie told her, "Don't go there! They'll put you on a ventilator and kill you!" After he explained she went home and successfully nursed herself through the illness instead.
Political insider Steve Bannon lately likes to quote a French philosopher, who said "What's important is that you SEE what you see."
My late father-in-law (d. 2008), who held a chair in nephrology at Thomas Jefferson University, was wont to claim that the FDA had killed more people than it had saved, through the long, bound-up-in-red-tape process to get a drug from the lab bench to the people. Might have been true in his day; no longer.
Not sure what you mean by the FDA killing more people in your f-in-law’s day, but no longer?
Did you mean by holding up new drug approvals, vs. other nefarious deeds like pushing this Covid Bioweapon via EUA incl. still current injections or things like wanting 75 yrs, to publish Pfizer safety study results?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, I agree with you about the 15 years. Something has been bothering me. I watched the Highwire which had Aaron Siri talking to I think a Arizona state committee (or something similar) it was excellent, as usual his case for maintaining exemption from vaccines and reviewing history of vaccines was excellent. The only little thing that niggled my brain was Dr McCullough’s closing remarks, which usually he seems pretty good but he said to those that have had 2 vaccines and are really worried if you haven’t had a problem yet with a bad initial reaction you are probably going to be fine because it seems only those that reacted quite severely at first are having problems. Hmmm how can he know that…? I mean maybe from his perspective of heart inflammation that might be what he thinks he is seeing but it felt like wishful thinking and placating. It felt like don’t worry , it’s ok but how can he know. And I mean this only weeks after the scandal of dna in shots and just because he thinks it’s what the others had placebos?? Maybe their cocktail causes cancer instead or just sudden death? That is one way to quell a rebellion, oh don’t worry your fine…
Maybe I m too ready to buy into fear and maybe fear is worse then the disease but if the disease is sudden death then 🤔. I just don’t know. I like him but what if I’m mistaken or what if he is.
I also believe he cannot possibly know what the future holds for the once or twice vaccinated.
Or even someone who did not get the Bioweapon injection.
We HAVE to please STOP calling it " vaccinated ". As we all here know, it is not that.
Best
Transfected is the actual biological term. It is a method that has used for many years.. Novel tech it is not (except when used as "vaccination")
Have you seen Sasha's and Dr Yeadon's comments re transfection here ?
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-comments-on-lead-me?publication_id=581065&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=bo73h
no that's a new one. I'll check it out. I actually learned about from JJ Couey on Twitch (gigaohmbiological)
Like him. He is the Real thing. 🙏
I will watch his take. He knows his stuff.
So true. I stand corrected.
😊🙏
I think Dr. McCullough is a good-hearted soul who wants people not to unduly worry.
But his background is orthodox medicine. Those of us who have been interested in what they now call "Integrative Medicine" for many years know that apparently little things over many years can have a very big negative impact.
Just look at the excessive use of CT-scans, exposing patients to much more radiation than a simple single X-ray--even though the newer CT Scans use computers so they can still give clear pictures with much less radiation, if I remember correctly.
But over a lifetime repeated exposures raise the risk of cancer. Madame Curie didn't die from eating too many croissants.
He has said in several occasions (the Q&As with Malcolm) that there is a probably 5-year window for any carcinogenic effects and advised some vigilance. Dr. McCullough is a doctor. If he says "I think you will all die of cancer in 5 years", then some might just get cancer from worrying and being depressed about it. If he says "you will probably be fine" but be vigilant in terms of medical checkups etc, that might just have a positive effect and improve someone's chances.
You make some good points. Strange fact- women who had regular mammograms were more likely to get cancer, possibly the yearly x-rays are damaging/cancer causing-also the sooner it’s caught to the sooner it’s treated but the treatments are also possibly dangerous. But agree with you living healthy and keeping stress lowered is way better.
I think this is his educated, highly experienced seeing patients gut feeling and there are no " for sures/guarantees " in medicine however, like you touched on, a doctors job is to reassure ( not empty reassurances ) a patient on the good components of their health.
I don't see how this would have much to do about calming a rebellion. I think all people should be forming at the mouth angry and want action and justice for the murderers. As a society, we have a moral duty to eliminate the murderers among us. Life and society becomes better as a result.
Fair enough.
May the many deceived and departed rest in peace.
IMO we need much much more of this brainstorming. I, for one, am foaming at the mouth. My cancer returned with vengeance (yes, two jabs) before I was enlightened. Every doc involved is bewildered by the fact that this cancer returned at all. Hmmm….
I’m not getting that warm and fuzzy feeling!!!!
Wishing you a speedy return to health. Your anger is totally understandable. These folks must be held accountable or it will just happen again.
Thank you for reading. I feel bamboozled at the very least and am in the throws of formulating a plan of attack for dealing with this cancer round. It is said quite often that what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. Not so sure….
Well I trust your plan to rid your body of cancer than any mainstream quack these days. They have proven that they are money driven rather than health driven. Look into intermittent fasting, no sugar. There is also a man on Truth Social called the Sharkman, he has a cancer protocol that cured himself and many others. If I can find a link, I will send it your way. I do believe that stopping the inflow of ulta processed food and chemical products would be a good first step. They are trying to kill us from the multiple approach strategy.
https://www.contrabandcures.com/Parasite_Protocol/
There is an MD earlier mentioned by Dr Alexander who is crying out the String Mechanism to be taken in consideration and stop this vaccine. It is pretty surprising that the “freedom movement “ MDs are not debating it preferring to treat the injured patients? If is not stopped will be more patients to treat further? Or die further? Could be that the deal? If this is not the case, why Dr Lees’ String Mechanism presentation keeps being ignored but not debated instead?
https://josephyleemd.substack.com/p/david-cartland-do-you-really-believe?publication_id=1148553&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=18h3vn
And here in the 73 pages of the publication:
https://josephyleemd.substack.com/p/why-im-so-angry-at-the-pretend-hypocrite?publication_id=1148553&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=18h3vn
The unfortunate young doctor was brilliant perhaps but not questioning enough. I have a family member who also works at a hospital, whose attitudes are similar--completely accepts the orthodoxy, never questioning it. And clings to it with almost a religious fervor.
Lots of more common folks who ostensibly are less accomplished often seem to have more street smarts. Early in the Plandemic, a Bronx woman contracted Covid and had trouble breathing. She grabbed a cab to run to the hospital. But the cabbie told her, "Don't go there! They'll put you on a ventilator and kill you!" After he explained she went home and successfully nursed herself through the illness instead.
Political insider Steve Bannon lately likes to quote a French philosopher, who said "What's important is that you SEE what you see."
My late father-in-law (d. 2008), who held a chair in nephrology at Thomas Jefferson University, was wont to claim that the FDA had killed more people than it had saved, through the long, bound-up-in-red-tape process to get a drug from the lab bench to the people. Might have been true in his day; no longer.
Not sure what you mean by the FDA killing more people in your f-in-law’s day, but no longer?
Did you mean by holding up new drug approvals, vs. other nefarious deeds like pushing this Covid Bioweapon via EUA incl. still current injections or things like wanting 75 yrs, to publish Pfizer safety study results?