Robert Clark's substack, excellent; 'CDC giving incorrect numbers for vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations and deaths'; the bottom line is CDC is lying, covering up the failed dangerous data
Robert Clark's substack, excellent; 'CDC giving incorrect numbers for vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations and deaths'; the bottom line is CDC is lying, covering up the failed dangerous data
It is unfortunate that we view Canadian Covid data as "some of the most accurate." Since the beginning of the plandemic, I believe that PCR tests with cT over 40 have been routinely used. Antibody testing has been available as a private test for over a year, but there was very little availability of immune status assessment before the shots were unleashed. One article from CMAJ in Nov., 2020, advised against antibody testing, and an article from BCCDC in about Aug., 2020, assessed the antibody titres around Vancouver from May, 2020.
I have assessed many of the Canadian datasets as "GIGO" due to the missing information on pre-existing immune status of the injectees, and the conclusions proposed which appear more political than clinical.
It is unfortunate that we view Canadian Covid data as "some of the most accurate." Since the beginning of the plandemic, I believe that PCR tests with cT over 40 have been routinely used. Antibody testing has been available as a private test for over a year, but there was very little availability of immune status assessment before the shots were unleashed. One article from CMAJ in Nov., 2020, advised against antibody testing, and an article from BCCDC in about Aug., 2020, assessed the antibody titres around Vancouver from May, 2020.
I have assessed many of the Canadian datasets as "GIGO" due to the missing information on pre-existing immune status of the injectees, and the conclusions proposed which appear more political than clinical.