Röltgen et al.: "Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, & germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection & vaccination"; Original antigenic sin, OAS & vaccine mRNA 60 days post jab
Röltgen et al.: "Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, & germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection & vaccination"; Original antigenic sin, OAS & vaccine mRNA 60 days post jab
Just wanted to throw this out there because I'm surprised and a bit shocked that no one has mentioned it yet.
Wuhan covid was the original covid..."THE" bioweapon. The shots are all tailored to a bioweapon and no one is interested in upgrading to something that may protect against a more current covid variant like omicron.
Why not? There's still plenty money to be made by big pharma there....a vax is a vax
But not in this case.
I see articles and opinions that not upgrading the vax to match the variant is foolish or poor science, as the Wuhan version is now ancient history.
COME ON PEOPLE.
Put on those thinking caps. The Wuhan covid was a bioweapon. A Wuhan tailored vax IS a bioweapon.
Anything that protects against a more natural variant like omicron would no longer retain a bioweapon's lethality. Keeping the Wuhan vax is an intentional move in this war against humanity.
I can't thank you enough, Dr. Alexander for your diligence, your steadiness, in keeping up with the data and science. We, as a human community, appreciate you. May you stay strong, resilient, open and renewed constantly..
Snap shot above re just in case you have not seen the Canadian tax dollars spent yesterday, today and future on these death shots in this nation. Despite the proven data, the warnings, the tragedies au nauseum.
when a substantial portion of the population is vaccinated, natural selection will shift towards favoring variants that can resist the vaccine. These variants can therefore become dominant and even cancel out the benefit of the vaccine
‘Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies, but prior mRNA vaccination imprints serological responses toward Wuhan-Hu-1 rather than variant antigens’ interpreted differently would be;
Antibodies are not conferring immunity to infectious agents but have other roles in homeostasis.
Those going through a sickness have antibodies to the proteins involved when cells in the body and in culture are stressed. Those who did not have a sickness process but are injected with mRNA making p180-200 do not have these proteins and therefore don't have these antibodies but do have antibodies to p180-200.
They note there is no IgA and IgM mucosal response with the jab. These are produced in the mucus membranes by those going through a sickness process and of course the jab is injected straight into the blood.
While the Roltgen study has a lot of good data, it seems that their conclusions and hypotheses that vaccine imprinting seemed to them to lead to greater Ab activity against variants has certainly not aged well. Perhaps because their study was limited to Ab RBD binding, recent history is showing that reinfection rates in the vaxxed are higher than those with natural immunity particularly with Omicron.
Hey!
Hey!
Hey!
Just wanted to throw this out there because I'm surprised and a bit shocked that no one has mentioned it yet.
Wuhan covid was the original covid..."THE" bioweapon. The shots are all tailored to a bioweapon and no one is interested in upgrading to something that may protect against a more current covid variant like omicron.
Why not? There's still plenty money to be made by big pharma there....a vax is a vax
But not in this case.
I see articles and opinions that not upgrading the vax to match the variant is foolish or poor science, as the Wuhan version is now ancient history.
COME ON PEOPLE.
Put on those thinking caps. The Wuhan covid was a bioweapon. A Wuhan tailored vax IS a bioweapon.
Anything that protects against a more natural variant like omicron would no longer retain a bioweapon's lethality. Keeping the Wuhan vax is an intentional move in this war against humanity.
I can't thank you enough, Dr. Alexander for your diligence, your steadiness, in keeping up with the data and science. We, as a human community, appreciate you. May you stay strong, resilient, open and renewed constantly..
How can you have a gain of function vaccine for a gain of function virus?
Dr. Alexander, When reporting on highly specialized studies, please define the acronyms for your lay readers, e.g., GC, LN, and LNP. Best,
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/procuring-vaccines-covid19.html
Snap shot above re just in case you have not seen the Canadian tax dollars spent yesterday, today and future on these death shots in this nation. Despite the proven data, the warnings, the tragedies au nauseum.
when a substantial portion of the population is vaccinated, natural selection will shift towards favoring variants that can resist the vaccine. These variants can therefore become dominant and even cancel out the benefit of the vaccine
‘Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies, but prior mRNA vaccination imprints serological responses toward Wuhan-Hu-1 rather than variant antigens’ interpreted differently would be;
Antibodies are not conferring immunity to infectious agents but have other roles in homeostasis.
Those going through a sickness have antibodies to the proteins involved when cells in the body and in culture are stressed. Those who did not have a sickness process but are injected with mRNA making p180-200 do not have these proteins and therefore don't have these antibodies but do have antibodies to p180-200.
They note there is no IgA and IgM mucosal response with the jab. These are produced in the mucus membranes by those going through a sickness process and of course the jab is injected straight into the blood.
Nobody is being imprinted to anything.
While the Roltgen study has a lot of good data, it seems that their conclusions and hypotheses that vaccine imprinting seemed to them to lead to greater Ab activity against variants has certainly not aged well. Perhaps because their study was limited to Ab RBD binding, recent history is showing that reinfection rates in the vaxxed are higher than those with natural immunity particularly with Omicron.
Thanks for sharing much appreciated
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2794999
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.07.21259916v1
Modeling the emergence of vaccine-resistant variants with Gaussian convolution COVID-19: Could the wrong strategy ruin vaccine efficiency?
The paper also recommends vaccine boosters💉💉💉💉💉 oddly enough👍