DUE DILIGENCE AND ART; very interesteing piece by Sasha, well written! Over the target for I & others have always pointed to the PREP Act (Azar Feb 2020 or so) as the rate limiting step, DEADLY Act
My group sued the CEO in office (Trump) just before they rolled out the covid jabs. Here's what we learned by confronting SCOTUS 4 times:
1. All of the Justices are fully onboard with the extermination of the American people.
2. Trump is fully onboard with the extermination of the American people.
3. The U.S. government, and most state governments REFUSE to permit the American people any pretense of a CIVIL remedy to prevent our extermination at the hands of government.
None of this is about "framing the case correctly" or "standing" or the EVIDENCE. It's about the fact this is not a self-governing Nation and this is also something our judicial branch will never permit us to remedy via a CIVIL mechanism.
Therefore, whatever the remedies might be, they are not going to be civilized. This is truly what we are down to because both "sides" (at the top) are fully onboard with exterminating the majority of Americans, and they're determined to pull this off ASAP. The only thing we can do is NOT COMPLY with our extermination or ANY of their BS. They NEED us to go along with the falsity that they have the "authority" to do this to us, that it's somehow legitimate. NONE of it is actually authorized UNTIL you go along with it. Then it's just voluntary because YOU consented.
I really hate to say it, but I am starting to realize we really don’t have any other options. No one is coming to help us. As you stated, our only option is to NOT COMPLY.
Our Founders presented King George with the Declaration of independence and then took up arms to enforce and defend it pledging their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.
We are well past the stage of the effectiveness of non-compliance.
I agree the courts are captured, as well as the legislatures and executive bureaucracy.
By “not complying” with their mandates what do you mean exactly?
Suppose i refuse to pay annual income tax to a tyrannical and illegitimate government? They’d kidnap me and lock me in their prisons.
My point is this: they don’t “need us to go along” with anything. They can simply FORCE us. I think by 2030, or shortly thereafter, we may all have to face the choice of compliance or jail, or death.
Good points all. My answer? Duck and jive until we can't anymore, (start a tax free foundation like Hillary did;-) and then we defend our lives however we have to. It may have to get very ugly. But I'd rather go to a prison where the bars can be SEEN (or even be executed for fighting them) than live in this dystopian nightmare as one of their barcoded slaves they can kill whenever they want to anyway.
If you really think all this, then my advice is throw away your smart phone - that would be step #1 towards detachment and I await the day when I do it myself, but I’m going to wait till my hand is forced on this but I’m already prepared to do and have setup contingencies when it happens if it does.
“Suppose i refuse to pay annual income tax to a tyrannical and illegitimate government?” Well, are you actually a ‘tax-payer’ per the actual definition?
It’s more likely you are not actually subject to the “income” tax but haven’t bothered to research the definition of “income” or who is actually subject to the tax.
Most Americans have no “income” per the actual definition and are therefore not subject to the tax.
You can refuse to pay the IRS unless you are a resident of Washington DC, are a government employee, or are a government contractor - according to Peymon Mottahedeh of Freedom Law School dot Org. I’ll be looking into it for sure. He has done many interviews. Recently he was interviewed by Silk. Go to Frankspeech and scroll down
Well too many rules just ruin everything and if a rule makes no sense, then why comply with it.
If your neighbor does likewise and then turns out the whole neighborhood does not comply what they gonna do - send the national guard to attack their own brothers and sisters?
If a city says enough is enough then what they gonna do - send in the army?
If a state says - we want to go our own way, then I think said state should be allowed to depart and I will say based on study most of the founders would agree with this sentiment -
So truly…why comply with rules that makes no sense.
The process by which the state would determine if any federal action is unconstitutional involves a “plain reading and reasoning” of the Constitution and “the definitions at the time of the framing and construction” of it before making a “final declaration of constitutionality.”
~
According to the bill, “nullification” of any unconstitutional federal action would involved the state making an official declaration of the following:
A specific federal action has exceeded the prescribed authority under the United States Constitution;
That said action, as being ultra vires, will not be recognized as valid within the bounds of Tennessee;
That said action, as being ultra vires, is null and void in this state;
That an officeholder, agency, or government employee, whether state, county, or city, serving under the authority of the Constitution of Tennessee shall not assist in any attempted enforcement of said federal action; and
That state or local funds collected under the authority of the Constitution of Tennessee shall not be used to assist in any attempted enforcement of said federal action.
Per the bill, the general assembly would have the “sole authority” to determine what consequences would befall a violation of the nullification.
I am not a lawyer but this TN effort seems worthy and perhaps will be a example for other states. I assume states evaluating federal orders unconstitutional will likely have federal $ withheld.
Fiat money is rapidly becoming worthless and why take funds from the feds...when all they are is the equivalent to chains around the necks of the states....there ain't no funds that don't come with strings attached.
I think TN recently was attempting to put into place some legislation that is consistent with the Constitution with respect to State Rights - can't remember the term just now...I'll see if I can find it. In general it amounts to saying State Law can supersede the Supreme Court - per the Constitution. I know I read this, but can't find the link just now. If you are interested, just respond and then I'll make the effort.
In the U.S., if state and local governments take firm stands based on the 10th amendment, by nullifying unconstitutional laws, putting taxes for unconstitutional activities in escrow, and prosecuting crimes such as medical tyranny and genocide, then one by one, other state and local jurisdictions will follow and the house of cards will fall.
It's a pickle due to so many city and county officials being so greedy for more federal money. The feds cut off the payoffs when a county says no to tyranny. It has to get so insanely tyrannical that the officials realize they cannot personally live in such a community themselves before they will take a pass on the $$.
Trump didn't start the fire. And he was gone as it became an inferno. The vaccine programs have ALWAYS belonged to the executive branch of the federal government. So suing the CEO in official capacity was the correct legal approach.
Not this one… This was a covert MILITARY operation, see the posts at Katherine Watt, paralegal par excellence, and Sasha Latypova. RFK Jr is finishing a book about it (not sure I fully trust him, however)
The whole pandemic grift has been in the works since 9 -11. Not Trump. All this maneuvered AROUND HIM. And remember that he ordered millions of doses of HCQ, through Dr. Peter Navarro, to be offered as an outpatient treatment (to save hospital beds), and was traitorously countermanded by Dr. Rick Bright (who added a hospitalization requirement, defeating the purpose), then creating the killer protocol of vent, Remdisevir, and die, then COLLECT BILLIONS OF GOV’T $$$.
Trump did all he could. He was secretly neutralized by our corrupt DS assholes.
Quite correct. The tech in these new jabs is directly from DOD/DARPPA. I used to study these patents a decade ago, cringing in horror at the thought they might one day be DEPLOYED. They have been deployed. This is REALLY happening. But my point is still the same so far as naming the proper defendant. The executive branch is in charge of the military as well, (or it's supposed to be;-)
It started with investigating the cause of "Morgellons." They've refined their tech quite a bit since those early experiments on the public. It was so sad watching these random people suffer, only to have their doctors call them "crazy" even as these biomechanical "creatures" were crawling out of their skin.
The self-assembling tech now appears to be wholly dependent upon DNA from nature (coded into new polymer-based chimeric life forms), specifically, these creatures don't appear capable of surviving anti-parasitic treatments. Because they needed these parasite features to replicate, they borrowed parasite DNA, and built into this, are the same vulnerabilities.
Stock up on ivermectin, and all of the naturally-occurring methods of killing parasites. Take the safe and natural ones frequently, i.e., citrus bitters from peels and seeds, pine needle tea, NAC, etc. We're being shed upon. And do know that everything they inject us with at the dentist is now full of this same nanotech.
The standard for dismissal on "standing" requires that ALL of the allegations in the initial complaint must be taken as TRUE, and assuming they are all true, the complaint must not be dismissed if these allegations establish proper standing. We had the allegations more than sufficient to establish standing. So what did the courts do? They OUTRIGHT LIED about the contents of our initial complaint, outright LIED by saying we had not made the allegations we DID make, (they ARE in print!) and then dismissed for lack of "standing" by outright LYING about the ACTUAL contents of the complaint.
This is how they prevent ALL consequential cases from proceeding to the EVIDENTIARY stage. It's the same roadblock for anyone trying to find a CIVIL remedy to stop this extermination agenda. The federal courts simply LIE about the contents of the pleadings in order to justify a swift dismissal at the outset. The prevents EVIDENCE from ever being presented in ANY case that truly matters. They do the same thing with all of the election fraud cases.
After Trump stepped out of office, the title got changed to Garner v. Biden due to the fact it was the Executive Office (office of the President) we were suing rather than the person. The President is in charge of (responsible for) the CDC, FDA, HHS, etc., as these are all executive branch agencies, and the House merely maintains a pretense of "oversight" over them.
The WHO is a subsidiary of the UN. The UN's primary goal is DEPOLUATION. The WHO is the world's largest promoter and distributor of vaccines. Got it?
Our first Writ filed with SCOTUS closes with these words:
""So the only real questions before this Court are these: Will our Justices now take corrective action to legally delegitimize all attempted enforcements of the President’s catastrophic medical experiments, to save this Nation and its people from the abyss? Or will our Justices align themselves with defending the President's systematic, ongoing, and now "warp speed" physical destruction of our Nation's people?
When courts themselves force vaccine passports at the courthouse doors, will there be any civil recourse remaining in Article III?
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. - Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776)."
And the "answer" we got from the 9th Circuit was that my lawyers were not permitted to enter the Court without proof they'd been vaccinated. SCOTUS let it hold. We got our answer.
Controlled opposition comes out exposing things you already know are true anyway, planting their flag at the top of your movement, and then directing the herd over a cliff. Reforming the UN or the WHO is a BAD plan. It is not possible.
It is disgusting that someone who fully understands the present goals of the UN (extermination of the majority of humanity and enslaving the survivors) would push the legitimacy of the UN and it's subsidiary the WHO.
I have never trusted him. There are several statements on his website, without citations, that I tracked down in independent, original-source research, that they were lies.
Excellent. This -- liability immunity -- is the underbelly of this horrific crime. More people -- people like Dr. McCullough who has the respect of tens of millions -- need to start talking about this!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At this point I believe they all really know what’s going on and what the real facts are. By dancing around the issues just muddies the water and makes the message harder to understand by the masses.
Thank you, Dr. Alexander, for cross posting this important and highly informative, article by Sasha Latypova and, as always, my deep appreciation for her careful and clear work.
We are dealing with criminals. Anything they tell us to do, any command, mandate or suggestion, regulation or advisory should be viewed as so suspect as to be rejected.
That means non compliance, in fact, it is the very definition of non-compliance.
We will, if we are to survive this criminal assault on our lives, our fortunes and our sacred DNA, have to put real muscle into the simple declaration that we will not comply by determining what that really means and then doing it.
Sure, let’s help Nancy Pelosi and the other commies expand their list of “insurrectionists” and give them a document with your name on it to prove their point. It’s such a “reasonable choice “
You are kidding me, right? You really do not think that you are already on at least one list tracking what you say, and believe, and do?
And not declaring that you are not afraid, not cowering in the corner, hiding your decision to remain a free and sovereign adult is the path to securing your liberty based on your inalienable rights?
WOW! Enjoy your cowardice, Dude, but realize that answering me here indicates that you read this substack while your answer itself indicates that you are already cowed.
You have my condolences.
The Mayor of London announced that by 2030 people will have no meat, no dairy, no private vehicles and will have three new garments per year.
I was responding to Ke L McF whose comment you can read above mine- and hadn't you read my first comment? A rather harsh tirade you loosed upon me. Cyber chats sometimes can be unreliable.
[Recap: I was commenting on a commenter- Ke L McF. Sasha also lambasted him later on.] Geesh!
Thank-you! Ofcourse, it was shocking nonetheless ( coming from such an important figure ). I knew I was on the right side and Dr Laibow on the right to launch her vitriol against such ignorance and it was quickly rectified. Thanks for your kind attention!
You are right. My apologies. The tirade was meant for the guy you were responding to but when I saw my error I saw no way to remove the post and put it where it actually belonged, as a response to the poster to whom you were responding. So I apologize for its misplacement, but not it’s harshness.
I commented on the Gateway Pundit that I was glad that someone finally asked the hard questions instead of playing softball and was attacked by the Trump worshippers. I want to know the truth no matter who it is, we have to ask the hard questions. It would be better if he just admitted his mistakes and apologized. This article explains a lot.
I tend to agree w/ Ke L McF; while I’m distrustful of our government in total, I’m not ready to discount Trump or any strategy of his. After all he’s the master of the Art of the Deal, & I look at the sum of his tenure as president; he accomplished more conservative initiatives than any other supposedly conservative president. He promised & delivered. ALL while being attacked on every side as no public figure I’ve seen in my 77 years.
For 3 years conservatives watched in amazement that an elected leader defied the liberal leftists communists at every turn. Not until a new type of flu hit did he falter. And now we know it was a set up & planned by WEF, Gates, Soros, et al.
Yep, he should have handled it differently but remember he put Pence as his cv19 czar so to speak. The rest is history. I can’t find anyone else who I believe will stand against this soft tyranny. I love DeSantis & hope he’s a future president. But I remember Dr. Ben Carson endorsing Trump (as he was exiting the race) saying America was at a crossroads (a tipping point if you will) & the time called for a man such as Trump. Dr. Ben was my 1st choice but Trump was my 2nd. Dr. Ben was spot on; he still supports Trump. So do I.
I think you are incorrect. I’m not a Trump worshipper, but I remember all the good he did for conservatives during his first term. He will be president again, and he will appoint more Supreme Court justices. (The greatest fear of the Trump-deranged).
I cannot begin to guess what his intentions were or whether the choices he made were on purpose or to protect his own butt (most likely), but only God knows his intent. Jesus said to judge them by their fruits, I am not seeing the good fruits of repentance or regret from him. all I know is he won't come clean, and in my mind that makes him dirty. Sad for America.
And all he has suffered, all the good he did amongst brutal persecution, and you would throw him in the trash, instead of trust him with this one thing?? Wow. I guess no one can meet your high standard. Probably not even Christ.
He is just a man. He is not Christ. Trust him with this one thing? Millions have died and millions more disabled. This is not just a "thing". If he had a hand in this, I want to know the truth. If he was duped, then he can admit that he was and apologize.
What if one of your most loving and faithful family members, who had aways been strong, wise, etc, been good in all his decisions, watched over his family, and who you learned over the years had excellent character, had made one huge mistake... What would you do? Throw him in the trash? Expect him to expose himself to his/our enemies even more? Just so you could have the satisfaction of hearing him confess?
No, I looked long and hard into his history, read the court files on every bankruptcy, checked out all the stories of his quiet generosity pre-president, as much as I could find, before I voted for him.
It's NOT IN HIS CHARACTER to betray those who had faith in him. Did you know why billionaire Wilbur Ross agreed to be his Sec. Of Commerce, at around age 82? Because DJT borrowed money from him in one of the bankruptcies, and Ross was so impressed with Trump's character and conduct that he agreed to take a thankless job for 4 years.
Character is the most important thing in life, and if you live long enough, you learn to trust people of character, who have proven themselves 90% of the time, with the 10% you don't understand. I'm gonna trust him with this.
So you go and make him apologize, give our enemies another accusation to club him to death with. You immature, narcissistic child. Grow up.
If the DOD and the whole system of medical authorities is legally protected from committing democide, those harmed by the vax may find no option but to take matters in their own hands. If they and their families are going to die from this jab eventually. Maybe the threat of trial and incarceration, or even execution may not seem too high a personal price to pay to avenge their family.
I am not advocating anything, I did not take the "poison death shot" but thinking this through, some may feel compelled to get justice any way they can. Especially for their kids.
I saw Bill Gates get harassed in his car while traveling to a recent event. Trudeau has been harassed recently too.
I have heard a prediction that "they won't be able to walk the streets."
Their legal protections may not protect them from threats while traversing the public square.
The Holocaust Narrative is just out. The author makes the case that those with immense unelected power will label you antisemetic for questioning their ethics.
We need to keep doing what we’ve been doing recently - keep getting more involved! - in local politics, and calling legislators OFTEN (I’d bet none of the rabble rousers commenting here have bothered to do that). Use our money and time to support people who have platforms and connections so they can keep fighting - Mike Lindell’s Legal Offense Fund; Ivan Raiklin’s substack, Brannon Howse and people he promotes. Liberty Counsel is a 502c3 law firm that deserves support because they’ve already done so much good, and the have some big cases that will likely go before the Supreme Court - one that could overturn Obergefell. Buy Alex Jones’ products, and Mike Lindell’s, and Brannon Howse’s, and Steve Friend’s book, etc, and keep sharing articles. Read your Bible and study God’s Word. Pray always - pray for our enemies, and don’t be violent, and let God defeat them. He’ll do it better than we ever could, as many accounts in the Bible prove. We’re in this mess because we have wandered away from God.
If anyone took the shot or made their family do it, it’s mostly their fault. They’ve likely long been watching ungodly TV shows and movies (and Super Bowl halftimes, etc), dazed and mesmerized while they willingly suspend disbelief watching fiction, and enjoying the magick shows, and ridiculing anyone (like you will me) who has warned them about the mind control ability of the media, -blindly following what’s fashionable and cool, preferring lies and their sin over truth and repentance - and I’m talking about people who claim to believe in Jesus as savior. The Christians in our nation must repent of sin and turn back to God, really seeking him - then he will heal our land.
My grandparents were staunch Catholics and very good people. I won’t follow or support a Catholic apologist though, because according to their own documents they call Jesus the divine Victim, and believe that he spiritually allows himself to suffer being sacrificed by priests at every mass. Hebrews 10:14 says Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross did away with the need for priests (who are sinful men) to make sacrifices to take away sins. “For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.”
One Catholic I respect is Malachi Martin, who got out of the Jesuits (Society of Jesus) and wrote about the evil they are causing. Unfortunately they are very influential as well as very wicked. Of course there are wicked people at every level everywhere - Jews, Catholics, Baptists, Hindus, atheists ...everywhere. But the Jesuits are like the Muslims in that they have the duty to lie and deceive when it suits their purpose, and both groups are determined to subjugate the globe to their respective religion. Interesting that they seem to be working together in “interfaith” activities.
Most Christians have never read one of the gospels, let alone the whole bible, and even fewer have studied God’s word. Brave men and women have given their lives to get the Bible to the common person so they can read it for themselves.
Their soteriology is a complete negation of the completed work of atonement by Christ. Which is why they won't take the body off the cross ... Which, of course, is the whole point.
I was raised Catholic, so I understand what the concept of judeochristain is. But my understanding is the term no longer necessarily applies. It's all about the books and the plans the globalists deny.
The Holocaust has been a wildly $successful$ endeavor. A psyop of extraordinary cleverness. They claim victimhood making the goim into the victimizers. The brilliance of the plan is evidenced in the psychological brick wall that victimhood can be used to manipulate silly, stupid, goyim.
If you are already in the camp of Holocaust deniers, fine. If not you should seek the truth in this matter. This book is just the latest in a number that covers the topic. Arthur Butz wrote The Hoax of the 20th Century. Ernst Zundel published Did 6 Million Really Die. As long as we remain deluded by the Holocaust narrative, we won't ID those responsible for the current Holocaust-by-injection.
he is using it. And he has also used 5 other laws passed between 1980's and 2019 to enable the mass genocide with no liability as long as one follows HHS orders.
Thank you Sasha for clarifying and explaining why, Trump can’t nor will he say anything against the HHS and COVID rules, for lack of a better word. I appreciate your guidance and as I mentioned and posted earlier on another Substack blog, we as Americans and people around the world must understand and learn all we can from those who understand and know, medically and legally, etc. The only way I believe “GOOD VS EVIL” can win this battle, is to help each other learn and share what we know and have been taught. It shouldn’t be about one person, it’s about all of the “GOOD” vs all of the “EVIL”! I honestly can’t see any simple way through or around what has been deliberately and militarily executed, “MASSACRE”! I don’t believe that word is to course. Thank you again Sasha, I do appreciate all you knowledgeable informed post.
I would love to know Karen Kingston’s opinion about this.
I have never trusted Latypova. She is slick, and well spoken, but there’s something about her that makes me wary....a little bit too cool and measured, like she could be a host on NPR. Propagandist? Same goes for Malone.
I’m a hobbit making an observation and I get a reply from “Sasha” herself. Maybe I should start watching for FBI agents coming to my house in the dead of night? I’m not afraid of you.
Murder is wrong and passing laws to make it “right” doesn't make it right. That's what I don't get about these supposedly clever government people who wish to kill us. They can pass all the laws they want but they are off and will have to face an angry God. He doesn't change and these laws they make up don't faze Him.
As I recall they landed in Italy first to start the spread; Italy was a test case to see how the plan played out. To see how compliant citizens would be, etc.
I appreciate Dr. Alexander but at times his hyperbole makes me squirm. The message is good but delivered with over the top language that precludes me from sharing with those I’m trying to wake up. His passion I admire.
His coverage of happenings inform me of things I might have missed otherwise.
Debate here & exchange of ideas are healthy, but snark is not.
BTW, this “new & improved” Substack just obliterated all my “Saves.” My Archives still live. But Saves - kaput. Why?
My group sued the CEO in office (Trump) just before they rolled out the covid jabs. Here's what we learned by confronting SCOTUS 4 times:
1. All of the Justices are fully onboard with the extermination of the American people.
2. Trump is fully onboard with the extermination of the American people.
3. The U.S. government, and most state governments REFUSE to permit the American people any pretense of a CIVIL remedy to prevent our extermination at the hands of government.
None of this is about "framing the case correctly" or "standing" or the EVIDENCE. It's about the fact this is not a self-governing Nation and this is also something our judicial branch will never permit us to remedy via a CIVIL mechanism.
Therefore, whatever the remedies might be, they are not going to be civilized. This is truly what we are down to because both "sides" (at the top) are fully onboard with exterminating the majority of Americans, and they're determined to pull this off ASAP. The only thing we can do is NOT COMPLY with our extermination or ANY of their BS. They NEED us to go along with the falsity that they have the "authority" to do this to us, that it's somehow legitimate. NONE of it is actually authorized UNTIL you go along with it. Then it's just voluntary because YOU consented.
Joy
I really hate to say it, but I am starting to realize we really don’t have any other options. No one is coming to help us. As you stated, our only option is to NOT COMPLY.
Our Founders presented King George with the Declaration of independence and then took up arms to enforce and defend it pledging their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.
We are well past the stage of the effectiveness of non-compliance.
Wow, I don’t think I’ve seen anyone state the facts so succinctly. Thank you!
I agree the courts are captured, as well as the legislatures and executive bureaucracy.
By “not complying” with their mandates what do you mean exactly?
Suppose i refuse to pay annual income tax to a tyrannical and illegitimate government? They’d kidnap me and lock me in their prisons.
My point is this: they don’t “need us to go along” with anything. They can simply FORCE us. I think by 2030, or shortly thereafter, we may all have to face the choice of compliance or jail, or death.
Good points all. My answer? Duck and jive until we can't anymore, (start a tax free foundation like Hillary did;-) and then we defend our lives however we have to. It may have to get very ugly. But I'd rather go to a prison where the bars can be SEEN (or even be executed for fighting them) than live in this dystopian nightmare as one of their barcoded slaves they can kill whenever they want to anyway.
If you really think all this, then my advice is throw away your smart phone - that would be step #1 towards detachment and I await the day when I do it myself, but I’m going to wait till my hand is forced on this but I’m already prepared to do and have setup contingencies when it happens if it does.
Eff em and all their stupid rules.
“Suppose i refuse to pay annual income tax to a tyrannical and illegitimate government?” Well, are you actually a ‘tax-payer’ per the actual definition?
It’s more likely you are not actually subject to the “income” tax but haven’t bothered to research the definition of “income” or who is actually subject to the tax.
Most Americans have no “income” per the actual definition and are therefore not subject to the tax.
https://open.substack.com/pub/dawnfrench/p/the-fascinating-truth-about-the-16th?r=gse79&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
You can refuse to pay the IRS unless you are a resident of Washington DC, are a government employee, or are a government contractor - according to Peymon Mottahedeh of Freedom Law School dot Org. I’ll be looking into it for sure. He has done many interviews. Recently he was interviewed by Silk. Go to Frankspeech and scroll down
👆
Well too many rules just ruin everything and if a rule makes no sense, then why comply with it.
If your neighbor does likewise and then turns out the whole neighborhood does not comply what they gonna do - send the national guard to attack their own brothers and sisters?
If a city says enough is enough then what they gonna do - send in the army?
If a state says - we want to go our own way, then I think said state should be allowed to depart and I will say based on study most of the founders would agree with this sentiment -
So truly…why comply with rules that makes no sense.
state gov gets 40% of their budget from fed gov. Source ed dowd
Here - it wasn't easy, but I found it:
https://www.wkrn.com/news/tennessee-politics/new-bill-seeks-to-assert-states-right-to-oppose-federal-action-it-deems-unconstitutional/
The term is "nullification".
Here is additional detail from the link direct:
~
The process by which the state would determine if any federal action is unconstitutional involves a “plain reading and reasoning” of the Constitution and “the definitions at the time of the framing and construction” of it before making a “final declaration of constitutionality.”
~
According to the bill, “nullification” of any unconstitutional federal action would involved the state making an official declaration of the following:
A specific federal action has exceeded the prescribed authority under the United States Constitution;
That said action, as being ultra vires, will not be recognized as valid within the bounds of Tennessee;
That said action, as being ultra vires, is null and void in this state;
That an officeholder, agency, or government employee, whether state, county, or city, serving under the authority of the Constitution of Tennessee shall not assist in any attempted enforcement of said federal action; and
That state or local funds collected under the authority of the Constitution of Tennessee shall not be used to assist in any attempted enforcement of said federal action.
Per the bill, the general assembly would have the “sole authority” to determine what consequences would befall a violation of the nullification.
~
Regards,
BK
I am not a lawyer but this TN effort seems worthy and perhaps will be a example for other states. I assume states evaluating federal orders unconstitutional will likely have federal $ withheld.
Yep.
Fiat money is rapidly becoming worthless and why take funds from the feds...when all they are is the equivalent to chains around the necks of the states....there ain't no funds that don't come with strings attached.
I think TN recently was attempting to put into place some legislation that is consistent with the Constitution with respect to State Rights - can't remember the term just now...I'll see if I can find it. In general it amounts to saying State Law can supersede the Supreme Court - per the Constitution. I know I read this, but can't find the link just now. If you are interested, just respond and then I'll make the effort.
In the U.S., if state and local governments take firm stands based on the 10th amendment, by nullifying unconstitutional laws, putting taxes for unconstitutional activities in escrow, and prosecuting crimes such as medical tyranny and genocide, then one by one, other state and local jurisdictions will follow and the house of cards will fall.
Here’s an example from Canada, of all places:
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/these-canadians-will-not-let-their
It's a pickle due to so many city and county officials being so greedy for more federal money. The feds cut off the payoffs when a county says no to tyranny. It has to get so insanely tyrannical that the officials realize they cannot personally live in such a community themselves before they will take a pass on the $$.
Can you sue him in a personal capacity in any way? Now he is just a ‘Florida man.’
Trump didn't start the fire. And he was gone as it became an inferno. The vaccine programs have ALWAYS belonged to the executive branch of the federal government. So suing the CEO in official capacity was the correct legal approach.
Not this one… This was a covert MILITARY operation, see the posts at Katherine Watt, paralegal par excellence, and Sasha Latypova. RFK Jr is finishing a book about it (not sure I fully trust him, however)
The whole pandemic grift has been in the works since 9 -11. Not Trump. All this maneuvered AROUND HIM. And remember that he ordered millions of doses of HCQ, through Dr. Peter Navarro, to be offered as an outpatient treatment (to save hospital beds), and was traitorously countermanded by Dr. Rick Bright (who added a hospitalization requirement, defeating the purpose), then creating the killer protocol of vent, Remdisevir, and die, then COLLECT BILLIONS OF GOV’T $$$.
Trump did all he could. He was secretly neutralized by our corrupt DS assholes.
Quite correct. The tech in these new jabs is directly from DOD/DARPPA. I used to study these patents a decade ago, cringing in horror at the thought they might one day be DEPLOYED. They have been deployed. This is REALLY happening. But my point is still the same so far as naming the proper defendant. The executive branch is in charge of the military as well, (or it's supposed to be;-)
Wow, what a burden for you to carry all those years.
It started with investigating the cause of "Morgellons." They've refined their tech quite a bit since those early experiments on the public. It was so sad watching these random people suffer, only to have their doctors call them "crazy" even as these biomechanical "creatures" were crawling out of their skin.
The self-assembling tech now appears to be wholly dependent upon DNA from nature (coded into new polymer-based chimeric life forms), specifically, these creatures don't appear capable of surviving anti-parasitic treatments. Because they needed these parasite features to replicate, they borrowed parasite DNA, and built into this, are the same vulnerabilities.
Stock up on ivermectin, and all of the naturally-occurring methods of killing parasites. Take the safe and natural ones frequently, i.e., citrus bitters from peels and seeds, pine needle tea, NAC, etc. We're being shed upon. And do know that everything they inject us with at the dentist is now full of this same nanotech.
You sued Trump? What’s the case number?
The standard for dismissal on "standing" requires that ALL of the allegations in the initial complaint must be taken as TRUE, and assuming they are all true, the complaint must not be dismissed if these allegations establish proper standing. We had the allegations more than sufficient to establish standing. So what did the courts do? They OUTRIGHT LIED about the contents of our initial complaint, outright LIED by saying we had not made the allegations we DID make, (they ARE in print!) and then dismissed for lack of "standing" by outright LYING about the ACTUAL contents of the complaint.
This is how they prevent ALL consequential cases from proceeding to the EVIDENTIARY stage. It's the same roadblock for anyone trying to find a CIVIL remedy to stop this extermination agenda. The federal courts simply LIE about the contents of the pleadings in order to justify a swift dismissal at the outset. The prevents EVIDENCE from ever being presented in ANY case that truly matters. They do the same thing with all of the election fraud cases.
Here's the first brief we filed with SCOTUS: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-300/188634/20210826143152044_SCOTUS%20Writ%20Petition%20TCG%20August%2026%202021.pdf
# 21-300 you can see the case here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-300.html
After Trump stepped out of office, the title got changed to Garner v. Biden due to the fact it was the Executive Office (office of the President) we were suing rather than the person. The President is in charge of (responsible for) the CDC, FDA, HHS, etc., as these are all executive branch agencies, and the House merely maintains a pretense of "oversight" over them.
The WHO is a subsidiary of the UN. The UN's primary goal is DEPOLUATION. The WHO is the world's largest promoter and distributor of vaccines. Got it?
Our first Writ filed with SCOTUS closes with these words:
""So the only real questions before this Court are these: Will our Justices now take corrective action to legally delegitimize all attempted enforcements of the President’s catastrophic medical experiments, to save this Nation and its people from the abyss? Or will our Justices align themselves with defending the President's systematic, ongoing, and now "warp speed" physical destruction of our Nation's people?
When courts themselves force vaccine passports at the courthouse doors, will there be any civil recourse remaining in Article III?
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. - Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776)."
And the "answer" we got from the 9th Circuit was that my lawyers were not permitted to enter the Court without proof they'd been vaccinated. SCOTUS let it hold. We got our answer.
It's down to the Declaration of Independence.
Controlled opposition comes out exposing things you already know are true anyway, planting their flag at the top of your movement, and then directing the herd over a cliff. Reforming the UN or the WHO is a BAD plan. It is not possible.
It is disgusting that someone who fully understands the present goals of the UN (extermination of the majority of humanity and enslaving the survivors) would push the legitimacy of the UN and it's subsidiary the WHO.
I have never trusted him. There are several statements on his website, without citations, that I tracked down in independent, original-source research, that they were lies.
He tells much "truth."
HOWEVER, he refuses to tell the WHOLE truth, let alone "nothing BUT the truth."
In many ways, this is worse than simply staying out of the conversation.
Her take on Trump's silence is spot on. No more excuses.
It does make it crystal clear.
Excellent. This -- liability immunity -- is the underbelly of this horrific crime. More people -- people like Dr. McCullough who has the respect of tens of millions -- need to start talking about this!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Amen to that.
At this point I believe they all really know what’s going on and what the real facts are. By dancing around the issues just muddies the water and makes the message harder to understand by the masses.
Just my take on it.
Thank you, Dr. Alexander, for cross posting this important and highly informative, article by Sasha Latypova and, as always, my deep appreciation for her careful and clear work.
We are dealing with criminals. Anything they tell us to do, any command, mandate or suggestion, regulation or advisory should be viewed as so suspect as to be rejected.
That means non compliance, in fact, it is the very definition of non-compliance.
I urge you to visit https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/i-will-not-comply-declaration and sign the Universal Declaration of Non Compliance and then forward it to everyone you can reach, urging them to use their powers of reason and choice to do the same.
We will, if we are to survive this criminal assault on our lives, our fortunes and our sacred DNA, have to put real muscle into the simple declaration that we will not comply by determining what that really means and then doing it.
Humanity's very existence is at stake.
Sure, let’s help Nancy Pelosi and the other commies expand their list of “insurrectionists” and give them a document with your name on it to prove their point. It’s such a “reasonable choice “
WTF
Awesome! It's all good!
That was a good tirade!
God's wrath shall not tarry!!
You are kidding me, right? You really do not think that you are already on at least one list tracking what you say, and believe, and do?
And not declaring that you are not afraid, not cowering in the corner, hiding your decision to remain a free and sovereign adult is the path to securing your liberty based on your inalienable rights?
WOW! Enjoy your cowardice, Dude, but realize that answering me here indicates that you read this substack while your answer itself indicates that you are already cowed.
You have my condolences.
The Mayor of London announced that by 2030 people will have no meat, no dairy, no private vehicles and will have three new garments per year.
That's what fear and submission will buy you.
I prefer another way.
I WILL NOT COMPLY.
Cowed to what?
I was responding to Ke L McF whose comment you can read above mine- and hadn't you read my first comment? A rather harsh tirade you loosed upon me. Cyber chats sometimes can be unreliable.
[Recap: I was commenting on a commenter- Ke L McF. Sasha also lambasted him later on.] Geesh!
Daniel, I could see that Dr. Laibow meant that comment for Ke L McF, if that's any help.
Thank-you! Ofcourse, it was shocking nonetheless ( coming from such an important figure ). I knew I was on the right side and Dr Laibow on the right to launch her vitriol against such ignorance and it was quickly rectified. Thanks for your kind attention!
You are right. My apologies. The tirade was meant for the guy you were responding to but when I saw my error I saw no way to remove the post and put it where it actually belonged, as a response to the poster to whom you were responding. So I apologize for its misplacement, but not it’s harshness.
I love the reference to the Declaration of Independence! Sasha Rock!! Cheers!!!
This is a good recap of what happened during Trumps time in office during the plandemic.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/trumps-gaslighting-on-covid-lockdowns-is-finally-called-out-in-megyn-kelly-interview/?utm_source=popular
I commented on the Gateway Pundit that I was glad that someone finally asked the hard questions instead of playing softball and was attacked by the Trump worshippers. I want to know the truth no matter who it is, we have to ask the hard questions. It would be better if he just admitted his mistakes and apologized. This article explains a lot.
Mistakes?
He made no mistakes. For him it was mission accomplished.
Now he’s simply throwing verbal darts at us to make it burn.
I tend to agree w/ Ke L McF; while I’m distrustful of our government in total, I’m not ready to discount Trump or any strategy of his. After all he’s the master of the Art of the Deal, & I look at the sum of his tenure as president; he accomplished more conservative initiatives than any other supposedly conservative president. He promised & delivered. ALL while being attacked on every side as no public figure I’ve seen in my 77 years.
For 3 years conservatives watched in amazement that an elected leader defied the liberal leftists communists at every turn. Not until a new type of flu hit did he falter. And now we know it was a set up & planned by WEF, Gates, Soros, et al.
Yep, he should have handled it differently but remember he put Pence as his cv19 czar so to speak. The rest is history. I can’t find anyone else who I believe will stand against this soft tyranny. I love DeSantis & hope he’s a future president. But I remember Dr. Ben Carson endorsing Trump (as he was exiting the race) saying America was at a crossroads (a tipping point if you will) & the time called for a man such as Trump. Dr. Ben was my 1st choice but Trump was my 2nd. Dr. Ben was spot on; he still supports Trump. So do I.
DeSantis abandoned FL as soon as he was elected in 2022. There's much more at Laura Loomer's substack. You are correct to support P. Trump.
I think you are incorrect. I’m not a Trump worshipper, but I remember all the good he did for conservatives during his first term. He will be president again, and he will appoint more Supreme Court justices. (The greatest fear of the Trump-deranged).
I cannot begin to guess what his intentions were or whether the choices he made were on purpose or to protect his own butt (most likely), but only God knows his intent. Jesus said to judge them by their fruits, I am not seeing the good fruits of repentance or regret from him. all I know is he won't come clean, and in my mind that makes him dirty. Sad for America.
And all he has suffered, all the good he did amongst brutal persecution, and you would throw him in the trash, instead of trust him with this one thing?? Wow. I guess no one can meet your high standard. Probably not even Christ.
He is just a man. He is not Christ. Trust him with this one thing? Millions have died and millions more disabled. This is not just a "thing". If he had a hand in this, I want to know the truth. If he was duped, then he can admit that he was and apologize.
What if one of your most loving and faithful family members, who had aways been strong, wise, etc, been good in all his decisions, watched over his family, and who you learned over the years had excellent character, had made one huge mistake... What would you do? Throw him in the trash? Expect him to expose himself to his/our enemies even more? Just so you could have the satisfaction of hearing him confess?
No, I looked long and hard into his history, read the court files on every bankruptcy, checked out all the stories of his quiet generosity pre-president, as much as I could find, before I voted for him.
It's NOT IN HIS CHARACTER to betray those who had faith in him. Did you know why billionaire Wilbur Ross agreed to be his Sec. Of Commerce, at around age 82? Because DJT borrowed money from him in one of the bankruptcies, and Ross was so impressed with Trump's character and conduct that he agreed to take a thankless job for 4 years.
Character is the most important thing in life, and if you live long enough, you learn to trust people of character, who have proven themselves 90% of the time, with the 10% you don't understand. I'm gonna trust him with this.
So you go and make him apologize, give our enemies another accusation to club him to death with. You immature, narcissistic child. Grow up.
If the DOD and the whole system of medical authorities is legally protected from committing democide, those harmed by the vax may find no option but to take matters in their own hands. If they and their families are going to die from this jab eventually. Maybe the threat of trial and incarceration, or even execution may not seem too high a personal price to pay to avenge their family.
I am not advocating anything, I did not take the "poison death shot" but thinking this through, some may feel compelled to get justice any way they can. Especially for their kids.
I saw Bill Gates get harassed in his car while traveling to a recent event. Trudeau has been harassed recently too.
I have heard a prediction that "they won't be able to walk the streets."
Their legal protections may not protect them from threats while traversing the public square.
In many ways I don’t blame them. They have nothing to lose as the system didn’t help them and never will and they don’t see any other option.
No matter what happens it’s not going to end well. We are being attacked from every possible angle and no one is going to help you except you.
Just the way I see it.
Exactly the way I see it.
The Holocaust Narrative is just out. The author makes the case that those with immense unelected power will label you antisemetic for questioning their ethics.
That’s what they’re hoping for.
Sounds like that might be what you’re wanting too.
Violence from the people will give them a reason to clamp down. Don’t fall for it.
So violence from the jab-givers must be met with pacificism?
They are clamping down anyway. What makes you think they need a reason?
We need to keep doing what we’ve been doing recently - keep getting more involved! - in local politics, and calling legislators OFTEN (I’d bet none of the rabble rousers commenting here have bothered to do that). Use our money and time to support people who have platforms and connections so they can keep fighting - Mike Lindell’s Legal Offense Fund; Ivan Raiklin’s substack, Brannon Howse and people he promotes. Liberty Counsel is a 502c3 law firm that deserves support because they’ve already done so much good, and the have some big cases that will likely go before the Supreme Court - one that could overturn Obergefell. Buy Alex Jones’ products, and Mike Lindell’s, and Brannon Howse’s, and Steve Friend’s book, etc, and keep sharing articles. Read your Bible and study God’s Word. Pray always - pray for our enemies, and don’t be violent, and let God defeat them. He’ll do it better than we ever could, as many accounts in the Bible prove. We’re in this mess because we have wandered away from God.
If anyone took the shot or made their family do it, it’s mostly their fault. They’ve likely long been watching ungodly TV shows and movies (and Super Bowl halftimes, etc), dazed and mesmerized while they willingly suspend disbelief watching fiction, and enjoying the magick shows, and ridiculing anyone (like you will me) who has warned them about the mind control ability of the media, -blindly following what’s fashionable and cool, preferring lies and their sin over truth and repentance - and I’m talking about people who claim to believe in Jesus as savior. The Christians in our nation must repent of sin and turn back to God, really seeking him - then he will heal our land.
I don't disagree.
We have been deceived. Spreading truth is a key activity now. Dr. Jones new book is out. Please spread the word.
https://www.fidelitypress.org/
My grandparents were staunch Catholics and very good people. I won’t follow or support a Catholic apologist though, because according to their own documents they call Jesus the divine Victim, and believe that he spiritually allows himself to suffer being sacrificed by priests at every mass. Hebrews 10:14 says Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross did away with the need for priests (who are sinful men) to make sacrifices to take away sins. “For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.”
One Catholic I respect is Malachi Martin, who got out of the Jesuits (Society of Jesus) and wrote about the evil they are causing. Unfortunately they are very influential as well as very wicked. Of course there are wicked people at every level everywhere - Jews, Catholics, Baptists, Hindus, atheists ...everywhere. But the Jesuits are like the Muslims in that they have the duty to lie and deceive when it suits their purpose, and both groups are determined to subjugate the globe to their respective religion. Interesting that they seem to be working together in “interfaith” activities.
Most Christians have never read one of the gospels, let alone the whole bible, and even fewer have studied God’s word. Brave men and women have given their lives to get the Bible to the common person so they can read it for themselves.
Their soteriology is a complete negation of the completed work of atonement by Christ. Which is why they won't take the body off the cross ... Which, of course, is the whole point.
He is RISEN!
I was raised Catholic, so I understand what the concept of judeochristain is. But my understanding is the term no longer necessarily applies. It's all about the books and the plans the globalists deny.
The Holocaust has been a wildly $successful$ endeavor. A psyop of extraordinary cleverness. They claim victimhood making the goim into the victimizers. The brilliance of the plan is evidenced in the psychological brick wall that victimhood can be used to manipulate silly, stupid, goyim.
If you are already in the camp of Holocaust deniers, fine. If not you should seek the truth in this matter. This book is just the latest in a number that covers the topic. Arthur Butz wrote The Hoax of the 20th Century. Ernst Zundel published Did 6 Million Really Die. As long as we remain deluded by the Holocaust narrative, we won't ID those responsible for the current Holocaust-by-injection.
We are a hair's breadth from CW2. I suggest you read the exemplary Matt Brackens short story from 2012, "What I Saw at the Coup". Very prescient.
http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/matthew-bracken-what-i-saw-at-the-coup/
How is Trump responsible for a law passed in 2005?
he is using it. And he has also used 5 other laws passed between 1980's and 2019 to enable the mass genocide with no liability as long as one follows HHS orders.
Trump 2024
He modified and updated it in 2019.
Thank you Sasha for clarifying and explaining why, Trump can’t nor will he say anything against the HHS and COVID rules, for lack of a better word. I appreciate your guidance and as I mentioned and posted earlier on another Substack blog, we as Americans and people around the world must understand and learn all we can from those who understand and know, medically and legally, etc. The only way I believe “GOOD VS EVIL” can win this battle, is to help each other learn and share what we know and have been taught. It shouldn’t be about one person, it’s about all of the “GOOD” vs all of the “EVIL”! I honestly can’t see any simple way through or around what has been deliberately and militarily executed, “MASSACRE”! I don’t believe that word is to course. Thank you again Sasha, I do appreciate all you knowledgeable informed post.
AJR
I would love to know Karen Kingston’s opinion about this.
I have never trusted Latypova. She is slick, and well spoken, but there’s something about her that makes me wary....a little bit too cool and measured, like she could be a host on NPR. Propagandist? Same goes for Malone.
Hi agent Kel! Slow day in the online information campaigns today? How many of you are there?
I would still like to know KK’s opinion
I’m a hobbit making an observation and I get a reply from “Sasha” herself. Maybe I should start watching for FBI agents coming to my house in the dead of night? I’m not afraid of you.
Wow
None of this will matter...they are winning...... no amount of evidence will ever overturn this now that this has happened..... WHO welcomes historic commitment by world leaders for greater collaboration, governance and investment to prevent, prepare for and respond to future pandemics https://merylnass.substack.com/p/who-welcomes-historic-commitment?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=746368&post_id=137242310&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=c55mw&utm_medium=email
...now what?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/how-far-are-we-revolution
The government is telling us who the bad guy is, but the real bad guys are them.
We will not be allowing our youth to be used as cannon fodder in their next wars of choice.
These lunatic sociopaths are willing to initiate Armageddon to achieve their goals.
Before they can accomplish this destruction we will have to decide when revolution will be absolutely necessary.
That time will be within the next few years. The choice is yours.
Murder is wrong and passing laws to make it “right” doesn't make it right. That's what I don't get about these supposedly clever government people who wish to kill us. They can pass all the laws they want but they are off and will have to face an angry God. He doesn't change and these laws they make up don't faze Him.
Bleach
Trump shut down China, closed border.
And? The poison came from the US.
China knowingly let planes full of infected people fly from China all around the globe.
As I recall they landed in Italy first to start the spread; Italy was a test case to see how the plan played out. To see how compliant citizens would be, etc.
The policy of the CDC prior to Trump was the same as the WHO, border control does not control pandemics.
But the HHS during his administration did advise to shut the border to certain countries.
So I was wrong.
I don't think he has announced the winner of the free subscription. Have you seen one ?
I appreciate Dr. Alexander but at times his hyperbole makes me squirm. The message is good but delivered with over the top language that precludes me from sharing with those I’m trying to wake up. His passion I admire.
His coverage of happenings inform me of things I might have missed otherwise.
Debate here & exchange of ideas are healthy, but snark is not.
BTW, this “new & improved” Substack just obliterated all my “Saves.” My Archives still live. But Saves - kaput. Why?
It's just his personality type. But his heart is good.
Wow! Awesome Dr Paul! Thanks for sharing this. Only the truth will set us free !