case series"; in the transgendered community in the patient group examined, "annual incidence rate (159 per 100 000) is 26.5 times higher than the National Cancer Institute’s previous report (6.0 per
Also, it would be interesting to know the percentage of testicular neoplasms amongst
A. Normal (and I use that word deliberately because why the hell should normal boys be described in terms of “trans”?) viral mRNA product-negative boys of the same age group
B. Normal viral mRNA product-positive boys of the same age group.
And it would also be good in all these groups to see the rate of increase of testicular neoplasms from prepubertal to the present in terms of
1. Tanner stage of development
2. The number of viral mRNA product exposures.
My guesses are that
1. the frequency of appearance of neoplasms will track with the Tanner developmental stage.
Why? Simply because the frequency of neoplasms is very closely linked to tissues having rapid cell turnover, differentiation, and inflammation.
2. the growth of the neoplasms beyond a certain point will track with the number of viral mRNA shots.
Why? Simply because
A. the innate immune system is always spotting and taking out deranged cells,
B. the innate immune system, while having the ability to upregulate its capacity, is not immediately or unrestricted in its ability to compensate for increased demand,
C. the primary mechanism of action common to ALL of the viral mRNA products is responsible for immediate and significant demands on the existing capacity of the innate immune system, and
D. whatever overloads existing innate immune capacity (C) impairs its constitutive ability of dealing with everything else (A), meaning
E. that problems not ordinarily nipped in the bud can develop to the point that they can’t easily be dealt with by the innate immune system, whether neoplasms developing into obvious tumors, opportunistic infections (like cryptosporidium), overgrowth like yeast (thrush), all seen in HIV infection when the CD4 cell population (or even worse) the stem cell population from which they come are wiped out,
F. the association of neoplasms with inflammatory conditions, which are extremely exacerbated by the viral mRNA products,
G. the number of adverse events, including all cause mortality, track in a dose-dependent manner with
i. the number of doses administered and
ii. the state of health of those being shot up, and
H. the population of trans boys is already one having a great deal of emotional stress, mental instability, being subjected to drugs and procedures with not inconsiderable stress on the body and the innate immune system, probably a host of other diseases contracted because of the adults managing that entire process are encouraging them to “explore” their sexuality, so all that PLUS the unavoidable consequences of the viral mRNA products’ primary mechanism of action could significant shift this population into even more trouble that normal boys who are not being shot up with viral mRNA products and who are not being heavily propagandized by opportunistic adults in schools and medical facilities, all eager, some literally, to fuck them over.
Finally, though, back to my earlier question of the percentage of “trans” boys, meaning simply kids born with balls, that have been treated one or more times with viral mRNA products.
There is the matter of selection bias and heightened scrutiny.
This was seen in the aftermath of Chernobyl when anti-nuke activists (though, actually, they should have been anti-“nuclear plant personnel deliberately operating the reactor in violation of safety protocols” activists, but don’t expect folks like that to engage in making careful distinctions) went on and on about the discovery of huge number of pediatric thyroid tumors.
People were all trampling each other trying to get aboard the “post hoc, ergo, propter hoc” train heading off into Agenda-land.
They entirely failed to make certain critical distinctions:
1. Developing thyroid neoplasms is not uncommon in children,
2. Having those thyroid neoplasms spontaneously resolve (because of the innate immune system’s constitutive function of looking for and taking out stuff like that) is not uncommon in children.
3. Most of the time in many children, especially those with no medical care beyond the usual, 1 and 2 can come and go without ever being spotted (just like everyone else that has cells going awry all the time that you never notice until what’s regularly taking them out becomes impaired).
4. If you subject an entire population of kids (such as those evacuated from the greater region around Chernobyl, which, incidentally, before, during, and after Chernobyl, has had a background radiation level only half the world average; while other places have background radiation over 600 times the world average yet have no increased incidence of cancers), to extreme levels of medical scrutiny looking specifically for thyroid tumors, guess what you’re going to spot? All the stuff that’s been appearing and disappearing all on its own.
5. The pediatric thyroid tumors discovered amongst that population of kids from the Chernobyl region were at stages of development that antedated the supposed cause of those tumors.
Because of this, and because the population of trans boys is regularly and generally undergoing a much higher level of scrutiny, and, specifically, scrutiny of their poor little balls which appear to be, among the adults doing all that scrutinizing, almost totemic objects either of veneration or disgust, then any naturally-occurring testicular neoplasms are going to be noticed much more frequently.
The tendency, among some less given to designing adequate controls, would be to attribute those neoplasms to something those boys have in common, like “being trans” or to some undefinable something in their nature from conception or birth (well, the super helpful adults would probably say, from birth, so as not to have the pre-trans boys’ politically-protected nature confer upon their pre-birth selves a presumption of the need and a right to have their incipient trans nature protected and accorded rights en utero) that predisposes them both to
A. developing neoplasms and
B. their desire (as yet unrecognized by anyone but that woke herd of Trans Lassies busy sniffing for any signs of pre-trans-Tammy’s diseased Timmy balls) to have them lopped off (also unrecognized by those boys until it’s too late).
But what else might they have in common?
Being groomed for trans-sistership?
Being assiduously poked, palpated, and prodded?
Being given drugs to mess with their normal pubertal development?
Being given viral mRNA products that will exacerbate all the other affronts done to their bodies?
A lot of people are busting RFK Jr's balls for his positive characterization of Peter Duesberg. I also think Peter Duesberg makes a strong case for the idea that HIV causing AIDS has not been conclusively established, and that the role of poppers and drug use in destroying people's immune systems was largely ignored. Please post a substack article about the issue when you get a chance as I am curious your opinion on the matter.
I find it difficult to tell the difference netween transgenders and RINOS, which obviously are not mutually exclusive categories - far from it - but I guess the difference is that RINOS have no balls to begin with. Any readers with balls who are considering having them chopped off, please insist they are biopsied for cancer. The more data that's available the better. Speaking of data, had any of these transgenders with testicular cancer had the mRNA injections? A groundbrea new sudy, proving scientifically what we already knew, has raised grave concerns about these injections:
BREAKING - New Study Urges Immediate Halt to COVID-19 mRNA Injections Over Alarming Levels of DNA Contamination
It seems that, worldwide, the virtually incontrovertible evidence of DNA contamination in c19 mRNA injections is gaining well-organized attention to the dangers. (Australians seems to be making an especially good effort publicizing this despite government resistance.)
Whatever evidence it takes to result in the total withdrawal from human use is praiseworthy. A wonderful development despite the horrible implications of the contamination.
That said, I cannot comprehend why sudden inexplicable deaths, inexplicable "turbo" cancers, the international proliferation of terminal heart failure and autoimmune disease in adults and children, etc., hasn't been enough reason to end these coerced life-threatening injections once and for all.
We shouldn't have to beg our own doctors and clinicians to stop killing us. And our doctors should not be able to blame the government for their crimes. Are they waiting for the government to give them permission to stop killing us and our loved ones?
Thank you for this excellent link! I LOVE the way McKernan shares his reactions, his thought process in declining to peer review the linked study, and walks the reader through the study in plain language.
Reading this important work enhanced by his reportage is a truly exciting experience that elevates my hopes for the eventual resolution of the c19 injection disaster.
P.S. I just noticed the substack from Anandamide hit my inbox 4 minutes after you sent to me!
This new study extends the work of McKernan and Buckhaults and appears to demolish the objections of their critics such as the Australian TGA. This research should be the final nail in the coffin of the mRNA shots but of course it won't be. Regulators will simply move the goalposts. Pharma and their money won't permit them not to. And Fauci's influence remains powerful. It is a terrible shame that Gaetz's desire to investigate Fauci crossed a line for McConnell.
It’s probably a moot point, but what percentage of the “trans” population have NOT been shot up repeatedly with viral mRNA products?
Also, it would be interesting to know the percentage of testicular neoplasms amongst
A. Normal (and I use that word deliberately because why the hell should normal boys be described in terms of “trans”?) viral mRNA product-negative boys of the same age group
B. Normal viral mRNA product-positive boys of the same age group.
And it would also be good in all these groups to see the rate of increase of testicular neoplasms from prepubertal to the present in terms of
1. Tanner stage of development
2. The number of viral mRNA product exposures.
My guesses are that
1. the frequency of appearance of neoplasms will track with the Tanner developmental stage.
Why? Simply because the frequency of neoplasms is very closely linked to tissues having rapid cell turnover, differentiation, and inflammation.
2. the growth of the neoplasms beyond a certain point will track with the number of viral mRNA shots.
Why? Simply because
A. the innate immune system is always spotting and taking out deranged cells,
B. the innate immune system, while having the ability to upregulate its capacity, is not immediately or unrestricted in its ability to compensate for increased demand,
C. the primary mechanism of action common to ALL of the viral mRNA products is responsible for immediate and significant demands on the existing capacity of the innate immune system, and
D. whatever overloads existing innate immune capacity (C) impairs its constitutive ability of dealing with everything else (A), meaning
E. that problems not ordinarily nipped in the bud can develop to the point that they can’t easily be dealt with by the innate immune system, whether neoplasms developing into obvious tumors, opportunistic infections (like cryptosporidium), overgrowth like yeast (thrush), all seen in HIV infection when the CD4 cell population (or even worse) the stem cell population from which they come are wiped out,
F. the association of neoplasms with inflammatory conditions, which are extremely exacerbated by the viral mRNA products,
G. the number of adverse events, including all cause mortality, track in a dose-dependent manner with
i. the number of doses administered and
ii. the state of health of those being shot up, and
H. the population of trans boys is already one having a great deal of emotional stress, mental instability, being subjected to drugs and procedures with not inconsiderable stress on the body and the innate immune system, probably a host of other diseases contracted because of the adults managing that entire process are encouraging them to “explore” their sexuality, so all that PLUS the unavoidable consequences of the viral mRNA products’ primary mechanism of action could significant shift this population into even more trouble that normal boys who are not being shot up with viral mRNA products and who are not being heavily propagandized by opportunistic adults in schools and medical facilities, all eager, some literally, to fuck them over.
Finally, though, back to my earlier question of the percentage of “trans” boys, meaning simply kids born with balls, that have been treated one or more times with viral mRNA products.
There is the matter of selection bias and heightened scrutiny.
This was seen in the aftermath of Chernobyl when anti-nuke activists (though, actually, they should have been anti-“nuclear plant personnel deliberately operating the reactor in violation of safety protocols” activists, but don’t expect folks like that to engage in making careful distinctions) went on and on about the discovery of huge number of pediatric thyroid tumors.
People were all trampling each other trying to get aboard the “post hoc, ergo, propter hoc” train heading off into Agenda-land.
They entirely failed to make certain critical distinctions:
1. Developing thyroid neoplasms is not uncommon in children,
2. Having those thyroid neoplasms spontaneously resolve (because of the innate immune system’s constitutive function of looking for and taking out stuff like that) is not uncommon in children.
3. Most of the time in many children, especially those with no medical care beyond the usual, 1 and 2 can come and go without ever being spotted (just like everyone else that has cells going awry all the time that you never notice until what’s regularly taking them out becomes impaired).
4. If you subject an entire population of kids (such as those evacuated from the greater region around Chernobyl, which, incidentally, before, during, and after Chernobyl, has had a background radiation level only half the world average; while other places have background radiation over 600 times the world average yet have no increased incidence of cancers), to extreme levels of medical scrutiny looking specifically for thyroid tumors, guess what you’re going to spot? All the stuff that’s been appearing and disappearing all on its own.
5. The pediatric thyroid tumors discovered amongst that population of kids from the Chernobyl region were at stages of development that antedated the supposed cause of those tumors.
Because of this, and because the population of trans boys is regularly and generally undergoing a much higher level of scrutiny, and, specifically, scrutiny of their poor little balls which appear to be, among the adults doing all that scrutinizing, almost totemic objects either of veneration or disgust, then any naturally-occurring testicular neoplasms are going to be noticed much more frequently.
The tendency, among some less given to designing adequate controls, would be to attribute those neoplasms to something those boys have in common, like “being trans” or to some undefinable something in their nature from conception or birth (well, the super helpful adults would probably say, from birth, so as not to have the pre-trans boys’ politically-protected nature confer upon their pre-birth selves a presumption of the need and a right to have their incipient trans nature protected and accorded rights en utero) that predisposes them both to
A. developing neoplasms and
B. their desire (as yet unrecognized by anyone but that woke herd of Trans Lassies busy sniffing for any signs of pre-trans-Tammy’s diseased Timmy balls) to have them lopped off (also unrecognized by those boys until it’s too late).
But what else might they have in common?
Being groomed for trans-sistership?
Being assiduously poked, palpated, and prodded?
Being given drugs to mess with their normal pubertal development?
Being given viral mRNA products that will exacerbate all the other affronts done to their bodies?
Even a Transwomen for Trump have had the injections. For example, Caitlyn Jenner has and she encouraged everyone to get vaccinated.
A lot of people are busting RFK Jr's balls for his positive characterization of Peter Duesberg. I also think Peter Duesberg makes a strong case for the idea that HIV causing AIDS has not been conclusively established, and that the role of poppers and drug use in destroying people's immune systems was largely ignored. Please post a substack article about the issue when you get a chance as I am curious your opinion on the matter.
FAFO in play - who could ever have guessed that fucking around with nature might have consequences.
It's all over but the crying when one tries to change genders.
...and then the rabbits cull themselves.
I find it difficult to tell the difference netween transgenders and RINOS, which obviously are not mutually exclusive categories - far from it - but I guess the difference is that RINOS have no balls to begin with. Any readers with balls who are considering having them chopped off, please insist they are biopsied for cancer. The more data that's available the better. Speaking of data, had any of these transgenders with testicular cancer had the mRNA injections? A groundbrea new sudy, proving scientifically what we already knew, has raised grave concerns about these injections:
BREAKING - New Study Urges Immediate Halt to COVID-19 mRNA Injections Over Alarming Levels of DNA Contamination
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-new-study-urges-immediate?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=152515896&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1gmx8e&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
It seems that, worldwide, the virtually incontrovertible evidence of DNA contamination in c19 mRNA injections is gaining well-organized attention to the dangers. (Australians seems to be making an especially good effort publicizing this despite government resistance.)
Whatever evidence it takes to result in the total withdrawal from human use is praiseworthy. A wonderful development despite the horrible implications of the contamination.
That said, I cannot comprehend why sudden inexplicable deaths, inexplicable "turbo" cancers, the international proliferation of terminal heart failure and autoimmune disease in adults and children, etc., hasn't been enough reason to end these coerced life-threatening injections once and for all.
We shouldn't have to beg our own doctors and clinicians to stop killing us. And our doctors should not be able to blame the government for their crimes. Are they waiting for the government to give them permission to stop killing us and our loved ones?
McKernan has published a stack on this study too. Among other things, the study raises questions about shedding, which must be addressed.
The most comprehesive study on Vax DNA sails through peer review.
Fluorometry + RNaseA for the win
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/the-most-comprehesive-study-on-vax?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=456768&post_id=152521764&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1gmx8e&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Thank you for this excellent link! I LOVE the way McKernan shares his reactions, his thought process in declining to peer review the linked study, and walks the reader through the study in plain language.
Reading this important work enhanced by his reportage is a truly exciting experience that elevates my hopes for the eventual resolution of the c19 injection disaster.
P.S. I just noticed the substack from Anandamide hit my inbox 4 minutes after you sent to me!
This new study extends the work of McKernan and Buckhaults and appears to demolish the objections of their critics such as the Australian TGA. This research should be the final nail in the coffin of the mRNA shots but of course it won't be. Regulators will simply move the goalposts. Pharma and their money won't permit them not to. And Fauci's influence remains powerful. It is a terrible shame that Gaetz's desire to investigate Fauci crossed a line for McConnell.
Great points.
Your last sentence particularly hits a raw nerve. But I hope and suspect Gaetz and his supporters will not be thwarted.
It's God's way of saying, enjoy the meat suit God has given you!
Unsettling!