SHOCKING (I remind you) that FDA published a study (Wong et al.) using surveillance data finding Pfizer COVID vaccine increases risk of lung blood clots by 50%; not one media outlet ran it, NOT one!
SHOCKING (I remind you) that FDA published a study (Wong et al.) using surveillance data finding Pfizer COVID vaccine increases risk of lung blood clots by 50%; not one media outlet ran it, NOT one!
Media censorship: 18 million COVID-19 Pfizer vaccinees, 4 outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42)
SHOCKING (I remind you) that FDA published a study (Wong et al.) using surveillance data finding Pfizer COVID vaccine increases risk of lung blood clots by 50%; not one media outlet ran it, NOT one!
What kind of federal funds were print and broadcast media receiving during the COVID catastrophe? Everyone else got $$. What did it take to buy media (granted, I know the legacy media was already in the tank for the deep state— did they get extra extra incentives?)
The MSM Media is part of the DOD, U.S. Department of Defense operation to attack us with their bio-weapons. "The DOD, has classified the Covid-19 Injections as "military counter-measure prototypes", meaning that these injections are not considered Medical Treatments or Vaccines, they are considered Bio-weapons. The Pharmaceutical Cos are on the third level down on this Chain of Command. The entire C19 operation was a Pentagon run show planned by a secretive Cabal since 2013. The trials and FDA approval process was all smoke and mirrors.”
It makes me ill to learn this critical data has been suppressed by the NIH, FDA, Biden Administration, CDC, all television media, and all legacy newspapers.
WHY DIDN’T THE FDA CALL A NEWS CONFERENCE TO ALERT THE PUBLIC OF DISCOVERING THIS LOOMING DANGER AND IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF mRNA COVID SHOTS?
It's well nigh that people realize the media keep their audience woefully uninformed. They never mention geoengineering or the rollout of 5G. I found this out starkly when I learned about CAFR reports. This stands for Consolidated Annual Financial Reports which are distributed to the media every year for decades and not once have they reported it. Just another graft that is done on the public with the government's mouthpiece to keep the people in the dark. It's worth listening to what CAFR funds are, and try not to get mad. Rather - get even. Here's a start - 14 mins. https://www.bitchute.com/video/6JRJfD29sIjV/
Remember when they said the vac was 95% effective? They used slight of hand, confusing Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) with Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR). It was wrong to do that then, so is it wrong to do that now, claiming a 50% increase in the risk of a Pulmonary Embolus (PE)?
PE's can kill.
Fortunately, PE's are rare, in the base case. They are hard to confirm, both in mild, non-death cases, as well as in post-mortem cases, or in death from multiple causes. In other words, this data more than likely underestimates PE cases, so is suspect.
Here, 18 million people were jabbed with the Pfizer ClotShot. Without access to the raw data and a similar statistical analysis package, we can only surmise that the (PE; RR = 1.54) means that of the about 9000 PE's in these 18 million, about 0.05%, only about 0.017% were more than the control or expected without the vax.
On the other hand, given this paper was originally submitted about a year ago, it has been known for about a year that this vax likely contributed to (dare I say caused? Correlated?) to the death of 3000 people, just by verified PE's (number unverified?). This does not include acute myocardial infarctions (AMI's, heart attacks), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), or other potentially-related causes of death from coagulopathy. So, this data does not mean much, if not nothing.
To be fair, at least 3000 people likely died from the vax by PE by this data, people who may not have died, except for getting the vax.
Wild claims of Covid19 "saves" by vax are made but did ANYONE actually benefit from the vax?
The corollary question is, did the vax reduce ANY deaths from any other cause, or even all causes? Of course, this analysis was not done here. Anywhere?
And yet in the background section right off the bat..all safe and effective narrative framing:
"We present new findings from a nationally representative early warning system that may expand the safety knowledge base to further public trust and inform decision making on vaccine safety by government agencies, healthcare providers, interested stakeholders, and the public."
How can these FDA "authors" even take themselves seriously? Perhaps they all would be better off becoming record spinning dj's.
can you trust anything that comes out of the FDA or CDC when they are hugely funded by big pharma ?? It is like allowing a pack of wolves guard the hen house.
SHOCKING (I remind you) that FDA published a study (Wong et al.) using surveillance data finding Pfizer COVID vaccine increases risk of lung blood clots by 50%; not one media outlet ran it, NOT one!
What kind of federal funds were print and broadcast media receiving during the COVID catastrophe? Everyone else got $$. What did it take to buy media (granted, I know the legacy media was already in the tank for the deep state— did they get extra extra incentives?)
The MSM Media is part of the DOD, U.S. Department of Defense operation to attack us with their bio-weapons. "The DOD, has classified the Covid-19 Injections as "military counter-measure prototypes", meaning that these injections are not considered Medical Treatments or Vaccines, they are considered Bio-weapons. The Pharmaceutical Cos are on the third level down on this Chain of Command. The entire C19 operation was a Pentagon run show planned by a secretive Cabal since 2013. The trials and FDA approval process was all smoke and mirrors.”
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/01/09/pentagon-controlled-covid-19-from-the-beginning/
Trusted news initiative at work!
It makes me ill to learn this critical data has been suppressed by the NIH, FDA, Biden Administration, CDC, all television media, and all legacy newspapers.
WHY DIDN’T THE FDA CALL A NEWS CONFERENCE TO ALERT THE PUBLIC OF DISCOVERING THIS LOOMING DANGER AND IMMEDIATELY SUSPEND THE DISTRIBUTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF mRNA COVID SHOTS?
Ask Al Roker...
So glad I never got those shots
It's well nigh that people realize the media keep their audience woefully uninformed. They never mention geoengineering or the rollout of 5G. I found this out starkly when I learned about CAFR reports. This stands for Consolidated Annual Financial Reports which are distributed to the media every year for decades and not once have they reported it. Just another graft that is done on the public with the government's mouthpiece to keep the people in the dark. It's worth listening to what CAFR funds are, and try not to get mad. Rather - get even. Here's a start - 14 mins. https://www.bitchute.com/video/6JRJfD29sIjV/
News media are complicit.
RRR vs. ARR
Devil's advocate here.
Remember when they said the vac was 95% effective? They used slight of hand, confusing Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) with Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR). It was wrong to do that then, so is it wrong to do that now, claiming a 50% increase in the risk of a Pulmonary Embolus (PE)?
PE's can kill.
Fortunately, PE's are rare, in the base case. They are hard to confirm, both in mild, non-death cases, as well as in post-mortem cases, or in death from multiple causes. In other words, this data more than likely underestimates PE cases, so is suspect.
Here, 18 million people were jabbed with the Pfizer ClotShot. Without access to the raw data and a similar statistical analysis package, we can only surmise that the (PE; RR = 1.54) means that of the about 9000 PE's in these 18 million, about 0.05%, only about 0.017% were more than the control or expected without the vax.
On the other hand, given this paper was originally submitted about a year ago, it has been known for about a year that this vax likely contributed to (dare I say caused? Correlated?) to the death of 3000 people, just by verified PE's (number unverified?). This does not include acute myocardial infarctions (AMI's, heart attacks), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), or other potentially-related causes of death from coagulopathy. So, this data does not mean much, if not nothing.
To be fair, at least 3000 people likely died from the vax by PE by this data, people who may not have died, except for getting the vax.
Wild claims of Covid19 "saves" by vax are made but did ANYONE actually benefit from the vax?
The corollary question is, did the vax reduce ANY deaths from any other cause, or even all causes? Of course, this analysis was not done here. Anywhere?
THIS ANALYSIS IS NEVER REPORTED.
Except maybe by Edward Dowd: CAUSE UNKNOWN?
Media censorship that causes death and harm to people is a crime, and must be dealt with as such.
And yet in the background section right off the bat..all safe and effective narrative framing:
"We present new findings from a nationally representative early warning system that may expand the safety knowledge base to further public trust and inform decision making on vaccine safety by government agencies, healthcare providers, interested stakeholders, and the public."
How can these FDA "authors" even take themselves seriously? Perhaps they all would be better off becoming record spinning dj's.
Not looking good in Aussie or UK https://petersweden.substack.com/p/australia-pandemic
can you trust anything that comes out of the FDA or CDC when they are hugely funded by big pharma ?? It is like allowing a pack of wolves guard the hen house.
Shocking? This type of terrorism is now 100% standard operating procedure around the world.
Wish we had read this before he got his first one.