Shrestha et al. (2023); remember, this study showed us that among 51,017 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 mRNA technology vaccine was 29% effective in preventing
Shrestha et al. (2023); remember, this study showed us that among 51,017 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, the bivalent COVID-19 mRNA technology vaccine was 29% effective in preventing
infection while the BA.4/5 lineages were dominant, and 20% effective while the BQ lineages were; a clear dose-response was seen & I had to re-post the graph;
First a study of integrity would match that score with a placebo. Secondly, the horror of the untested unstudied mRNAs bioweopons are the long term injuries. They are far worse than all the past vaccines that forced the fake Vaccine Court pushed by pharma cartels to protect themselves from the injured and the educated. The point: the drug cartels wag Americans.
Yeah, well, smashing your finger in a car door is effective at alleviating a headache.
-Any substance that stimulates the immune system can alter a future response of the immune system , and thus lessen symptoms of illness, or accentuate symptoms. Which, in reference to the above claimed 29% effectiveness of the vaccine, means it's not more effective than many, many other possible natural and safe treatments and because of the dangerous and deadly side effects, it should not be considered as a treatment let alone prophylactic treatment at all. A condom is over 90% effective at preventing a sperm from infecting an egg, but if it was only 29% effective, and there was a 5% incidence of a man's penis rotting & falling off, condoms would not be used or sold.
Though persons were injected with substances claimed to prevent infection and though those persons did not develop infections does not demonstrate/prove the injected substances were the cause that prevented infection. Correlation does not equal causation works both ways.
We were lied to about the Wuhan market and lab virus. Wrong. Nanotechnology crosses blood barriers, causes oxidative stress, so it causes low saturation/suffocation.
Here's a great article about what it does to your body so you can see what Covid is and why people have all these adverse effects:
Real-world zero efficacy initially, and then negative efficacy shortly thereafter.
Slow kill bioweapon injections.
But just think how much less rich Pfizer and Moderna would be if fewer doses had been taken.
First a study of integrity would match that score with a placebo. Secondly, the horror of the untested unstudied mRNAs bioweopons are the long term injuries. They are far worse than all the past vaccines that forced the fake Vaccine Court pushed by pharma cartels to protect themselves from the injured and the educated. The point: the drug cartels wag Americans.
How do you calculate a 29% effectiveness of something with an unknown probability of being infected and accurately determined to be infected?
Yeah, well, smashing your finger in a car door is effective at alleviating a headache.
-Any substance that stimulates the immune system can alter a future response of the immune system , and thus lessen symptoms of illness, or accentuate symptoms. Which, in reference to the above claimed 29% effectiveness of the vaccine, means it's not more effective than many, many other possible natural and safe treatments and because of the dangerous and deadly side effects, it should not be considered as a treatment let alone prophylactic treatment at all. A condom is over 90% effective at preventing a sperm from infecting an egg, but if it was only 29% effective, and there was a 5% incidence of a man's penis rotting & falling off, condoms would not be used or sold.
Though persons were injected with substances claimed to prevent infection and though those persons did not develop infections does not demonstrate/prove the injected substances were the cause that prevented infection. Correlation does not equal causation works both ways.
The Pfizer bullshit jab had a relative risk reduction of 0.7 per cent - no measurable efficacy....
We were lied to about the Wuhan market and lab virus. Wrong. Nanotechnology crosses blood barriers, causes oxidative stress, so it causes low saturation/suffocation.
Here's a great article about what it does to your body so you can see what Covid is and why people have all these adverse effects:
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms | Particle and Fibre Toxicology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)
forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/?sh=d1dd55452479
What is meant by “effective”? I don’t think it’s the same definition I know.