Is this true? As you know, I am asking Malone to be interviewed by me (as of this writing he has not responded & has essentially refused) to address serious mRNA technology questions; same here
"I write as an imperfect, hugely imperfect, broken at times, stumbling blockhead moron at times, prone to mistakes and very jaded, person. I have issues. I am a fool at times. I admit that."
So you are one of us then. 😉
But you aren't any of those things. And neither are we.
wow that was quite the read. very eye opening. thank you for sharing i hope all involved figure it out and do not take advantage of people. we the people have had enough from the last few years. i thank God everyday for you Dr. Paul. you are honest and tell it like it is and that is why i like you so much.
Paul, Dr Gold was among the very first to blow the whistle on the dangerous, experimental Covid-19 injections. Her White Coat Summits were at the forefront of the health freedom movement. She and her colleagues published a comprehensive "white paper" on the experimental injectables, presciently documenting numerous ways the toxic shots would harm people. She published that white paper in November 2020, before the first EUA even had been issued. It is because of her work, specifically including that white paper, that I and no doubt countless others remain uninjected today. She is a warrior, who at the beginning was fighting this war largely alone. Other notable leaders of today's health freedom movement still were blissfully ignorant at that time, many lining up to get the shots themselves and recommending the same for their patients. In short, Dr Gold has done as much as anybody and far more than most to sound the alarms and save lives. By now, most critical thinkers know the criminal conspiracists behind what may be the biggest ever attack on humanity will do whatever it takes to destroy the opposition, obviously including fomenting discord among our ranks and trying to take out leaders of the opposition. Indeed, they even put Dr Gold in prison for having the courage to give a speech on Jan 6. With her record, Dr Gold deserves much better than for you to be publicly repeating scandalous claims. Given her record, she has earned the benefit of the doubt. Nobody should accept at face value or otherwise uncritically repeat allegations about health freedom warriors without first fully vetting the claims and making sure they are not simply yet another disinformation plot by the same wrongdoers who brought us the travesty of the past three years. If you think the allegations could have merit, at a minimum you should've first privately sought comment directly from Dr Gold.
I'll repeat some of the comment I posted above - I assure you, I am not pro-Big Pharma and you can read a ton of my writing since 2021 as well as review my holistic health credentials to see I'm not a fan of pharmaceutical companies. A few people I have interviewed (some who worked for her) believe Gold is controlled opposition. I can't say for sure but she's at least messy with her finances at minimum.
I also have spoken privately with ex-employees and Gold allegedly has a reputation for harassing people who question her, and I simply wasn't in a space to confront her directly on these things.
PS Just because someone says something you like or agree with, it doesn't mean their underlying motives are pure...and vice versa.
Count me as extremely skeptical. The "controversy" around Dr Gold, including amorphous and uncredited claims like saying she allegedly "has a reputation for harassing people," sounds like a carbon copy of what they did to James O'Keefe. I don't buy it for a second. And the idea that Dr Gold is "controlled opposition" is ridiculous. Her comprehensive critique of the toxic injections contained in the well-sourced white paper that she published for the world to see before the criminals at FDA authorized the first poisonous injection was way ahead of its time and way ahead of just about everybody else, with the possible exception of Stephanie Seneff. I'm not one who thinks the global cabal who orchestrated this tragedy is all-knowing. The red flags Dr Gold raised and pounded home at free public events all over the country were on target as to the toxic nature of the injections, and the message she worked so hard to deliver to anybody willing to listen about the availability of extremely safe, highly effective -- and inexpensive -- treatments and the irrationality of the government's approach to all things Covid, were so clear and cogent that it borders on craziness to think she is controlled opposition helping the wrongdoers. To believe otherwise would be tantamount to thinking the criminals are playing 20-dimensional chess and we have no chance. And that's ridiculous.
An ad hominem attack, by definition, is an attack on the character, motives, or other attributes of the person rather than focusing on substance. Suggesting that Dr Gold cavorts with an underwear model is a classic ad hominem attack. Throwing in that he's "younger" is more of the same, and is obviously intended to provoke outrage. Frankly, and although I don't believe the aspersion that I guess is intended to conjure up images of tiger-like behavior or maybe a female version of Jeffrey Epstein, I also don't care whether Dr Gold may have a boyfriend or who he may be. As with all classic ad hominem attacks, it simply has nothing to do with the merits of anything that is relevant.
The same is true of the claim that she harassed people as well as the suggestion that she has a "handler," never mind that the "report" admits the slanderous claim is based only on somebody's suspicion.
Back to my initial comment: Dr Gold has done far more than most for the medical freedom movement. She was calling out the fraud while most still were cowed by the criminal cabal's fear-based propaganda campaign and were excited for the criminal cabal's toxic shots to hit the market. She has proven her bona fides and has earned the right to expect that before somebody presumably on the same side publishes a hit piece about her they would first seek her side of the story and that they would never include slanderous, ad hominem attacks, being especially sure to avoid those based only on someone's suspicion. I hesitate even to bother addressing the denial that the person claiming harassment is unnamed -- and I won't, other than to point out the obvious: your denial admits the person is unnamed! Indeed, denying the obvious -- like denying the shots are toxic, remdesivir kills, Covid deaths are wildly inflated, masks don't work and actually cause harm, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine both are extremely safe and highly effective, etc. -- is a tactic honed to perfection by the criminal cabal. Just saw this report, which seems to capture the essence of what this is about. https://frontline.news/post/big-government-behind-take-downs-of-dr-gold-and-james-o-keefe
If I get evidence she's on the up and up I will write a follow-up, but at minimum she manages her company finances poorly, and I don't care if she made some pretty speeches back at the beginning of the pandemic, a lot of us have spoken out, not just her, and she doesn't deserve to be lionized for it above all the other hundreds of other activists, Substack writers, and boots on the ground people who also did so **without asking for $50,000/month from charitable donations for our time or a personal McMansion paid for with nonprofit funds.**
PS My source is not "unnamed" to me. A lot of journalistic sources are kept anonymous. Give it a rest, please.
“Give it a rest.” Almost funny, coming as it does after publishing a thinly-veiled, anonymously-sourced, ad hominem-laden hit piece. So-called anonymous sourcing (which often translates to "completely made up") plays a big role in the ongoing demise of the biased and corrupt legacy media and helped create space for alternatives like Substack. Anyway, thanks but no thanks for the link — I read Substack because I’m not into that kind of thing. I don’t know whether you're well-intentioned, but I do think you’ve been duped.
Ad hominem attacks, like claims by unnamed people that she "harasses" them and titillating suggestions about underwear models coupled with a wholly unsubstantiated, fact-free claim by a third person who "suspects" someone may be her "handler" isn't journalism or serious reporting. Frankly, I'm surprised so many still are willing to uncritically accept whatever they are told.
The interview and her name, are, actually pretty public (a disgruntled ex employee). I won't provide a link but look it up on Reinette's blog. If it's claimed a secret ("interview" and "afraid to be public" in one sentence???), you can't make your own judgement... Psychological manipulation. The "harassment" claim was her managers requiring her to give back department property, it's in the lawsuit and other sources.
"(interview" and "afraid to be public" in one sentence???)" Yes, as in, I had a conversation with this person (an "interview") over video that was not recorded or published publicly because the person being "interviewed" didn't want Gold to retaliate. The information is not "secret," the source's identity is. However, what my source said is corroborated by Reinette's many sources, public and private.
Not claims by unnamed people. An interview with a source who is a real person with a real name but who is afraid to be public because of said harassment concerns. And that's not an "ad hominem" attack.
And once again, her LLC records are public record, you can follow all the info I provided on that account and make up your own mind, but the hard-cold fact is, she dissolved her GoldCare LLC while keeping the website up.
My research of her was mostly based on public records - you can see for yourself that she dissolved her healthcare LLC without mentioning it on the GoldCare website, which is still active and supposedly selling memberships. It would also be a mistake to compare Simone Gold to James O'Keefe - he's been transparent and hasn't attempted to claim he still runs Project Veritas when he is not, as she has done with AFLDS. James O' Keefe also doesn't have a young male underwear model "boyfriend" who people (like Reinette Sennum) suspect may be Gold's "handler." I can't speak to the handler stuff but it's odd to say the least.
In short. The agencies and elite are working hard to counter all opposition. They will use all the weaknesses of people, so the opposition splits up. They probably even have AI-assisted simulations running of each person on facebook and google. We are in a 5th generation civil war, where the propaganda is fine-tuned to each opposition group.
Solution: Stay a critical thinker, but also help people on your side to do things better than they do now.
About the Ai-assisted simulations...if you take on board testimony from ( those already badly stung by the global enemy )..it's more a case that "all" of us are being absolutely GMO'd from the inside out...enabling exactly that = avatars of us "they" are actively Ai-enabled to know our thoughts, conversations and our every whereabouts at any given time. Sophisticated beyond most people's grasp.
Which - was the whole purpose for Transhumanising us via jab contents of Graphene Oxide, other metals, etc - and the decades long geoengineering of our world environment via chemtrails = raining these same components down on us and into our crops, food supplies, water, air supply, etc. Building up these components inside of all living things - which our internal environment and iron-rich blood supply....has been seen to lead to formation of circuitry in those affected's blood samples - all over the globe. The 5th generation capability, 5G..and the HAARP carrier wave frequency..."is" the hook-up between us - to our avatar's - the enemy has control over.
It's a 5th generation GLOBAL war upon humanity, total surveillance ( Starlink) above our planet and on the ground everywhere you look. According to those in the know. They aim to make us very very ill - with it. Take all of the good health advice given by many, and fortify your immune health and utilise the given methods of removal-of Graphene Oxide and heavy metals to counter-act this evil plan. Most of all believe in your right to be "here" and your Divine destiny.
The basic issue is that those big Pharma companies that embrace the allopathic medicine model for treating disease states do not want any competition, and they will do anything in their power to discredit anybody that has any other approach to good health! It’s a money game and has nothing to do with treating the ills of humanity
I listen to you but I am getting tire of your vitriol and biting of others in this movement that is so essential to our progress and to our survival. You are right, you are not perfect, so quit talking about others as if you are. It’s painful to your followers such as me.
Don’t be an idiot, he is shining light on matters we need to be informed about - as fairly as one could. Stick your head back in the sand and be content there.
Excuse me? You seem to have a similar style to that of Alexander’s, which I find offensive. This touches on my point. That kind of uncivil discourse is not helpful to any movement promoting humanistic values and free expression or the search for truth. Otherwise we are behaving in ways too similar to those who we are countering. Maturity, patience and open mindedness are much more useful.
Reply to Christine B. You don’t have very good interpretive skills. I am completely as your last sentence states.
The biggest reason humanity is where it is - total devastation, is because most people go through life NOT PAYING ATTENTION to ANYTHING. Now more than ever we need millions of voices speaking out against corruption. This is Dr Paul’s site, not ours. he is the “host”…he has invited a discussion. If you don’t like his style or character of person - go somewhere else. He tells you this in his opening story lines.
Those of us who come here do so to learn and contribute to that. You took the ad hominem path and chose to attack his person - not - the issue up for discussion on the table. I am in agreeance with you, I also don’t like foul language or vile behaviour from anyone. Dr Paul is a fiery personality… but it’s his posting site and I for one am glad he raises his voice to shine light on issues we need to know about. So because of my maturity, patience and OPEN MINDEDNESS - am able to be here at this table of discussion and make discovery and contribute.
"68% of the news @StephanieBrail interacts with on Twitter Leans Left."
Not sure I'd trust her credibility, Dr. Alexander. She just might toss a truck at your head when you're playing in that sandbox you play in. JUST KIDDING!!!
Disclaimer: I was the person who provided the link to the court document and commented about consultant fees and expenses (used to be a consultant myself).
Brail learned about the very existence of Dr. Gold about 5 minutes before writing about her from "internet research" and whatever she dug out of her own ass (no, Dr. Gold doesn't charge anything for speaking - how?, and every donation collected goes to the nonprofit), but skipping facts that didn't fit the spin. Seriously, I don't know where this fascination about her writing comes from... Brail proceeded to be deranged with my church (on the other side of the country!) who hosted a talk by Dr. Gold in February and with people who came to listen and ask questions, and express their opinion. So, now we can't even ask questions, right? And can't have our own knowledge and opinion about the situation. The internet is going to tell you what to think.
Dr. Gold previously visited our community and is well liked. Our nonprofit leaders commented that Dr. Gold has made peanuts all combined and assumed compared to the cut professional fundraisers charge. Fundraising is hard and she raised a lot. There is a difference between being well paid for making a lot of $$ for your employer and being paid $20K/month for doing no job. Incidentally, a local activist recently struck a conversation about Dr. Gold and revealed that she helped him a lot providing resources 2 years ago. Then another person in our small group mentioned she also had used help from AFLDS. AFLDS didn't brag about any of this work behind the scenes or visiting suffering communities like ours in the lockdown. The real world is not about some bs "internet research" and imaginary "arguments" and creating narratives.
I'm going to disable this thread. Internet dwellers with SGDS, don't bother, I won't read you. Learn to live in the reality and meet people in person.
Oh my, is this the same "Julia" who came onto my Substack months ago and started harassing me there in defense of Gold?
"Brail proceeded to be deranged with my church (on the other side of the country!) who hosted a talk by Dr. Gold in February and with people who came to listen and ask questions, and express their opinion." Huh? What the heck are you talking about? I think you are confusing me with Reinette Senum...
"Fundraising is hard and she raised a lot." My first job out of college was as a development assistant for Big Sisters of Los Angeles, so my full-time job was administrative support for fundraising as well as helping coordinate big gala fundraising events with celebrities. The kind of fundraising Gold does isn't "hard." She's the celebrity face of AFLDS. She's not doing the hard work behind the scenes. BTW...my salary was...wait for it...$23,000 PER YEAR.
Please, stop excusing Gold's big salary and "expenses." When you start a non-profit, you're supposed to be paid less. Otherwise, set up a for profit company. Yeesh.
I just joined your substack today as a paid member as I felt I should being that I read every single article you post every day since joining a week ago as a free member. You are answering all of my questions. Everything that seemed 'off' for months now, you gave me the inside look which validated my suspicions. Thank you. BTW, if not for Dr. Tenpenny's clinic , I would not have started watching her videos. (binging on those too!) And I would not have watched your recent interview with her and I would not have found your amazing Substack. I KNEW things were wrong with Malone and then my ears perked up when Stew warned people of him but, I remained skeptical. Then later seeing Malone on Epoch sliding in slanderous (and childish) accusations about Risch and then discrediting the amazing work by Stew Peters on Bannons Warroom, I knew Stew was on to something . Malone just slides in these little seeds of doubt about the people doing some real heavy lifting and research. But when Stew mentioned Gold I did not believe it. How could I? An accomplished Doctor and Lawyer - she could never be that stupid or greedy. I have a lot of more reading to do. There are more answers to my many questions yet to be learned. Thank you for all you do.
Dr. Paul, my money is on Dr. Gold. This whole thing stinks of a big pharma attack to destroy their competition. Dr. Gold just spent 4 month in jail for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. She was targeted by the Demorats and the CIA. Without Dr. Gold as the front person would there be a AFLDS organization??? And speaking of Malone, he is like a ground hog, only coming out of his hole to eat. He knew the dangers of mRNA and he said nothing UNTIL, the shit hit the fan. He is as guilt as the rest of the crooks.
I assure you, I am not pro-Big Pharma and you can read a ton of my writing since 2021 as well as review my holistic health credentials to see I'm not a fan of pharmaceutical companies. A few people I have interviewed (some who worked for her) believe Gold is controlled opposition. I can't say for sure but she's at least messy with her finances at minimum.
"I write as an imperfect, hugely imperfect, broken at times, stumbling blockhead moron at times, prone to mistakes and very jaded, person. I have issues. I am a fool at times. I admit that."
So you are one of us then. 😉
But you aren't any of those things. And neither are we.
Dr Alexander's 'problem' is he's not a socio/psycho-path.
Like many of us, if he combined his skill set with a sociopathic personality, he'd be financially thriving in this environment.
His 'problem' is to our benefit. Just like our 'problem' is to the benefit of those around us.
And, you're spot on. We aren't any of those things, we're just aware we could be.
wow that was quite the read. very eye opening. thank you for sharing i hope all involved figure it out and do not take advantage of people. we the people have had enough from the last few years. i thank God everyday for you Dr. Paul. you are honest and tell it like it is and that is why i like you so much.
You know what else is suspicious about Malone?
Dr Alexander confessed Pfizer offered him a gazillion dollars to buy his silence and work for them. Pfizer has bought other people too.
Why wouldn’t Pfizer try and silence Malone? If it happened why didn’t he say so.
Sooooo. If Pfizer is not trying to silence him... Malone is letting limited info out and getting paid from someone else? To control our anger?
Idk. Just an idea to ponder.
Disappointed with Gold to say the least..
expose on Dr. Simone Gold
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/americas-frontline-doctors-all-roads
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/americas-frontline-doctors-founder
Whoa. Some crazy shit in there. The snow storms in Cali and shots of that narcissist were...crazy, eh?
Haven't done any research but this could be a nothingburger, people.
definitely not a nothing burger. I know the woman who did the expose and she digs deep
...or not.
Paul, Dr Gold was among the very first to blow the whistle on the dangerous, experimental Covid-19 injections. Her White Coat Summits were at the forefront of the health freedom movement. She and her colleagues published a comprehensive "white paper" on the experimental injectables, presciently documenting numerous ways the toxic shots would harm people. She published that white paper in November 2020, before the first EUA even had been issued. It is because of her work, specifically including that white paper, that I and no doubt countless others remain uninjected today. She is a warrior, who at the beginning was fighting this war largely alone. Other notable leaders of today's health freedom movement still were blissfully ignorant at that time, many lining up to get the shots themselves and recommending the same for their patients. In short, Dr Gold has done as much as anybody and far more than most to sound the alarms and save lives. By now, most critical thinkers know the criminal conspiracists behind what may be the biggest ever attack on humanity will do whatever it takes to destroy the opposition, obviously including fomenting discord among our ranks and trying to take out leaders of the opposition. Indeed, they even put Dr Gold in prison for having the courage to give a speech on Jan 6. With her record, Dr Gold deserves much better than for you to be publicly repeating scandalous claims. Given her record, she has earned the benefit of the doubt. Nobody should accept at face value or otherwise uncritically repeat allegations about health freedom warriors without first fully vetting the claims and making sure they are not simply yet another disinformation plot by the same wrongdoers who brought us the travesty of the past three years. If you think the allegations could have merit, at a minimum you should've first privately sought comment directly from Dr Gold.
I'll repeat some of the comment I posted above - I assure you, I am not pro-Big Pharma and you can read a ton of my writing since 2021 as well as review my holistic health credentials to see I'm not a fan of pharmaceutical companies. A few people I have interviewed (some who worked for her) believe Gold is controlled opposition. I can't say for sure but she's at least messy with her finances at minimum.
I also have spoken privately with ex-employees and Gold allegedly has a reputation for harassing people who question her, and I simply wasn't in a space to confront her directly on these things.
PS Just because someone says something you like or agree with, it doesn't mean their underlying motives are pure...and vice versa.
Count me as extremely skeptical. The "controversy" around Dr Gold, including amorphous and uncredited claims like saying she allegedly "has a reputation for harassing people," sounds like a carbon copy of what they did to James O'Keefe. I don't buy it for a second. And the idea that Dr Gold is "controlled opposition" is ridiculous. Her comprehensive critique of the toxic injections contained in the well-sourced white paper that she published for the world to see before the criminals at FDA authorized the first poisonous injection was way ahead of its time and way ahead of just about everybody else, with the possible exception of Stephanie Seneff. I'm not one who thinks the global cabal who orchestrated this tragedy is all-knowing. The red flags Dr Gold raised and pounded home at free public events all over the country were on target as to the toxic nature of the injections, and the message she worked so hard to deliver to anybody willing to listen about the availability of extremely safe, highly effective -- and inexpensive -- treatments and the irrationality of the government's approach to all things Covid, were so clear and cogent that it borders on craziness to think she is controlled opposition helping the wrongdoers. To believe otherwise would be tantamount to thinking the criminals are playing 20-dimensional chess and we have no chance. And that's ridiculous.
An ad hominem attack, by definition, is an attack on the character, motives, or other attributes of the person rather than focusing on substance. Suggesting that Dr Gold cavorts with an underwear model is a classic ad hominem attack. Throwing in that he's "younger" is more of the same, and is obviously intended to provoke outrage. Frankly, and although I don't believe the aspersion that I guess is intended to conjure up images of tiger-like behavior or maybe a female version of Jeffrey Epstein, I also don't care whether Dr Gold may have a boyfriend or who he may be. As with all classic ad hominem attacks, it simply has nothing to do with the merits of anything that is relevant.
The same is true of the claim that she harassed people as well as the suggestion that she has a "handler," never mind that the "report" admits the slanderous claim is based only on somebody's suspicion.
Back to my initial comment: Dr Gold has done far more than most for the medical freedom movement. She was calling out the fraud while most still were cowed by the criminal cabal's fear-based propaganda campaign and were excited for the criminal cabal's toxic shots to hit the market. She has proven her bona fides and has earned the right to expect that before somebody presumably on the same side publishes a hit piece about her they would first seek her side of the story and that they would never include slanderous, ad hominem attacks, being especially sure to avoid those based only on someone's suspicion. I hesitate even to bother addressing the denial that the person claiming harassment is unnamed -- and I won't, other than to point out the obvious: your denial admits the person is unnamed! Indeed, denying the obvious -- like denying the shots are toxic, remdesivir kills, Covid deaths are wildly inflated, masks don't work and actually cause harm, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine both are extremely safe and highly effective, etc. -- is a tactic honed to perfection by the criminal cabal. Just saw this report, which seems to capture the essence of what this is about. https://frontline.news/post/big-government-behind-take-downs-of-dr-gold-and-james-o-keefe
I'm sorry, I'm not engaging with you anymore on this, and you can read why here: https://wholistic.substack.com/p/whats-going-on/
If I get evidence she's on the up and up I will write a follow-up, but at minimum she manages her company finances poorly, and I don't care if she made some pretty speeches back at the beginning of the pandemic, a lot of us have spoken out, not just her, and she doesn't deserve to be lionized for it above all the other hundreds of other activists, Substack writers, and boots on the ground people who also did so **without asking for $50,000/month from charitable donations for our time or a personal McMansion paid for with nonprofit funds.**
PS My source is not "unnamed" to me. A lot of journalistic sources are kept anonymous. Give it a rest, please.
“Give it a rest.” Almost funny, coming as it does after publishing a thinly-veiled, anonymously-sourced, ad hominem-laden hit piece. So-called anonymous sourcing (which often translates to "completely made up") plays a big role in the ongoing demise of the biased and corrupt legacy media and helped create space for alternatives like Substack. Anyway, thanks but no thanks for the link — I read Substack because I’m not into that kind of thing. I don’t know whether you're well-intentioned, but I do think you’ve been duped.
Ad hominem attacks, like claims by unnamed people that she "harasses" them and titillating suggestions about underwear models coupled with a wholly unsubstantiated, fact-free claim by a third person who "suspects" someone may be her "handler" isn't journalism or serious reporting. Frankly, I'm surprised so many still are willing to uncritically accept whatever they are told.
The interview and her name, are, actually pretty public (a disgruntled ex employee). I won't provide a link but look it up on Reinette's blog. If it's claimed a secret ("interview" and "afraid to be public" in one sentence???), you can't make your own judgement... Psychological manipulation. The "harassment" claim was her managers requiring her to give back department property, it's in the lawsuit and other sources.
"(interview" and "afraid to be public" in one sentence???)" Yes, as in, I had a conversation with this person (an "interview") over video that was not recorded or published publicly because the person being "interviewed" didn't want Gold to retaliate. The information is not "secret," the source's identity is. However, what my source said is corroborated by Reinette's many sources, public and private.
Not claims by unnamed people. An interview with a source who is a real person with a real name but who is afraid to be public because of said harassment concerns. And that's not an "ad hominem" attack.
And once again, her LLC records are public record, you can follow all the info I provided on that account and make up your own mind, but the hard-cold fact is, she dissolved her GoldCare LLC while keeping the website up.
My research of her was mostly based on public records - you can see for yourself that she dissolved her healthcare LLC without mentioning it on the GoldCare website, which is still active and supposedly selling memberships. It would also be a mistake to compare Simone Gold to James O'Keefe - he's been transparent and hasn't attempted to claim he still runs Project Veritas when he is not, as she has done with AFLDS. James O' Keefe also doesn't have a young male underwear model "boyfriend" who people (like Reinette Sennum) suspect may be Gold's "handler." I can't speak to the handler stuff but it's odd to say the least.
Social Media Is A Test Lab For PSYOP Technology - Dr. Robert Malone (interview on London Real) -> https://www.bitchute.com/video/fUvjeZZbdB8/
In short. The agencies and elite are working hard to counter all opposition. They will use all the weaknesses of people, so the opposition splits up. They probably even have AI-assisted simulations running of each person on facebook and google. We are in a 5th generation civil war, where the propaganda is fine-tuned to each opposition group.
Solution: Stay a critical thinker, but also help people on your side to do things better than they do now.
About the Ai-assisted simulations...if you take on board testimony from ( those already badly stung by the global enemy )..it's more a case that "all" of us are being absolutely GMO'd from the inside out...enabling exactly that = avatars of us "they" are actively Ai-enabled to know our thoughts, conversations and our every whereabouts at any given time. Sophisticated beyond most people's grasp.
Which - was the whole purpose for Transhumanising us via jab contents of Graphene Oxide, other metals, etc - and the decades long geoengineering of our world environment via chemtrails = raining these same components down on us and into our crops, food supplies, water, air supply, etc. Building up these components inside of all living things - which our internal environment and iron-rich blood supply....has been seen to lead to formation of circuitry in those affected's blood samples - all over the globe. The 5th generation capability, 5G..and the HAARP carrier wave frequency..."is" the hook-up between us - to our avatar's - the enemy has control over.
It's a 5th generation GLOBAL war upon humanity, total surveillance ( Starlink) above our planet and on the ground everywhere you look. According to those in the know. They aim to make us very very ill - with it. Take all of the good health advice given by many, and fortify your immune health and utilise the given methods of removal-of Graphene Oxide and heavy metals to counter-act this evil plan. Most of all believe in your right to be "here" and your Divine destiny.
I know all those things in technical details. And came to very different conclusions. For a radiation see -> https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/how-non-ionizing-radiation-affects
Yela has already posted this twice.....
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/americas-frontline-doctors-all-roads
I read this over 3 months ago when it came out and Dr Jane Ruby wrote in the comment section.
The basic issue is that those big Pharma companies that embrace the allopathic medicine model for treating disease states do not want any competition, and they will do anything in their power to discredit anybody that has any other approach to good health! It’s a money game and has nothing to do with treating the ills of humanity
I listen to you but I am getting tire of your vitriol and biting of others in this movement that is so essential to our progress and to our survival. You are right, you are not perfect, so quit talking about others as if you are. It’s painful to your followers such as me.
Don’t be an idiot, he is shining light on matters we need to be informed about - as fairly as one could. Stick your head back in the sand and be content there.
Excuse me? You seem to have a similar style to that of Alexander’s, which I find offensive. This touches on my point. That kind of uncivil discourse is not helpful to any movement promoting humanistic values and free expression or the search for truth. Otherwise we are behaving in ways too similar to those who we are countering. Maturity, patience and open mindedness are much more useful.
Reply to Christine B. You don’t have very good interpretive skills. I am completely as your last sentence states.
The biggest reason humanity is where it is - total devastation, is because most people go through life NOT PAYING ATTENTION to ANYTHING. Now more than ever we need millions of voices speaking out against corruption. This is Dr Paul’s site, not ours. he is the “host”…he has invited a discussion. If you don’t like his style or character of person - go somewhere else. He tells you this in his opening story lines.
Those of us who come here do so to learn and contribute to that. You took the ad hominem path and chose to attack his person - not - the issue up for discussion on the table. I am in agreeance with you, I also don’t like foul language or vile behaviour from anyone. Dr Paul is a fiery personality… but it’s his posting site and I for one am glad he raises his voice to shine light on issues we need to know about. So because of my maturity, patience and OPEN MINDEDNESS - am able to be here at this table of discussion and make discovery and contribute.
From Ground News Blindspotter on Stephanie Brail:
"68% of the news @StephanieBrail interacts with on Twitter Leans Left."
Not sure I'd trust her credibility, Dr. Alexander. She just might toss a truck at your head when you're playing in that sandbox you play in. JUST KIDDING!!!
I call it "Simone Gold Derangement Syndrome".
Disclaimer: I was the person who provided the link to the court document and commented about consultant fees and expenses (used to be a consultant myself).
Brail learned about the very existence of Dr. Gold about 5 minutes before writing about her from "internet research" and whatever she dug out of her own ass (no, Dr. Gold doesn't charge anything for speaking - how?, and every donation collected goes to the nonprofit), but skipping facts that didn't fit the spin. Seriously, I don't know where this fascination about her writing comes from... Brail proceeded to be deranged with my church (on the other side of the country!) who hosted a talk by Dr. Gold in February and with people who came to listen and ask questions, and express their opinion. So, now we can't even ask questions, right? And can't have our own knowledge and opinion about the situation. The internet is going to tell you what to think.
Dr. Gold previously visited our community and is well liked. Our nonprofit leaders commented that Dr. Gold has made peanuts all combined and assumed compared to the cut professional fundraisers charge. Fundraising is hard and she raised a lot. There is a difference between being well paid for making a lot of $$ for your employer and being paid $20K/month for doing no job. Incidentally, a local activist recently struck a conversation about Dr. Gold and revealed that she helped him a lot providing resources 2 years ago. Then another person in our small group mentioned she also had used help from AFLDS. AFLDS didn't brag about any of this work behind the scenes or visiting suffering communities like ours in the lockdown. The real world is not about some bs "internet research" and imaginary "arguments" and creating narratives.
I'm going to disable this thread. Internet dwellers with SGDS, don't bother, I won't read you. Learn to live in the reality and meet people in person.
Oh my, is this the same "Julia" who came onto my Substack months ago and started harassing me there in defense of Gold?
"Brail proceeded to be deranged with my church (on the other side of the country!) who hosted a talk by Dr. Gold in February and with people who came to listen and ask questions, and express their opinion." Huh? What the heck are you talking about? I think you are confusing me with Reinette Senum...
https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/americas-frontline-doctors-oversight
"Fundraising is hard and she raised a lot." My first job out of college was as a development assistant for Big Sisters of Los Angeles, so my full-time job was administrative support for fundraising as well as helping coordinate big gala fundraising events with celebrities. The kind of fundraising Gold does isn't "hard." She's the celebrity face of AFLDS. She's not doing the hard work behind the scenes. BTW...my salary was...wait for it...$23,000 PER YEAR.
Please, stop excusing Gold's big salary and "expenses." When you start a non-profit, you're supposed to be paid less. Otherwise, set up a for profit company. Yeesh.
Yes, I totally came "harassing" you with the court document you used for the post.
Thread muted. I don't engage with manipulators and narcissists.
I just joined your substack today as a paid member as I felt I should being that I read every single article you post every day since joining a week ago as a free member. You are answering all of my questions. Everything that seemed 'off' for months now, you gave me the inside look which validated my suspicions. Thank you. BTW, if not for Dr. Tenpenny's clinic , I would not have started watching her videos. (binging on those too!) And I would not have watched your recent interview with her and I would not have found your amazing Substack. I KNEW things were wrong with Malone and then my ears perked up when Stew warned people of him but, I remained skeptical. Then later seeing Malone on Epoch sliding in slanderous (and childish) accusations about Risch and then discrediting the amazing work by Stew Peters on Bannons Warroom, I knew Stew was on to something . Malone just slides in these little seeds of doubt about the people doing some real heavy lifting and research. But when Stew mentioned Gold I did not believe it. How could I? An accomplished Doctor and Lawyer - she could never be that stupid or greedy. I have a lot of more reading to do. There are more answers to my many questions yet to be learned. Thank you for all you do.
Dr. Paul, my money is on Dr. Gold. This whole thing stinks of a big pharma attack to destroy their competition. Dr. Gold just spent 4 month in jail for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. She was targeted by the Demorats and the CIA. Without Dr. Gold as the front person would there be a AFLDS organization??? And speaking of Malone, he is like a ground hog, only coming out of his hole to eat. He knew the dangers of mRNA and he said nothing UNTIL, the shit hit the fan. He is as guilt as the rest of the crooks.
I assure you, I am not pro-Big Pharma and you can read a ton of my writing since 2021 as well as review my holistic health credentials to see I'm not a fan of pharmaceutical companies. A few people I have interviewed (some who worked for her) believe Gold is controlled opposition. I can't say for sure but she's at least messy with her finances at minimum.
Well, I can see why this 'not for profit' is not making any profit.
Way to go Stephanie!! I am still a fan!
You are a kind man. Thank you for posting this.