Stroke with COVID infection after mRNA technology based gene injection (Pfizer, Moderna etc.) highlights urgent need for Spike protein detoxification to reduce amount of spike post vaccine
Stroke with COVID infection after mRNA technology based gene injection (Pfizer, Moderna etc.) highlights urgent need for Spike protein detoxification to reduce amount of spike post vaccine
Nahab's: Those with concurrent COVID infection within 21 days post-vaccination had an increased risk of ischemic (OR = 8.00, 95% CI: 4.18, 15.31) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR =5.23, 95% CI: 1.11, 24.64)
Why are they even being allowed to keep using this and giving these injections? Does everyone want to damage their body and die? Why aren't these insane pushers of this death shot in prison or worse?
Paul Alexander’s continued insistence on using this phony “mRNA gene technology” designator that EVERY molecular biology graduate student knows is complete and utter bullshit is inexplicable.
Why?
Because he’s a critic of the viral RNA products and “mRNA gene technology” is the phony name Covid, Inc came up with to hide the fact that they’re just using 40 year old cell transfection reagents in a completely illegitimate off-brand manner to infect people with viral genes just like a virus and at LEAST the same immunological consequences of a viral infection.
Continuing to let the malefactors set the terms used to describe their artificial viruses almost gives the appearance of having been told by the manufacturers, “Hey, criticize it all you want so long as
A. You use OUR term to describe it, and
B. You tell no one in the simplest possible terms what it actually is: widespread, repeated infections by artificial viruses to initiate repeated multi-systemic innate immune inflammatory attacks for no good reason at all.
Or the almost idiotic use of the term “gene therapy.” Anyone who knows what “gene therapy” was conceived to be, starting many decades ago, knows that there is nothing in the use of viral RNA products that even remotely resembles that. Instead it is the absurd multiple use of the fallacy of the undistributed middle term together with the fallacy of emphasis when the same word is used in two different ways, hoping the casual observer won’t notice the verbal sleight of hand and will just accept the conclusion.
“Gene therapy” means that there is a type of therapy that will either overcome the effects of existing defective genes or will be able to insert a copy of a normal gene, the output of which will be able to offset either the lack of a normal gene product or the presence of a defective gene product. It also includes the concept of a small interfering mRNA molecule designed to block the translation of a defective mRNA gene into a defective disease or disorder-causing protein.
The viral RNA products do NONE of these things to offset a disease process inherent in the host.
The viral RNA products, instead, by mimicking a viral infection in the replication phase, INDUCE a disease state that leads to multi-systemic innate immune inflammatory attacks on the product-compromised cells.
There is NOTHING therapeutic about that.
And because the introduction of a pathogenic gene where it does not belong is NOT gene therapy.
You can see just how moronically-contrived that use of “gene therapy” is by this simple comparison:
A. A virus infects your healthy ACE2-expressing cells with its viral genes in ONE organ system, the respiratory system, and brings down innate immune inflammatory hell on all the virally-compromised cells. It’s rightfully understood to be disease.
B. The viral RNA products infect your healthy cells in multiple organ systems again and again and again and again with viral genes and bring down EXACTLY the same or worse innate immune inflammatory hell on all the virally-compromised cells regardless of their location or cell type, and they’re called “gene therapy” or “mRNA gene technology.”
That anyone is willing to accept such a contradiction is evidence of a reason that, for one or another wholly inadequacy reason, has been undermined.
Either ALL viral infections are “gene therapy” or all viral RNA products are artificial viral infections.
For God’s sake, come back to reality and describe what is actually going on.
Do these spike protein treatment work if it’s been a year since post vaxx ??
Why are they even being allowed to keep using this and giving these injections? Does everyone want to damage their body and die? Why aren't these insane pushers of this death shot in prison or worse?
Paul Alexander’s continued insistence on using this phony “mRNA gene technology” designator that EVERY molecular biology graduate student knows is complete and utter bullshit is inexplicable.
Why?
Because he’s a critic of the viral RNA products and “mRNA gene technology” is the phony name Covid, Inc came up with to hide the fact that they’re just using 40 year old cell transfection reagents in a completely illegitimate off-brand manner to infect people with viral genes just like a virus and at LEAST the same immunological consequences of a viral infection.
Continuing to let the malefactors set the terms used to describe their artificial viruses almost gives the appearance of having been told by the manufacturers, “Hey, criticize it all you want so long as
A. You use OUR term to describe it, and
B. You tell no one in the simplest possible terms what it actually is: widespread, repeated infections by artificial viruses to initiate repeated multi-systemic innate immune inflammatory attacks for no good reason at all.
Or the almost idiotic use of the term “gene therapy.” Anyone who knows what “gene therapy” was conceived to be, starting many decades ago, knows that there is nothing in the use of viral RNA products that even remotely resembles that. Instead it is the absurd multiple use of the fallacy of the undistributed middle term together with the fallacy of emphasis when the same word is used in two different ways, hoping the casual observer won’t notice the verbal sleight of hand and will just accept the conclusion.
“Gene therapy” means that there is a type of therapy that will either overcome the effects of existing defective genes or will be able to insert a copy of a normal gene, the output of which will be able to offset either the lack of a normal gene product or the presence of a defective gene product. It also includes the concept of a small interfering mRNA molecule designed to block the translation of a defective mRNA gene into a defective disease or disorder-causing protein.
The viral RNA products do NONE of these things to offset a disease process inherent in the host.
The viral RNA products, instead, by mimicking a viral infection in the replication phase, INDUCE a disease state that leads to multi-systemic innate immune inflammatory attacks on the product-compromised cells.
There is NOTHING therapeutic about that.
And because the introduction of a pathogenic gene where it does not belong is NOT gene therapy.
You can see just how moronically-contrived that use of “gene therapy” is by this simple comparison:
A. A virus infects your healthy ACE2-expressing cells with its viral genes in ONE organ system, the respiratory system, and brings down innate immune inflammatory hell on all the virally-compromised cells. It’s rightfully understood to be disease.
B. The viral RNA products infect your healthy cells in multiple organ systems again and again and again and again with viral genes and bring down EXACTLY the same or worse innate immune inflammatory hell on all the virally-compromised cells regardless of their location or cell type, and they’re called “gene therapy” or “mRNA gene technology.”
That anyone is willing to accept such a contradiction is evidence of a reason that, for one or another wholly inadequacy reason, has been undermined.
Either ALL viral infections are “gene therapy” or all viral RNA products are artificial viral infections.
For God’s sake, come back to reality and describe what is actually going on.
I always thought gene therapy was used in an ironic sense, as therapy suggests something beneficial.