Sub-variants XBB 1.5 seems on its way out to be supplanted by likely XBB.1.16 (Arcturus), XBB 2.3, & EG.5; so the real question is, why are they bringing new vaccine when 100% they will be ineffective
Sub-variants XBB 1.5 seems on its way out to be supplanted by likely XBB.1.16 (Arcturus), XBB 2.3, & EG.5; so the real question is, why are they bringing new vaccine when 100% they will be ineffective
be ineffective, will not sterilize virus (stop infection, replication, transmission); this is all utter chaos & dangerous for these criminals at Pfizer, Moderna, FDA etc. know they cause new variants
Well I think most of us know the answer to that question Paul as an effective vaccine (if that's what you want to continue to call it), was never their intention in the first place.
I have a different question: why are we talking about any "vaccine ", aka gene modifying injection killing and maiming people, who is still lining up for this hoax?
Paul, you ask "why are they bringing new vaccine when 100% they will be ineffective"
This is the question you should have asked back in the beginning in March 2020...there should NEVER have been a vaccine response to this purported 'Covid emergency'...
I raised the matter in my BMJ rapid response published on 25 March 2020...where were members of the scientific and medical establishment then?
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
Dear Editor
If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?
According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1]
Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]
In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]
This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.
In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]
Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?
This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.
The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.
References:
1. WHO Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19) - Should I worry about COVID-19. 9 March 2020.
2. Elisabeth Mahase. Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260 000 potential deaths. BMJ2020;368:m1089
3. Heidi Larson. Vaccine safety in the next decade. Why we need new modes of trust building? WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, 2-3 December 2019.
4. John P.A. Ioannidis. A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data. STAT, 17 March 2020.
5. Coronavirus: 60% of UK population need to become infected so country can build 'herd immunity', government's chief scientist says. Independent, 13 March 2020.
6. The UK backs away from "herd immunity" coronavirus proposal amid blowback. Vox, 15 March 2020.
7. Expert comments about herd immunity. Science Media Centre, 13 March 2020.
Competing interests: No competing interests
25 March 2020
Elizabeth M Hart
Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
The pivot guy was Ferguson, If I recall. UK CFR asset that worked fake numbers in any direction ordered; has a huge track record beginning with mad cow disease ruining lives of many and killing many beautiful cows...for no reason other than to force the cattle guys to buy vaccines for herds.
That's right Scout, Neil Ferguson and his Imperial College Report 9, dated 16 March 2020, which recommended suppression of the virus (aka restrictions and lockdowns) "until a vaccine becomes available".
What Report 9 failed to mention is that Neil Ferguson is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, arguably the world's biggest vaccine promoter.
Bill's everywhere when jabs are the fake solution; he's Asperger, I suspect, but that's the only aspect about Bill that is unique, as he behaves at the same level as all teens in terms of never having a thought.... Except for themselves. Just noticed your header above about vaccines; use this concept as it hits the target: Vaccines require politically CORRECTED science, or something like that. :)
Oh for the love of God! Why in the holy hell are people still talking about vaccines? Viruses? Is no one awake yet? This whole shit show is man made by our military using our taxes to have us line up for our own suicide! Good grief, wake the hell up already!!!!!!!
This cannot be a serious question after all this time! We/you know from the Pfizer papers and whistleblowers like Michael Yeadon and comments made by Fauci and his cabal that this is their game; it is their playbook. Non-stop hysteria to sell toxic/harmful drugs that make people weaker with so many deaths from them. They hysteria is needed now especially to prime the public for the alleged need of a One World Treaty under the distant, inaccessbile WHO.
They do it because they don't know any better. But here is another version: they went too far, and they can't go back. They can't go out and tell everyone they were wrong about the shots. They need to continue their strategy otherwise people will wake up and start to rebel. And that's too risky for them. They see less risk in continuing their lies than telling the truth.
The problem is that the vaxxed make us sick through shedding. Also, we're all sick regardless. Chem trails have been dropping most of the vaccine ingredients for almost 30 years. DOD changes the formula, though. I recall when thousands were complaining about morgellens, however that's spelled, about 2005 or so.
Paul, everyone now knows that the vaccines are fake; All vaccines are dangerous for healthy since the roll out about 1880 and all know that natural immunity works best for healthy. For people with prior health problems, their problem is that all vaccines from now up to the start are dirty, untested, no long term testing, have caused the diseases, and often, that the very vaccines are marketed as insurance against the bug. Fear is the motivation. Watch the ancient film, Old Yeller. The beloved K9 went berserk from rabies. SV40 caused bugs, autism began with vaccines,
But ONE vaccine was clean, early on, Ender's Measles, about 1962 or so. He grew the bugs on chicken egg yolks. It was him that pointed out that method that gave Sabin and Salk the monkey bugs-on-kidneys idea and us with brain, lung and blood cancers years later.
Your article BEGS the question, 'What group is being targeted?' All fixed, Paul! :)
I think the covid experience has demonstrated more clearly than anything before what a house of cards immunology and vaccines are built on. No dissenters are allowed into their world and they all talk the same message which is not normal, true growth only happens with genuine open discourse. Instead we have a closed shop that will ruthlessly punish and shut down anyone who dissents.
They keep bringing them out because they're a cash cow for them and our lives mean shit to them.
Yeah, people paying to get sicker or die.
Well I think most of us know the answer to that question Paul as an effective vaccine (if that's what you want to continue to call it), was never their intention in the first place.
I have a different question: why are we talking about any "vaccine ", aka gene modifying injection killing and maiming people, who is still lining up for this hoax?
Unfortunately, more than I’d care to think about. You cannot fix brainwashed and Stupid.
Paul, you ask "why are they bringing new vaccine when 100% they will be ineffective"
This is the question you should have asked back in the beginning in March 2020...there should NEVER have been a vaccine response to this purported 'Covid emergency'...
I raised the matter in my BMJ rapid response published on 25 March 2020...where were members of the scientific and medical establishment then?
See my BMJ rapid response below... Accessible via this link: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
Dear Editor
If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?
According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1]
Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]
In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]
This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.
In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]
Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?
This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.
The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.
References:
1. WHO Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19) - Should I worry about COVID-19. 9 March 2020.
2. Elisabeth Mahase. Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260 000 potential deaths. BMJ2020;368:m1089
3. Heidi Larson. Vaccine safety in the next decade. Why we need new modes of trust building? WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, 2-3 December 2019.
4. John P.A. Ioannidis. A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data. STAT, 17 March 2020.
5. Coronavirus: 60% of UK population need to become infected so country can build 'herd immunity', government's chief scientist says. Independent, 13 March 2020.
6. The UK backs away from "herd immunity" coronavirus proposal amid blowback. Vox, 15 March 2020.
7. Expert comments about herd immunity. Science Media Centre, 13 March 2020.
Competing interests: No competing interests
25 March 2020
Elizabeth M Hart
Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
Adelaide, Australia
The pivot guy was Ferguson, If I recall. UK CFR asset that worked fake numbers in any direction ordered; has a huge track record beginning with mad cow disease ruining lives of many and killing many beautiful cows...for no reason other than to force the cattle guys to buy vaccines for herds.
That's right Scout, Neil Ferguson and his Imperial College Report 9, dated 16 March 2020, which recommended suppression of the virus (aka restrictions and lockdowns) "until a vaccine becomes available".
What Report 9 failed to mention is that Neil Ferguson is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, arguably the world's biggest vaccine promoter.
References:
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/mrc-gida/2020-03-16-COVID19-Report-9.pdf
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/971151/Covid-19_SAGE_register_of_participants__interests.pdf
Bill's everywhere when jabs are the fake solution; he's Asperger, I suspect, but that's the only aspect about Bill that is unique, as he behaves at the same level as all teens in terms of never having a thought.... Except for themselves. Just noticed your header above about vaccines; use this concept as it hits the target: Vaccines require politically CORRECTED science, or something like that. :)
Oh for the love of God! Why in the holy hell are people still talking about vaccines? Viruses? Is no one awake yet? This whole shit show is man made by our military using our taxes to have us line up for our own suicide! Good grief, wake the hell up already!!!!!!!
All of these ‘variants’ will never end. It’s the nature of the virion to constantly change. A fool’s errand to seek to stop it or even track it.
How do we even know the variant tracking data is clean and legit?
What a circus.
Doesn't matter. The bioweapons are not designed for virus' as the entire program of corona is a hoax.
you’re right—nothing matters 🙄
Not a circus, a Mass Democide!
Both can be true simultaneously…
This cannot be a serious question after all this time! We/you know from the Pfizer papers and whistleblowers like Michael Yeadon and comments made by Fauci and his cabal that this is their game; it is their playbook. Non-stop hysteria to sell toxic/harmful drugs that make people weaker with so many deaths from them. They hysteria is needed now especially to prime the public for the alleged need of a One World Treaty under the distant, inaccessbile WHO.
They do it because they don't know any better. But here is another version: they went too far, and they can't go back. They can't go out and tell everyone they were wrong about the shots. They need to continue their strategy otherwise people will wake up and start to rebel. And that's too risky for them. They see less risk in continuing their lies than telling the truth.
Fake variants in some computer algorithm, not in the biosphere. Where are the real samples of all these viruses? Up gates's butt doubt.
At this stage, let natural selection take place....if fool's are still lining up for these death shots ...so be it!
The problem is that the vaxxed make us sick through shedding. Also, we're all sick regardless. Chem trails have been dropping most of the vaccine ingredients for almost 30 years. DOD changes the formula, though. I recall when thousands were complaining about morgellens, however that's spelled, about 2005 or so.
why do they keep spitting out new injections? because round #1 demonstrated the profitability of stupidity.
Paul, everyone now knows that the vaccines are fake; All vaccines are dangerous for healthy since the roll out about 1880 and all know that natural immunity works best for healthy. For people with prior health problems, their problem is that all vaccines from now up to the start are dirty, untested, no long term testing, have caused the diseases, and often, that the very vaccines are marketed as insurance against the bug. Fear is the motivation. Watch the ancient film, Old Yeller. The beloved K9 went berserk from rabies. SV40 caused bugs, autism began with vaccines,
But ONE vaccine was clean, early on, Ender's Measles, about 1962 or so. He grew the bugs on chicken egg yolks. It was him that pointed out that method that gave Sabin and Salk the monkey bugs-on-kidneys idea and us with brain, lung and blood cancers years later.
Your article BEGS the question, 'What group is being targeted?' All fixed, Paul! :)
Keep an eye on what's happening in Japan. Virulence may be on the rise.
I think the covid experience has demonstrated more clearly than anything before what a house of cards immunology and vaccines are built on. No dissenters are allowed into their world and they all talk the same message which is not normal, true growth only happens with genuine open discourse. Instead we have a closed shop that will ruthlessly punish and shut down anyone who dissents.
It's all very "effective" for depopulation and sterilization.
It is the money!
They can stick there useless jabs up there ass