That was the key, a positive result with fraud PCR (used to manufacture a fake fraud non 0.05% IFR pandemic which was an EMERGENCY if any) did not mean you were INFECTED (SAGE gets it fully), nor

INFECTIOUS or that it was lethal pathological & that you would become severely ill or die; it never did! SAGE gets it & it was all a lie, COVID was a PCR manufactured LIE & it toppled 45, see my stack

Person Who Understands the Question

Person Who Understands the Question

What Was the PCR Test Even Designed to do and to what Plausible End?

‘It’s a bloody good question, Sage. I don’t think you’ve really elicited a good answer yet. I haven’t given you one.

I genuinely don’t think your original question was rhetorical but in practise, I think that it is.

There is no legitimate use of the technique of PCR, configured to make, in the opinion of the manufacturer, a test. There’s nothing being tested. If there’s ONE copy of the target sequence in the sample & you are able to amplify it one trillion times (roughly the notional effect of 40 cycles of amplification, where each cycle should double the amount of copies) you’ll easily be able to see it in fluorescence.

And that means absolutely nothing. Everything is contained in anything, pretty. I recall people calculating how likely it is that you just breathed in one molecule of oxygen that at some time had been in a famous persons lungs.

You could have one broken piece of RNA. So what? It doesn’t even mean you’re infected or ever had been. It certainly doesn’t mean you’re infectious. Or going to get sick. It’s utterly meaningless.

They never include proper controls (known negative & known positive samples). Even if the principle was sound, the lack of controls blows it up.

Remember also we don’t know what it is that these short sequences that were told are in “SARS-CoV-2” really are. We can be sure they’re lying. They’ve lied about absolutely everything else. Unlikely this is true, then. So what is being detected? No idea & no way to know.’