The Vostok Ice Core sample in East Antarctica; the data from the ice core over 400,000 years of data indicate the warming nutballs have it backward; I give the key graph & you tell me what do you see
The Vostok Ice Core sample in East Antarctica; the data from the ice core over 400,000 years of data indicate the warming nutballs have it backward; I give the key graph & you tell me what do you see
I think the many articles and books I read exposing the fraud behind the climate scare (years BEFORE covid) really helped prepare me for the way “science” has been (mis)used to push this scandemic. It was clear from early 2020 what was really going on. My hope and prayer is that enough ppl will finally open their eyes to the fact that none of this is even remotely supported by actual (real deal) science. Thank you SO much for all you’re doing to help make that happen!🙏🏼♥️
I wouldn't say that this "disproves" the link between CO2 and warming though. You have to consider all kinds of things that complicate the picture. Examples include: orbital changes, initial warming that melts permafrosts that leads to a release in greenhouse gases, the ability of the oceans to absorb CO2, the rise of mountain ranges which increases silicate weathering, which draws down CO2 from the atmosphere. Don't get me wrong- I think the media panics and acts much more certain about how catastrophic or certain global warming is than they should... In particular I think it's ridiculous when media cites modeling studies that claim that there's going to be some tipping point by year X. There is so much uncertainty in this area- it's not an easy thing to model at all. I also think that there are actors out there that would be more than happy to use global warming as an excuse to exert more centralized control over people. But that doesn't mean there isn't a causal link between CO2 and global warming; it's just not always in a neat fashion, because there are many other factors at play.
CO2 is good and always has been...Humanity would cease to exist without the presence of CO2...
Rain forest BAD...Grass GOOD! Grass grows faster than trees and therefore converts gases into harmless compounds and liquids much faster than trees...!
You need to study chemistry and science before spouting climate change dogma...!
Of course a certain level CO2 is good. That doesn't mean that more is better. And I hate to wave credentials around, but your comment was insulting by insinuating that I "need to study chemistry and science." I did a PhD where I studied physiology and biochemistry of marine algae. Of course algae need CO2. And yeah, I also studied biogeochemistry and oceanography while I was at it. I've met people who worked on climate modeling. They will be the first to tell you that modeling warming is very difficult and that there's huge uncertainty. Did you actually read what I said? What I wrote was not "climate change dogma." It's actually a nuanced opinion. I said that there are many factors at play. Look them up. Look up how the earth's orbit affects temperature or how silicate weathering affects CO2 levels or how the ocean absorbs CO2 or how biogeochemical cycles change and affect primary production (carbon fixation from photosynthetic organisms like algae and trees). Also I don't know what you mean by "rain forest bad," but no, they are not bad. Not even sure where you are getting that from or if I'm misunderstanding you.
Yes that is what this study really shows that the mechanism of historical climate change is more complex that many have assumed. I would say it is not particularly relevant to the current period of AGW. The thing that bothers me, as no doubt Dr. Alexander also, is the use of climate change hysteria and fear porn to justify more onerous assaults on our wealth, free speech & human rights. The CC fear porn is being promoted by the same bunch who are promoting the Covid Plandemic hysteria.
Rather than nutcases, most of them are devious money-grubbing grifters who could care less about the suffering they cause to humanity, as long as they get lot's cash for their betrayal.
The U.S. working with Russia abut climate...That's what prevents war...!
You know, I'd almost rather live in Russia when I realize what American is going to be like in a year or two...Marxists, climate change radicals, unhealthy compromised vaccinated extremists, un-checked antifa thugs, militant police forces, BLM revolutionaries and lying CDC, FDA and spying government agencies…
The loss of our perceived Constitutional freedoms is going to be very traumatic...The truck convoy may be the last ha rah for Americans...!
You Go Dr. Alexander...You stand for what is true and authentic and as a result have many supporters...!
Other evidence has shown that temperatures dont rise or fall evenly over the whole planet at once. So the temperature rise could have preceded CO2 rise in Vostok area while staying colder elsewhere.
along the lines of the Convoy, it's clear that Left/Right isn't as important as a common cause. Carbon credits? Just outrageous, especially considering all we've gone through over the past two years and where they wanted to take us with vaccine passports. Looking from a political standpoint, I think its fair to say, in general, the Right is far more close to nature in their lives than the Left. I think all can come together for clean air, clean water, getting harmful chemicals out of our food supply, and on and on. This is an area where the Right can win over the Left to a cause which is a holistic view of the environment and completely devoid of the globalist agenda. My 2 cents, a nickle really with inflation.
Climatism is a fraud for control, as are the frauds of Safeism, Healthism and Racism.
The Four Horsemen of the UNEP apocalypse.
The UNFCCC definitions of 'climate change' cannot be falsified without expunging humanity from the face of Gaia. They are predicated upon, 'any direct and indirect anthropogenic influence on atmospheric composition and land usage'.
'Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined. The differences in temperatures between all records which are approximately a century apart were determined, after any trends in the data had been removed. The differences were close to normally distributed. The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27C. (Lloyd 2015)
The signal of anthropogenic global warming has not emerged from the natural
background noise. Climate variability is an entirely natural and massively dominant atmospheric engine with a trivial climate sensitivity approximating 1. Climate change is LOCAL not global, and is an obvious political ploy backed by grasping corporate globalists.
Thank temporary warming against a backdrop of millennial cooling en route to the next ice age for giving us a 15% greening in the last 25 yrs, greater crop yields and greater prosperity. But for now, hunker down for the Grand Solar Minimum.
I have noticed the Dr. A puts out quite a few posts a day , and much of the posts are repetitive . This repetitive and multiple postings starts to become draining to check if there is anything relevant and knew . And generally when someone says too much it devalues what they say .
And when starting to explore other social territory of controversy like climate change denial , it puts everything else into context . Like this is not his field of expertise and that will be attacked.
I expect in a few weeks that Dr A will be upset as somewhat writes a hit piece about him . And I can point out that he is doing everything to provide all the content to do so . It’s not well thought out and will reflect poorly on all vaccine hesitancy
That ain't climate change denial. That's like saying anyone who opposes forced vaccination of an experimental drug is an ANTI-VAXXER. He is publishing very interesting scientific data which does imply that in the historical record CO2 rise is caused by temperature rise, not the other way round. That in no way is "climate change denial" it just means the mechanism involved in climate change is more complex than previously assumed (as many top CC scientists have stated). I doubt it has much significance regarding the current period of AGW. I would say the real truth is that Dr. Alexander is not a climate change alarmist. He knows that climate change fear porn is used by the same bunch pushing the Covid fear porn, for the same ultimate goal i.e. Wealth & Power for the Ruling Class at the expense of the 99%.
The point is not whether the climate argument is bogus . The point is that for Paul to post it puts unnecessary context into defamation potential . Watch how like fools people are attacking me , when totally misunderstanding my point .
Pointing out that the powers-that-be lie at every turn is hardly hurting Dr. Paul's credibility. That anyone still thinks, "Oh, they lied about everything with COVID, but they usually tell the truth," is what I find remarkable.
Glad you understand that this war isn't just about Covid.
I think the many articles and books I read exposing the fraud behind the climate scare (years BEFORE covid) really helped prepare me for the way “science” has been (mis)used to push this scandemic. It was clear from early 2020 what was really going on. My hope and prayer is that enough ppl will finally open their eyes to the fact that none of this is even remotely supported by actual (real deal) science. Thank you SO much for all you’re doing to help make that happen!🙏🏼♥️
I wouldn't say that this "disproves" the link between CO2 and warming though. You have to consider all kinds of things that complicate the picture. Examples include: orbital changes, initial warming that melts permafrosts that leads to a release in greenhouse gases, the ability of the oceans to absorb CO2, the rise of mountain ranges which increases silicate weathering, which draws down CO2 from the atmosphere. Don't get me wrong- I think the media panics and acts much more certain about how catastrophic or certain global warming is than they should... In particular I think it's ridiculous when media cites modeling studies that claim that there's going to be some tipping point by year X. There is so much uncertainty in this area- it's not an easy thing to model at all. I also think that there are actors out there that would be more than happy to use global warming as an excuse to exert more centralized control over people. But that doesn't mean there isn't a causal link between CO2 and global warming; it's just not always in a neat fashion, because there are many other factors at play.
CO2 is good and always has been...Humanity would cease to exist without the presence of CO2...
Rain forest BAD...Grass GOOD! Grass grows faster than trees and therefore converts gases into harmless compounds and liquids much faster than trees...!
You need to study chemistry and science before spouting climate change dogma...!
Of course a certain level CO2 is good. That doesn't mean that more is better. And I hate to wave credentials around, but your comment was insulting by insinuating that I "need to study chemistry and science." I did a PhD where I studied physiology and biochemistry of marine algae. Of course algae need CO2. And yeah, I also studied biogeochemistry and oceanography while I was at it. I've met people who worked on climate modeling. They will be the first to tell you that modeling warming is very difficult and that there's huge uncertainty. Did you actually read what I said? What I wrote was not "climate change dogma." It's actually a nuanced opinion. I said that there are many factors at play. Look them up. Look up how the earth's orbit affects temperature or how silicate weathering affects CO2 levels or how the ocean absorbs CO2 or how biogeochemical cycles change and affect primary production (carbon fixation from photosynthetic organisms like algae and trees). Also I don't know what you mean by "rain forest bad," but no, they are not bad. Not even sure where you are getting that from or if I'm misunderstanding you.
Yes that is what this study really shows that the mechanism of historical climate change is more complex that many have assumed. I would say it is not particularly relevant to the current period of AGW. The thing that bothers me, as no doubt Dr. Alexander also, is the use of climate change hysteria and fear porn to justify more onerous assaults on our wealth, free speech & human rights. The CC fear porn is being promoted by the same bunch who are promoting the Covid Plandemic hysteria.
Exactly...!
Fascinating. ...
The "Warming Nutballs" are clearly demonstrating that they are dumber than a bag of rocks !!
The correct term is Climate Change Alarmists.
Actually, "Warming Nutcases" is better, unless someone can find a better one...!
Rather than nutcases, most of them are devious money-grubbing grifters who could care less about the suffering they cause to humanity, as long as they get lot's cash for their betrayal.
Dr. Alexander will you ever cease to amaze us? Please don’t stop💕💕
The U.S. working with Russia abut climate...That's what prevents war...!
You know, I'd almost rather live in Russia when I realize what American is going to be like in a year or two...Marxists, climate change radicals, unhealthy compromised vaccinated extremists, un-checked antifa thugs, militant police forces, BLM revolutionaries and lying CDC, FDA and spying government agencies…
The loss of our perceived Constitutional freedoms is going to be very traumatic...The truck convoy may be the last ha rah for Americans...!
You Go Dr. Alexander...You stand for what is true and authentic and as a result have many supporters...!
Prayers,
Dr. Donnie Smith
Global warming is another way to control.
Other evidence has shown that temperatures dont rise or fall evenly over the whole planet at once. So the temperature rise could have preceded CO2 rise in Vostok area while staying colder elsewhere.
I think you are confusing the science with the, oh wait a minute, the science.
along the lines of the Convoy, it's clear that Left/Right isn't as important as a common cause. Carbon credits? Just outrageous, especially considering all we've gone through over the past two years and where they wanted to take us with vaccine passports. Looking from a political standpoint, I think its fair to say, in general, the Right is far more close to nature in their lives than the Left. I think all can come together for clean air, clean water, getting harmful chemicals out of our food supply, and on and on. This is an area where the Right can win over the Left to a cause which is a holistic view of the environment and completely devoid of the globalist agenda. My 2 cents, a nickle really with inflation.
Well known, well established!
Climatism is a fraud for control, as are the frauds of Safeism, Healthism and Racism.
The Four Horsemen of the UNEP apocalypse.
The UNFCCC definitions of 'climate change' cannot be falsified without expunging humanity from the face of Gaia. They are predicated upon, 'any direct and indirect anthropogenic influence on atmospheric composition and land usage'.
'Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined. The differences in temperatures between all records which are approximately a century apart were determined, after any trends in the data had been removed. The differences were close to normally distributed. The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27C. (Lloyd 2015)
The signal of anthropogenic global warming has not emerged from the natural
background noise. Climate variability is an entirely natural and massively dominant atmospheric engine with a trivial climate sensitivity approximating 1. Climate change is LOCAL not global, and is an obvious political ploy backed by grasping corporate globalists.
Thank temporary warming against a backdrop of millennial cooling en route to the next ice age for giving us a 15% greening in the last 25 yrs, greater crop yields and greater prosperity. But for now, hunker down for the Grand Solar Minimum.
Oh Paul are you going to do every possible ti ruin your credibility ?
Yes, his credibility with the liars, the corrupt, the evil, the genocide specialists and the bioterrorists is definitely low.
I have noticed the Dr. A puts out quite a few posts a day , and much of the posts are repetitive . This repetitive and multiple postings starts to become draining to check if there is anything relevant and knew . And generally when someone says too much it devalues what they say .
And when starting to explore other social territory of controversy like climate change denial , it puts everything else into context . Like this is not his field of expertise and that will be attacked.
I expect in a few weeks that Dr A will be upset as somewhat writes a hit piece about him . And I can point out that he is doing everything to provide all the content to do so . It’s not well thought out and will reflect poorly on all vaccine hesitancy
That ain't climate change denial. That's like saying anyone who opposes forced vaccination of an experimental drug is an ANTI-VAXXER. He is publishing very interesting scientific data which does imply that in the historical record CO2 rise is caused by temperature rise, not the other way round. That in no way is "climate change denial" it just means the mechanism involved in climate change is more complex than previously assumed (as many top CC scientists have stated). I doubt it has much significance regarding the current period of AGW. I would say the real truth is that Dr. Alexander is not a climate change alarmist. He knows that climate change fear porn is used by the same bunch pushing the Covid fear porn, for the same ultimate goal i.e. Wealth & Power for the Ruling Class at the expense of the 99%.
The point is not whether the climate argument is bogus . The point is that for Paul to post it puts unnecessary context into defamation potential . Watch how like fools people are attacking me , when totally misunderstanding my point .
Talking about climate change gives his opponents another avenue to attack him. Bad strategy.
Thanks , that’s my point
Pointing out that the powers-that-be lie at every turn is hardly hurting Dr. Paul's credibility. That anyone still thinks, "Oh, they lied about everything with COVID, but they usually tell the truth," is what I find remarkable.
You must be lost...But hopefully be blocked...!
Why would you suggest I be blocked? Such an idea seems a bit off , it certainly does not come across as being open to debate or discussion .
Thanks — but Dude I totally need to recover from brain whiplash now!