12 Comments

That the side which supposedly reveres science plays ignorant about the fact that life begins at conception is par for the course. It's time for us to stand up and protect science from the hypocrites who twist it for their ideology.

Expand full comment

Congratulations and thank you for your courage to speak up for the lives of the most vulnerable of all - the babies in the womb! God bless!

Expand full comment

I am a woman and the right to chose people use that deflection that you can't speak to the right to life if your a man is ridiculous don't buy into it,half of the children are male.The children are humans and if these same people were against the black people being called 3fourths of a person now want to claim a baby is not fully human.think about it.

Expand full comment

Fathers have rights too, to go with their responsibilities.

Expand full comment

Fantastic! Knew you were one of the good guys.

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022·edited Mar 31, 2022

Couples have a choice to prevent conception, the baby does not have a choice and needs protecting.

Expand full comment

It's an even bigger threat to children after they leave the womb - especially girls, as per the impeccable research of Peter Aaby et al on African babies. And don't get me started on GM Golden Rice that is prohibitively expensive and can't cure retinol deficiency, and their ridiculous approval of neurotoxic fluoride supplementation via drinking water.

Expand full comment

❤️

Expand full comment

Thank you for nice information. Please visit our web:

www.uhamka.ac.id

Expand full comment

I do not know of a single person that has regretted nurturing their zygote, embryo, fetus ... their baby, their child. All beautiful, exquisite, miraculous forms of human life. ( https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html )

Expand full comment

AN AMAZINGLY BLATANT FRAUD BY THE

NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE OF GREAT BRITAIN.

From http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184

Week 3, 2022, of the surveillance report introduces an amazingly blatant fraud. Here, manipulation of the data presented in Table 11(b) reduces the number of covid-19 deaths reported among vaccinated individuals by a minimum of 48%. The fraud is effected by splitting the reported deaths into two groups, and simply ignoring the deaths in one group.

In the age group 18-29 the fraud reduces 9 deaths to 1 death (a 89% reduction in deaths)

In the age group 30-39 the fraud reduces 40 deaths to 6 deaths (a 85% reduction in deaths)

In the age group 40-49 the fraud reduces 59 deaths to 11 deaths (a 81% reduction in deaths)

In the age group 50-59 the fraud reduces 186 deaths to 44 deaths (a 76% reduction in deaths)

In the age group 60-69 the fraud reduces 418 deaths to 140 deaths (a 67% reduction in deaths)

In the age group 70-79 the fraud reduces 751 deaths to 325 deaths (a 57% reduction in deaths)

In the age group ≥80 the fraud reduces 1882 deaths to 982 deaths (a 48% reduction in deaths)

Previous to Week 3 the last column of Table 11(b)..........

Expand full comment

That pill idea is so open to abuse.

How would anyone even know what they were taking, or even if it was slipped into food.

Expand full comment