One of the keys lies in the symptoms of those that fell ill, which can be ascribed to a great many causative factors. One of the greatest tricks played was getting everyone to think it was what they claimed it was. With no real way to confirm causation except a non-specific symptom list and a deeply flawed test protocol.
Respectfully, NO you are NOT going to "where the evidence and data takes us always." As I clearly point out in several of my posts here today and many times previously; you are deliberately ignoring Dr David Martin's evidence which he has provided openly and publicly for ALL to see, not to mention my own comments; not only I but I expect your readers would like an explanation for your wholesale dismissal of Dr Martin; "today we remain as far from the truth as day one": that is a shockingly false statement, totally untrue! We actually know where to look for the truth and much about how the truth was covered up, as well as who did the covering up!
Not here to be argumentative, but I will offer this perspective. Very familiar with MartinтАЩs research on this, and thereтАЩs valuable insight gained there, no doubt. But Couey, Yeadon, and Martin are not necessarily mutually exclusive. MartinтАЩs documentation of the patent and paper trail is illustrative of certain aspects of the picture, but does not adequately account for the biology or the ACM issues raised by Rancourt. There is space for all of these perspectives to coexist and actually reinforce each other.
Keep thinking, keep asking questions, Dr. Alexander.
JJ and Yeadon are both barking up the right trees, and not necessarily different ones.
The truth is out there.
yes, we know, we get hammered but we are fearless...we know we are closest to the truth...
One of the keys lies in the symptoms of those that fell ill, which can be ascribed to a great many causative factors. One of the greatest tricks played was getting everyone to think it was what they claimed it was. With no real way to confirm causation except a non-specific symptom list and a deeply flawed test protocol.
BOOM
Some kind of poison or toxin?
DoesnтАЩt have to be either/or, it could easily be both/and, or moreтАж
today we remain as far from the truth as day one...yet we cant stop getting to the bottom of this. we go where the evidence and data takes us always.
Respectfully, NO you are NOT going to "where the evidence and data takes us always." As I clearly point out in several of my posts here today and many times previously; you are deliberately ignoring Dr David Martin's evidence which he has provided openly and publicly for ALL to see, not to mention my own comments; not only I but I expect your readers would like an explanation for your wholesale dismissal of Dr Martin; "today we remain as far from the truth as day one": that is a shockingly false statement, totally untrue! We actually know where to look for the truth and much about how the truth was covered up, as well as who did the covering up!
Dr. David Martin Reveals the Creation of the Covid Virus, Who Was Involved and Why Ron Johnson or Rand Paul Won't Arrest The Criminals
https://rumble.com/v2er2qq--dr.-david-martin-reveals-the-creation-of-the-covid-virus-who-was-involved-.html
Not here to be argumentative, but I will offer this perspective. Very familiar with MartinтАЩs research on this, and thereтАЩs valuable insight gained there, no doubt. But Couey, Yeadon, and Martin are not necessarily mutually exclusive. MartinтАЩs documentation of the patent and paper trail is illustrative of certain aspects of the picture, but does not adequately account for the biology or the ACM issues raised by Rancourt. There is space for all of these perspectives to coexist and actually reinforce each other.
Thank you for your well reasoned argument. It would be good to see an eventual synthesis of these perspectives.