I don't know, I got into an argument with someone about the N95's. Even after showing them that the .7um pores are larger than the .07-09um particles, they still assert they work citing the electrostatic nature of the mask, which of course fails as soon as it gets wet, or doesn't fit properly.
I don't know, I got into an argument with someone about the N95's. Even after showing them that the .7um pores are larger than the .07-09um particles, they still assert they work citing the electrostatic nature of the mask, which of course fails as soon as it gets wet, or doesn't fit properly.
The question we have to ask ourselves also though is, would we wear one, even if one fit?
Also of note...rarely do we talk about eyewear in conjunction with viruses, and yet it too is a vector for infection.
I don't know, I got into an argument with someone about the N95's. Even after showing them that the .7um pores are larger than the .07-09um particles, they still assert they work citing the electrostatic nature of the mask, which of course fails as soon as it gets wet, or doesn't fit properly.
The question we have to ask ourselves also though is, would we wear one, even if one fit?
Also of note...rarely do we talk about eyewear in conjunction with viruses, and yet it too is a vector for infection.