UK: Stunning New data show that COVID Gene Injection Vaccines (mRNA) are deadly as they reveal Mortality Rates per 100k are LOWEST among the Unvaccinated in all Age Groups
UK: Stunning New data show that COVID Gene Injection Vaccines (mRNA) are deadly as they reveal Mortality Rates per 100k are LOWEST among the Unvaccinated in all Age Groups
The data reveals the gap between unvaccinated and vaccinated population in terms of mortality rates is widening by the month; as with all data by governments, hold your nose; this is one puzzle piece
This is not useful data. The numbers appear to be per capita numbers. There are fewer unvaccinated and fewer triple vaccinated people per capita, therefore there should be fewer deaths per capita in these groups. A better representation would be to compare deaths of unvaccinated per total unvaccinated and deaths of triple vaccinated per total triple vaccinated, etc.
The Office of National Statistics (ONS) has recently acknowledged that their data cannot be used (with any accuracy) due to problems with
mis-categorization. This acknowledgment came after an analysis done by Dr Fenton showing the impossibility of analytical outcomes. Dr Fenton said that all the numbers were incorrectly skewed toward favorable efficacy and safety.
I have had prior experience with the Expose before.
The person behind it takes your money.
The person behind it purges any controversial comments if you go against the Expose's BS storyline, or if you take this person to task.
They're nothing more than a two-bit lie-shop with an agenda.
They can massage Alex Bourla into being up for the next Nobel peace prize.
Or Osama bin Laden as going to be reincarnated and to be running against Orange Man in the next US elections.
I'm merely making a suggestion here, but rather do not use them as authority for anything, because it will just make people doubt your solid work and end in tears.
I’m hesitant to share this with friends and family that stopped after the first two shots. Seems like those 3rd shot people have low mortality. I expect those low mortality rates will skyrocket with time. Would you say that they got these 3rd shots too recently to show raised mortality in this study?
Looks like the 40-59 year olds have some advantage to get a third shot if they survive the first two shots. As they say in the movies “It’s a long shot, but it just might work.”
I continue to repost Dr. Alexander's factual missives on LinkedIn, where I would surmise, 90% of my large group of connections is double jabbed or worse. Their silence is deafening. These smarmy, C level a-holes were pretty chipper as the "mandatory" corporate directives were flying. They showed off their ESG and Blackrock/Vanguard stripes by posting their Fauci Ouchy pics, and preened on about how virtuous they were, and how glorious Gates et al was.
Now, they have shut their pie holes. There is not enough schadenfreude to ever overcome my complete contempt for this crowd. Seriously, I am more disgusted by a good friend, a $30M net worth CMO who lives in Palo Alto, with three quad jabbed daughters (all college age), then I am by the people who cooked up this scam. This friend is Stanford/Oxford, and a fellow cyclist. He understood the risks, but to keep his acceptance in the Club of Slime, he did what he was told. he "led" from the front. Now? I hope he dies.
Dr. Alexander, I read this story a while back. It seems the core conclusions are impossible to dismiss. The graph that grabbed my attention simply showed the number of deaths pre-vaccine years and the number of deaths after the vaccines had been widely administered (in the young age cohorts). If memory serves, deaths had increased by 60,000 in this age demo! This is just the raw numbers of deaths. A death is a death. These statistics, one would think, couldn't be rigged or manipulated. So why did the raw numbers suddenly spike ... after 70 percent of the population had been vaccinated?
I don't know about other reports of Expose, but this one seems powerful and the conclusions impossible to dismiss. At least to me.
If you're looking at the numbers on the left side of those subsequent charts, everyone whose gotten the shots in the 18 and up groups will eventually age into the 50-70 year old groupings which appears to show a massive increase in chance of death as the numbers on the left go from 30-100 in the first chart to 3000-4000 in the 60s and then up to 12000 in the 70s.
Thats presuming the shots don't seed disease, by co-opting ones cellular protein production to make the garbage spike protein which consumes the bodies resources, thereby reducing the immune systems ability to respond which in turn allows existing genetic disorders and disease to come to the forefront much sooner than it would if people would have had to Age into their diseases.
Its almost like the injections will help depopulate the planet before they introduce the age blocker tech that will make human lifetimes multiples of what they are now. Telomere fixation. Dotto Ring type tech. Course they'll have to wait till the numbers drop to their target level, which per the georgia guidestones is 500 million humans Total.
Comparison should be with total deaths in vaccinated group against un-vaccinated, % per thousand. Once you died from the first jab, you can't die again.... That is the reality and it looks really bad.
What shots did they use on UK? A potential problem with the data is, which shot? Is one dose the J&J shot? Found this, not sure if this was the case earlier.
The COVID-19 vaccines currently approved for use in the UK are:
The Cleveland Clinic and similar data show that those who were forced to, or who were dumb enough to voluntarily, take the mRNA jab have higher rates of infection, which is a prerequisite for severe covid, hospitalization, ICU admission and death. The data showing that the wipe out of IgG3 and class switch to IgG4 starts after the second mRNA jab explains the data reported in The Expose. The immune systems of the dumbf-cks who voluntarily submitted to the forced jabs or who failed to research them are broken. They are sitting ducks for covid plus for cancer and CVD progression, autoimmune diseases and death. This is not a bad thing and will improve the quality of the gene pool worldwide. LMFAO!!!
This is not useful data. The numbers appear to be per capita numbers. There are fewer unvaccinated and fewer triple vaccinated people per capita, therefore there should be fewer deaths per capita in these groups. A better representation would be to compare deaths of unvaccinated per total unvaccinated and deaths of triple vaccinated per total triple vaccinated, etc.
The Office of National Statistics (ONS) has recently acknowledged that their data cannot be used (with any accuracy) due to problems with
mis-categorization. This acknowledgment came after an analysis done by Dr Fenton showing the impossibility of analytical outcomes. Dr Fenton said that all the numbers were incorrectly skewed toward favorable efficacy and safety.
Hi Paul,
I have had prior experience with the Expose before.
The person behind it takes your money.
The person behind it purges any controversial comments if you go against the Expose's BS storyline, or if you take this person to task.
They're nothing more than a two-bit lie-shop with an agenda.
They can massage Alex Bourla into being up for the next Nobel peace prize.
Or Osama bin Laden as going to be reincarnated and to be running against Orange Man in the next US elections.
I'm merely making a suggestion here, but rather do not use them as authority for anything, because it will just make people doubt your solid work and end in tears.
All the best for the week ahead.
Barry
I’m hesitant to share this with friends and family that stopped after the first two shots. Seems like those 3rd shot people have low mortality. I expect those low mortality rates will skyrocket with time. Would you say that they got these 3rd shots too recently to show raised mortality in this study?
Looks like the 40-59 year olds have some advantage to get a third shot if they survive the first two shots. As they say in the movies “It’s a long shot, but it just might work.”
Well this confirms it. I definitely made the right decision #pureblood 👍 I was born FREE and don’t plan on ever giving that up 👊
I continue to repost Dr. Alexander's factual missives on LinkedIn, where I would surmise, 90% of my large group of connections is double jabbed or worse. Their silence is deafening. These smarmy, C level a-holes were pretty chipper as the "mandatory" corporate directives were flying. They showed off their ESG and Blackrock/Vanguard stripes by posting their Fauci Ouchy pics, and preened on about how virtuous they were, and how glorious Gates et al was.
Now, they have shut their pie holes. There is not enough schadenfreude to ever overcome my complete contempt for this crowd. Seriously, I am more disgusted by a good friend, a $30M net worth CMO who lives in Palo Alto, with three quad jabbed daughters (all college age), then I am by the people who cooked up this scam. This friend is Stanford/Oxford, and a fellow cyclist. He understood the risks, but to keep his acceptance in the Club of Slime, he did what he was told. he "led" from the front. Now? I hope he dies.
The majority of Expose's reporting is accurate and comprehensive. They tend to sensationalize, but overall their journalism is good.
Dr. Alexander, I read this story a while back. It seems the core conclusions are impossible to dismiss. The graph that grabbed my attention simply showed the number of deaths pre-vaccine years and the number of deaths after the vaccines had been widely administered (in the young age cohorts). If memory serves, deaths had increased by 60,000 in this age demo! This is just the raw numbers of deaths. A death is a death. These statistics, one would think, couldn't be rigged or manipulated. So why did the raw numbers suddenly spike ... after 70 percent of the population had been vaccinated?
I don't know about other reports of Expose, but this one seems powerful and the conclusions impossible to dismiss. At least to me.
If you're looking at the numbers on the left side of those subsequent charts, everyone whose gotten the shots in the 18 and up groups will eventually age into the 50-70 year old groupings which appears to show a massive increase in chance of death as the numbers on the left go from 30-100 in the first chart to 3000-4000 in the 60s and then up to 12000 in the 70s.
Thats presuming the shots don't seed disease, by co-opting ones cellular protein production to make the garbage spike protein which consumes the bodies resources, thereby reducing the immune systems ability to respond which in turn allows existing genetic disorders and disease to come to the forefront much sooner than it would if people would have had to Age into their diseases.
Its almost like the injections will help depopulate the planet before they introduce the age blocker tech that will make human lifetimes multiples of what they are now. Telomere fixation. Dotto Ring type tech. Course they'll have to wait till the numbers drop to their target level, which per the georgia guidestones is 500 million humans Total.
Comparison should be with total deaths in vaccinated group against un-vaccinated, % per thousand. Once you died from the first jab, you can't die again.... That is the reality and it looks really bad.
What shots did they use on UK? A potential problem with the data is, which shot? Is one dose the J&J shot? Found this, not sure if this was the case earlier.
The COVID-19 vaccines currently approved for use in the UK are:
Moderna (Spikevax)
Pfizer/BioNTech (Comirnaty)
Novavax (Nuvaxovid)
AstraZeneca (Oxford) (not available)
Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) (not available)
Valneva (Valneva) (not available)
Thanks Paul and Shared. I will say this .... of course they are.
The Cleveland Clinic and similar data show that those who were forced to, or who were dumb enough to voluntarily, take the mRNA jab have higher rates of infection, which is a prerequisite for severe covid, hospitalization, ICU admission and death. The data showing that the wipe out of IgG3 and class switch to IgG4 starts after the second mRNA jab explains the data reported in The Expose. The immune systems of the dumbf-cks who voluntarily submitted to the forced jabs or who failed to research them are broken. They are sitting ducks for covid plus for cancer and CVD progression, autoimmune diseases and death. This is not a bad thing and will improve the quality of the gene pool worldwide. LMFAO!!!
Ron Unz is back on Substack insisting there are no Covid excess deaths.
When is someone going to accept his debate challenge?