Malhotra, despite the accolades, I find disingenuous.
I find it was unconscionable to recommend any product with so little data to support it, much less an experimental tech that had never before been used in humans. The lack of any significant safety data was enough to say no. Too many ordinary folks—not just doctors—came to this conclus…
Malhotra, despite the accolades, I find disingenuous.
I find it was unconscionable to recommend any product with so little data to support it, much less an experimental tech that had never before been used in humans. The lack of any significant safety data was enough to say no. Too many ordinary folks—not just doctors—came to this conclusion and abstained. A large number of folks looked at the data critically, but qualified doctors did not? That’s bad medicine and poor professional conduct. At the very least, recommending experimental jabs is reckless endangerment. At worst, it’s manslaughter. This doesn’t become gray just because we’re in a struggle, in my opinion.
You know, when a crime is committed—like reckless endangerment or manslaughter—the kind of contrition that feels authentic is when someone turns themselves in. It’s the willingness to accept the consequences of one’s actions, however damaging they may be, that signifies to others and themselves that they have faced the true nature of their actions.
Still waiting for that.
Malhotra’s tweet speaks to the arrogance that lubricated his recommendation of the jabs early on.
Malhotra, despite the accolades, I find disingenuous.
I find it was unconscionable to recommend any product with so little data to support it, much less an experimental tech that had never before been used in humans. The lack of any significant safety data was enough to say no. Too many ordinary folks—not just doctors—came to this conclusion and abstained. A large number of folks looked at the data critically, but qualified doctors did not? That’s bad medicine and poor professional conduct. At the very least, recommending experimental jabs is reckless endangerment. At worst, it’s manslaughter. This doesn’t become gray just because we’re in a struggle, in my opinion.
You know, when a crime is committed—like reckless endangerment or manslaughter—the kind of contrition that feels authentic is when someone turns themselves in. It’s the willingness to accept the consequences of one’s actions, however damaging they may be, that signifies to others and themselves that they have faced the true nature of their actions.
Still waiting for that.
Malhotra’s tweet speaks to the arrogance that lubricated his recommendation of the jabs early on.