Buchan et al.: "Epidemiology of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA Vaccination by Vaccine Product, Schedule, and Interdose Interval Among Adolescents and Adults in Ontario, Canada"
One study after another built on the premise that it made sense to inject young people with these 'vaccines'.
The closest we came was the gross lie that injecting young people would protect the elderly. This was, of course, entirely immoral, but it was also objectively, and completely false.
Still, the policy of injecting those at zero risk from Covid persists with vigor. Madness.
This article by Emeritus Professor of Pathology Robert Clancy may interest you. His speciality is mucosal Immunology. He was the inventor of the Broncostat vaccine.
They weren't at zero risk. That's one of the lies your side keeps repeating over and over.
Repetitive messaging very effectively (re)programs the human mind in most. Since early 2020, your side has been programmed to believe all infectees have been experiencing a flu/cold or at least in those below a certain age. Your side shunned and vilified anyone who didn't fit the narrative pounded into your brains. Influencers on both sides of the shot issue keep showing one-sided studies to reinforce a different narrative that keeps the population divided.
These shots are no different than any other vaccine. Humans (in this case scientists) created a toxin. Scientists took this or something similar (or instructions to make it) then reformulated that into injectable form. The original idea of doing this ritual was to hopefully cause a lesser reaction. Over time the sickness cult started duping the public into believing it stops infection and transmission. They programmed almost everyone to shun and vilify the ones harmed by these.
Most likely the injected injured in the one-sided studies you've been consuming also would have been injured by the spread version and perhaps shed version if exposed either in the same or other ways.
The Covid19 IFR for those under 19 is ~ 0.0003%, those under 30 ~ 0.003%.
This is with the suppression of effective treatment protocols, and likely picks up those erroneously classified ie some dying with Covid19, but with terminal comorbidities.
PS I don't have 'a side', nor follow a narrative. I have a brain, and an ability to use it to think critically.
Edit PSS. If the injected injured would also have been injured by the spread version - and that's a big if - it is the same characters, Fauci et al, who created the spread version. Additionally, given the 'vaccines' do not stop transmission, those injected will still get the spread version (more so, repeatedly), thus their exposure to the toxic spike protein is always increased by their injected quantity. And, the spread version does not contain lipid nano-particles.
Your logic is persuasive. You are factually correct. The risk is so low that it rounds down to zero and young people were at negligible risk. The rest of the criticism seems to be a mix of strawman, ad hominem and unverified assumptions. It says more about the critic than it does about you.
Actually, you're wrong, factually. The government announced it had developed a "vaccine" in months! Look up the definition of vaccine if you're not certain.
"Prevent transmission/spread of disease."
The original intent has always been to maim/kill with vaccines. Even the one's that prevented spread. Which is why aluminum, mercury, peg's were added. They create the disease and thrn they have the cure to sell you, which is always worse. Besides, "vaccinating" duding a pandemic goes against everyrhing in virology. A lot of credible people have spoken out on this. Papers have been erotten on this many years before covid was ever planned. AND, LASTLY, this is vedy different than other times becUse this particular "vaccine" has killed more than any prior vaccine, and, in fact, more than all of them combined. Swine flu was pulled for 32 deaths. Think about that for a moment. We appreciatd shills like you defending the murderers but really, don't sorry, they're going to be fine because the governments and all of the people that should do something about this evil are all being paid.
Serena, you've stated elsewhere that the shots are no different from other vaccines. You've also downplayed the myocarditis risk. See Professor Clancy's observations on the difference between the shots and the flu vaccine. Following the flu jab, the death rate in the vaccinated population is decreased by approximately 10% whereas following the COVID-19 jabs it's increased, so far, by approximately 10% in the vaccinated population. See also his observations on myocarditis and about the impact of the shots on kid deaths.
The mRNA injections are very deadly. That's why the FDA allowed them into the market and the CDC endorsed their use. That's what big pharma's killing machines do.
Dr. Charles Hoffe reported very early after injections began that he had found micro clots in 84% of his patients.
Then we saw a lot of blood clots, strokes, myocarditis and pericarditis. Now morticians are pulling out huge long fibrous tissues from veins and arteries of the jabbed after they die.
Seems like a circulatory system problem, but these jabs have a list of 1300 different side effects, so they can blame lots of different diseases rather than the jabs.
The best way to see the damage they have done is to look at the all cause death rate increases comparing before and after the jab was used. This shows between 40-200% increases in different age groups, but no decreases. Clearly they are deadly, designed by DOD and promoted by Malthusians who want to depopulate the earth.
One study after another built on the premise that it made sense to inject young people with these 'vaccines'.
The closest we came was the gross lie that injecting young people would protect the elderly. This was, of course, entirely immoral, but it was also objectively, and completely false.
Still, the policy of injecting those at zero risk from Covid persists with vigor. Madness.
This article by Emeritus Professor of Pathology Robert Clancy may interest you. His speciality is mucosal Immunology. He was the inventor of the Broncostat vaccine.
Covidiocy
The Problem with the COVID Narrative
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/covidiocy/2022/11/the-problem-with-the-covid-narrative/
They weren't at zero risk. That's one of the lies your side keeps repeating over and over.
Repetitive messaging very effectively (re)programs the human mind in most. Since early 2020, your side has been programmed to believe all infectees have been experiencing a flu/cold or at least in those below a certain age. Your side shunned and vilified anyone who didn't fit the narrative pounded into your brains. Influencers on both sides of the shot issue keep showing one-sided studies to reinforce a different narrative that keeps the population divided.
These shots are no different than any other vaccine. Humans (in this case scientists) created a toxin. Scientists took this or something similar (or instructions to make it) then reformulated that into injectable form. The original idea of doing this ritual was to hopefully cause a lesser reaction. Over time the sickness cult started duping the public into believing it stops infection and transmission. They programmed almost everyone to shun and vilify the ones harmed by these.
Most likely the injected injured in the one-sided studies you've been consuming also would have been injured by the spread version and perhaps shed version if exposed either in the same or other ways.
False logic. Why try to defend murderers?
The Covid19 IFR for those under 19 is ~ 0.0003%, those under 30 ~ 0.003%.
This is with the suppression of effective treatment protocols, and likely picks up those erroneously classified ie some dying with Covid19, but with terminal comorbidities.
PS I don't have 'a side', nor follow a narrative. I have a brain, and an ability to use it to think critically.
Edit PSS. If the injected injured would also have been injured by the spread version - and that's a big if - it is the same characters, Fauci et al, who created the spread version. Additionally, given the 'vaccines' do not stop transmission, those injected will still get the spread version (more so, repeatedly), thus their exposure to the toxic spike protein is always increased by their injected quantity. And, the spread version does not contain lipid nano-particles.
Your logic is persuasive. You are factually correct. The risk is so low that it rounds down to zero and young people were at negligible risk. The rest of the criticism seems to be a mix of strawman, ad hominem and unverified assumptions. It says more about the critic than it does about you.
Actually, you're wrong, factually. The government announced it had developed a "vaccine" in months! Look up the definition of vaccine if you're not certain.
"Prevent transmission/spread of disease."
The original intent has always been to maim/kill with vaccines. Even the one's that prevented spread. Which is why aluminum, mercury, peg's were added. They create the disease and thrn they have the cure to sell you, which is always worse. Besides, "vaccinating" duding a pandemic goes against everyrhing in virology. A lot of credible people have spoken out on this. Papers have been erotten on this many years before covid was ever planned. AND, LASTLY, this is vedy different than other times becUse this particular "vaccine" has killed more than any prior vaccine, and, in fact, more than all of them combined. Swine flu was pulled for 32 deaths. Think about that for a moment. We appreciatd shills like you defending the murderers but really, don't sorry, they're going to be fine because the governments and all of the people that should do something about this evil are all being paid.
Serena, you've stated elsewhere that the shots are no different from other vaccines. You've also downplayed the myocarditis risk. See Professor Clancy's observations on the difference between the shots and the flu vaccine. Following the flu jab, the death rate in the vaccinated population is decreased by approximately 10% whereas following the COVID-19 jabs it's increased, so far, by approximately 10% in the vaccinated population. See also his observations on myocarditis and about the impact of the shots on kid deaths.
Covidiocy
The Problem with the COVID Narrative
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/covidiocy/2022/11/the-problem-with-the-covid-narrative/
What did Bill the eugenist say?
"If we do a really good job with the vaccines, we could lower that number by 10, maybe 15 percent"
(That number being the population)
He took good notes from Kissinger!
The mRNA injections are very deadly. That's why the FDA allowed them into the market and the CDC endorsed their use. That's what big pharma's killing machines do.
Dr. Charles Hoffe reported very early after injections began that he had found micro clots in 84% of his patients.
Then we saw a lot of blood clots, strokes, myocarditis and pericarditis. Now morticians are pulling out huge long fibrous tissues from veins and arteries of the jabbed after they die.
Seems like a circulatory system problem, but these jabs have a list of 1300 different side effects, so they can blame lots of different diseases rather than the jabs.
The best way to see the damage they have done is to look at the all cause death rate increases comparing before and after the jab was used. This shows between 40-200% increases in different age groups, but no decreases. Clearly they are deadly, designed by DOD and promoted by Malthusians who want to depopulate the earth.