Vivek Ramaswamy on Third Trump Indictment: ‘Political Persecution Through Prosecution’; Donald Trump, has yet again been indicted by the Biden DOJ — a political party in power that is now repeatedly
Vivek Ramaswamy on Third Trump Indictment: ‘Political Persecution Through Prosecution’; Donald Trump, has yet again been indicted by the Biden DOJ — a political party in power that is now repeatedly
using police force to indict and arrest and potentially eliminate it’s political opponent; 'The corrupt federal police just won’t stop until they’ve achieved their mission: eliminate Trump.'
Trump. It must get him more votes. I don't think it changes his popularity. In fact as a Canadian it solidifies in my mind that he is not the swamp. I pray for him.
I like the fact that he used the words “corrupt federal police“ instead of FBI… Brings it down to the left level of local police forces that they want to so badly criticize…. The Obama Biden administration went on several endeavors to federalize local police forces through agreements, after some accused racial profiling …
If they’re not going to defund the FBI, and perhaps is a good tactic to equate them with local police forces to garner some support from some of these anti-police folks…? Just remind them how corrupt the FBI has been towards communities of minorities over the years, perhaps… Top down bottom up right?
"... Roivant's mission is to improve the delivery of healthcare to patients by treating every inefficiency as an opportunity. Roivant develops transformative medicines faster by building technologies and developing talent in creative ways, leveraging the Roivant platform to launch Vants - nimble and focused biopharmaceutical and health technology companies....." - https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/roivant-and-pfizer-form-new-vant-company-focused-developing
Please forgive our verboseness, syntax or grammatical errors. I'm not a genius...lol.
Now, to such matters at hand, to wit:
Sadly, the sickness of society (on mother Earth) to reign honor for honor, is observed by all-fathers sovereign witness for all good people of united America of these United States and eternal Creation. Our standing, proclaims restitution of all things in passing all, toward eternal good onward.
For all-fathers fearfully and wonderfully made godsons and goddaughters of mother Earth, harken.
In order for you to beat someone in a debate, your opponent needs to realize they’ve lost. Therefore, it’s easier to win an argument against a genius than an idiot.....lol
STATEMENT OF TRUTH
The "Emoluments Clause" of the Constitution does not provide immunity for Officials of Government lying within their "Official Capacity" now confirmed under Hardwick V. Vreeken, (2017). The clause was in fact written as a "Check and Balance Mechanism" to remove "Bad Actors" in government who through their Offices of Authority, under their color of authority, abuse that authority and inflict harm upon the citizens under Constitutional Protections. This establishes a "Fiduciary Duty of Service" under Article Four (4), Section Four (4) of the Constitution. A republic the party of the first part...lol) not a democracy (the part of of the second part....lol) at least for the "good people of united America of these United States - federal Union"!" While preserving a democracy for all "Inhabitants' of the United States" (in pure trust stiled "The United States of America) which are jurisdictionally administered via treaty (8 Statutes at Large 80) otherwise, known as the district of Columbia until 1982 and affirmed by 1988 now known as State of New Columbia (see: Volume 1, DC Code Annotated).
That standing "Emoluments Clause" Definition as fiduciary, is as follows:
Fiduciary Duty: is a legal duty to act solely in another party's interests. Parties owing this duty are called fiduciaries. The individuals to whom they owe a duty are called principals. Fiduciaries may not profit from their relationship with their principals unless they have the principals' express informed consent. They also have a duty to avoid any conflicts of interest between themselves and their principals or between their principals and the fiduciaries' other clients. A fiduciary duty is the strictest duty of care recognized by the US legal system.
The Breaches in Fiduciary Duty are so numerous as to shock all-fathers sovereign witness have resulted in Libelous entries into Public Record File, for these ongoing commissions of Frauds cast upon peaceful proponents' (American people one & all) lawful standing in perfect Union, the good people of united America of these United States, now, must demand the supreme Court, and THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES to stand and hear such testimony as (original action) Mandamus sua sponte Claim of Right for declaratory judge-ment and injunctive relief., per a (class-action) Citizen Petitions - U.S. Code) Title 15) Chapter 53 ) Subchapter I) § 2620 (a).
For Libel: A published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
No immunity for fraud (see: United States v Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61). Or, lying….lol.
The Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law. Tolman v. Finneran, 171 F. Supp. 2d 31 (D. Mass. 2001).
What people know but unable to put to word effectively is a monopolized version of a "Social Control" which is in direct Conflict of Interest of the Constitutions intention of "Domestic Tranquility".
Are these Fraud/s Civil or Criminal? America's people & inhabitants Constitutional Right to Due Process remains circumvented to date, your sovereign witness say we find out by way of a Grand Jury trial as demanded. SEE: Warnock v. Pecos County, 88 F.3d 341 (5th Cir. 07/08/1996).
The intention of such just Cause & suit, is for the (national) Grand Jury to decide who the "Bad Actors" are, and to what level does their involvement arise given the current status of events; being a "Preponderance of the Evidence", or "Beyond Reasonable Doubt".
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court held that a municipality has no immunity from liability under Section 1983 flowing from its constitutional violations and may not assert the good faith of its officers as a defense to such liability.
Here is what we have already established as fact in this case:
(from this point, people can if they wish, proceed to network in fellowship amongst any good will seeking service in honor above all else, to find solutions for the travesty that passes as law enforcement out of control, only because of the fraud of congress!
Why don’t the American people rebel against the injustices in your country stand up to these bastards so many Americans say us Canadians do nothing well guess what we see the same thing
They want totally out of the way and won’t stop until he is. We are next because we’re not fighting back.
I’ve been using that phrase for a while now, because it is entirely appropriate… Persecution through prosecution… The Marxist way…
The REAL Vivek RamaSWAMPY
"All that glitters is not gold". Like Mitt Romney, is Vivek just another WEF-obedient mason in politics?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-vivek-ramaswampy
Trump. It must get him more votes. I don't think it changes his popularity. In fact as a Canadian it solidifies in my mind that he is not the swamp. I pray for him.
He is correct but something about him seems untrustworthy. He knows what to say and when to say it. Hopefully he will not be chosen as VP.
I like the fact that he used the words “corrupt federal police“ instead of FBI… Brings it down to the left level of local police forces that they want to so badly criticize…. The Obama Biden administration went on several endeavors to federalize local police forces through agreements, after some accused racial profiling …
If they’re not going to defund the FBI, and perhaps is a good tactic to equate them with local police forces to garner some support from some of these anti-police folks…? Just remind them how corrupt the FBI has been towards communities of minorities over the years, perhaps… Top down bottom up right?
beware Ramaswami, Pfizer/Big Pharma gofer through his company Roivant Sciences - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roivant_Sciences
"... Roivant's mission is to improve the delivery of healthcare to patients by treating every inefficiency as an opportunity. Roivant develops transformative medicines faster by building technologies and developing talent in creative ways, leveraging the Roivant platform to launch Vants - nimble and focused biopharmaceutical and health technology companies....." - https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/roivant-and-pfizer-form-new-vant-company-focused-developing
Is anybody surprised by this bogus bs?
Please forgive our verboseness, syntax or grammatical errors. I'm not a genius...lol.
Now, to such matters at hand, to wit:
Sadly, the sickness of society (on mother Earth) to reign honor for honor, is observed by all-fathers sovereign witness for all good people of united America of these United States and eternal Creation. Our standing, proclaims restitution of all things in passing all, toward eternal good onward.
For all-fathers fearfully and wonderfully made godsons and goddaughters of mother Earth, harken.
In order for you to beat someone in a debate, your opponent needs to realize they’ve lost. Therefore, it’s easier to win an argument against a genius than an idiot.....lol
STATEMENT OF TRUTH
The "Emoluments Clause" of the Constitution does not provide immunity for Officials of Government lying within their "Official Capacity" now confirmed under Hardwick V. Vreeken, (2017). The clause was in fact written as a "Check and Balance Mechanism" to remove "Bad Actors" in government who through their Offices of Authority, under their color of authority, abuse that authority and inflict harm upon the citizens under Constitutional Protections. This establishes a "Fiduciary Duty of Service" under Article Four (4), Section Four (4) of the Constitution. A republic the party of the first part...lol) not a democracy (the part of of the second part....lol) at least for the "good people of united America of these United States - federal Union"!" While preserving a democracy for all "Inhabitants' of the United States" (in pure trust stiled "The United States of America) which are jurisdictionally administered via treaty (8 Statutes at Large 80) otherwise, known as the district of Columbia until 1982 and affirmed by 1988 now known as State of New Columbia (see: Volume 1, DC Code Annotated).
That standing "Emoluments Clause" Definition as fiduciary, is as follows:
Fiduciary Duty: is a legal duty to act solely in another party's interests. Parties owing this duty are called fiduciaries. The individuals to whom they owe a duty are called principals. Fiduciaries may not profit from their relationship with their principals unless they have the principals' express informed consent. They also have a duty to avoid any conflicts of interest between themselves and their principals or between their principals and the fiduciaries' other clients. A fiduciary duty is the strictest duty of care recognized by the US legal system.
The Breaches in Fiduciary Duty are so numerous as to shock all-fathers sovereign witness have resulted in Libelous entries into Public Record File, for these ongoing commissions of Frauds cast upon peaceful proponents' (American people one & all) lawful standing in perfect Union, the good people of united America of these United States, now, must demand the supreme Court, and THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES to stand and hear such testimony as (original action) Mandamus sua sponte Claim of Right for declaratory judge-ment and injunctive relief., per a (class-action) Citizen Petitions - U.S. Code) Title 15) Chapter 53 ) Subchapter I) § 2620 (a).
For Libel: A published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
No immunity for fraud (see: United States v Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61). Or, lying….lol.
The Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law. Tolman v. Finneran, 171 F. Supp. 2d 31 (D. Mass. 2001).
What people know but unable to put to word effectively is a monopolized version of a "Social Control" which is in direct Conflict of Interest of the Constitutions intention of "Domestic Tranquility".
Are these Fraud/s Civil or Criminal? America's people & inhabitants Constitutional Right to Due Process remains circumvented to date, your sovereign witness say we find out by way of a Grand Jury trial as demanded. SEE: Warnock v. Pecos County, 88 F.3d 341 (5th Cir. 07/08/1996).
The intention of such just Cause & suit, is for the (national) Grand Jury to decide who the "Bad Actors" are, and to what level does their involvement arise given the current status of events; being a "Preponderance of the Evidence", or "Beyond Reasonable Doubt".
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court held that a municipality has no immunity from liability under Section 1983 flowing from its constitutional violations and may not assert the good faith of its officers as a defense to such liability.
Here is what we have already established as fact in this case:
(from this point, people can if they wish, proceed to network in fellowship amongst any good will seeking service in honor above all else, to find solutions for the travesty that passes as law enforcement out of control, only because of the fraud of congress!
Be wise, safe & blessed,
Arthur
We MUST Fight Back!
We Lose Our Lives IF We "Allow" them to Win! And those of all humans including children and grandchildren.
Why don’t the American people rebel against the injustices in your country stand up to these bastards so many Americans say us Canadians do nothing well guess what we see the same thing