Warning to MALONE by judge as his lawsuit case dismissed! Excellent substack by Breggins, the right touch as they relay the news! Judge warns MALONE about his repeated law suits; Criticizes and Warns

Criticizes and Warns Malone About Further Defamation Suits and Dismisses Robert Malone Vs. Washington Post Defamation Lawsuit; IMO, this holds promise for Breggins & Ruby et al. (same judge)

This is great news for Dr. Peter Breggin and his warrior wife Ginger Breggin who have been leading the COVID fight day one and for decades have helped inform and educate America and the world. I am hoping this dismissal is followed by this sensible judge doing same for the Breggins and Ruby et al.

I now appeal to Dr. Malone to step back, and rejoin the army of COVID contrarians and dissidents (us, me included, the Breggins) yet as a team member, shed your idiot moronic stupid lawyer Bliss, shed the combative manner, understand we are in a battle to save lives and not sue each other each time our feelings are hurt. You Dr. Malone have lots of exposure and people have not sued you out of resources issues but if you persist, I am afraid some may. Please take a pause, withdraw your Breggin and Ruby suit et al. and let us move on. The battle goes on. Take this dismissal and use it as a teachable moment. Learn from it. Show some compassion and show some gracious mercy and step back. I would welcome you openly and still do, but you must cease against Breggin, Ruby, cease this incessant relentless hammering of The Wellness Company and Mr. Coulson etc. Just stop this, there are enough problems for all of us to have a role and make a difference. Also, shed some of the morons you have around you, some of those stupid doctors and scientists who just like to see the ‘action’ and ‘mayhem’…IMO not worth it….they egg you on and drive you. You need to get back to first principles and come join us but as a friend and compadre. Be the man you are. You make up your own mind no doubt but I think this is your exit ramp, this judge has helped you and given you the exit ramp.

Take it! Come back to the fold as a team member.

Judge Dismisses Robert Malone Vs. Washington Post Defamation Lawsuit

‘Judge Norman K. Moon—who is also presiding over Malone’s case against Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin and Dr. Jane Ruby—ordered the dismissal of Dr. Robert Malone’s defamation lawsuit against The Washington Post on September 28, 2023.

Specifically, Judge Moon directed the clerk of the court to “STRIKE this case from the docket.”  He invoked Virgina’s Anti-SLAPP law which allows a judge to dismiss a case deemed without merit, essentially throwing it out of the court. At his discretion in an Anti-SLAPP suit, the judge can also require the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s legal fees.  But Judge Moon decided not to require this of Malone, in part because the newspaper’s resources are so much larger than Malone’s. 

In dismissing Malone’s lawsuit against the newspaper, Judge Moon pointed out that Malone’s lawsuit was dealing with COVID-19 and the vaccines, matters of serious public interest, which were protected by the First Amendment and should not be stifled. He also found that Malone failed to document malice on the part of The Washington Post.   

However, the judge was critical of Malone and issued a strong warning to Malone about continuing to bring defamation actions:

Nonetheless, the Court notes that Plaintiff [Dr. Malone] has filed repeated defamation cases¹⁴ and is represented by a lawyer [Steven Biss] who has sued Defendant [The Washington Post] three times in the past three years.¹⁵ And if Plaintiff [Dr. Malone] continues to bring defamation actions like those that have been dismissed, there will come a time when his lawsuits might fairly be deemed frivolous and awarding attorney fees is appropriate.

Footnote 14 above specifically cites the case against the Breggins and Dr. Jane Ruby: “¹⁴ See, e.g., Malone v. Twitter, Inc., 2022 WL 14835110 (Cal. Super. Sept. 28, 2022); Malone v. Breggin, No. 3:22-cv-63 (W.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2022).” [Emphases added.] Footnote 15 is related to cases by attorney Biss that do not involve Dr. Malone.

See the documents below.

On a related topic, Malone’s attorney, Steven Biss, was hospitalized some time ago and is reportedly in a coma or very ill. On Monday, September 25, 2023, Malone requested three months’ time to find a new lawyer but did so long after the lawyer’s condition was leaked to the public. Judge Moon granted Malone only one month to find a new lawyer. 

At present, Robert Malone’s case against Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin and Dr. Jane Ruby is still alive, waiting for Malone to get a new lawyer. The appearance of a new attorney will considerably prolong the case and generate new costs and require more time and energy, while continuing to threaten and suppress freedom of speech, especially in the health freedom movement.  

Robert Malone V Washington Post-- Judge Moon Memorandum Opinion

242KB ∙ PDF file

Download

Judge Order To Dismiss Malone Suit Against Wp 9 29 23

129KB ∙ PDF file’